Toyota, Japan’s biggest car maker by volume, plans to sell more than 1 million subcompacts in more than 100 countries and regions, such as China, Southeast Asia, India and Brazil, by 2015.

Toyota does not have many other places to go for expansion. The European markets are nearly dead. China’s market has slowed considerably. Toyota’s sales have picked up a great deal in America, but the market has become progressively more competitive as U.S. car companies has been revived and large firms, including Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes, have aggressively exploited the one region in which they have an ongoing chance for rising sales volume.

A New Web Browser

For some reason, Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) wants to be in the crowded web browser arena. Its new product is called Axis. It is meant to compete with Apple’s (NASDAQ: AAPL) iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch products. But Apple already has its own Safari browser. And the industry is controlled by Microsoft’s (NASDAQ: MSFT) Internet Explorer, Google’s (NASDAQ: GOOG) Chrome, and Firefox. It is a good guess that Yahoo! wants to use Axis to move further into mobile search, but it already has lost most of that market to Google. And there is no reason for the great majority of users to switch from their preferred browser when they move from computer to portable device.

Galaxy S3’s U.S. Launch

The wildly successful Samsung Galaxy S III will be available in the United States starting on June 1. But the first wave of handsets will not be sold by carriers. Amazon.com (NASDAQ: AMZN) will sell the new Galaxy without a wireless contract. Wireless companies underwrite the costs of smartphones because they get two-year subscriptions from customers. Amazon will sell the Galaxy S III for $800. The product will be “unlocked” so it can be used on a number of networks. There is some debate over whether its powerful processor is set to work on superfast 4G LTE networks, or if a less-powerful processor will be required to operate on those systems. The Samsung Galaxy is widely regarded as the primary competitor to the Apple iPhone 4S, so early sales in the U.S. will prove whether that perception is true.

MSNBC.com Buyout Talks

Comcast’s (NASDAQ: CMCSA) NBCUniversal operations is in talks with Microsoft to takeover the part of MSNBC.com that it does not already own. The rumor was reported in Adweek. Microsoft may not want to part with the stake. NBC could use it as a portal to increase traffic to its media sites. But Microsoft has its large MSN.com operation, which has a close relationship with MSNBC.com. As Microsoft works to drive traffic to its Bing search engine, MSNBC.com is strategically important.

Douglas A. McIntyre

EU concerns push the euro to close to a two-year low. (Reuters)

Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) will invest $40 billion into alternative energy in the next decade. (Reuters)

TV networks battle with Dish Network (NASDAQ: DISH) over a DVR that can skip ads. (Reuters)

Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) CEO Tim Cook gives up $75 million in dividends on his stock holdings. (Reuters)

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B) may buy more newspapers. (Reuters)

Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) loan shares to short sellers who want to hedge Facebook’s stock. (WSJ)

U.S. bank lending falls in the first quarter, a possible sign of economic slowing. (WSJ)

Toyota (NYSE: TM) will push further into emerging markets. (WSJ)

Comcast’s (NASDAQ: CMCSA) NBCUniversal division may buyout Microsoft’s (NASDAQ: MSFT) part ownership in MSNBC.com. (WSJ)

Japanese power companies invest in U.S. shale gas to help replace nuclear power. (WSJ)

Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) releases an Internet browser call Axis, which will compete with Google’s (NASDAQ: GOOG) product. (WSJ)

Spain is concerned about a run on its banks. (NYT)

Large European institutional funds begin to sell euro assets. (FT)

Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti says most leaders in the region back regionwide bonds. (Bloomberg)

Douglas A. McIntyre

The rumor was reported in Adweek.Microsoft may not want to part with the stake. NBC could use it as a portal to increase traffic to its media sites.

But, Microsoft has its large MSN.com operation which has a close relationship with MSNBC.com. As Microsoft works to drive traffic to its Bing search engine, MSNBC.com is strategically important.

