Daily Archives: February 22, 2007

24/7 Wall St. Break-Up Values: Sun Micro $6.61 (Current Price $6.28)

By Ryan Barnes. Edited By Douglas A. McIntyre

Sun Microsystems (SUNW) – Price $6.28; Break-up Value $6.61

Remember when Sun was one of the “Four Horsemen of the Internet”?  It wasn’t all that long ago in calendar terms, but in terms of the stock market it might as well be as old as the Old Testament itself.  Sun has seemed so close to breaking through again for quite a while now, but even when sales growth is strong for new product offering, the success never makes it to the bottom line.  The reason is a bloated cost structure where annual SG&A and R&D combined amount to nearly 50% of gross revenues. 

Sun paid $4 billion for StorageTek in 2005 with the stated reason of bolstering the company’s presence in storage products; less than a year later the company blamed revenue shortfall on a weak storage product sales.  Sun’s balance sheet had long been the best thing they had going, and they wiped out half of their cash balance to acquire a company that has not been as immediately accretive as most investors would have liked.  Still, Sun’s balance sheet is quite strong, and by all accounts they seem to be picking up market share in their core server businesses, thanks in no small part to partnering up with AMD and Intel on the chip side to make them more marketable to customers. 

Which leads us to the one of the problems with Sun.  They make processors.  They produce high-end servers and storage products.  They design their own software and middleware applications.  Sun is all over the place.  They spend $2 billion a year on research & development, which is all fine and good until they try to go out and sell what they’ve designed in their brain labs only to find they can’t turn a profit.  To be sure, Sun has plenty of geniuses in its ranks – I have known a few of them myself.  Sun is visionary by many accounts, from their early adoption of open-source initiatives to their “The network is the computer” slogan (time will tell just how visionary that statement is).

But visionary will wear thin very quickly if a profit can’t be turned with all the great ideas.  This leads us to the other big problem at Sun.  It is appalling to think that a company with gross margins above 45% and no debt can barely turn a profit.  The geniuses over there must be making too much money, because the SG&A is out of control – recent workforce reductions have helped, but that’s only a linear solution.  Something bigger needs to happen, and KKR’s recent $700m investment may be a sign that others are in agreement.

Now that private equity has taken a public interest in the company, it is a good time to inspect what the company could be worth upon break-up.  Before beginning I need to lay out the underlying assumption that the SG&A can be brought under control and end up near industry averages.  Without further improvement here, Sun will be a dead stick.

Sun operates in two main segments, Products and Services.  The products group includes the servers and storage hardware, and actually has decent top-line growth of late for the first time in years at nearly 9%.  Because the company has stated they intend to further integrate storage products into their core servers, we will keep these segments together and look at a spin-off value of the combined products group.  If we make our stated assumption that SG&A costs will make their way to industry norms, this group would show operating margins of 8%, which is slightly less than HPQ and Hitachi.  Based on the low end of industry multiples, this segment could be sold for 11-13x operating profit, or about $8.1b. 

The Services segment contains two groups – one dealing with ongoing support and maintenance contracts and the other doing high-end tech consulting worldwide.  The segment would make for a pretty attractive IPO or spin-off, with revenue growth in the mid-teens and possibly even allowing for some “genius premium” for the folks in the consulting group.  Services revenue amounted to more than $5b in the last 12 months, so this segment could easily stand on its own as a listed company.  Based on the solid growth prospects and again using our necessary SG&A assumption, this group could trade for 14-16 operating profits, giving it an estimated cap of $8.4b.

The easy task is to add in the cash & related liquid securities, which are worth nearly $5 billion.  The more difficult one is estimating the value of their intellectual property.  Solaris, Java, and in-production research is definitely worth something, but because they’ve been giving so much away for free it is hard to tell what the monetary value of these products are.  Unfortunately we have to give it little monetary value ourselves, simply for the reason that whatever future earnings value these free-for-anyone products has is wrapped in the human capital at Sun.  It’s the engineers and consultants themselves who have been using the various software and platforms to drive sales and form relationships.  We do think that Java is worth $2-3 billion based on the high levels of adoption in mobile devices worldwide, but that is all we’ll be adding in for IP at this point. 

