Posts related to ‘Large Cap Stocks’

The More Focused, and More Opaque, Buffett & Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A, BRK-B, BNI, UNP, NSC, GS, GE, TIF, HOG, WMT, COP, XOM, WFC, RSG, DOW, ETN, WBC, MCO, WLP, UNH, GSK, SNY, GCI, WPO)

This was an important week for investment guru and billionaire watchers to see which gurus were holding which stocks.  The full public equity holdings of Warren Buffett via Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK-A) were particularly of note, particularly with those B shares under “BRK-B” soon to split and giving a chance for even the less astute ranks of Joe Public to own a piece of the Berkshire dream.  Obviously the huge change is via the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. (NYSE: BNI) buyout.  As part of this deal, Buffett is exiting Union Pacific (NYSE: UNP) and exiting Norfolk Southern (NYSE: NSC) stakes of about $600 million and $100 million, respectively, to avoid duplication and internal competition.  The rail transport play now accounts for about one-quarter of the total Berkshire Hathaway entity upon closing. But the less obvious position in that Warren Buffett in 2009 has made it clear that there will be a simpler and probably less “stock-hound” version of Berkshire Hathaway ahead.

Buffett has gone higher up the food chain and is likely to be a creditor now inside or to large institutions.  We have seen this during the crisis.  Buffett negotiated a better deal for Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS) than the US Government was able to get.  Buffett’s preferred stock in Goldman Sachs has a dividend of 10% and is callable at any time at a 10% premium; but Buffett also got warrants to purchase $5 billion of common stock with a strike price of $115.00 per share, exercisable for a five-year term (4 years now), and Buffett would effectively get to pocket $61 per share if he exercised those all today at the market (and with a $2.6 billion warrant profit alone).

The General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE) stake was listed only as 7.77 million shares of common stock (about $125 million now), the same as it has been for quarters.  Yet last year Buffett came to the rescue with a $3 billion of perpetual preferred stock in a private offering with a dividend of 10% and warrants to purchase $3 billion of common stock.  The preferred is callable after 3-years (2 years now) at a 10% premium; the warrants have a strike price of $22.25 and are exercisable for a five-year term (4 years now).
Read More »

Tech Giants Now Hold ~$265 Billion Cash To Spend (HPQ, COMS, INTC, AMD, MSFT, CSCO, AAPL, GOOG, ORCL, JAVA, QCOM, EMC, YHOO, DELL, AMZN, EBAY, ONT, BRCD, JDSU, STAR, VMW)

You have already seen the Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ) buyout of 3Com Corporation (NASDAQ: COMS).  But this week before that deal was announced we covered how mergers in the technology sector have been very slow to develop over the scale in which we and others think is possible for the sector.  After the Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC) settlement with Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD), the tally of cash that is now estimated would be an implied $265 billion that is available for the tech giants in our 24/7 Wall St. Real-Time 500 to make acquisitions.

The giant cash balances are held by Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT), Cisco Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO), Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL), Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG), and Oracle Corp. (NASDAQ: ORCL), assuming nothing happens with Sun Microsystems Inc. (NASDAQ: JAVA).  But players like QUALCOMM Inc. (NASDAQ: QCOM), EMC Corporation (NYSE: EMC), International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM), Dell Inc. (NASDAQ: DELL), Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO), Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN), and eBay Inc. (NASDAQ: EBAY) are either all sitting with large amounts of cash or will be very soon.

We have broken out these technology, IT, software, and Internet companies by the cash amount they hold or what they have in a soon-to-be cash balance.  Of course only a fraction of this cash will be used for mergers.  But there is also a ton of room here for dividends and of course the share buybacks.

Read More »

Tech Titans Still Have $269 Billion Cash For Deals (MSFT, CSCO, AAPL, GOOG, INTC, HPQ, QCOM, EMC, VMW, YHOO, DELL, ORCL, JAVA, AMZN, EBAY)

The recovery is on and mergers are happening, yet the technology sector has been slow to make deals.  Despite some deals already having taken place from the technology giants and that $260 billion cash balance which was there in the middle of last quarter is even larger now.  The tally for cash by our count is now right around $269 billion.  We looked through the top market caps of technology companies in our 24/7 Wall St. Real-Time 500 and this list is expanded now that some issues have been resolved in all the companies.  The stocks in this group are Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT), Cisco Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO), Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL), Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG), Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC), Oracle Corp. (NASDAQ: ORCL), Sun Microsystems Inc. (NASDAQ: JAVA), Hewlett-Packard Company (NYSE: HPQ), QUALCOMM Inc. (NASDAQ: QCOM), EMC Corporation (NYSE: EMC), International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM), Dell Inc. (NASDAQ: DELL), Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO), Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN), and eBay Inc. (NASDAQ: EBAY).