Douglas A. McIntyre

Whether or not that’s true is certainly arguable. What is not arguable is that usage-based pricing is better for cable operators and for wireless carriers. Comcast Corp. (NASDAQ: CMCSA) last week said that it planned to drop its 250-gigabyte data plan and introduce a new pricing scheme that would allow its customers to consume 300 gigabytes of data at a base rate and pay $10 for each 50 gigabytes customers use above that limit. The usage-based plan could squeeze streaming video providers like Netflix Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) that have built their entire business models on essentially unlimited bandwidth. Streaming a 2-hour movie in HD consumes about 4 gigabytes.

It’s probably only a matter of time before other cable providers like Time Warner Cable Inc. (NYSE: TWC) and Cablevision Corp. (NYSE: CVC) adopt similar plans. Wireless carriers AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) and Verizon Wireless, the joint venture between Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) and Vodafone Group plc (NASDAQ: VOD), appear set to announce shared data plans that will allow more than one device to share usage on a single data plan. The carriers already charge more for usage above the plan limit.

Genachowski appears to believe that usage-based plans will level the playing field between the cable operators and the wireless carriers. Time Warner Cable experimented with a usage-based plan in 2009, but decided not to adopt the plan because customers hated it. Customers will still hate the plans, but without FCC backing customers no longer have any heavyweight help.

Comcast and the other cable companies will argue that the 300-gigabyte limit affects a small number of very high usage customers. They will also argue that by adopting a usage-based plan the vast majority of customers will pay less. But the data plan will also include internet access from computers, smartphones, and tablets, as well as Wi-Fi access from the local coffee shop.

Comcast has not yet announced pricing for its usage-based plan, but the odds of prices actually dropping don’t seem particularly good. Especially because the company is throwing in another 50-gigabytes of usage.

Cable companies need to prevent customers from “cutting the cord” and choosing to use their wireless data plans to drive home entertainment. An Internet TV box that really works is their biggest nightmare.

But if the cable guys and the wireless carriers can grab enough wireless spectrum and do enough cross-licensing deals and keep the content creators happy, the cost to consumers will not fall. The cable and wireless industries will appear to be competitive, but they’ll really operate an oligopoly and some small carriers and cable companies will be allowed to stick around to make things look good by providing service to low density markets. If the FCC really wants competition in the wireless business, then the agency better stick up for consumers, not cable or wireless providers.

Paul Ausick

The U.S. allows China to buy treasuries directly without banker assistance. (Reuters)

MF Global paid Jon Corzine $8 million in the year before it collapsed. (Reuters)

The new BrandZ annual study of brand values puts Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) in the top position, followed by McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD), Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO), IBM (NYSE: IBM), Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) and Google (NASDAQ: GOOG). (Reuters)

Trading losses at JP Morgan (NYSE: JPM) help competitors make money. (Reuters)

Comcast (NASDAQ: CMCSA), Time Warner Cable (NYSE: TWC) and Cablevision (NYSE: CVC) will share Wi-Fi systems to give customers more access to wireless broadband. (WSJ)

Many traders blame Morgan Stanley for overpricing Facebook shares. (WSJ)

France and Germany remain in a battle over the future of austerity in the region. (WSJ)

Facebook’s largest hurdle with investors remains its mobile strategy. (WSJ)

The European Union gives Google little time to answer charges about its business practices, which include privacy matters. (WSJ)

Formula One Group will go public on the Singapore Stock Exchange to raise $2.5 billion. (WSJ)

Zynga (NASDAQ: ZNGA) shares are hurt by the drop in Facebook’s stock. (WSJ)

JP Morgan will kill is share buybacks because of trading losses. (NYT)

Eastman Kodak loses its patent case against Apple and Research In Motion (NASDAQ: RIMM). (NYT)

France will press its neighbors to create eurozone-wide bonds. (FT)

Douglas A. McIntyre

This could be a big seller or it could be a flop. To hazard a guess, more likely closer to a flop. The capability is simply not likely to get widespread use. It’s very cool, of course, but not something that today’s mostly young and ferociously mobile smartphone customers are likely to use much. Young smartphone users don’t have time to sit still for a nice cozy Skype chat with the grandparents. Sad, perhaps, but true.