Add it all up and Sun Micro could be worth nearly $24 billion, or right at $6.61/share.  But this is implicit on the employee and stock costs coming down in coming quarters.  If we see incremental improvement in the next quarter we can expand on this assumption and narrow our break-up range for the stock.

Ryan Barnes

Ryan Barnes has over 10 years’ experience in portfolio management and investment research, covering equities, fixed income, and derivative products. Ryan spent the past 5 years working as an institutional trader & manager for high-net worth investors, working with Merrill Lynch, Charles Schwab, Morgan Stanley, and many others.  Ryan is currently working as a writer and financial modeling consultant on hedging and capital appreciation strategies, and does not own securities in the companies being covered.

Methodology

Apple Settles With Cisco, But iPhone Success Still In Doubt

Apple (AAPL) and Cisco (CSCO) have reached an agreement. Cisco, which holds the trademark on the term "iPhone", will allow Apple to use the name for its new handset. Cisco will also use the name for products that allow VoIP calls over the internet.

Apple was not too bright to launch the product using the name without Cisco’s clearance, but all’s well that ends well.

Apple has suggested it could sell 10 million iPhones in 2008. That’s not very much in a global market where one billion handsets are sold per year.

Bloomberg has given a list of reasons that the iPhone will not do well, and they are compelling. One of the most credible is that the iPhone is such a late entry to the handset market that the large cell manufacturers like Motorla (MOT) and Nokia (NOK) will introduce similar products to keep share.

Another reason the iPhone may not be a success is that mobile operators like Verizon (VZ) may not want to alienate their current handset partners by taking on the new Apple phone. Verizon actually passed on the chance to distribute the iPhone to its customers.

For Apple, it’s nice to have the name, but having customers is a much bigger problem.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He doe not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Europe Markets 2/22/2006 AXA Up Sharply, Daimler Down

Stocks:  (BCS)(BP)(BT)(GSK)(PUK)(RTRSY)(UN)(VOD)(BAY)(DCX)(DB)(DT)(SAP)(SI)(ALU)(AXA)(FTE)(STM)(V)

Market in Europe are modestly higher at 6.35 AM New York time.

The FTSE is up .6% to 6,394. Barclays is up .5% to 784. BP is up .6% to 524.5. BT is down .3% to 308. GlaxoSmithKline is down .8% to 1448. Prudential is up .4% to 710. Reuters is up .2% to 429.5. Unilever is down .4% to 1378. Vodafone is down .2% to 146.75.

The DAXX is up .7% to 6,992. Bayer is up .1% to 44.46. DaimlerChrysler is down 1.8% to 52.95. DeutscheBank is up .2% to 106.52. Deutsche Telekom is up 1% to 13.54. SAP is down .1% to 35.21. Siemens is up .9% to 84.9.

The CAC 40 is up .5% to 5,721. Alcatel-Lucent is up .1% to 9.9. AXA is up 3% to 34.12. France Telecom is down .1% to 21.12. ST Micro is up .7% to 14.62. Vivendi is down .6% to 30.51.

Data from Reuters.

Douglas A. McIntyre

15 Companies That Management Can’t Fix: Ford

There are certain companies that probably cannot be turned around no matter who runs them. They tend to be in industries where macro-economic trends are against them, like the buggy whip business 150 years ago.

Investors are not likely to get much out of these firms, unless and until the trend that is hurting them is reversed.

The management at DaimlerChrysler (DCX) has financial resources and manufacturing prowess that only a few car companies like VW, GM (GM), and Toyota (TM) can match. Daimler’s CEO ran its Chrysler unit for several years and got it to the point where it made money for Daimler.

