Posts for Ticker ‘AVP’

The 100 Hardest Working Brands In The World

hersheyThere are a number of ways to rank brand values. One of the most important is the level at which a brand contributes to the market value of a public company.

24/7 Wall St. asked Corebrand, the brand research and consulting firm, to look at the top 100 brands based their contribution to market capitalizaton. Using this method, the hardest working brand was Hershey (NYSE:HSY), followed  by Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) and Harley-Davidson (NYSE:HOG)

Corebrand described the process briefly to 24/7 Wall. St.

24/7 Wall St.: Corebard often refers to the brands on this list as the”hardest working brands”. How did you come to that description?

Corebrand: There are a lot of people measuring and examining the “strongest brands” or the “most valuable brands”.  Our opinion is that examining one without the other is somewhat meaningless.  How “strong” a brand is nice to know but not very relevant unless you understand how that strength benefits business.  Similarly, “value” is little more than a measure of corporate size unless you understand the drivers of that value and how to influence it. By examining the strength of the brand and it’s contribution to total market value, we can help companies and their leadership manage that strength and value over time.

24/7 Wall St.: Is there any advantage or disadvantage to having a brand value be a very large percentage of market cap in the present and as an indication of a company’s future performance?

Corebrand: The brand will need to be in balance with the rest of the company’s assets.  A company should strive to have it’s brand strong enough to fend off competitors or changing market conditions but not so strong that it becomes overly dependent on the brand as a single driver of value.  If a company can achieve and maintain its appropriate maximum strength without becoming over-dependent, it will see greater returns in bull markets and retain greater value in bear markets.

The list: Read More »

The 100 Most Valuable Brands Of 2009?

bearSeveral consulting firms post annual figures for the world’s most valuable brands. The two best known are probably the Interbrand and BrandZ surveys. They are notably different, up until now at least. BrandZ includes a number of large brands from Asia. Interbrand does not.

24/7 Wall St. has put together a list of the most valuable brands of 2009 by looking at valuation calculations from a number of sources. Then a base valuation was taken from the 2008 Interbrand data to fix values for this year and changes from last.

Most methods take into account the future earnings of a brand for its parent company. This is fundamentally a guess particularly during a turbulent period in the global economy. Interbrand’s rule is that a brand most get at least a third of its revenue from outside its country-of-origin. That is arbitrary, particularly as it apply to brands in China.

24/7 Wall St. has made the assumption that the value of most brands have been hurt log-term by the deep recession.  Forward earnings estimates for many of the firms on this list show that. Those brands which post value improvements show much more modest increases than they would be in a stable economy.

Looking at the Interbrand list from last year, it is fair to ask why firms like Nissan, Wal-Mart (WMT) and Red Bull are not present.

Because the brands on this list are taken from names on the Interbrand survey, we have not made a calculation about which companies may be new to their list in 2009 or which may drop off.

Public firms which are part of this ranking include (KO)(IBM)(MSFT)(GOOG)(GE)(NOK)(TM)(INTC)(MCD)(DIS)(HPQ)(AXP)(C)(HMC)(ORCL)(AAPL)(SNE)(PEP)(HBC)(NKE)(UPS)(FDX)(SAP)(DELL)(JPM)(GS)(KL)(EBAY)(SI)(F)(AIG)(AMZN)(CAT)(AVP)(RIMM)(GPS)(TIF)(BP)(SBUX)(JNJ)(MAR)(V)

The 100:  Read More »

Media Digest 2/20/2009 Reuters, WSJ, NYTimes, Bloomberg

newspaper10According to Reuters, Allan Stanford was found in Virginia.

Reuters reports that the stimulus is unlikely to fix state problems.

Reuters writes that US consumer prices probably moved up in January. Read More »

Top Analyst Downgrades (AVP, CAH, ETR, ETFC, F, IP, ITRI, LAB, NDAQ, NYX, SNDK, WYN)

Burning_money_picThese are some of the top pre-market analyst downgrades and negative calls we have seen on Wall Street this morning:

  • Avon Products (AVP) Cut to Neutral at Goldman Sachs.
  • Cardinal Health (CAH) Cut to Neutral at Goldman Sachs.
  • Entergy (ETR) Cut to Hold at Jefferies.
  • E*TRADE (ETFC) Cut to Equal Weight at Barclays.
  • Ford (F) Cut to Underweight at Barclays.
  • International Paper (IP) Cut to Sell at Goldman Sachs.
  • Itron (ITRI) Cut to Neutral at UBS.
  • LaBranche (LAB) Cut to Neutral at Goldman Sachs.
  • NASDAQ: OMX (NDAQ) Cut to Neutral at Goldman Sachs.
  • NYSE (NYX) Cut to Sell at Goldman Sachs; Cut to Market Perform at KBW.
  • SanDisk (SNDK) Cut to Sell at Auriga.
  • Wyndam Worldwide (WYN) Cut to Neutral at Goldman Sachs.

