Daily Archives: November 29, 2006

Cramer names annointed stocks institutions use for mechanics

Cramer said the mechanics of the market are a secret to most.  This moves stocks in the short term, and the institutons will hate him for this.  The mechanics of a stock moving up are more imprtant than the fundamentals and "the market" doesnt really exist.

With this you can outsmart the institutions, but this is on short-term gaming.  This is why you can buy stocks that already ran and still make money.  Symbolism is important here.  They may need to have oil exposure, so Exxon (XOM) is symbolic for that.  In aerospace, it is Boeing (BA), in banking it is Bank of America (BAC), with internets it is Google (GOOG), equipment is Cisco (CSCO), in oil services it is Schlumberger (SLB).

Jon C. Ogg
November 29, 2006

No Merry Christmas For Verizon

Stocks:  (VZ)(CMCSA)(CVC)

According to Barron’s, Comcast was able to raise rates for basic cable by 5.4%. The data to estimate the figure was based on a survey of several markets by Berstein Research.

So, the bottome line is that the competition from Verizon’s new fiber FiOS TV service is "restrained". In other words, the $18 billion that Verizon is putting into it fiber initiative is not scaring Comcast into rate breaks to keep customers.

Although the news is not definitive, it is hardly good for Verizon. The company’s massive bet on FiOS has to pay off within the next year or so, or Verizon management will look like a pack of fools to Wall St.

Some industry experts think that Verizon is simply too far behind the cable companies, and that, with their investment behind them and Verizon’s $18 billion being spent now, it is "game, set, match" to the cable guys.

Until the market see companies like Comcast and Cablevision offering sharp discounts on cable TV, Verizon is struggling.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Market Wrap (Nov. 29, 2006)

DJIA    12,226.73; Up 90.28 (0.74%)
NASDAQ    2,432.23; Up 19.62 (0.81%)
S&P500    1,399.35; Up 12.63 (0.91%)
10YR-Bond    4.521%     Up 0.012
NYSE Volume    2,732,627,000
NASD Volume    1,870,362,000

Q3 GDP was revised from an initial estimate of 1.6% growth to 2.2% (compared to 1.8% estimates).  Today is a mixed bag in the markets, despite the major averages rising.  The Fed’s Beige Book indicated that consumer spending is increasing and that most districts are cautiously optimistic on holiday sales after the economy has improved a bit since October.

The New York Times (NYT) had a very strong day rising 7.5% to $24.76 as CNBC’s Charlie Gasparino said that Hank Greenberg may try to acquire the entire company.

Home Depot (HD) also rose 1.5% to $37.61 after CNBC’s Charlie Gasparino commented that private equity firm KKR had crunched numbers to look at acquiring the $77 Billion home improvement and building supply behemoth.

3Com (COMS) fell 10% to $4.02 after it acquired the remaining 49% stake in its venture with Huawei; mainly because this wipes out their cash and their history of going-it-alone stinks.

Pfizer (PFE) rose $0.02 to $27.07 after announcing it would shed 25% of its drug sales workforce.

Dollar General (DG) fell 6% to $15.70 after no bid emerged after the rumors were out yesterday.

Tiffany’s (TIF) rose 6% to $38.21 after beating earnings and raising guidance for the fiscal year.

GRUPO AEROPORTUARIO (OMAB), today’s IPO of the Mexican airport operator, priced at $18.00 and closed considerably higher at $20.85 after numerous look at this as a very protected business operation.

Microsoft (MSFT) rose 0.6%, or $0.18, to $29.57 after it offered 13-15% sales growth targets for 2007 and noting it would be more aggressive on share buybacks.

Bon-Ton (BONT) rose 16% to $37.68 after retail sales there exceeded estimates.

Dress Barn (DBRN) also rose a sharp 19% to $24.46 after strong sales numbers.

Chicos (CHS) rose 4% to $24.09 after it profits fell but they were in-line and the company did not warn nor did it post a negative s-s-s number.

Ford Motor (F) rose $0.01 to $8.16 after noting that some 38,000 workers were taking early buyouts and after the company said losses in 2007 would keep a dividend out of the picture.

SanDisk (SNDK) fell 2.3% to $43.73 after Merrill Lynch said NAND inventory levels were increasing and maintained a neutral sidelines stance until the shares go lower.