These few tech companies with the $269 billion cash that could be deployed for mergers, acquisitions, or the good old dividends are also listed before tallying up credit lines, factoring, debt sales, and other creative financing methods.  We have listed the suppositions and counting methods for each one to illustrate how much is available at each company.
Read More »

Next Week’s Top 10 Earnings on Deck (AAPL, UNH, YHOO, FCX, WFC, T, MCD, POT, MSFT, SLB)

NYSE Floor ImageWe have almost an endless wave of corporate earnings for the calendar Q3-2009 coming out next week.  We have what looks to be over 100 of the S&P 500 Index members reporting and what appears to be 12 current or ex-DJIA components reporting earnings as well.  Coming up with a Top 10 is almost unfair, but this coming week’s top ten earnings we will be focusing on are as follows: Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL), UnitedHealth Group Inc. (NYSE: UNH), Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO), Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold (NYSE: FCX), Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE: WFC), AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T), McDonald’s Corporation (NYSE: MCD), Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (NYSE: POT), Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT), and Schlumberger Limited (NYSE: SLB).

We screened out the companies whose destiny has already been set by competitor earnings from this last week and screened out the ones which will have no real broad impact but are still widely held and actively traded. Lastly, we screened out the drug and medical companies as we are featuring those in their own group at BioHealthInvestor.com.  A more detailed estimate count from Thomson Reuters has been provided, along with data showing performance from the March 9 close and the June 30 closing date along with other pertinent information on each stock.
Read More »

Brazil Olympic Stock Plays Feeling Lofty (EWZ, BRF, BZF, BBD, BRP, BTM, BAK, PDA, EBR, ABV, ELP, SID, CPL, ERJ, GFA, GGB, GOL, ITUB, NETC, PBR, TAM, TNE, TSP, VALE, VIV, VCP)

Rio Olympic ImageInvesting into emerging markets where the Olympics are headed is supposed to be a safe bet, in theory.  Despite a flat close for stocks in the U.S. on Friday, Brazilian shares rose almost across the board Friday after last week’s decision to send the 2016 Summer Olympics to Rio de Janeiro.  It was huge for the iShares MSCI Brazil (NYSE: EWZ) gaining 1.9% to $67.30 ($26.64 to $68.50 is the 52-week range) and the Market Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (NYSE: BRF) rose 1.5% to $39.76 (its 52-week range is $23.68 to $40.42).  The WisdomTree Dreyfus Brazilian Real (NYSE: BZF) currency ETF rose 0.54% to $25.89.

Outside of the ETF investing, this story becomes one where stocks may still have great growth prospects.  But if you are a value investor or one who does not like to chase stocks when they are close to yearly or all-time highs, then there is a problem.  So many of these stocks are hitting highs or are so close that you have to wonder just how much upside is there.  Using 52-week highs and all-time highs is of course not the only metric for valuations, but you might be surprised as you read through a summary of the major Brazilian stock performances on Friday alone.  Throw in the Brazilian Real currency versus the US Dollar component as these are all ADRs and it adds in yet another element.

Banco Bradesco S.A. (NYSE: BBD) is the huge Brazilian bank and its shares rose 1.8% at $19.94, with a 52-week trading range of $7.40 to $20.20 and an all-time high north of $24.00.

Brasil Telecom Participacoes S.A (NYSE: BRP) is a telecom player in Brazil and its shares rose 2.9% to $52.33, with a 52-week trading range of $22.00 to $53.49 with highs in 2007 and 2008 hitting north of $80.00.

Brasil Telecom S.A. (NYSE: BTM) is a telecommunications services provider whose shares rose 3.3% to $26.28 and its 52-week trading range is $9.49 to $26.55 and it was in the mid-$30’s in early 2008.

Read More »

Tech Titans Holding $260 Billion In Cash (DELL, PER, ORCL, JAVA, MSFT, AAPL, IBM, GOOG, CSCO, INTC, HPQ, QCOM, EMC, YHOO)

The economy is obviously getting better, so long as you are not one of the unemployed or about to lose your job.  Now with more than a 50% rally from the March lows and a Dow Jones Industrial Average challenging the 10,000 level, suddenly everyone wants to put on their investment banker hats again and look for buyers and buyout candidates after deals are announced.  This week’s Dell Inc. (NASDAQ: DELL) deal for Perot Systems Corp. (NASDAQ: PER) was a $3.9 billion acquisition versus $12.7 billion in cash and equivalents held at the end of the quarter.  The Oracle Corp. (NASDAQ: ORCL) deal for Sun Microsystems Inc. (NASDAQ: JAVA) is valued at $7.4 billion, or $5.6 billion net of Sun’s cash and debt.  We went back through our list from September 2, 2009 where we noted that outside of the financials  in the 20 largest US companies had a cash hoard of $335 billion that could be used for mergers and acquisitions, and that is not accounting for lines of credit, stock or debt that could be sold, and other means of financing a deal.  While nowhere near all of the cash will ever be used, many companies could pay big dividends before any tax changes.