Jon C. Ogg
February 2, 2009

Cosmetics Companies Down The Recession Drain (EL, RDEN, AVP, BARE, REV)

Witch_burningHusbands have long joked that certain segments in their households, such as cosmetics and personal beauty care products, were largely immune from recessions.  Many will still joke about this, but the numbers reported by Estee Lauder Companies Inc.(NYSE: EL) and Elizabeth Arden, Inc. (NASDAQ: RDEN) show this is not quite the case.  The good news is that they are at least still very profitable.  Both companies cut their earnings forecast and this is taking its toll on other major players in the sector today.  Avon Products Inc. (NYSE: AVP), Bare Escentuals, Inc. (NASDAQ: BARE), and Revlon Inc. (NYSE: REV) are all trading as though they are next in line to join the warnings parade.

Read More »

The 52-Week Low Club (HIG)(CI)(AVP)(GLBL)(SYMC)(EXPE)

Sad_clownHartford Financial (HIG) Big analyst downgrade. Plunges to $8.23 from 52-week high of $98.70.

CIGNA (CI) Profit drops 53%. Stock off to $15.08 from 52-week high of $56.98.

Avon (AVP) Weak guidance. Falls to $19.85 from 52-week high of $45.34.

Global Industries (GLB) Bad earnings. Analyst downgrade. Daily double. Off to $2.27 from 52-week high of $27.06.

Symantec (SYMC) Misses on earnings and give poor outlook. Moves down to $11.85 from 52-week high of $22.80.

Expedia (EXPE) Big drop-off in its core market–travel.. Sells down to $9.66 from 52-week high of $34.66.

Douglas A. McIntyre

Top Pre-Market Analyst Downgrades (AIG, ANEN, AVP, KMX, CTRN, EW, FMX, LAMR, TRMK, VMW)

These are not all of the downgrades or negative calls we are seeing, but these are the stand out calls early this Thursday morning:

  • AIG (AIG) Cut to Market Perform at FBR.
  • Anaren (ANEN) Cut to Neutral at Piper Jaffray.
  • Avon Products (AVP) Cut to Neutral at Credit Suisse.
  • CarMax (KMX) Cut to Market Perform at Raymond James.
  • Citi Trends (CTRN) Cut to Neutral at Piper Jaffray.
  • Edwards Lifesciences (EW) Cut to Underweight at JPMorgan.
  • Femsa (FMX) Cut to Equal-weight at Morgan Stanley.
  • Lamar Advertising (LAMR) Started as Sell at Citigroup.
  • Trustmark (TRMK) Cut to Underweight at JPMorgan.
  • VMware (VMW) Started as Underperform at Bernstein.

Jon C. Ogg
August 7, 2008

Top Pre-Market Analyst Downgrades (AKAM, AVP, CPKI, CBG, FDX, GGP, HOLX, JLL, TIN, THQI, TBL, TROW, USNA)

These are the early bird Downgrades and negative calls from analysts we are seeing this Thursday morning:

  • Akamai (AKAM) Cut to Market Perform at FBR.
  • Avon (AVP) Cut to Hold at Deutsche Bank.
  • California Pizza Kitchen (CPKI) Cut to Neutral at Baird.
  • CB Richard Ellis (CBG) Cut to Neutral at JPMorgan.
  • FedEx (FDX) Cut to Equal Weight at Morgan Stanley.
  • General Growth Properties (GGP) Cut to Sell at Citigroup.
  • Hologic (HOLX) Cut to Hold at Jefferies.
  • Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) Cut to Neutral at JPMorgan.
  • Temple-Inland (TIN) Cut to Neutral at Credit Suisse.
  • THQ (THQI) Cut to Perform at Oppenheimer.
  • Timberland (TBL) Cut to Sell at Citigroup.
  • T.Rowe Price (TROW) Cut to Market Perform at Wachovia.
  • USANA (USNA) Cut to Underperform at Jefferies.

