Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ) posts better-than-expected earnings and says it will fire 27,000 people. (Reuters)

Oracle (NASDAQ: ORCL) loses an important ruling in an intellectual property suit against Google (NASDAQ: GOOG). (Reuters)

Shareholders sue Facebook (NASDAQ: FB) because of trouble with its IPO. (Reuters)

Facebook may move to the NYSE (NYSE: NYX). (Reuters)

Some large investors receive warnings from analysts that projections of Facebook’s earnings have come down. (WSJ)

Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK) increases drilling on the Utica Shale in Ohio. (WSJ)

Sony (NYSE: SNE) will sell part of its LCD business to Sharp. (WSJ)

The head of sales at Research In Motion (NASDAQ: RIMM) departs. (WSJ)

Yields on German bonds fall to all-time lows as capital moves to safety. (WSJ)

General Electric (NYSE: GE) says its industrial profit margin will rise in 2013. (WSJ)

Oil falls below $90 for the first time since October. (WSJ)

Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS-A) will begin to drill in far north areas of Alaska. (NYT)

Martha Stewart will once again become chairperson of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (NYSE: MSO). (NYT)

A deal for financial coordination among EU nations will be put off until a June meeting. (FT)

Shale gas helps the U.S. lower emissions. (FT)

Large companies turn over CEOs less than in the downturn, according to Booz & Company. (FT)

BMW will triple its output in China. (Bloomberg)

Detroit turns off street lights to save money. (Bloomberg)

Douglas A.McIntyre

We’ve looked at five conglomerates that offer some upside: General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE), 3M Co. (NYSE: MMM), United Technologies Corp. (NYSE: UTX), Honeywell International Inc. (NYSE: HON), and Tyco International Ltd. (NYSE: TYC).

With one exception, implied upside for these companies wanders in the mid- to high-teens. The exception is United Technologies. The second-lowest of the five is Tyco, the de-conglomerated conglomerate.

General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE) traded at $19.06 and has a market value of $203 billion. The consensus target price from Thomson Reuters is $22.57 and the 52-week range is $14.02 to $21.00. GE has a dividend yield of 3.6%. The implied upside to the consensus target is 18%, but we would note that the target is above the 52-week high.

3M Co. (NYSE: MMM) traded at $83.38 and has a market value of around $58 billion. The consensus target price from Thomson Reuters is $95.47 and the 52-week range is $68.63 to $98.19. 3M has a dividend yield of 2.8%. The implied upside to the consensus target is 14.5%, but we would note that the target is also above the 52-week high.

United Technologies Corp. (NYSE: UTX) traded at $73.37 and has a market value of around $67 billion. The consensus target price from Thomson Reuters is $94.60 and the 52-week range is $66.87 to $91.83. UTX has a dividend yield of 2.6%. The implied upside to the consensus target is 29%, but we would note that the target is also above the 52-week high.

Honeywell International Inc. (NYSE: HON) traded at $56.72 and has a market value of around $44 billion. The consensus target price from Thomson Reuters is $67.56 and the 52-week range is $41.22 to $62.00. Honeywell has a dividend yield of 2.6%. The implied upside to the consensus target is 19%, but we would note that the target is also above the 52-week high.

Tyco International Ltd. (NYSE: TYC) traded at $53.59 and has a market value of around $24 billion. The consensus target price from Thomson Reuters is $62.20 and the 52-week range is $37.39 to $57.75. Tyco has a dividend yield of 1.9%. The implied upside to the consensus target is 16%, but we would note that the target is also above the 52-week high.

Based on these numbers, United Technologies offers the most potential upside, but the thing to keep in mind that its acquisition of Goodrich Corp. (NYSE: GR), which is set to close by mid-year, will leave the company with a large debt and not the brightest prospects for profit growth for another year or so.