Paul Ausick

Verizon Wireless, a joint venture between Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) and Vodafone Group plc (NASDAQ: VOD), wanted the additional spectrum to accommodate future growth. That was no particular show-stopper as other wireless companies have been allowed to accumulate spectrum against prospective future needs. SpectrumCo, jointly owned by Comcast Corp. (NASDAQ: CMCSA) and Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX) among others, and Verizon Wireless had also agreed to a cross-licensing deal where the two cable providers would be able to bundle Verizon Wireless’ service and the wireless carrier would be able to sell the cable companies’ content in a bundle.

Smaller rival wireless providers like MetroPCS Communications Inc. (NYSE: PCS), Sprint Nextel Corp. (NYSE: S), Deutsche Telekom AG’s (OTC: DTEGY.PK) T-Mobile USA division, and Leap Wireless International Inc. (NASDAQ: LEAP) complained about the hoarding of spectrum. As a result, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is considering requiring Verizon Wireless to divest some of its current spectrum before the deal is approved. A report at Bloomberg News cites “people familiar with the matter” for the information.

The FCC and the US Department of Justice, which must also approve the deal, want to maintain competition in the wireless and cable markets to protect consumer choice and prevent monopolistic pricing. But depending on how much spectrum Verizon Wireless must shed, there may be only one potential buyer — big rival AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T), which has stayed out of the fray so far, probably because it has equally big plans now that its $39 billion deal for T-Mobile has been killed.

The cross-licensing deals are also being investigated by the DoJ to determine if they threaten competition. The threat to competition and monopolistic pricing for consumers may be greater here than in the actual spectrum purchase. The nationwide reach of wireless networks and consumer demand for mobile resources opens up a whole new profit potential for Comcast and Time Warner. At the same time Verizon gets to offer programming that makes the company’s network a more attractive option, particularly if it can undercut competitive pricing.

The nuts and bolts of this acquisition and its fallout are nearly impossibly arcane. But the government’s decision will touch nearly everyone in the US. And that’s why the deal is so important.

Paul Ausick

We get more evidence of the switchover today from Charter Communications Inc. (NASDAQ: CHTR), which reported results this morning including miss on an already awful estimated EPS loss of -$0.57. Charter’s EPS loss came in at -$0.95. The company added a scant 20,000 customers for video in the first quarter compared with 141,000 new customers for Internet service.

As we noted last week in our look at earnings from Comcast Corp. (NASDAQ: CMCSA), bundling of services and content is becoming the new way of doing business in the space once dominated by cable providers. For example, Time Warner Cable Inc. (NYSE: TWC) and Comcast both have long-term deals with Walt Disney Co. (NYSE: DIS) to offer WatchESPN, the online and mobile version of Disney’s ESPN network. The cable providers are hoping that the offer of free mobile content will stem the flow of unsubscribers.

Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: V) and AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) also offer high-speed digital content and are working on deals to offer new bundles to customers. Verizon’s attempt to acquire more wireless spectrum in its $3.6 billion deal for SpectrumCo gives the company’s wireless carrier, Verizon Wireless, the opportunity to bundle programming from Comcast and Time Warner Cable along with access to mobile broadband.

The cable providers, in turn, are able to offer a bundle to their customers that now includes Verizon’s high-speed mobile broadband. It should be no surprise that smaller carriers like MetroPCS Communications Inc. (NYSE: PCS), Leap Wireless International Inc. (NASDAQ: LEAP), and Frontier Communications Corp. (NASDAQ: FTR) are struggling.