So, why is the German automotive company so anxious to auction off its American unit? It may be that the management at Daimler believes that the retirement costs and labor burdens at Chrysler coupled with Toyota’s relentless increase in market share in America make the operation almost impossible to turn around.

Which brings Wall St. to Ford (F) and its long list of problems. Ford has several immediate issues it needs to resolve and it may not have the resources to do so. First is that the company relies heavily on SUVs and pick-ups for revenue. These vehicles are among its most profitable. But, rising fuel costs have cut into sales and made it necessary to offer significant incentives to bring customers to dealerships.

Ford’s next set of critical problems involve its costs. The company is in the midst of closing plants, but legacy labor costs for health benefits and pension costs remain much higher than those at many of its rivals, especially the Japanese. Ford’s retirement and benefits plans are underfunded by about $46 billion. If the UAW will not make historic concessions, Ford may have no way around curtailing these expenses. Although Ford has brought in additional cash through new debt, the balance sheet may not support the company’s huge burn rate. Reuters quotes Sean McAlinden, an analyst for the Center for Automotive Research as saying that "They (Ford) are going to start burning through their cash faster than they thought they would, maybe at twice the rate."

The final problem is Toyota. Toyota’s market share in the US was 15.4% in 2006. While Ford’s share was 16.4% in 2006, it is forecasting that the figure could drop as low as 14% in the coming years. Toyota already has the fuel efficient cars that Americans want in its product line-up and it has the financial resources to attack Ford in its core SUV and pick-up product lines.

Ford has fallen so far behind in the industry and has so many handicaps, that it simply may not be able to get back on its feet.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Wall St Wises Up On Qualcomm

Many of Qualcomm’s (QCOM) supporters assume that it will settle its licensing dispute with its largest customer Nokia (NOK). The current contract between the two companies comes up for renewal in April.  But, AG Edwards see a lot of risk in the possibility that the dispute between the two companies will go on. According to Barron’s “it may take some time” for the company to work out a royalty agreement with Nokia.

And that may only be part of the problem. A number of handset companies may not want to pay license fees to Qualcomm at all. As the firms that build inexpensive wireless devices for emerging countries look at their options for new handsets "it may want those phones to operate on GSM-based technologies, not Qualcomm’s CDMA," according to Barron’s.

And, there is a third hurdle for Qualcomm. Rival Broadcom (BRCM) is challenging certain Qualcomm intellectual property rights, and if it prevails QCOM could face another cut in its current revenue stream.

No wonder AG Edwards dropped the stock to a "hold".

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

YouTube’s Anti-Piracy Tools May Not Help

Google (GOOG) management says that getting anti-piracy software into the hands of content owners.

But, this only solves part of the issues facing the YouTube video site. Content companies like Viacom (VIA) and CBS (CBS) have not been able to come to business terms with Google for how they will make money from their content. Until there is progress there, YouTube may take the property of the big media companies off of its site, but the challenge of how it can become a revenue creating business for Google remains.

Douglas A. McIntyre

Media Digest 2/22/2007 Reuters, WSJ, NYTimes, FT, Barron’s

According To Reuters, Apple (AAPL) and Cisco (CSCO) have both decided to use the iPhone name for their sharply different products. The tradmark belongs to Cisco.

Reuters writes that Coca-Cola (KO) has completed the purchase of its Phillipines bottler.

Reuters writes that Whole Foods (WFMI) will buy Wild Oats (OATS) for $565 million.

Reuters also writes that European music company may seek other bids while it is considering a buyout from Warner Music (WMG).

The Wall Street Journal reports that Google (GOOG) plans to sell its web-based spreadsheet and word processing applications in a move that may compete with Microsoft (MSFT) Office.

GM (GM) is still considering buying Chysler (DCX) although there would be huge cost and labor problems to overcome.

The WSJ reports that Microsoft (MSFT) and AT&T (T) have been to the Supreme Court to have a case over AT&T’s patents which it says Microsoft violated in software it sold overseas.