Jon C. Ogg
November 29, 2006

Cramer says Bank of America is better than Citigroup

On today’s STOP TRADING segment on CNBC around 2:45 PM EST, Jim Cramer outlined which was better between Citigroup (C) and Bank of America (BAC) now that BAC has eclipsed C’s market cap.

Cramer says that Citigroup’s Chuck prince needs to go.  C is up 2% compared to BAC, but Citigroup could go up 5 points if he would leave.  If Cramer had to buy one, he’d buy B of A (BAC) because it is a stock and Citigroup (C) acts like a bond.

Cramer said you gotta "buy the heck out of apple" with iPhones going to be huge for it. Zune is not a threat.

Jon C. Ogg
November 29, 2006

Does Online Shopping Kill Stores?

ComScore has come out with its data on Cyber-Monday, the weird appellation given to the first day after the Thanksgiving weekend. The day went better than expected. Revenue from online ecommerce hit $608 million, up 26% from a year ago. The largest one-day total ever. For the first 27 days of November, online ecommerce revenue was up 24% to $9.84 billion.

Putting these number next to the same-store sales drop-off at Wal-Mart. Same-store sales across the industry rose 2.5% in November according to the International Counsil Of Shopping Centers. The trade group said this was the slowest month since March.

Althought there is a dearth of good data on what online shopping takes from the so-called "bricks and mortar" world, it is hard to imagine that there is not some element of borrowing from Peter to pay Paul.

Online sales may be doing fine. But, if off-line sales are not, a false sense of how well the retail sector is going might tempt investors to be overly confident. That could be a mistake.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Brokerage Stocks Getting Hit With NYSE

If you looked at the brokerage firm stocks today, you’d have no idea the market was up.

Bd_chart_nov_29_2

Morgan Stanley (MS), Merrill Lynch (MER), Bear Stearns (BSC), and Goldman Sachs (GS) are all down.  They have made some inroads here for a small recovery, but this was very out of whack.  Bank of America (BAC) wasn’t part of the carnage, so it looks like some traders may be taking year-end profits very early after seeing a huge run.

If you look at the volume here with about 2 hours to the close there isn’t exactly a huge amount of selling.  You could say it is simply a buyers’ strike, but for it to be in most of the big names it just looks off.  Here is the volume in the names.

MS: Volume 2,985,100; Avg Vol (3m) 4,055,070
MER: Volume 3,374,900; Avg Vol (3m) 4,841,100
BSC: Volume 1,443,100; Avg Vol (3m) 1,555,460
GS: Volume 4,161,500; Avg Vol (3m) 4,969,790

The true guilty party here may be the exchange stocks.  Since J.P.Morgan downgraded the NYSE (NYX) rating from Outperform to Neutral, whose shares are down 5.6% at $95.50 today.  It isn’t from the economic numbers earlier because those would be affecting others too.  The tie in here is obviously tied to the exchange weakness.  NASDAQ (NDAQ) shares are down 2% at $39.06.  Oddly enough shares of market making Knight Capital (NITE) are up $0.03 at $17.44, but had been lower.  Specialists Van der Moolen (VDM) are up 0.4% at $5.32 and LaBranche (LAB) are down 2.6% at $10.70. 

The street is acting confused here.

Jon C. Ogg
November 29, 2006

CNBC’s Charlie Gasparino Says Home Depot (HD) & New York Times (NYT) Could Be Acquired

CNBC’s Charlie Gasparino keyed in today on 2 potential takeout candidates today.

His Street Stories Hank Greenberg may be engaged trying to buyout the ENTIRE New York Times (NYT) company.  He said the controlling family that holds all the votes needs to be taken care or the deal can’t happen.  But Greenberg has approached bankers to try this, and he thinks Jack Welch may want to do more than go after the Boston Globe too.

Charlie also said Home Depot (HD) has been rumored for weeks because of underperformance, but while it is huge they make a lot of money.  KKR has actually crunched the numbers according to him but it would be close to a $100 Billion deal if it happened.  He said this is still a long shot but the chances of a deal are higher than before.

"The Deal"  Magazine’s John Morris keyed in afterwards and said this size would be a stretch and $60 to $70 Billion would be the highest a deal could go now.  The biggest deal so far is $36 Billion, so it would be monumental.  On NYT he said the only way to do the buyout is to have the controlling family stay on.