Jon C. Ogg
July 31, 2008

Apple (AAPL): Steve Jobs Is Fine

Steve_jobsConcern about the health of Apple (AAPL) CEO and founder Steve Jobs has been mounting since his appearance to launch the iPhone 3G model. He was terribly thin. Earlier this week, the press raised the issue again and  when the company’s CFO said during the Apple earnings call that Jobs health was a "private matter," investors grew more restless.

Read More »

GE’s (GE) Earnings, Immelt, And Jack’s Ghost

For reasons that are impossible to explain, much of the mythology of the late 20th Century American CEO was placed Atlas-like on the shoulders of John Francis Welch, GE’s head man from 1981 to 2001. He was physically small but sported a two handicap, was unusually brilliant and could slit a competitor’s throat as easily as he could read a balance sheet. Only Lee Iaccoca could be considered a popular rival, because he had turned around a deeply troubled company at Chrysler. Welch had done something far more difficult. He had taken a great company and made it far greater.

Welch became what every CEO wanted to be. He became the vessel for skills he did not have and became the symbol of things he had never been. The wide-spread notion was that Welch could run any company better than its incumbent management. Welch’s skill and guile trumped the experience of all other managers.

Welch’s sloganeering, backed by the cagey skills of the GE public relations machine, pushed his fame beyond Wall Street. “Never be in a business where you are not No.1 or No 2”. “Change before you have to.” “Control your own destiny or someone else will.” Whatever his great talents may have been, his penchant for fame and the adulation of the business world matched it.

Welch was actually the antithesis of the CEO who had been educated and groomed for the top job at a huge American corporation. Welch did not go to Harvard Business School, the birthplace of many of the men who ran the Fortune 500 during that time when he ran GE. Welch had a degree in chemical engineering and graduated from the University of Massachusetts. He added to his degrees at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, located in a town best known for its large number of fluorescent light bulb recycling locations. Welch was not part of the club and this probably added to the chips on his shoulder.  This assured some degree of his success when he took over the top spot at GE from Reginald H. Jones, an Ivy League man from Penn.

GE was founded by Thomas Edison, a genius far more inventive than Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, or the West Coast software engineers who began Google and Yahoo!. Edison slept under his desk, worked for 20 hours each day, and amassed 1,093 US patents. His favorite film was “Birth of a Nation”, making it unlikely that, as he grew old and rich, he was a friend of anyone other than those who were rich, powerful, and insular.

Edison was GE’s most famous employee until Welch turned himself into America’s most admired businessman.

Under Welch, GE’s revenue rose from $27 billion to $130 billion and the market cap of the company went from $14 billion to $410 billion. He needed no myth makers to embellish that record. He has remained well-regarded since, save for the management self-help column that he writes with his third wife. It runs on the last page of BusinessWeek and appears to be Welch’s only contact with the outside world.

                                   ********                                 ********            **********

Fairfield, Connecticut is a single Superfund site covered by a massive strip mall located along Long Island Sound about halfway between New York City and New Haven. The local cops spend their time busting drunks and harassing pot smoking teenagers. Fairfield is a monument to the mediocrity in which Americans are willing to live, believing that the good life is made up of McDonald’s and schools which can get their children into state universities. If the people who live in Fairfield could live in a richer suburb like Greenwich, they would.

Fairfield is a step down ward from the American Dream. It is also the home of the world headquarters of General Electric, which is still considered by some as the most widely admired company in the world.

                       *******                         ********                         ********

When Welch’s fame was at its peak, he stepped down from GE. Jeff Immelt, Welch’s hand-picked successor, had run the company’s medical systems unit.  Immelt was a graduate of Dartmouth and Harvard Business School. It may be telling that he was also the president of his fraternity, Phi Delta Alpha, known for its secret handshake and the bizarre rituals of its Winter Rush. Immelt was chosen over Bob Nardelli, who subsequently went to Home Depot and nearly destroyed the company while looting it out of $250 million in compensation. To this day, Welch calls Nardelli “the best operational executive I have ever met,” which begs that question of why he was not given the top job at GE. It is as if Welch had undermined the future fortunes of company as he left.

There is no telling whether Immelt has the talent to run a company as massive as GE, or whether it can be run at all. The knee jerk evaluation of the company by Wall St. analysts is that GE is in too many businesses, and that many of them are crummy. About once a month, a brokerage firm which has run out of other companies to analyze puts together a plan to break GE into pieces. Every analyst falls victim to the adage that the parts are worth much more than the whole. As recent break-up calculations for companies like Motorola and Yahoo! show, the parts are often worth less.