The WSJ also reports that Verizon (VZ) has sued Vonage (VG) over the use of several functions that the large phone company says it has patents on.

The New York Times writes that shares of home mortgage companies were hit after NovaStar reported poor earnings and its stock fell 43%.

The New York Times reports that with few suitors, Daimler (DCX) may face selling its Chrysler unit in several pieces.

A Genentech (DNA) patent for making monoclonal antibodies was revoked by the Patent Office, a move that could cost the company hundreds of million of dollars, according to the NYT.

The NYT also reports the JetBlue (JBLU) faces losses in the current quarter due to costs for the delay of hundreds of flights.

The FT reports that the Nintendo Wii is outselling the Xbox from Microsoft (MSFT) and Sony PS# (SNE) according to January figures.

Barron’s reports that Wedbush Morgan rates Avaya (AV) a hold. Its goal of reviving sales growth may not payoff for a year.

Douglas A. McIntyre

Asia Markets 2/22/2007 China Mobile Up, NTT Down

Stocks: (CAJ)(FUJ)(HIT)(HMC)(NIPNY)(NTT)(SNE)(TM)(CHL)(CHU)(CN)(PCW)(HBC)

Markets in Asia rose.

The Nikkei was up 1.1% to 18,109. Bridgestone was up 1.2% to 2815. Canon was up 1.7% to 6680. Fuji Film was up 1% to 5280. Hitachi was up .8% to 840. Honda was falt at 4620. NEC was up .2% to 638. NTT was down 1.4% to 642000. Sharp was up 2.8% to 2325. Softbank was down 1.3% to 2840. Sony was up .3% to 6380. Toshiba was down .4% to 786. Toyota was up .5% to 8220. Yahoo Japan was up 2.1% to 45200.

The Hang Seng rose .8% to 20,808. China Mobile was up 2.9% to 79.35. Cathay Pacific was up 1.8% to 21.7. China Unicom was down .4% to 10.6. China Netcom was down 2.4% to 20.28. HSBC was down .2% to 138.8 PCCW was down .8% to 4.74.

The KOSPI was up 1% to 1,465.

The Straits Times was down .1% to 3,289.

Shanghai was closed.

Data from Reuters

Douglas A. McIntyre

Cramer’s Ten Most Anti-Competitive Merger Summary

Stock Tickers: KR, SWY, DGX, LH, CCL, RCL, ODP, OMX, CAH, MCK, CP, CVX,ACI, XOM, RDS, BA, UTX, LMT, NOC, RTN, CMCSA, TWCA, TWC, S, GCI, MNI,UNP, BNI, NSC & CSX.

Jim Cramer came out with a huge list of anti-competitive mergers he would like to see on Wednesday night’s MAD MONEY on CNBC.  He noted pricing power and the potential rush-job that may occur in mergers before a DOJ under a potential Democratic White House or Congress.  This is the TOP 10 LIST from Cramer, but it is actually more than ten if you count them. We broke these up into two different posts because the length of them was quite long otherwise:

The first half of his list is here.

The second half of his list is here.

Keep in mind that many of these are VERY anti-competitive and would be blocked if the DOJ actually monitored mergers like they are supposed to, so this is sort of a ‘merger wish list’ of Cramer’s even if he said he thinks they will occur.  Yes we are about Wall Street, but most of these mergers would be horrible for Main Street and many of these wouldn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of getting through. 

Jon C. Ogg
February 21, 2007

Jon Ogg can be reached at jonogg@247wallst.com; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.

The Wii Goes Crazy And Sony Scrambles

The lead that the Nintendo Wii has over the Microsoft Xbox (MSFT) and Sony Playstation3 (SNE) appears to be growing. According to research firm NPD, the Wii sold 436,000 units in the US during January. Xbox was second with 294,000 units and the PS3 trailed with 244,000.

Research firm Enterbrain estimates that 600,000 game consoles were sold in Japan during January. Nintendo’s share was 68% to Sony’s 25% for PS3. Xbox trailed with 7%.