This is just one day after CNBC’s David Faber said Penn National Gaming (PENN) was considering leveraging up to bid for Harrah’s (HET) and after CNBC immediately after Faber’s report host Merger Markets’ Josh Kosman who said he is hearing that Dollar General (DG) is actively being looked at (after rumors have been in the market for more than a week) by private equity firms since it hit 7.5-times EBITDA at the lows.

Jon C. Ogg
November 29, 2006

Most Actives Under $5.00 Lagging the Horsemen by Far (Nov. 29, 2006)

As far as where the NASDAQ trading volume interest is, it isn’t even close.  The Horsemen stocks are chugging along at almost twice the share volume of the smaller cap traditional most active names under or around $5.00.

Apple (AAPL) is the only one down on the day, and that just may be some profit taking as Wall Street analysts have been ratcheting up their price targets the last few days.

In truth, traders and investors will always go after small and microcap stocks if they think there is money to be made.  But right now they are focusing their efforts either in mega-caps or in other small cap or low-priced stocks.  It is possible that some of the low price stock volume is in COMS today, but that is actually selling volume rather than buying.

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

Ticker Price Change Volume
FNSR $ 3.80 $ (0.09) 8,637,668
LVLT $ 5.07 $ (0.06) 14,591,550
SIRI $ 4.13 $ (0.04) 14,667,856
SUNW $ 5.38 $ 0.03 17,263,756
PMCS $ 7.57 $ 0.13 2,710,650
CNXT $ 2.13 $ 0.03 8,755,812
CHTR $ 3.07 $ 0.12 12,474,745
Total 79,102,037
NASDAQ 2429.22 16.61 1,020,345,000
Ticker Price Change Volume
INTC $ 21.25 $ 0.27 32,810,074
MSFT $ 29.63 $ 0.24 27,530,720
CSCO $ 27.05 $ 0.02 43,261,960
AAPL $ 91.42 $ (0.39) 23,039,420
ORCL $ 19.15 $ 0.25 12,788,562
Total 139,430,736

Jon C. Ogg

November 29, 2006

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

Ticker Price Change Volume
FNSR $ 3.80 $ (0.09) 8,637,668
LVLT $ 5.07 $ (0.06) 14,591,550
SIRI $ 4.13 $ (0.04) 14,667,856
SUNW $ 5.38 $ 0.03 17,263,756
PMCS $ 7.57 $ 0.13 2,710,650
CNXT $ 2.13 $ 0.03 8,755,812
CHTR $ 3.07 $ 0.12 12,474,745
Total 79,102,037
NASDAQ 2429.22 16.61 1,020,345,000
Ticker Price Change Volume
INTC $ 21.25 $ 0.27 32,810,074
MSFT $ 29.63 $ 0.24 27,530,720
CSCO $ 27.05 $ 0.02 43,261,960
AAPL $ 91.42 $ (0.39) 23,039,420
ORCL $ 19.15 $ 0.25 12,788,562
Total 139,430,736

Jon C. Ogg

November 29, 2006

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

<>

 

November 29, 2006

Amazon Gets Downgraded (AMZN)

Amazon trades pretty much in the middle of its three year range. The stock hit $60 in mid-2003. It sits around $40 now.

Pacific Crest securities says that it is time to dump AMZN. Even with good revenue and margin growth over the next four years, the current valuation is too high, according to the research firm.

They could be wrong. Amazon really does not have any direct competition. Some online sites compete with its book franchise. Some compete with it in consumer electronics and its new video download service. But, it is still the internet’s shopping mall. Additionally, Jeff Bezos, the founder and CEO, appears to come up with new opportunities every few months. He is not selling Amazon’s excess storage and computing capacity. The mark-up on the business of selling something that is not being used must be pretty high.

But, there is a more fundamental arguement about Amazon’s value, When the stock was $60, revenue was $5.3 billion a year and operating income was $270 million. Over the trailing twelve months, revenue is now running $9.7 billion and operating income about $357 million.

Operating margins are down some, but, if that trend gets better, the stock may be cheap.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Google Still Monkeying With Content Owners

Stocks:  (GOOG)

Google seems to take one step forward and two steps back in its dispute with content owners over whether they can post their headlines. Or, is that two steps forward and one step back.

Google settled its battle with two news organizations in Belgium. But, some Belgian newspapers and copyright advocates are still complaining. Loudly.

And, the AFP news agency in France is still in US court trying to get Google to pay it $17.5 million. Google has cut a deal with the Associated Press to run its content. For pay.