Tyco, with the lowest implied gain at 16%, is splitting itself into three pieces. The company expects to complete the spin-off of its home security division into The ADT Corp. later this year as well as the spin-off of the fire and security division and the spin-off and merger of the flow control business with Pentair Inc. (NYSE: PNR). All these moves pushed the stock to a year-to-date gain of 20% in late March, which has since been ratcheted back to 15%. And over the past 12 months, only Tyco has shown an increase in share value, up more than 11%.

GE, with its 3.6% dividend yield, and implied upside of 18% is a safe choice here. 3M, with the lowest upside potential, and Honeywell are about equal otherwise. United Technologies has the most potential upside, but it may take a while to materialize. Overall, Tyco, which has withstood the fall in prices better than any of the others, may offer the best reward sooner than any of the others.

Gold & Silver Miners with the Most Upside Value

Major Oil Companies with the Most Upside Value

Industrials with the Most Upside Value

Paul Ausick

Of the top brands, the following came in after Apple:

2. International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE: IBM)

3. Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG)

4. McDonald’s Corporation (NYSE: MCD)

5. Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT)

6. Coca-Cola Corporation (NYSE: KO)

7. Marlboro of Altria Group Inc. (NYSE: MO)

8. AT&T, Inc. (NYSE: T)

9. Verizon Communications, Inc. (NYSE: VZ)

10. China Mobile Limited (NYSE: CHL)

11. General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE)

The ‘Top Riser” from 2011 to 2012 was Facebook, Inc. (NASDAQ: FB) with a 74% rise

The full Millward Brown study on these brands gets broken down into segments such as industry, brand growth, geographic, and sectors.

JON C. OGG

Some companies, like General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE) and Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE: CAT) have been expanding their US manufacturing capacity. And smaller firms, too, have been either expanding or building new capacity in the US. But numbers are a little hard to come by.

Consulting firm Accenture plc (NYSE: ACN) has a report out with data that indicates that US firms are indeed moving back home. The firm surveyed 81 senior manufacturing executives at companies that average more than $2 billion in annual revenues. The report is available here.

According to those surveyed, 65% moved manufacturing operations in the past 2 years and 43% plan to move in the next 2 years, while 62% started new operations in the same period. The US led all countries in locations where plants were closed (60% of closings were in the US) and also led in locations to which operations are being moved, with 40% of plants moving to the US.

Western Europe was second in plant closings and China leads in new openings with 54% of new manufacturing plants going to China. The US is second in new plants, with 32% of new plants opening here. China is also expected to overtake Western Europe as the second largest market for US goods within three years.

The new construction in China reflects the belief that the country’s domestic demand will continue to expand and that being able to make things locally helps with meeting customer requirements and lowering costs. For manufacturers re-shoring to the US, the reasons are the same, especially for some durable goods makers.

How much the re-shoring movement means to the US economy depends to a large degree on whether the economy can create enough jobs to buy all those goods. The key is jobs and they are still scarce.

Paul Ausick

The market value is still the largest of any public company at $501 billion, but the market value is now down almost $100 billion from the actual peak.  We have reported on two recent occasions how weak iPhone sales projections from analysts seem to be the big concern.  Both reports indicate that the iPad will save the day, and the latest earnings report showed that China really saved the day (with purchases rather than cheap labor).

The consensus analyst target on Apple is now above $708.00 and that implies another 32% upside if the analysts are right.  Some analyst calls even target $1,000 (and higher) for Apple stock.  At that rate, it becomes cheaper to buy Apple’s products than it does to buy 1 share of Apple stock.

Maybe this is the peak valuation concern coming into play as well.  Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT), which ultimately may have saved Apple with a Gates-led investment, reached up close to the $600 billion or so at the peak in 2000.  Cisco Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO) also reached about $350 billion.

General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE) peaked somewhere around the $475 billion valuation.  Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE: XOM) also peaked out above $500 billion during the energy bubble run-up, but that has not been seen since and the current market value is about $385 billion or so.  The common theme is that all of these values have come crashing down.