So we wanted to look through the technology sector and after we looked through the top 100 markets caps in our 24/7 Wall St. Real-Time 500 we added a few new additions in the tech sector that still had over $5 billion in cash.  Out if the $335 billion from those in the top twenty, we broke out Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT), International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM), Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL), Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG), Cisco Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO), Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC), Oracle Corp. (NASDAQ: ORCL).  Even after a huge rally, $335 billion and then some could go a very long way for strategic and bolt-on acquisitions as a positioning strategy for the next decade.  Now, going further down the list of the top 100 companies with $5 billion or more in cash from tech companies alone adds in Hewlett-Packard Company (NYSE: HPQ), QUALCOMM Inc. (NASDAQ: QCOM), EMC Corporation (NYSE: EMC), and Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO). When we tally up all the cash, there is over $260 billion available from these few tech companies that could be deployed for mergers, acquisitions, or the good old dividends.  Again, that is before tallying up credit lines, factoring, debt sales, and other financing methods.
Read More »

M&A: America’s Top Companies Hold $335 Billion Cash (XOM, MSFT, JNJ, PG, BRK-A, IBM, T, AAPL, GOOG, CVX, CSCO, KO, INTC, ORCL, BAC, WFC, JPM, GE, PFE)

Money Stack ImageNow that we are out of the woods in the crash scenario, assuming this week is no ill omen, investors may want to know which of the big companies would start to deploy their billions and billions of dollars in cash for large mergers or strategic bolt-on acquisitions. In all of these companies, we are not taking the long-term or short-term debt obligations into account.  This is merely the cash, cash equivalents, and the long-term investments listed on the books.

But as these are the biggest companies in the world with what should be credible balance sheets (in most cases anyhow), we are also including a second combined figure for “receivables and inventories” for a few of these companies to show what the firms could use for additional sources of capital…. These figures do not include untapped credit lines and shelf registrations which could amount to untold billions more.  Because of this calculation, our figures may differ slightly from what companies have listed  as cash and equivalents.

Can all of this cash go for mergers?  What about for dividends?  No way.  But a large portion of it could be used for mergers and buyouts under the right circumstances.  We removed the companies which are either permanently out of the game of M&A or those which are temporarily out of it.  But of the fourteen mega-caps (over $100 billion in market cap) which we did cover, you would be shocked at the cash balance these companies are sitting on without even considering the total cumulative effect of credit lines, inventories, receivables, and open shelf registrations.  The first total cash figure comes to a whopping $335 billion.  This number is far more if you count the companies with exceptions.

These major companies broken down by cash balance and what sort of merger these could consider are Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM), Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT), Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSE: PG), Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK-A), International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM), AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T), Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL), Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG), Chevron Corporation (NYSE: CVX), Cisco Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO), Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC), Oracle Corp. (NASDAQ: ORCL).  Even after a huge rally, $335 billion and then some could go a very long way.
Read More »

The Best Short-Selling Opportunities Of The Year (C)(GE)(F)(SBUX)(SIRI)

angrybearThere is still some conversation about the federal government restricting short-selling activity in certain stocks. The counterargument to these restrictions is that short selling plays an important role in the valuation of securities by efficiently allowing investors to bet that a stock will fall as readily as they can bet that it will rise. Short sellers have the reputation, whether deserved or not, for trying to manipulate information about public companies with the hope of driving their prices down. That may be true.

24/7 Wall St. has come up with a list of the best short-selling opportunities between now and the end of the year. The list was chosen based on: 1) trading volume, 2) the total short position in the stock over the first half of the year, 3) a history of the short position in these stocks rising or falling rapidly, and 4) stocks in companies that tend to move on news throughout the year and not just on earnings information. Read More »

DJIA Component Replacement Candidates for GM (GM, F, CSCO, ORCL, GOOG, AAPL, CL, HON, PEP, TGT, MDT, ABT, GS, BRK-A)

The bets are on that General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM) is done as far as the current stock is concerned.  While it seems that the equity holders of today will keep 1% of the “New Co.,” this is far from fitting into parameters of being one of the thirty components of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  We have speculated on this with other companies moving in and out, but we have compiled a list of companies which we think could be replacements.  We have also listed some of the companies we think will not be included that many traders and investors might be hoping could be up for inclusion.
Read More »

Media Digest 5/12/2009 Reuters, WSJ, NYTimes, FT, Bloomberg

newspaperAccording to Reuters, Bernanke says he was encouraged by the stress tests.

Reuters reports that GM (GM) will probably exit the Dow.

Reuters writes that Bank of America (BAC) will probably sell its CCB stage for $7.3 billion.

Reuters writes that the Administration says the stimulus package will save 3.5 million jobs by the end of next year.

Reuters writes that the CEO of AIG (AIG) will fight criticism of his employees. Read More »

S&P 500 Pushes Toward 25% Gain Since March 9th

bear6At 842, the S&P is pushing near a 25% gains since it bottomed for the year-to-date at 677 on March 9th.

The bank stocks continue an extraordinary run over that period. Citigroup (C) is up 120% and Bank of America (BAC) has risen nearly 100%. GE (GE) has recovered from concerns about its financial unit and it up 40% for the period. Read More »

Big Price Movers In S&P 500 For Q1 2008 (MSFT)(GOOG)(AAPL)(INTC)(C)(AIG)(VZ)

The largest losers among the big companies in the S&P 500 for the first quarter were:

Microsoft (MSFT) down 21.6%, Google (GOOG) down 36.7%, Apple (AAPL) down 27.8%, Intel (INTC) down 22%, Citigroup (C) down 29.3%, AIG (AIG) down 26.6%, Verizon (VZ) down 17.9%, Schering-Plough (SGP) down 22.1%, Merck (MRK) down 23.4%, Wachovia ((WB) down 31.7%, United Health (UNH) down 40.9%, Merrill Lynch (MER) down 26.3%, Marathon Oil (MRO) down 23.6%, EMC (EMC) down 22.8%, Amazon (AMZN) down 24.7%, Valero (VLO) down 30.1%, Fannie Mae (FNM) down 34.9%, CME Group (CME) down 30.1%, WellPoint (WLP) down 50.7%, Motorola (MOT) down 42.6%, Lehman (LEH) down 42.3%. Spint (S) down 51.1%, Best Buy (BBY) down 23%, Freddie Mac (FRE) down 25.3%, and NYSE Euronext (NYX) down 30.4%.