Google claims that its spiders 4,500 news sources to constantly update its database. While it would by hyperbole to say that there may be 4,500 copyright infringment suits out there, it is safe to say that the French and Belgians are not the only parties that would be upset by Google’s actions.

SInce Google does not appear to run its text ads on the news search pages, it is hard to assess damage, unless it is linking to material that customers have to pay for.

The issue isn’t resolved. And, it won’t be for a long, long time.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

3Com Gets Poor Reception

Yesterday I keyed in about some concerns about 3Com (COMS) paying out $882 million for the other 49% of the Huawei joint venture called H3C.  The buyout itself isn’t the big deal, but they fact that they are going to go it alone is a big deal. 

Apparently I wasn’t alone.  The stock is trading down 10% pre-market and it has already traded 5 million shares pre-market.

Analysts are a perplexed as well, and the influential calls are negative so far.  Lehman thinks this stinks, and they downgraded COMS to Underweight.  Bear Stearns also downgraded the stock to a Peer Perform because of execution risks (i.e. management dropping the ball like they always have).  Sanford Bernstein maintained a market perform rating but took its target to $4.15 (under yesterday’s $4.49 close).

A couple of relatively positive calls came this morning.  One came from UBS after it thinks this is accretive to earnings and Citigroup thinks they got a good price.

My issue with this is that they zeroed their cash for all practical purposes, and the company is operating on losses and still trying to complete a restructuring.  Now their break-up value is gone too, so upon completion the company will have removed the perceived $3.00 floor because the liquid asset base will have been paid outto secure the rest of the Huawei venture.

After seeing the various notes today, it makes my initial fears of yesterday seem more and more likely.  Long-term investors in COMS are hoping this isn’t the case, but hoping doesn’t work to well in the same sentence as investing.

3Com’s only hope the street hasn’t factored in is IF a private equity white knight is hiding to participate in this deal too.  The company wiped out its liquidity on this deal and management would be comparable to getting Arthur (Dudley Moore) to run a distillery.

Jon C. Ogg
November 29, 2006

Pre-Market Stock News (Nov. 29, 2006)

(ABI) Abraxis Bio gets FDA approval for Amphicillin Injection.
(AGN) Allergan up on Cramer from Mad Money.
(AH) Armor Holdings wins another $53 million order for components.
(ARNA) Arena filed to sell 8M shares of stock.
(CHS) Chico’s $0.24 EPS vs $0.24e.
(COF) Capitol One noted as a creditcard winner on Cramer’s Mad Money.
(COMS) 3Com paid $882 million to buyout the rest of the interest in its Huawei joint venture.
(CPC) Central Parking hired Blackstone to enhance value.
(DBRN) Dress Barn $0.40 EPS vs $0.37e.
(DVAX) Dynavax noted statistically significantresults in phase III hepatitis B vaccine.
(FLR) Fluor won management pact over a $2.2 Billion Saudi Construction pact.
(JPM) JPMOrgan sold its Amaranth stake to Citadel for $725M.
(LNUX) VA Linux $0.00/R$10.3M vs $0.01/$10.25M(e)
(OPSW) Opsware $0.01 EPS vs $0.00e.
(PFE) Pfizer said it will trim its sales force by 20%.
(PFG) Principal Financial approved $250M share buyback.
PKD has a 3.8M share secondary.
(SGMO) Sangamo started phase II studies for diabetic neuropathy.
(SPSN) Spansion’s stake held by AMD was trimmed last week to 21%.
(SSS) Sovran has a 2M share secondary.
(THQI) THQ signed Miocrosoft pact for retail distribution.
(TIF) Tiffany’s $0.21 EPS vs $0.16e.
(TUG) Maritrans buyout completed.
(WGOV) Wooward Governor in supply pact with GE.
(WPSC) Whheling Pittsburgh lowered guidance.