There is one thing to consider here in the ’mega-cap valuations and that is that Exxon Mobil is the only stock that had a low valuation like Apple still has.  In fact, Apple now trades at only about 10-times the Fiscal 2013 earnings estimates now that it has pulled back over $100.  Its multiple is even less than that if you back out the $100+ billion treasure trove that the company has.

The focus ahead has to be on Apple TV.  iPad and iPhone sales may only be able to go so far, and now it will be up to the new devices.  One concern we have is that the story of the Mac is a lost one.  Honestly, when was the last time you heard anyone focused on Mac sales in the last few months?  It is all about iPads and iPhones, which are actually cannibalizing what would have been Mac sales, and the talk remains around Apple TV.

One issue to consider is that certain funds have had to lighten up in Apple shares.  The large institutional sales orders have not been very evident in recent months, but the reality is that Apple started to become too heavily weighted for many non-index fund managers.  To prove this in the NASDAQ 100, the PowerShares QQQ (NASDAQ: QQQ) has close to an 18% weighting in Apple.  We have seen one estimate that only about one-third of the share selling was tied to large funds and hedge funds, although that no longer be the case since that data is 45 days old (or longer).

What seems to be at work is simply a change of heart.  The stock was weak ahead of May and the stock was still above $600 as recently as April 27.  Still, the psychology of “Sell in May and go away!” has been exaggerated due to the woes of Europe, the slowing growth of the BRIC nations, and weakening U.S. economic data.

Another concern may be that Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT) is being favorably treated going into the Windows 8 launch later this year.  All of the companies in technology are talking this up.  It is even possible that investors are unloading shares just so they can buy up Facebook shares after the IPO on Friday.

Apple is not expensive at all.  The question is whether or not it can be maintained.  When you are paying 10-times for future earnings today, that implies that you are paying for earnings out about ten years on a static basis.  All that is happening after the massive run that has been seen over the last decade is that the growth rate cannot be maintained indefinitely.

This sentiment won’t last forever, but the focus is elsewhere for the time being.  Will Apple hit $500 or even lower?  Maybe.  As long as the market does not really tank and as long as we do not enter a second recession, the consensus is that Apple’s stock still has a lot of room to rise after the dust settles.

JON C. OGG

MEMC named Brian Wuebbels as its new CFO. Wuebbels has been with MEMC in various roles since 2007. His previous experience came at Honeywell International Inc. (NYSE: HON) and General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE).

Investors are treating the switch as yet another signal that MEMC is a sinking ship. Shares are off more than -18%, at $1.74 after posting a new 52-week low of $1.67 earlier. The previous range was $2.07-$10.64. After the announcement last night shares only fell by a penny. That situation changed fast this morning.

Paul Ausick

When you hear $30 versus $19 it probably sounds huge.  If you consider the real call, this is really calling for a move of about 15% compounded over each of the next three years.  It is perhaps even less than that if you consider that the dividend is only 3.6% here.  This 15% share growth also compares to what Jeff Immelt has as an internal ambition of each unit generating 20% in annual returns on capital.  The company has previously said that its dividend payment will increase by roughly the same amount as its earnings increase.

GE shares have not been at $30.00 since before the recession took it down under $10 at the peak of selling.  The Barclays thesis is that this clearance for a dividend should bring the first real excitement in years as part of its turnaround.  The company has said over and over that its capital unit operations were recovering, but the dividend news from the GECC unit on Wednesday morning should have been enough.

Another catalyst is that Barclays sees GE unloading its stake in NBC Universal by 2015 or so and then it expects GE to consider how to shed the appliance and lighting unit as it had previously considered.

Keep in mind that GE has a one-year price target consensus from Thomson Reuters of just over $22.50 and the highest analyst target is $25.00.

JON C. OGG

Here is where the news really gets interesting for GE… In addition to the second quarter dividend from GECC, the unit is now planning to pay a special dividend of $4.5 billion to GE in 2012.