The largest winners among the big companies in the S&P 500 in the first quarter were:

Wal-Mart (WMT) up 9.7%, Devon Energy (DVN) up 17.3%, Yahoo! (YHOO) up 24.6%, Burlington Northern (BNI) up 10.5%, XTO Energy (XTO) up 18.2%, EOG Resources (EOG) up 33.2%, Calgene (CELG) up 28.6%, Chesapeake Energy (CHK) up 16.1%, CSX (CSX) up 28.6%, and Nucor (NUE) up 16.2%.

Douglas A. McIntyre

Stocks Which Had The Worst Of It In February (T)(VZ)(S)(AIG)(GM)(MSFT)

No matter how bad the markets were in February, they were worse for some stocks than for others.

Shares in Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) dropped 16% during the second month of the year, which shows how costly the company’s bid for Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) has been. Now that no other reasonable offer has materialized for the portal company, Redmond should withdraw its offer, let Yahoo! fall to $18 and then re-bid the deal at $22. That would certainly allow MSFT stockholders to recoup most of their losses.

Sprint Nextel (NYSE:S) has been a particularly gruesome piece of work, falling over 30% over the course of th last month. Earnings were bad and the company is still struggling to keep subscribers. The lowering of rate plans for cell customers at AT&T (NYSE: T) and Verizon Wireless puts even more pressure on Sprint. If the company does not put itself up for sale or get a large investor to put capital into the company’s WiMax initiative, the stock will go lower. There are rumors that Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) will invest $2 billion into a joint venture between Sprint and Clearwire (NASDAQ: CLWR) to help build-out a national WiMax network. The rumors had better be true.

AIG (NYSE:AIG) dropped about 17% in February because of a series of unexpected losses tied to investments in complex instruments which lost much of their value as the credit markets imploded. It is nearly impossible to see management doing anything to get shareholder confidence back. AIG gets to join other deservedly battered companies like Citigroup (NYSE: C) in purgatory.

GM (NYSE: GM) fell 15% over the course of February. The odds that there will be any good news for the company this quarter are unusually poor. The domestic car market shrinks by the month as does the chance for GM to make money in North America.

AT&T (NYSE: T) and Verizon (NYSE: VZ) are the surprising cripples of the last month. The stocks had been doing extraordinarily well. Their cellular businesses were growing and kicking off piles of cash. Their new fiber TV initiatives appeared to be giving cable companies fits. The most perverse thing about the companies, which were both down about 7% in February, is that they cut each others throats by getting into a cell service price war.

Douglas A. McIntyre

Hank Greenberg & AIG, Up A Rope & In The Wind (AIG)

Former head and oustered Maurice "Hank" Greenberg according to an SEC filing is leading a campaign to do a total makeover at his AIG (NYSE:AIG).  There is a problem besides the fact that Greenberg is 82 years old.  He was ousted in 2005 after Eliot Spitzer’s pre-Governorship probe of the industry that led to his demise as leader there. A key consideration is that Greenberg may in fact be blocked from being able to do very much on his own.  Here is the summary of the filing:

The Reporting Persons are considering and evaluating strategic alternatives designed to lead to the maximization of their investment in the Issuer.  The Reporting Persons believe that there are opportunities to significantly improve the Issuer’s performance and strategic direction, as well as the value of their investment.  In this connection, the Reporting Persons anticipate holding discussions with stockholders and third parties that may address a number of issues, including without limitation, their respective views on the Issuer’s business and prospects, the suggested disposition of certain of its operations, investment opportunities and concerns over the direction and management of the Issuer generally, and other opportunities to improve or realize on the value of their investment in the Issuer.  At this time, the Reporting Persons have not made any decisions regarding their future intentions with regards to their plans and proposals with respect to the Issuer.

The Reporting Persons reserve the right to change their plans and intentions, including the right to increase or decrease their investment in the Issuer.  In particular, any one or more of the Reporting Persons may (i) purchase additional shares of Common Stock, (ii) sell or transfer shares of Common Stock in public or private transactions (including, without limitation, transfers among Reporting Persons or between any Reporting Person and any entity affiliated with such Reporting Person, which may include entities not in existence as of the date hereof), (iii) enter into privately negotiated derivative transactions and/or public purchases and sales of puts, calls and other derivative securities to hedge the market risk of some or all of their positions in the Common Stock and/or (iv) take any other action that might relate to or result in any of the actions set forth in response to paragraphs (a) – (j) of Item 4 of Schedule 13D…………….