Select Analyst Calls (Nov. 29, 2006)

ACV started as Neutral at Prudential.
AMR started as Buya t Goldman Sachs.
ANN cut to Neutral at UBS.
BLDR started as Mkt Perform at JMP.
BMHC started as Mkt Perform at JMP.
BOBJ started as Equal Weight at Morgan Stanley.
BOL started as Underweight at JPMorgan.
CEG raised to Buy at Jefferies.
COGN started as Equal Weight at Morgan Stanley.
COMS cut to ZPeerPerform at Bear Stearns.
ECIL reitr Buy at Citigroup.
EXLS started as Hold at Citigroup; started as Overweight at Thomas Weisel, started as Sell at Merrill Lynch.
HYSL started as Overweight at Morgan Stanley.
LEAP started as Buy at Goldman Sachs.
LLTC cut to Equal Weight at Lehman.
LUV started as Sell at Goldman Sachs.
MTCT started as Outperform at Cowen.
NYX cut to Neutral at JPMorgan.
ORA raised to Hold at Citigroup.
PDCO cut to Neutral at Credit Suisse.
RSTO raised to Buy at BB&T.
STX started as Sector Perform at RBC.
UAUA started as Buy at Goldman Sachs.
VZ raised to Buy at AGEdwards.
WDC started as Neutral at Merrill Lynch.
WBS cut to Underweight at Lehman.
WEBX raised to Buy at Soleil.

Goldman Sachs started other airline with Neutral: ALK, CAL, HA, JBLU, LCC.

Citigroup: Prince Walid bin Talal’s Bad Hair Day

Saudi Prince Walid first put money into Citi in 1991. The stock was at about $2 then and trades at closer to $50 now.The man is believed to be Citi’s largest shareholder. He should be happy.

But, that may not be the case. Citi was passed as the world’s largest bank based on market cap by Bank of America. How humilating.

Citi still has 20% more assets than B of A, which makes the market cap figure all the worse.

The news is viewed as an affirmation of B of A CEO Kenneth Lewis’s program to focus on consumer banking, but it is more an indictment of Citi’s plans and execution.Citi’s focus has tended to be on overseas markets and investment and corporate banking.

Citi is still working on building its international footprint. But, some of the deals, like the recent purchase of China’s Guangdong Development Bank are viewed as risky. It is unclear how much bad debt the Chinese bank may have.

Wall St. is not enamoured of Citi’s overseas and corporate banking structure. The median price target among analysts who cover the bank is $55. The stock trades just below $50.

Not exactly a ringing endoresement.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Fifteen Most Overvalued Stocks: Merck

Merck’s stock price is fascinating  The shares trade near their 52-week high, changing hands at almost $44. But, the company has tons of problems. The fact that Pfizer has just cuts its US sales force by 20% is not good news for Merck.

A very few drugs, including Zocor and Fosamax, make up half of Merck’s sales. Generics are eating away at sales as its drugs come off patent. In that way, it is no different from any other Big Pharma company. And, there are the Vioxx suits. They may go well, but they could go badly. The liability has the potential of being huge. Not unlike the tobacco companies a decade ago.

But, Merck’s stock has not traded in this range since September 2004? Very hard to say.

The most recent developments at the company have not been good. The company’s newest big bang drug Arcoxia seems to present heart health risks.  And, Wal-Mart’s marketing of $4 a month perscriptions for generics does not make Merck’s future any brighter.

And, Merck’s price-to-sales ratio is 4.24  Bristol-Myers is at 2.59. And, Pfizer is at 3.74.

Makes Merck look expensive.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

From IPO Trader

WLDN

pre ipo analysis on the entire calendar week in and week out at: http://www.tradingipos.com

2006-11-18
WLDN – Willdan Group

WLDN, Willdan Group plans on offering 2.8 million shares at a range of $9-$11. 800k of the offering will be coming from selling insiders. Wedbush Morgan is the sole book-runner here. Wedbush Morgan has not led many offerings, although they co-managed the Baby Universe ipo and have placed small pieces of successful ipos such as crox/lend/ikan/ggxy/jmdt. Post-offering WLDN will have 6.7 million shares outstanding for a market cap of $67 million on a $10 pricing. Yes WLDN is a microcap ipo. Roughly 25% of ipo proceeds will be going to insiders as part of the conversion from an S Corporation, the remainder will be used for general corporate purposes.

Directors and executives will own approximately 25% of WLDN post-offering.

From the prospectus:

We are a leading provider of outsourced services to small and mid-sized public agencies in California and other western states.’

Well we’ve seen a number of Federal Defense outsourcing ipos this decade as well as a number of managed care Medicaid providers, why not a company that focuses on outsourcing at the county level. Actually the ipo WLDN most reminds me of in scope is the PRSC ipo, which came public in 2003 with a $92 million market cap. Today prsc totes a $320 million market cap. WLDN has a much different focus then PRSC, but each are small caps focusing on outsourced services at the state level and below.