Research firm Convergence Consulting recently released studies on broadcast and cable TV and bundling. Between 2000 and 2009, cable TV subscriber additions averaged 2 million a year. In 2010 additions totaled 272,000 and in 2011 additions totaled just 112,000. The firm estimates that 2.65 million cable subscribers “cut the cord” between 2008 and 2011, choosing instead to rely on “over-the-top” services from Netflix Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) and others. By the end of this year, the firm estimates there will be 3.58 million cord cutters.

Convergence Consulting estimates that the audience for free online/mobile viewing has plateaued at 19% of all TV viewing. But that seems low, especially in light of the cross-licensing deals between the wireless carriers and the content providers like Disney and the cable networks.

The other thing that could raise that plateau is another technological wonder from Cupertino. Rumors of an “insanely great” Internet TV box from Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) have been rampant for months, if not years. There are already several options available for these ‘over-the-top’ boxes, but if Apple were to come up with a killer piece of hardware, the ground could shift in a hurry.

Of course the TV and movie industries have learned from the music industry that Apple drives a hard bargain, and they can’t let themselves give up currently large broadcast revenues in exchange for much smaller online sales. What Apple should hope for is that a game-changing device with one or two significant content partners will convince consumers to force the rest of the media moguls to toe the line.

The transition from wired high-speed broadband connections to wireless connections is just starting. There are lots of different companies involved and the one or two with the deepest pockets or that are able to discern what the future holds will prosper. As for the rest, who knows?

Paul Ausick

The unofficial closing bells put the DJIA down nearly 11 points to 13,268.65 (-0.08%), the NASDAQ rose more than 9 points (0.31%) to 3,059.85, and the S&P 500 fell -0.25% or more than 3 points to 1,402.31.

There were several analyst upgrades and downgrades today, including Chesapeake Energy Corp. (NYSE: CHK) cut to ‘neutral’ at R.W. Baird; ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) cut to ‘underperform’ at BofA/ML and started as ‘overweight’ at JPMorgan; RadioShack (NYSE: RSH) raised to ‘buy’ at Auriga; STMicroelectronics NV (NYSE: STM) raised to ‘buy’ at Goldman Sachs and raised to ‘neutral’ at Citigroup; and Assurant Inc. (NYSE: AIZ) cut to ‘underperform’ at BofA/ML.

Earnings reports since markets closed last night have led to some price changes as of the last half hour of trading today: Barrick Gold Corp. (NYSE: ABX) is down -2.8% at $39.30 (more coverage here); Marathon Oil Corp. (NYSE: MRO) is down -4.4% at $28.85; Mastercard Inc. (NYSE: MA) is down -0.8% at $452.14; Allergan Inc. (NYSE: AGN) is down -4.3% at $92.29; Yamana Gold Inc. (NYSE: AUY) is down -2.6% at $14.36; Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX) is down -1.6% at $37.30; The Clorox Co. (NYSE: CLX) is down -3.3% at $67.74; Rowan Companies Inc. (NYSE: RDC) is up 1.3% at $34.97; R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. (NASDAQ: RRD) is down -7% at $11.79; Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. (NYSE: MSO) is down -1.2% at $3.41; and IAC/InterActiveCorp. (NASDAQ: IACI) is up 3.3% at $50.34 after posting a new 52-week high of $52.77 earlier today.

Tomorrow we get earnings from First Solar Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR), Diana Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSX), Corinthian Colleges Inc. (NASDAQ: COCO), Apache Corp. (NYSE: APA), Orbitz Worldwide Inc. (NYSE: OWW), and Western Refining Inc. (NYSE: WNR) among many others.

Other standouts from today include the following stocks:

Chesapeake Energy is down -13.5% at $16.95 after posting a new 52-week low of $15.86 earlier today. The natural gas producer reported weak results and more troubles for CEO Aubrey McClendon. More coverage here.

Comcast Corp. (NASDAQ: CMCSA) is down -1% at $30.29. The cable company reported good earnings this morning. More coverage here.