Even under Immelt, GE has usually “made its numbers” avoiding anything that might deeply disappoint investors. Last quarter, that changed. On April 1, the stock traded above $38. After earnings hit, it moved to below $32. For the first time in a long time, GE had become unreliable. As the market has dropped recently, GE’s shares have fallen below $27.

As the business press looks at GE, it cannot calm itself. How could a company be so well-regarded and perform so far below the market averages?  Almost any press report on the firm runs the same sentence: “GE trades below where it did when Welch left”.

While Immelt and his management group have not solved the puzzle of how to improve GE’s stock, neither has the company’s board. It is a blue ribbon panel that includes the head of MIT and the CEOs of Procter & Gamble, Avon, and Deere & Company, all of them ideal agents of radical change.

As GE releases second quarter earnings, it is likely to be hung, drawn, and quartered by its critics. The company’s measure of good will with investors is exhausted.  But, if Immelt can post strong numbers and can beat expectations time and again from here on out, he could become the worthy successor he was supposed to be the day he stepped into his job.  Almost no one is betting in that direction.

If Q2 earnings and GE’s forecasts are poor, the judgment of Immelt’s tenure will no longer be one of mediocrity. Instead, it will likely be viewed as the dismantling of the company’s decades-old image as the Hercules of the business world. The whispers about Immelt’s future will begin to grow louder, and, at some point, they will be legitimized by a mention in a big business magazine the way the criticism of the Vietnam War escalated after Walter Cronkite attacked the conflict on the CBS Evening News. If that happens, GE will have gone from being an institution to being a turnaround candidate, all in less than half a generation.

Each and every time there is a discussion of the best way to solve GE’s problems, the recurring theme is that the weaker divisions of the company should be sold off. This usually includes the firm’s Industrial division and NBC Universal. Radical thinkers also want GE out of many of its financial services operations. The reckless destruction of American banks and brokerages has left them terrified that one huge write-off could substantially damage GE earnings. Almost no one wants the firm out of its Infrastructure business which grew 22% last quarter against the firm’s overall growth rate of 8%. This division was also over 41% of GE’s segment operating profit for the period.

For the quarter about to be reported, none of these changes will have been made. The earnings release will be the numbers for the business largely as it has existed for several quarters. The results may be OK, but the general economy is too poor for the numbers to be spectacular. GE has become a company in a difficult position run by gentlemen.

If there is a Mount Rushmore of business leaders, Welch has Jefferson’s place—ambitious beyond a fault, wildly narcissistic, and deviled by measuring up to standards set by a world of class distinction. Welch would not have been allowed into Phi Delta Alpha, nor would he have been invited to Edison’s winter mansion at "Seminole Lodge". But GE had been founded by a younger Edison, born in Milan, Ohio, with next to nothing to his name. He became a member of the American establishment much, much later.

Welch was the most talented CEO of his generation because he was obsessively ambitious, refused to be bested, was remarkably able to operate in the chaos that is part of all huge corporations, and was willing to leave his wounded behind in order to stay on the march.

What troubles GE is not the businesses it is in, it is how the business is run.

Douglas A. McIntyre

Goldman Sachs Changes Consumer Products Coverage (AVP, CL, BARE, PG, KMB)

Goldman Sachs has made some changes in coverage to its consumer products universe. 

The bulge bracket brokerage firm favors Avon Products, Inc. (NYSE: AVP) and Colgate-Polmolive Co. (NYSE: CL) and gave both companies some increased earnings target estimates for both this year and next, while making downgrades and some estimate cuts elsewhere in the household consumer products sector. 

The brokerage firm has transitioned a Neutral rating down to a "Sell" rating on Kimberly-Clark Corp. (NYSE: KMB).  Also, both Bare Escentuals, Inc. (NASDAQ: BARE) and Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSEL PG) were downgraded from Buy ratings down to "Neutral" ratings.

This was a coverage transition in an analysts this morning at Goldman Sachs, with Andrew Sawyer assuming US Household Products coverage from Amy Chasen.

Jon C. Ogg
April 9, 2008

Jon Ogg produces the Special Situation Investing Newsletter.  He can be reached at jonogg@247wallst.com and he does not own securities in the companies he covers.