Two months ago, very few industry observers would have believed that the Wii could take such a large lead over the products from the bigger companies. And, it now appears that it is holding that lead handily.

While the numbers are painful for Microsoft, it was never the dominant platform. Playstation was, and at one point game consoles were the largest contributor to Sony’s operating income.

It is a good thing for Sony that its consumer electronics and movie studio businesses are doing well. Its video game business may never entirely recover.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Could Verizon Lawsuits Sink Vonage?

A cynic might says that Verizon’s (VZ) patent lawsuit against Vonage (VG) is just a way to get rid of a pesky competitor. VoIP is eating the Verizon and AT&T (T) landline businesses alive.

But, much of the VoIP competition comes from the cable companies like Comcast (CMCSA) and Time Warner (TWX). Who knows? They might get hit with patent litigation next.

Verizon claims that Vonage violates its patent on several items including call forwarding and fraud protection. All Verizon wants is $197 million and future royalties. That seems reasonable enough.

But, if Verizon wins it could wipe Vonage out.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Sarbanes-Oxley: It’s Not Just For Bashing Anymore

From AAO Weblog

Kind of a rare daily double: two separate clips in the news about the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. And not one of them mentions how it’s making the sky fall!

First up, reported by CFO.com, these comments from PCAOB member Charles Niemeier from a panel discussion titled “The Burdens of Regulation: Are the U.S. Capital Markets Less Competitive?” sponsored by the New York Society of Security Analysts.

“I don’t believe that ‘regulation light’ is an answer. We’re looking at an interesting time in where these markets are developing in other countries. It would put us in an extremely dangerous position to have lowered our standards in the United States…”If we start tweaking, are we putting at risk the one thing that gives us a true competitive advantage in the world?”

A question worth asking, I’d say. Then there’s this interesting piece in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal: a study by Thomson Financial that shows IPO activity hasn’t diminished since the implementation. In fact, according to the article:

“… foreign IPOs, excluding investment funds and closed-end funds, accounted for 16% of the 208 IPOs in the U.S. last year, the highest proportion of foreign IPOs in Thomson Financial’s 20-year review…foreign IPOs in the U.S. last year raised $10.6 billion of the $45.3 billion in IPO offerings priced in the U.S. It represents a 23% share of IPO volume sold last year, the highest level since 1994.”

Maybe all that foreign money is being raised here because the companies like what Sarbanes-Oxley might be doing for stock prices: there’s still a valuation premium for raising capital here – despite the higher banking fees.

http://www.accountingobserver.com/blog/

Wednesday’s Top Biotech and Medical Stocks

From BioHealth Investor

Biotechnology

BIONOVO INC [BNVI.OB] +27.33% $0
CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS [CORT] +20.19% $99.2 M
OPEXA THERAPEUTICS [OPXA] +11.11% $0
PANACOS PHARMA INC [PANC] +8.29% $49.9 M
AURIGA LABORATORIES [ARGA.OB] +7.14%

Diagnostic Substances

ICAGEN, INC. [ICGN] +20.93%
AVALON PHARMACEUTIC [AVRX] +6.71%
THRESHOLD PHARMACEUT [THLD] +4.64%
NYMOX PHARM CORP [NYMX] +4.17%
SCOLR PHARMA INC [DDD] +3.31%

Drug Delivery

SYMBOLLON PHARM CL A [SYMBA.OB] +7.14%
DELCATH SYSTEMS INC [DCTH] +1.96%
EMISPHERE TECH [EMIS] +0.95%
ALKERMES INC [ALKS] +0.91%
QUIGLEY CORP THE [QGLY] +0.90%

Drug Manufacturers

GENTIUM SPA ADS [GENT] +4.37%
EXEGENICS INC [EXEG.OB] +4.32%
SINOVAC BIOTECH LTD [SVA] +4.32%
PROVECTUS PHARMA [PVCT.OB] +3.57% $11.0 M
SPECTRUM PHARMA INC [SPPI] +2.91%

Read More »

Merck Pressured to Halt Gardasil Vaccine Lobbying

By H.S. Ayoub
BioHealth Investor.com

I wrote earlier about the anti-vaccination movement, and how Merck (MRK) has been receiving a lot of backlash because of its lobbying efforts.

