The New York Times reports that:
[A] pair of embarrassing problems last week revived concerns about the reliability of the plane, the first commercial aircraft to make extensive use of lightweight carbon composites that promise big fuel savings for airlines.
And from Reuters:
Improperly assembled parts in Boeing’s newest jet could cause the planes to run out of fuel, experience “engine power loss or shutdown, or leaks on hot engine parts that could lead to a fire,” the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration said in issuing a formal rule requiring U.S. carriers to inspect the fuel systems.
It might not take more than one serious fire or fuel problem to force Boeing to ground the entire 787 fleet. Boeing continues to insist that the problems with the plane are minor. But if the trouble reaches the severe end of the spectrum, Boeing’s management could well be wrong. The media may only be using hyperbole about the plane to garner readers or viewers. However, Boeing faces the prospect that the opinion of engineers and government experts could entirely offset many of the positive assessments of the aircraft both by carriers and passengers.
Boeing is fortunate that, so far, the engineering problems with the 787 have been modest ones. And Boeing has been quick to acknowledge them and to suggest repairs. Some of the troubles with the 787 cannot be laid at Boeing’s feet. There have been issues with the GEnx engine. However, ultimately, it does not matter whether General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE) is the guilty party. Future failures of the engine could have an effect similar to failures by Boeing. A plane judged as dangerous would be the target of regulators, no matter what the cause.
A grounding of the 787 fleet has some precedent. As the Seattle Times pointed out in June,
Boeing has temporarily grounded its 787 Dreamliner flight-test fleet while it checks for an assembly flaw in the horizontal tails built by Italian manufacturing partner Alenia
Also in June:
All Nippon Airways has grounded three Boeing 787 Dreamliners because of problems with the aircraft’s engines.
The ANA trouble was cause by issues with Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines.
Once again, the origin of any future crippling flaws do not have to originate from Boeing’s work. The risks, at this point, continue to compound fairly regularly, regardless of the source.
Douglas A. McIntyre