A Fox Sports analysis estimates that the cost of a single Nascar car is $125,000 for auto, engine, and labor. All of the teams carry multiple vehicles. Engine development programs run as high $3.5 million a season, although we have not prorated that into the costs of any of the crashes.

The most important hidden cost is the exposure a sponsor loses when a car is out of a race. Companies like Lowe’s (NYSE:LOW), Kellogg’s (NYSE:K), Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO), Procter & Gamble’s (NYSE:PG) Gillette division, Kraft’s (NYSE:KFT) Nabisco unit, UPS (NYSE:UPS), and Visa (NYSE:V) are unlikely to be hurt badly if a car is out of the race because they are sponsors of the all the Nascar races. Fedex (NYSE:FDX), Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT),  Best Buy (NYSE:BBY), and Aflac (NYSE:AFL) are sponsors of cars and that can cost them as much as $12 million a year. If one of their cars is off the track for a large number of laps, they lose important commercial exposure.

The high cost of Nascar crashes is one of many headaches in operating a team in the sport which may make it more difficult for GM and Chrysler which have gone through Chapter 11 bankruptcy to stay in the race business at the levels that they have in the past. A weak dollar and poor global margins may even hurt Toyota’s (NYSE:TM) participation.

Each estimate below covers that cost of the car wreck and in many cases the cost of several cars being destroyed. The cost of damage to the track and facilities has also been estimated.

The list:  

Watkins Glenn, 2009, Jeff Gordon & Sam Hornish, Jr. A six car pile-up with five cars totaled and one badly damaged. Damage to the track as well. Total damage: $688,000

China has already put money into huge metals and mining company Rio Tinto (RTP). The government is also beginning to lock up oil reserves by providing capital to national oil companies around the world for drilling and recovering crude . According to The Asia Times, China signed a $10 billion “loan-for-oil” deal with Petrobras that guarantees China up to 160,000 barrels a day at market prices. Now, it appears that China wants to be a major player in the global automotive industry. It may finance the buyout of Volvo, a division of Ford (F). The Times is reporting the Chinese car firm Geely may purchase  the car company that was originally based in Sweden.

It may take a number of years for worldwide light vehicle sales to recover to their 2006 levels. But, if  China can acquire enough brands and manufacturing assets in the West inexpensively, it may be in a better position to benefit from a recovery that any of the US or European-based firms.

Douglas A. McIntyre

But, that would be to miss the point. A survey of analysts by FactSet Research produced a consensus estimate of $22.91 billion of sales for the quarter

What CostCo did was post comparable store sales which were up 9% and revenue which was up 12% to $5.41 billion.

For the fourth quarter ended Aug. 31, Costco reported sales of $22.6 billion, up 12% from $20.09 billion in the year-earlier quarter.

Wall St. will beat up on CostCo and take its lunch money today. By doing so, it will ignore a superb performance in a murderous retail environment where very few companies are still standing.

Analysts set expectations too high. No one is going to post insanely good numbers, but CostCo was close.

Douglas A.McIntyre

Word out of Korea is that Samsung, which is neck-and-neck with Motorola for second place in global handsets sales is reorganizing its business with the intention of " finding new sources of revenue, realigning businesses, cutting costs", according to Dow Jones Newswires.

Sounds like the industry is kicking Motorola while it is down.

Douglas A. McIntyre

This is a new feature for this blog & I’m glad to inform you that Dr. Steenbarger aka Mr. TraderFeed & yours truly have agreed to collaborate to provide readers two sides of the same stock. Dr. Brett will provide his usual succinct short-term trade direction and yours truly will dissect a longer term trend. We thank all readers in advance and hope this adds value to your trading and investing.

FUNDAMENTALS: Yaser says-

The retiring baby boomers in the domestic market, AIG’s diverse distribution network to tap significant opportunities overseas and new product release are expected to support growth in Life Insurance operations going forward.