Unfortunately, this will be a tough one for Mr. Greenberg, despite his approximate 13% ownership.  He may have been unjustly run out of his own company, but the path was already set some time ago.  Many people refer to behemoth companies as battleships that take a long time to turn.  It is hard to imagine that this can be affected immediately, but 24/7 Wall St. will run the math on it.  It is obvious thatthe new management team is not a strong one, at least not compared to when Greenberg was commander in chief of the financial and insurance conglomerate.

AIG traded up over 3.5% to $61.25 in after-hours trading on Friday.  The 52-week trading range is $56.37 to $72.97.  This will create one hell of a Special Situation newsletter report if we get to look at AIG as a break-up or activist candidate. 

One key issue Mr. Greenberg will have to consider is a good old cowboy euphemism: "Once you let the cat out of the bag, it’s hard to put it back in."  Shining light on the hidden financial woes internally may also create some temporary harm to the stock.

Jon C. Ogg
November 2, 2007

Jon Ogg can be reached at jonogg@247wallst.com; he produces the 24/7 Wall St. subscriber-based Special Situation Investing Newsletter.

Defensive Stock ‘Havens’ For A Crummy Market (PEP, KO, MRK, NVO, PG, CAG, BUD, HRL, CL, MO, CG MCD, KFT, NVO, WTR)

It’s yet another crummy day in the markets with roughly a 280 DJIA point drop before the closing bell went off.  Bear Stearns added the most fuel at the end of the day, unemployment was not a big enough help, and American Home Mortgage (AHM) shut most operations.  There are many bulls still out there after the malaise ends, and the questions still seem to be around WHEN rather than IF.  As always, there are many unleveraged companies that make basic products that are deemed the defensive stocks.  We try to simplify the list of names down to the true economically immune names, although there in reality is no such thing as an immune stock.  Sell programs kicked in at the end of the day, and these probably got hit too. 

If you are looking for buys in a crummy market you want to usually look at the stocks that produce you goods you have to consume.  If you eat it, drink it, or smoke it, it’s a defensive stock.  We won’t stop using toiletries either.  There are many other defensive stocks, but here is a group of stocks from our classic list and we’ve removed the "leveraged names" and those which would do well only in a moderate economic drop.  Here goes:

Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) and Pepsi (NYSE:PEP)….does anyone ever stop drinking sodas or water, or stop eating chips?

Anheuser Busch (NYSE:BUD)….if you drink alchohol, you only drink more when things are bad.

Hormel (NYSE:HRL)….canned meats, deemed on the cheap.  Spam is a delicacy somewhere, or at least that is people keep saying.

Kraft (NYSE:KFT)…. maybe it’s too tied to activists, Buffett, Phillip Morris, or whatever, but it’s monster play in the sector.

McDonalds (NYSE:MCD)….best fast food play off the mid to lower income, and they won’t always eat at home regardless.

ConAgra (NYSE:CAG)….food giant that is fairly valued.

Altria (NYSE:MO) & Loews Carolina Group (NYSE:CG)….who says smoking is all bad?  Smoking kills, but people insist on buying.

Merck (NYSE:MRK)….drug king did well on last earnings.

Proctor & Gamble (NYSE:PG) and Colgate-Polmolive (NYSE:CL)….they get into your pocketbook regardless of the market unless you stop shaving, washing hands, and brushing your teeth.

Here are two runner-ups:

Novo Nordisk (NYSE:NVO)…. This is a bit challenging since it’s an ADR based in Denmark, but they are virtually a pureplay on insulin and diabetics need it regardless of a market crash.

Aqua America (NYSE:WTR)….largest independent water and waste water play, although high P/E ratio.

As a final reminder, there is no such thing as a "HAVEN" if there is a total market crash.  If the market falls 5% in a day or two, these are probably going to get hit hard too.  But people will own stocks and many firms HAVE TO own stocks.  The defensive names are where they tend to flock to first.

Jon C. Ogg
August 3, 2007

Jon Ogg can be reached at jonogg@247wallst.com; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.

(CAT) – Caterpillar Raises Estimates To….What They’ve Already Told Us

Caterpillar (CAT) has been up big lately, especially for a stodgy industrial the likes of CAT.  It’s name has been dropped incessantly in the past few days when analysts talk about the “big earnings surprises” of the March quarter.  Shares currently trade for about $73.30, and are up nearly 20% YTD after an impressive $0.13 beat in the 1st quarter and “raised guidance” to a range of $5.30 to $5.80 for the year, up from previous calls for $5.20 to $5.70. 

The 1st quarter net income figure was actually down 3% YoY, but everyone had been expecting the worst, with continued weakness in U.S. housing and trucking sales slowed down by rising fuel costs and new emission standards.  We have seen this fuel cost story play out in the higher pricing of the rails (with a big assist from Buffet), one of the hottest sectors of the year.

Going into CAT’s earnings, we expected weak domestic sales of construction equipment, and management didn’t call for anything different for the remainder of the year.  Same goes for sales of truck engines domestically.  And yet they kill their estimates for the last quarter, this company that traditionally lives and dies surfing the front of the business cycle.  If investor perceptions were the same towards CAT as say, five years ago, CAT would be rolling around the gutter right now, as it has every time the U.S. economy slows down.