Merck (MRK) has been lobbying pretty hard for mandating the vaccination of pre-teen girls with its HPV vaccine Gardasil.

More than 20 states have drafted bills to mandate the vaccination, and in fact, an executive order was made by Texas Gov. Rick Perry to force young girls to be vaccinated. Mr. Perry’s executive order calls for all girls entering sixth grade in that state to be vaccinated by September 2008.

Public backlash against the mandate, including parent groups, has forced Merck to end its lobbying campaign. Among the main arguments made by the opposition included, the freedom to make that decision for their daughters on their own, and of course, the high cost. A three dose regimen of Gardasil costs $360, higher than most mandated vaccination programs.

Merck will now focus on programs aimed at educating the public about HPV, which is a virus that is sexually transmitted, and is a cause of cervical cancer.

http://www.biohealthinvestor.com/

Consensus Portfolio Updates

From World Beta

Here are the updated portfolios for the Hedge Fund Consensus, and Activist Consensus Portfolios. Performance from 12/31/2006 – 2/21/2007 is below:

Hedge: 5.76%
Activist: 2.61%
SP500: 2.72%
Rus2k: 4.79%

AMP was the best HFC stock up 24.29%, and the worst performner was AXP at -3.66%.
AKS was the best AC stock up 26.27%, and the worst performer was SLI at -19.4%.

There was a good article the other day in the NY Times about Hedge Fund Activism, and a new paper titled, "Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance." The article confirms that activists generate statistically significant excess returns.

Barron’s also featured a good overview of San Diego based activist Relational Investors.

On to the portfolios.

HEDGE PORTFOLIO (names in bold are new, names below in italics are removed). UNH is the most often repeated stock (6 times), with QCOM second at 5 times. All the rest are 4 or less.

AAPL
AMP
AMT
AMX
AXP
BRK
CMCSK
FDC
GOOG
MSFT
QCOM
TYC
UNH
WMT
WU

AZO
BBBY

ACTIVIST PORTFOLIO (names in bold are new, names below in italics are removed)

BBI
BGP
DADE
FD
HLT
LCAPA
LGND
LINTA
MCD
MSFT
PDLI
SHLM
SYMC
TNS
TWX
UIC
UNM
WLT
WMB

AKS
FDC
GY
IKN
SHLD
SLI
WU

ANF: Abercrombie & Fitch

By William Trent, CFA of Stock Market Beat

Its a good thing Mid Cap Watch List and Large Cap Watch List member Abercrombie & Fitch’s (ANF) management won’t have to worry about claims they breached their fiduciary duties, because they’re going to be busy explaining their outlook to investors for a couple of days. according to the company, here are its Fourth Quarter Highlights: Total comparable store sales declining 3% hardly seems a highlight – particularly since the fourth quarter and full year benefitted from an extra week of sales compared to the prior year, but we’ll go along with it as the results pretty much exactly matched expectations – as well they should given the fact that the monthly sales reports should have steered analysts in pretty much the right direction. We admire Abercrombie for not dumping these progress reports while the going is tough.

  • Total Company net sales increased 18% to $1.139 billion; comparable store sales declined 3%, versus a 28% increase for the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2005
  • Abercrombie & Fitch net sales increased 6% to $504.0 million; Abercrombie & Fitch comparable store sales decreased 6%, versus an 18% increase for the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2005
  • abercrombie net sales increased 19% to $144.5 million; abercrombie comparable store sales increased 2%, versus a 59% increase for the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2005
  • Hollister Co. net sales increased 33% to $476.8 million; Hollister Co. comparable store sales were flat to last year, versus a 34% increase for the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2005
  • RUEHL net sales increased 89% to $13.4 million; RUEHL comparable store sales increased 6%, versus an 18% increase for the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2005
  • Net income for the fourth quarter increased 20% to $198.2 million from $164.6 million in Fiscal 2005
  • Net income per diluted share increased 19% to $2.14 in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2006 from $1.80 in Fiscal 2005