General Insurance Division

• Domestic Brokerage Group- I expect net written premium growth, which advanced a normalized 7% YoY in 3Q 06, to remain in the mid-to-high single-digits in 07—among the best growth rates in the industry as AIG continues to expand its distribution and to capitalize on dislocations in coastal-exposed property insurance businesses.
• In 07, I think the DBG loss ratio will move up modestly as the adverse impacts of competitive commercial lines pricing is partially offset by reserve releases. And, expense ratios likely will be in the 18-19% range, which are in-line.
• In 08, The Street projects NWP growth to slow to the low single-digits and the combined ratio to rise above 90% as the market becomes increasingly competitive and loss costs increase.
• The Street expects high single digit annual NWP growth over the next few years, driven by increased distribution, its new segmentation strategy, and higher Ascot syndicate premiums in Foregin General side.
• However, personal accident sales may weaken, particularly as competitive pressures in Japan increase. The Street expects loss ratios to increase modestly over the next year as the impact of competitive pricing in commercial lines and less favorable weather is partially offset by loss reserve releases.

Financial Services Division

• I’m looking for earnings to rise roughly 6% in 07, with international growth more than offsetting a double digit drop at American General Finance, which likely will suffer from lower interest margins and higher credit provisions. In 08, The Street is projecting 7% earnings growth, supported by mid single digit net receivable increases at American General Finance and double-digit international revenue progression

Life Insurance & Retirement Services Division

• In the Domestic Life area I anticipate mid single-digit earnings growth, 3% in 07 and 5% in 08), largely due to the run-off annuity block, spread pressures in the fixed annuity business, and challenges at AIG VALIC as a result of an aging in-force block.
• However The Street thinks individual variable annuity earnings could grow at a low double digit rate, helped by improving net flows and equity market appreciation. Also I think life insurance earnings could advance at an upper-single-digit annual pace, supported by higher than industry top-line growth and scale benefits.

Asset Management Division

• Quarterly institutional results are usually volatile due to performance-based fee income and real estate gains. That said, The Street is projecting quarterly institutional earnings to average $110 million in 07 & $120 million in 08, higher than the average $106 million earned in 05 and $104 million generated in 06 thanks toy AUM growth.
• Coming on to Brokerage Services- I’m expecting 11% and 15% bottomline growth in 07 and 08, respectively, supported by double digit third party AUM growth and assuming positive equity markets.

Analyst earnings forecasts for AIG have increased which indicates a rise in expected earnings growth. Hence, relative to changes in earnings forecasts for other companies AIG compares favorably. Furthermore AIGy has reported earnings that were higher than those predicted in earlier estimates which may be a positive for future earnings growth.

TECHNICALS: Dr. Brett, Ph.D. (Author- Enhancing Trader Performance) adds-

Since 2004, AIG has rather noticeably underperformed the S&P 500 Index (SPY). As the chart below shows, AIG is currently trading at almost the same place it opened 2004, while the S&P 500 Index has moved steadily higher.

• Over the past three weeks (15 trading sessions), AIG is up by about 2.5%. When we have a rise in AIG over a three-week period, does it pay to follow the "trend", can you expect lower prices ahead, or has it made no difference whatsoever?
• I examined the period from January 2, 2004 to November 29, 2006 (N = 734 trading days) and compared three-week periods in AIG that were flat or up (N = 443) to those that were down (N = 291). Specifically, I wanted to see how AIG has performed over the next three-week period.

• When AIG has been up over the past 15 trading sessions, the next 15 sessions in AIG average a gain of .49% (267 up, 176 down). Conversely, when AIG has been down over the past 15 trading sessions, the next 15 sessions have averaged a loss of -.27% (167 up, 124 down).
• Visual inspection of the above chart suggests that, since the start of 2004, AIG has been moving in swings of longer than 15 days. This creates a situation in which returns have been better following strong 15-day periods than following weak 15-day occasions. The S&P 500 Index, despite its relative strength compared to AIG, has traded in a choppier fashion. It has shown mean-reversion tendencies over periods from 2-20 days out in my recent investigations.

The moral of the story is that it is important to know how your instrument trades before making trading assumptions. It is common to hear that a stock is "overbought" because it’s been up for several weeks straight. The implication is that the stock is due for a fall. In the case of AIG, that casual logic hasn’t held water over the past three years.

We hope you enjoyed the inaugural post of a mutually beneficial bloggership (is that even a word?)

A special thanks to Dr. Steenbarger who insisted my name be mentioned first alongside my analysis. Goes to show his truly humble and modest nature, a big requirement if you want to succeed in the business- humility.

http://www.equityinvestmentideas.blogspot.com/