WLDN’s, outsourcing services focus on civil engineering, building & safety services, geotechnical engineering, financial consulting, economic forecasting, disaster preparedness and homeland security.

WLDN is primarily an engineering outsource firm, as 85% of contract revenues are engineering based. The focus of WLDN’s engineering outsourcing operations are building out infrastructure, as well as the rehabilitation of aging structures, such as those related to aviation, bridges, dams, drinking water, energy (power), hazardous waste, navigable waterways, public parks/recreation, railroads, roads, schools, security, solid waste, transit, and wastewater.

The American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE) estimates that 28 % of California’s bridges are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, and 71% of the state’s major roads are in poor or mediocre condition. Additionally, the ASCE estimates that $17.5 billion will be needed over the next 20 years to meet the drinking water needs for the state. These are all part of WLDN’s core business focus.

In 12/05 President Bush signed the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act. The act was signed in response to growing concern over the condition of the nation’s infrastructure.The act allocates more than $286 billion to infrastructure investment through 2009, a 40% increase over predecessor legislation. WLDN anticipates this act will filter down to greater city/county spending on infrastructure improvement.

WLDN, founded over 40 years ago has 20 offices throughout California(and other states) and a staff of just over 650. WLDN focuses on small to mid-size communities with populations of 10,000 – 300,000. The philosophy here is that since WLDN already has the infrastructure, they are able to utilize county dollars more efficiently as an outsource entity, then the smaller counties could by hiring staff, office, infrastructure etc. WLDN also focuses on these smaller counties as they feel they are underserved by the larger outsourcing agencies/companies.

WLDN provides services to approximately 60% of the 478 cities and over 60% of the 58 counties in California. 85% of revenues is derived from California municipalities.

WLDN is a direct play on local governments shifting to privatization in an attempt to accomplish more with finite resources. Factors driving this outsourcing/privatization trend include, 1) overall population growth without always a similar boost in county/city revenues; 2) sustained demand for services; 3) the creation of new municipalities, often in high growth suburban outlying areas; 4) Federal homeland security grants to local governments.

Financials

$2 a share in cash post-offering, negligible debt.

3 X’s book value at $10.

Less then 1 X’s 2006 expected revenues on a $10 pricing.

Revenues have grown steadily. $58 million in 2004 revenues grew 16% to $67 million in 2005. Through the first 9 months of 2006, WLDN is on track to grow revenues 16% to $80 million.

Expenses have been growing roughly at the same pace as revenues, eliminating any economies of scale. This is a thin margin business. Operating margins were 7% in 2004 and 2005 and are on track for 8% in 2006.

Net margins in 2005 were 4%-5%. Earnings per share were $0.45. On a pricing of $10, WLDN will be trading 22 X’s trailing earnings.

For 2006 WLDN appears on track for net margins of 5%, thanks in part to a strong 3rd quarter. Earnings per share appear on track for $0.60-$0.65 fully taxed. On a pricing of $10, WLDN would be trading 16X’s 2006 earnings.

Risk – the big risk here with the revenues concentrated in CA would be a severe economic downturn in the state. During the 1991-1992 economic downturn in California, WLDN experienced negative earnings and cash flow difficulties. Also outside of an economic downturn, budget cuts in CA would also negatively impact WLDN’s revenues and profitability. On the other hand, a natural disaster in the state would most likely benefit companies such as WLDN as greater federal monies would flow into the effected CA municipalities.

WLDN has steadily grown revenues and should continue assuming A) the population of California continues to grow and B) the economy of California remains strong. Also much of California’s infrastructure needs to be rebuilt and WLDN has worked with the majority of CA’s municipalities. I would like to see a bit stronger growth here, as well as stronger operating margins. However both are right on par for the government outsourcing sector. Solid micro-cap ipo. These smaller offerings can filter good news to the bottom line fast and hard. PRSC ipo’d with similar multiples and has more then tripled market cap in 3 years. If WLDN can continue growth curve and gain a solid new contract win or two annually, the stock should perform well over time. Recommend on an in range pricing.