CAT is already a company trading on the cheap at only 13 times 2007 estimates, and despite the inclination to sell into economic weakness, their stunning growth internationally can’t be ignored.  Neither can record-high commodity prices, which are driving heavy worldwide demand in mining, metals, and oil production.   

And we must not forget that Caterpillar is exposed to the trough of the housing cycle as we speak.  The truth of the matter is that most of the analyst community wrote Caterpillar off starting in the second half of last year, and they’re now just coming around to what management stated quite clearly starting in mid-2006: 

We are expecting to grow earnings at a 15% CAGR for the next five years. 

The words were simple and direct, yet now everyone seems to be scrambling to update their models.  There’s certainly nothing wrong questioning what comes out of the mouths of managers, even the smartest ones that run the biggest companies in the world.  It’s a “show-me” world, especially in the stock market. 

How’s this for show: 

Europe, Africa, & Middle East:  36% revenue growth year-over-year

Latin America:       15% growth

Asia/Pacific:        22% growth

A weakening dollar adds a great kicker, as most of those international sales can be favorably exchanged.  The international growth more than made up for the 13% shortfall in North American sales of $450 million, as total revenue in the quarter was up 7% YoY. 

So does CAT deserve a higher multiple?  Probably, but who will give it to them?  It’s not the traders or the opportunists who may currently be parked in CAT.  It’s going to have to come from the long arm of the buy-side managers, who collectively look this quarter’s numbers over and say “This company deserves a market multiple” (i.e., 15x to 17x earnings). 

This stock has the potential to attract a wide demographic of investors – the value guys, the opportunists, as well as the existing group of “mandatory” buyers who are there simply for index or sector representation.  And if this company, this industrial company, can grow earnings 15% while experiencing troughs in their core market, then they do deserve a market multiple.  It’s a simple and convincing argument that we first made in our break-up analysis of CAT back in February.  Back then, we said this stock could be worth $85

At the time, it was a big target, but now it just seems to be the mid-point of price targets coming from the sell-side in the past few days.

Ryan Barnes

April 27, 2007

Ryan Barnes can be reached at ryanbarnes@247wallst.com; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.

20 ‘Defensive Stocks’ For a Crummy Market

Stock Tickers: KO, PEP, JNJ, MRK, PFE, PG, CAG, BUD, HRL, CPB, K, GIS, DUK, CL, MO, RAI, MCD, PYX, KFT, TAP

DJIA                12,216.24; Down 416.02 (3.29%)
NASDAQ           2,407.87; Down 96.65 (3.86%)
S&P500            1,399.04; Down 50.33 (3.47%)
10Yr-Bond        4.5130%; Down 0.1180
NYSE-Volume    4,164,578,000
NASD-Volume    3,045,369,000
VIX                       18.31 (+7.16)

This was the worst drop on the DJIA since the pre-Iraq trading and since after the market reopened after the September 11, 2001 tragedy; all 30 DJIA components closed down on the day.  The massive sell-off seen today was on record NYSE trading volume.  Was writing about the VIX showing a complacency on the ‘fear index’ part of the reasoning of a drop? Or was it the record margin borrowing on stocks?  We can blame China, we can blame a horrible Durable Goods number, we can blame ex-FOMC head Greenspan for hinting at the risks of a recession.  Blame whatever you want, but the selling built and built and when the NYSE trading curbs were lifted the market took a bungee jump. 

There have been reports that many of the stocks actually got stuck at low prices and there is also talk that the programs went unchecked and the electronic trading allowed the markets to suddenly tank.  There was a flurry of trades around 3:00 PM EST where all of a sudden the programs took the market from down more than 200 points to down more than 500 points.  You can probably bet there were many computing errors from the automated system on such large trading volume.  This was a record day on NYSE volume and the system froze on many stocks.  John Thain’s argument for eliminating the trading floor without people just got hosed, and rightfully so.  IN a FLOOR BROKER world alongside electronic trading they are obligated to maintain a somewhat orderly market.

Here are the basic go-to stocks that holders tend to flock to when the stock market sells off heavily.  You cannot automatically assume that just because investors go into "safety" stocks and "defensive stocks" that they do not fall at all.  When markets go into freefall, these usually tend to fall less but they often still fall.  Most of these stocks were lower today, but if you look they were not even close to the drop seen in the broader markets.  They do tend to fall less and here is a basic remedial list of defensive stock names, but keep in mind these are not in any particular order:

1) Coca-Cola (KO) $46.39 (-$1.33)
2) Pepsi (PEP) $62.70 (-$1.79)
3) J&J (JNJ) $63.05 (-$1.25)
4) Merck (MRK) $43.18 (-$1.30)
5) Pfizer (PFE) $25.14 (-$0.70)
6) P&G (PG) $61.25 (-$3.19)
7) ConAgra Food (CAG) $24.99 (-$0.37)
8) Anheuser Busch (BUD) $49.01 (-$0.80)
9) Hormel (HRL) $36.65 (-$0.90)
10) Campbell’s Soup (CPB) $40.44 (-$1.26)
11) Kellogg (K) $49.04 (-$1.01)
12) General Mills (GIS) $56.61 (-$1.17)
13) Duke Energy (DUK) $19.62 (-$0.39)
14) Colgate-Polmolive (CL) $67.34 (-$1.13)
15) Altria (MO) $82.67 (-$3.00)
16) Reynolds American (RAI) $60.62 (-$2.17)
17) McDonalds (MCD) $44.46 (-$1.34)
18) Clorox (CLX) $63.60 (-$1.58)
19) Kraft (KFT) $32.08 (-$1.19)
20) Molson Coors (TAP) $86.02 (-$0.59)

