Facebook’s management may have insisted that a $38 valuation was important because they wanted to raise as much money as possible, even if that risked only a small increase in its shares. Many managements of companies that have IPOs are criticized for “leaving money on the table” when the value of their shares rise quickly. If shares were priced on the early market appetite that drove prices up sharply, these managements could have put more money onto their balance sheets.
Nothing in Facebook’s financial fundamentals changed in the past two weeks. If anything, its valuation should have been undermined some by news that General Motors (NYSE: GM) dropped its advertising from the social network because it was ineffective. Investors continued to worry about revelations that Facebook had made little progress in its attempt to get revenue from the extremely important wireless market. What kind of management would fail to do well in what is arguably the most important online platform? And shouldn’t the trouble have caused the market to back down from extraordinary EPS and sales multiples set for the stock?
Until only recently, Facebook was worth as little as $28 by the calculations of its bankers. That is 26% below the IPO price and where the stock traded on its first day. And underwriter Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) supported the shares above the $38 level the first day of trading. At some point, that support will end.
Stocks are only worth what the market will pay for them. That is almost too obvious to mention. Facebook shares were worth as little as $28 earlier this month. Someone blundered in setting the price later. That blunder means the share price was set too high.
Douglas A. McIntyre