So, since the analysts were able to pinpoint revenue and earnings with laser-like accuracy, it must be the guidance that is sending the shares down after hours:

The Company expects net income per diluted share for the first half of Fiscal 2007 to be in the range of $1.47 to $1.52, representing between 10% and 13% earnings growth over the first half of Fiscal 2006. Due to the impact of the Company’s London pre-opening store costs, along with the difficult comparisons to last year’s tax rate favorability, diluted earnings per share growth in the first quarter of 2007 is expected to be in the mid-single digit range. The low end of the earnings guidance reflects a flat comparable store sales scenario for the first half of Fiscal 2007.

Read More »

ADI: Analog Devices Investors Sigh In Relief?

By William Trent, CFA of Stock Market Beat

Apparently it doesn’t take much to get Analog Devices (ADI) investors excited. Which is good, seeing as how they didn’t deliver very much in terms of earnigns.

Analog Devices Announces Financial Results for the First Quarter of Fiscal Year 2007: Financial News – Yahoo! Finance

Total revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was $692 million, which included $657 million of product revenue and $35 million of revenue from a one-time technology license. Product revenue for the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 increased approximately 6% compared to the same period one year ago and increased approximately 2% compared to the immediately prior quarter.Diluted earnings per share (EPS) for the first quarter of fiscal 2007, on a GAAP basis, was $0.44, compared to $0.32 for the same period one year ago and $0.39 for the immediately prior quarter. Non-GAAP diluted EPS for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was $0.40, compared to $0.37 for the same period one year ago and $0.39 for the immediately prior quarter.

Revenue beat consensus estimates by $5 million, while the $0.40 in EPS compares to a $0.41 consensus according to Yahoo! Finance.  Guidance wasn’t much better, calling for $640-670 in revenue (consensus = $661) and $0.37-$0.42 in non-GAAP EPS (consensus = $0.42.) We’ll leave the discussion of whether estimates should be based on non-GAAP (GAAP stands for Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, so why is non-GAAP accepted?) for another time.

Read More »

Google (GOOG) Goes For Microsoft’s (MSFT) Throat

Perhaps because Google is not doing too well with YouTube it has decided to see if it can go after the richest franchise in software history. The new premium version of Google desktop software which has e-mail, document and spreadsheet functions will license for $50 and come with support. Microsoft’s product in this space is Office, which has 450 million users.

The only advantage the Google product, Apps Premier Edition, seems to have over Microsoft is cost. Business users are used to the features of the Microsoft products and their ubiquity makes the interaction of enterprise computers around the world fairly seamless.

Google may just be wasting time.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Does the iPhone Settlement Mean Anything? (AAPL, CSCO)

Cisco Systems (CSCO) and Apple (AAPL) announced that they have resolved their dispute involving the "iPhone" trademark and now both companies are free to use the "iPhone" trademark on their products globally.

The trademark rights have been granted and each will dismiss any pending action or litigation.  Cisco and Apple will also explore opportunities for interoperability in the areas of security, and consumer and enterprise communications; but terms of the agreement are confidential.

This is one of the issues that was probably over before it started, although Cisco had to act like it was going to be tough and fight it out.  What is an iPhone?  Cisco could sell one and it would instantly be thought of as their cool web-IP phone with real-time video conferencing, and Apple could sell one and it would instantly be known as the cool iTunes phone with web functionality. Neither one really takes away from the other’s brand. In short, Apple could have ended up calling this the ap-Phone, the tunesphone, or whatever.  Each iPhone was going to be a success regardless of the name and the differences, and it still will be for both iPhones.  Next Issue, Please!

Jon C. Ogg
February 22, 2007