Now, before you go out buying everything defensive you have to make sure you are even concerned about a drop of this magnitude.  Did the global markets really change that much?  They may have and they may not have.  And you have to ask why General Electric (GE) was only down 1.9% at $34.66 on the day. 

Jon C. Ogg
February 27, 2007

Jon Ogg is a partner in 24/7 Wall St., LLC and he can be reached at jonogg@247wallst.com; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.

Cisco Systems Earnings Preview (CSCO) (2)

Cisco Systems (CSCO-NASDAQ) is set to report earnings next Tuesday.While there are many others, this is the biggie for tech heads.  Thisstock was just maintained a BUY at Goldman Sachs this morning inanticipation that it will beat earnings expectations and a belief thatmanagement is likely to re-affirm positive longer-term trends after theclose next Tuesday (FEB 6).  CSCO used to either just meet or beat by atad, but lately they have been beating by a couple cents on EPS.

The street is looking for expectations of $0.31 EPS and roughly$8.28 Billion in revenues.  If the company offers guidance theexpectation is $0.33 and $8.55 Billion next quarter.

This BUY from Goldman is one of the few recent positive calls alongwith an AmTech Research calling it a Buy.  In roughly the last twoweeks CSCO has been downgraded at many large firms: cut to Hold atCitigroup, cut to Market Perform at JMP Securities, Cut to Neutral atBanc of America, and cut to Neutral at Prudential.

It started the November quarter at roughly $24.00 and it hadrecently hit as high as $28.99, and it is up from a $17.10 low in thelast year.  So the valuation comments were the reasons for thedowngrades and many of the analysts had been left holding the bag backin early 2004 when the stock was sniffing at $30.00.  It’s an entirelydifferent company now after some key acquisitions so we’ll see if itcan get back the mojo it recently lost.

As far as other fallout in direct supplier or tied stocks: NetLogic(NETL) has 60% of its business tied to CSCO and Clestica (CLS) also hashistorically been viewed as the EMS company most tied to CSCOmanufacturing.  Cypress Semi (CY) is also the chip stock with muchCisco exposure on a historical basis. 

One important thing to note in other fallout stocks in sectors isthat Cisco has turned into a bifurcated tech stock.  If Cisco’sbusiness is suddenly deemed bad on an unexpected basis then the falloutin the tech sector could continue because they are deemed one of thebrighter spots in tech now.  If they do well it may not lift the entiresector because they are already thought of as an exception to the ruleright now.

Even though the stock has come back in, this is deemed as valuationcalls from analysts who wanted to lock in some gains.  It isn’t asthough the expectations are really looking for a slowdown.  The averageprice target is still $29.00 to $30.00, so keep in mind that at currentprices there could easily be the belief that the great part of theturnaround has happened and it will have to really show massive upsideto keep everyone from using strength to lock in gains until later inthe year.  My partner here has a scenario that could give it a $34.00 target by the middle of the year if things go right, so we’ll have to see how time goes.  This was also noted as Cramer’s #3 Growth Pick for 2007. Cramer also had Cisco as one of his 5 Tech Exceptions for now.

Stay tuned Tuesday, but be sure to watch the "consensus" estimates.It is very frequent that the First Call, Zacks, Reuters and otherschange their consensus matrix ahead of numbers; so if there is a changeby Tuesday that is what the deal is.  We will send an "options trader"expectation on this after the close on Monday because that willeliminate the weekend-premium you’d have to account for between now andthen.

More factoids on Cisco:

Barron’s Online Tiernan Ray says Cisco Is Also CIBC’s Best In Show.

The Scientific-Atlanta merger is paying off big time according to Motley Fool.

Jon C. Ogg

February 3, 2006

Earnings Preview for Cisco Systems

Cisco Systems (CSCO-NASDAQ) is set to report earnings next Tuesday.  While there are many others, this is the biggie for tech heads.  This stock was just maintained a BUY at Goldman Sachs this morning in anticipation that it will beat earnings expectations and a belief that management is likely to re-affirm positive longer-term trends after the close next Tuesday (FEB 6).  CSCO used to either just meet or beat by a tad, but lately they have been beating by a couple cents on EPS.

The street is looking for expectations of $0.31 EPS and roughly $8.28 Billion in revenues.  If the company offers guidance the expectation is $0.33 and $8.55 Billion next quarter.

This BUY from Goldman is one of the few recent positive calls along with an AmTech Research calling it a Buy.  In roughly the last two weeks CSCO has been downgraded at many large firms: cut to Hold at Citigroup, cut to Market Perform at JMP Securities, Cut to Neutral at Banc of America, and cut to Neutral at Prudential.