From IPO Trader

WLDN

pre ipo analysis on the entire calendar week in and week out at: http://www.tradingipos.com

2006-11-18
WLDN – Willdan Group

WLDN, Willdan Group plans on offering 2.8 million shares at a range of $9-$11. 800k of the offering will be coming from selling insiders. Wedbush Morgan is the sole book-runner here. Wedbush Morgan has not led many offerings, although they co-managed the Baby Universe ipo and have placed small pieces of successful ipos such as crox/lend/ikan/ggxy/jmdt. Post-offering WLDN will have 6.7 million shares outstanding for a market cap of $67 million on a $10 pricing. Yes WLDN is a microcap ipo. Roughly 25% of ipo proceeds will be going to insiders as part of the conversion from an S Corporation, the remainder will be used for general corporate purposes.

Directors and executives will own approximately 25% of WLDN post-offering.

From the prospectus:

We are a leading provider of outsourced services to small and mid-sized public agencies in California and other western states.’

Well we’ve seen a number of Federal Defense outsourcing ipos this decade as well as a number of managed care Medicaid providers, why not a company that focuses on outsourcing at the county level. Actually the ipo WLDN most reminds me of in scope is the PRSC ipo, which came public in 2003 with a $92 million market cap. Today prsc totes a $320 million market cap. WLDN has a much different focus then PRSC, but each are small caps focusing on outsourced services at the state level and below.

WLDN’s, outsourcing services focus on civil engineering, building & safety services, geotechnical engineering, financial consulting, economic forecasting, disaster preparedness and homeland security.

WLDN is primarily an engineering outsource firm, as 85% of contract revenues are engineering based. The focus of WLDN’s engineering outsourcing operations are building out infrastructure, as well as the rehabilitation of aging structures, such as those related to aviation, bridges, dams, drinking water, energy (power), hazardous waste, navigable waterways, public parks/recreation, railroads, roads, schools, security, solid waste, transit, and wastewater.

The American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE) estimates that 28 % of California’s bridges are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, and 71% of the state’s major roads are in poor or mediocre condition. Additionally, the ASCE estimates that $17.5 billion will be needed over the next 20 years to meet the drinking water needs for the state. These are all part of WLDN’s core business focus.

In 12/05 President Bush signed the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act. The act was signed in response to growing concern over the condition of the nation’s infrastructure.The act allocates more than $286 billion to infrastructure investment through 2009, a 40% increase over predecessor legislation. WLDN anticipates this act will filter down to greater city/county spending on infrastructure improvement.

WLDN, founded over 40 years ago has 20 offices throughout California(and other states) and a staff of just over 650. WLDN focuses on small to mid-size communities with populations of 10,000 – 300,000. The philosophy here is that since WLDN already has the infrastructure, they are able to utilize county dollars more efficiently as an outsource entity, then the smaller counties could by hiring staff, office, infrastructure etc. WLDN also focuses on these smaller counties as they feel they are underserved by the larger outsourcing agencies/companies.

WLDN provides services to approximately 60% of the 478 cities and over 60% of the 58 counties in California. 85% of revenues is derived from California municipalities.

WLDN is a direct play on local governments shifting to privatization in an attempt to accomplish more with finite resources. Factors driving this outsourcing/privatization trend include, 1) overall population growth without always a similar boost in county/city revenues; 2) sustained demand for services; 3) the creation of new municipalities, often in high growth suburban outlying areas; 4) Federal homeland security grants to local governments.

Financials

$2 a share in cash post-offering, negligible debt.

3 X’s book value at $10.

Less then 1 X’s 2006 expected revenues on a $10 pricing.

Revenues have grown steadily. $58 million in 2004 revenues grew 16% to $67 million in 2005. Through the first 9 months of 2006, WLDN is on track to grow revenues 16% to $80 million.

Expenses have been growing roughly at the same pace as revenues, eliminating any economies of scale. This is a thin margin business. Operating margins were 7% in 2004 and 2005 and are on track for 8% in 2006.

Net margins in 2005 were 4%-5%. Earnings per share were $0.45. On a pricing of $10, WLDN will be trading 22 X’s trailing earnings.

For 2006 WLDN appears on track for net margins of 5%, thanks in part to a strong 3rd quarter. Earnings per share appear on track for $0.60-$0.65 fully taxed. On a pricing of $10, WLDN would be trading 16X’s 2006 earnings.

Risk – the big risk here with the revenues concentrated in CA would be a severe economic downturn in the state. During the 1991-1992 economic downturn in California, WLDN experienced negative earnings and cash flow difficulties. Also outside of an economic downturn, budget cuts in CA would also negatively impact WLDN’s revenues and profitability. On the other hand, a natural disaster in the state would most likely benefit companies such as WLDN as greater federal monies would flow into the effected CA municipalities.