GECC had to suspend the historical dividend in 2009 during the financial crisis.   As a result of the dividend and the special dividend, General Electric said that it plans to accelerate its common stock buyback starting in the second quarter if market conditions permit.

GE shares are up 1.8% at $18.73 against a 52-week trading range of $14.02 to $21.00 and its dividend on the common stock is currently almost 3.6% paid to public shareholders.

JON C. OGG

Also, keep in mind that portfolio managers Todd Combs and Ted Weschler are still new and those new positions of under $200 million $300 million are likely tied to them.

24/7 Wall St. has gone through line by line of each position to see which stocks have been bought and sold as new positions, as well as having added in whether or not the number of shares grew or shrank on each since the prior quarter. We had added some color in on some of the positions if applicable.

Be advised that the number of subsidiaries that this filing covers is 14 entities rather than 18 entities in the prior quarter. There is also a note in the 13F filing showing that the SEC has granted “Confidential Treatment” on some Berkshire stock holdings and that likely suggests that Buffett is still acquiring a position he does not want the public to know about yet. This filing does not signal the half-dozen or more European shares that Buffett said he bought so that remains an outstanding issue as well.

The value of the stock portfolio was $66,151,587,000 at the end of 2011 and this was listed as $75,300,250,000 at the end of March 2012.

American Express Co. (NYSE: AXP) was over 151.6 million shares, SAME AS last quarter.

Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (NYSE: BK) is now 5.6 million shares, HIGHER THAN the 1,793,915 shares last quarter.

CVS Caremark Corporation (NYSE: CVS) is the SAME SIZE at 7.106 million shares after having been a new holding in a recent quarter and having been raised one quarter ago.

Coca Cola Co. (NYSE: KO) was right at 200 million shares, SAME AS BEFORE.

ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) is roughly 29.1 million shares, roughly the SAME AS BEFORE but it is still lower than previous quarters in past reports.

Costco Wholesale (NASDAQ: COST) 4,333,363 Shares, SAME AS last quarter after having lowered it before.

Da Vita Inc. (NYSE: DVA) is now 6 million shares worth $541 million and that LARGER THAN BEFORE after having been a new position of 2.684 million shares.

DirecTV (NASDAQ: DTV) is a LARGER POSITION listed at 22.999 million worth over $1.13 billion. This one had been 20.348 million shares worth $870 million one quarter earlier and it had been a new position just two quarters ago at 4.249 million shares.

Read The Most Powerful CEOs in America

Read The Least Powerful CEOs in America

The most powerful CEOs fall into three categories. The first are founders who are currently CEOs. They may, by themselves, or with other founders, have voting control over their companies. Larry Page of Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) is the best example of this. He started the Internet search engine with Sergey Brin. Together with Google’s chairman Eric Schmidt, who they hired, the three hold shares that have nearly two-thirds of the company’s voting rights.

The next category is founders who no longer have the majority of the vote in their companies, but who have been in charge successfully for so long that their job security is not in question. Jeff Bezos at Amazon.com (NASDAQ: AMZN) is the best example of this group. He owns slightly less than 20% of the company that he started in 1994. This stake is greater than that of any other shareholder. But it is his status as founder and his tremendous success that ensure he will not be replaced unless he wishes to be.

The final category of powerful CEOs are relatives of founders. These CEOs inherited the voting rights, usually from their parents, and they use those rights to run the company for another generation. The best example of this is Brian Roberts of Comcast (NASDAQ: CMCSA), whose father started the company. By almost any measure, Comcast has done well financially and in the stock market. Even if it did not, Roberts would have his job.

24/7 Wall St. reviewed the corporate structure, governance and voting rights of the 500 largest companies by market cap. Based on a review of company proxies, we identified those companies where the CEO had voting control of the company or was the company’s founder. We then limited the universe to those companies with market cap in excess of $30 billion.

These are 24/7 Wall St.’s most powerful CEOs in America.