It started the November quarter at roughly $24.00 and it had recently hit as high as $28.99, and it is up from a $17.10 low in the last year.  So the valuation comments were the reasons for the downgrades and many of the analysts had been left holding the bag back in early 2004 when the stock was sniffing at $30.00.  It’s an entirely different company now after some key acquisitions so we’ll see if it can get back the mojo it recently lost.

As far as other fallout in direct supplier or tied stocks: NetLogic (NETL) has 60% of its business tied to CSCO and Clestica (CLS) also has historically been viewed as the EMS company most tied to CSCO manufacturing.  Cypress Semi (CY) is also the chip stock with much Cisco exposure on a historical basis. 

One important thing to note in other fallout stocks in sectors is that Cisco has turned into a bifurcated tech stock.  If Cisco’s business is suddenly deemed bad on an unexpected basis then the fallout in the tech sector could continue because they are deemed one of the brighter spots in tech now.  If they do well it may not lift the entire sector because they are already thought of as an exception to the rule right now.

Even though the stock has come back in, this is deemed as valuation calls from analysts who wanted to lock in some gains.  It isn’t as though the expectations are really looking for a slowdown.  The average price target is still $29.00 to $30.00, so keep in mind that at current prices there could easily be the belief that the great part of the turnaround has happened and it will have to really show massive upside to keep everyone from using strength to lock in gains until later in the year.  My partner here has a scenario that could give it a $34.00 target by the middle of the year if things go right, so we’ll have to see how time goes.  This was also noted as Cramer’s #3 Growth Pick for 2007. Cramer also had Cisco as one of his 5 Tech Exceptions for now.

Stay tuned Tuesday, but be sure to watch the "consensus" estimates.  It is very frequent that the First Call, Zacks, Reuters and others change their consensus matrix ahead of numbers; so if there is a change by Tuesday that is what the deal is.  We will send an "options trader" expectation on this after the close on Monday because that will eliminate the weekend-premium you’d have to account for between now and then.

Jon C. Ogg
February 2, 2007

What Can Buckley Do For 3M?

3M (MMM) is a name that has been kept in the disappointment file for some time under the "dead money" category and it is on the verge of going into the "companies that need new leadership" file.  Usually we like to let the dust settle after there is a big change like this to determine if Wall Street has been to kind or too harsh, but this is one that needs to go on watch.

George Buckley could very well find himself either gone or demoted.  Gone means fired and demoted would be where he remains Chairman instead of Chairman AND President/CEO.  Part of the problem may be the pay.  According to a couple of filings his pay is not even $400,000.00, although it may be safe to assume that the number has changed.  Of course he has Much more in restricted stock options valued around $20 million if they were able to be fully exercised and if they got into profitable levels.  Those numbers may be off, but it doesn’t matter because it is too low by major standards.  But the paychecks are fairly small for being the boss at such a large and powerful MNC such as 3M.  This would make for a short tenure, but if this continues it won’t go without a call for a change at the top.

Dear Mr. Buckley:  If you thought that deciding to stop issuing guidance was a good thing, you couldn’t be more wrong.  3M is a massive conglomerate second perhaps only to GE, and not giving any guidance for the individual components is going to potentially create much more volatility around your earnings in the future.  You should learn from the recent mistakes of Home Depot, Gap, Bristol-Myers, and others.  Dropping guidance projections may make your life easier inside departments but it really turns "setting expectations" into a bit of a dart game instead of a sniper contest.  Also when you announce that guidance will be non-existent you have sent the message that is being interpreted as "If it was good, they’d sure offer it."

There is a reason that Cramer added this stock to the ‘permanent’ SELL BLOCK last night (even though permanent on wall St. means ‘until I say differently’) while on CNBC’s MAD MONEY.  Since he has had a short tenure and since certain issues truly are out of his control it may be too soon to ask for Buckley to leave.  So he’s Not Yet being added to "CEO’s that need to go," but he’s surely on watch.  He may be the nicest man in the world, he may not.  The problem with being a CEO is that some of the shortcomings in the entire operation may not be their fault in reality, but it’s their problem and they are the ones that investors blame.

Over the last 5-days the shares fell and have drifted a tad lower. The stock closed out last week at$78.69 and closed at $78.96 on Monday right before earnings.  The stock closed at $74.70 after the dismal report with guidance (and promise of no more guidance)  and shares are now down under $74.00.  The 52-week range is $67.05 to $88.35.  This stock looked on track earlier last year to get out of a rough $70 to $90 band but that didn’t happen.  If this stock falls down too much and starts putting in lower lows then he is going to be called on to make drastic changes. He can also go out and get aggressive on more corporate change to build for the long-haul.  But doing nothing and slowing the flow of information isn’t the right path. 

He is still young (59-ish) for a CEO of such a large company and he had to fill in for the interim-CEO after McNerney left for Boeing (BA) at the end of 2005.  He was given much credit for the growth and performance at Brunswick (BC), but it has not turned out to be a great year and some change.  Once again, there probably isn’t a call for him to go yet.  But some investors sure might be scratching their heads.

Jon C. Ogg
February 2, 2007