Savient Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ: SVNT) is down -18.8% at $1.51. An analyst has said that the company insolvent. More coverage here.

Stay tuned for Thursday. Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser, Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart, and San Francisco Fed President John Williams are speaking at a conference. We have noted the following events on the schedule (all times Eastern):

• 7:30 a.m. – Challenger job cut report
• 8:30 a.m. – New claims for unemployment benefits
• 8:30 a.m. – Productivity and costs report
• 10:00 a.m. – ISM non-manufacturing index
• 10:30 a.m. – EIA weekly natural gas storage report
• 4:30 p.m. – Federal Reserve balance sheet and money supply

Your email address

subscribe

terms and conditions

Paul Ausick

Comcast posted EPS of $0.45 versus an estimate of $0.42. Revenue grew nearly 23% year-over-year to $14.89 billion, again higher than the consensus estimate of $14.43 billion.

The cable companies are losing subscribers to Verizon Wireless, a joint venture between Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) and Vodafone plc (NASDAQ: VOD) and AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) both of which offer high speed wireline broadband service in addition to voice and mobile services. And the competition is about to get even keener.

Verizon Wireless’ $3.6 billion bid for additional wireless spectrum from SpectrumCo LLC, a joint venture of Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and privately-held Bright House Networks and Cox Communications Inc., is about to change the landscape. The additional spectrum is what the other wireless carriers and the Federal Communications Commission are examining with a fine-toothed comb, but the cross-licensing agreements that give Verizon and Comcast and Time Warner Cable the ability to sell each other’s products are, perhaps, the bigger deal.

Although the FCC has not yet ruled on Verizon’s acquisition, the companies are acting like the deal is done. A Verizon-Comcast cross-licensing deal in San Francisco adds digital TV to its standard triple-play offer. AT&T, which offers its wireline U-verse high-speed service in San Francisco, has no comparable offer.

Similar deals between Comcast and Verizon are already in place in Portland, Oregon, and Seattle and Spokane, Washington. Verizon and Time Warner have launched a similar bundle in Raleigh, North Caroline, Kansas City, and Columbus and Cincinnati, Ohio. Subscribers can bundle cable services with Verizon Wireless mobile phone service and get the same deal from either the cable company or Verizon.

Cable-like companies such as Netflix Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX), Dish Network Corp. (NASDAQ: DISH), and DirecTV (NASDAQ: DTV) will also find the going getting tougher. Netflix is at the mercy of content providers like Comcast and Time Warner, which are likely to drive Netflix’s costs higher while lowering their own. Verizon could throttle network speeds for Netflix streaming videos, and although the carrier would eventually be stopped, it might be too late for Netflix. The satellite companies, likewise, could find themselves paying more for content.

As for AT&T’s U-verse and Verizon’s FiOS, neither is as valuable nor has as well-defined a growth path as wireless services. Comcast’s Xfinity broadband service will disappear eventually and be subsumed by the Verizon wireless network.

People want mobility and that means wireless services. At first, the deals between Comcast and Verizon and Time Warner and Verizon will be appealing because the companies will be offering free or low-priced smartphones as well as the convenience of a single provider for all of a customer’s communications needs. But as smaller competitors like MetroPCS Communications Inc. (NYSE: PCS), Leap Wireless International Inc. (NASDAQ: LEAP), and even T-Mobile USA, the US arm of Deutsche Telekom AG (OTC: DTEGY) fall by the wayside, large markets will have at most two choices, Verizon or AT&T, and small markets will not get even that.

The new cross-licensing services launched too late to have any impact on first quarter results, but the deals should make some kind of showing on second quarter results. The smart money says that the deals will be winners.

Comcast’s shares are down -2.7% this morning at $29.76 in a 52-week range of $19.19-$30.88.

For those interested in the Verizon-SpectrumCo deal, the FCC web site has all the relevant documents under Docket Number WT 12-4. To date 539 comments have been filed and thousands of pages of documents.

Paul Ausick