WLDN has steadily grown revenues and should continue assuming A) the population of California continues to grow and B) the economy of California remains strong. Also much of California’s infrastructure needs to be rebuilt and WLDN has worked with the majority of CA’s municipalities. I would like to see a bit stronger growth here, as well as stronger operating margins. However both are right on par for the government outsourcing sector. Solid micro-cap ipo. These smaller offerings can filter good news to the bottom line fast and hard. PRSC ipo’d with similar multiples and has more then tripled market cap in 3 years. If WLDN can continue growth curve and gain a solid new contract win or two annually, the stock should perform well over time. Recommend on an in range pricing.

Offshoring of Biotech Research to China

From BioHealth Investor

by Andrew Vaino

Interesting article in yesterday’s San Diego Union Tribune bemoaning the offshoring of biotech research to cheaper labor markets. The article discusses the demise of Discovery Partners (formerly DPII), a San Diego company that focussed on preparing libraries of compounds for other, typically large pharmaceutical, companies. There is some irony here, in that companies like Discovery Partners owed their existence to bigger companies seeking to cut costs by outsourcing. This same outsourcing has been evident in manufacturing for years.

According to a 2005 report by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PHRMA), US drug companies spent $11B on drug discovery in 2003. To clarify, drug discovery encompasses activities that lead up to a clinical trial, that is, identification of biologically relevant targets, design and synthesis of molecules to interact with those targets, and evaluation of efficacy and safety. Drug development refers to efforts at getting potential drugs through clincal trials and to market. According to PHRMA, in 2003 US drug companies spent $22B on drug development.

The high value inputs in the drug discovery process are in the design phase. In many ways the intermediate steps in drug discovery (preparation and testing of compounds) are not "high value" labor. Once you’re figured out how to do chemistry and biology it becomes pretty rote: the US has no comparative advantage here. Chinese and Indian scientists are just as smart as American scientists, so moving this work to cheaper labor markets makes economic sense. While pharmaceutical companies enjoy substantial (25-30%) operating margins, they, like all companies, are constantly seeking to cut costs.

I’m not convinced offshoring of biotech labor will go as far as in other industries. I don’t believe that drug development (clinical trials) will move offshore as fast as drug discovery. Intellectual property may limit how much of even drug discovery is done offshore. China has recently taken steps to better protect patent rights, but counterfeiting remains a substantial issue.

In any case, until labor costs in China equilibrate with labor costs in this country—and, given the near-predatory mercantilist policy China is pursing this is unlikely to happen anytime soon—offshoring of biotech research will only increase in scope and scale.

http://www.biohealthinvestor.com/

Anika Therapeutics Jumps 20% on FDA Letter

From BioHealth Investor

Shares of Anika Therapeutics (ANIK) jumped more than 20% on Tuesday after the company announced it had received an approvable letter from the FDA regarding its Cosmetic Tissue Augmentation (CTA) product.

CTA is an injectable filler used for facial wrinkles and other cosmetic procedures. It is based on Anika’s proprietary modified hyaluronic acid, and includes the common anesthetic Lidocaine.

The company expects final approval by end of 2006 and commercialization by mid-2007. The company intends on refiling with the FDA and European Union to enhance product features before commercial launch.

The company’s financials have been looking great as both revenues and net earning have been increasing over the last few years.

The company holds almost $50 million in cash and no debt, and is currently worth less than $150 million on the market.

Shares of Anika closed at $13.90 a share, near its 52-week high of $15.37

http://www.biohealthinvestor.com/

Essex Corp Volume Jumps 250%

From Volume Spike Investor

Shares of Essex Corp.(KEYW) rose more than 1% on Tuesday as volume spiked 250% above the 3-month daily average.

There were no significant news releases or other significant events that could be detected.

Essex Copr provides signal processing, image processing, information processing, information assurance, and engineering innovations for the U.S. Government intelligence and defense customers.

The $500 million company holds $20 million in cash with only $84 thousand in debt as last reported by Yahoo!Finance.

Both revenues and net earnings have seen tremendous growth over the last few years.

Shares of Essex closed at $24.01, less than 1% away from the 52-week high of $24.22 reached on the same day.

Essex Corp. has made VSI’s Watch List.

http://www.vsinvestor.com/