<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>24/7 Wall St. &#187; NLR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://247wallst.com/tag/nlr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://247wallst.com</link>
	<description>Insightful Analysis and Commentary for U.S. and Global Equity Investors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:21:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='247wallst.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://247wallst.com/osd.xml" title="24/7 Wall St." />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://247wallst.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Top Investment Trends For Futurists (FFD, AFK, EZA, PHO, PIO, PXN, TINY, LIT, BP, PBW, PZD, PBD, REMX, NLR, MOO, GLD, BBH, IBB, FPX, IPOSX)</title>
		<link>http://247wallst.com/2010/11/19/top-investment-trends-for-futurists-ffd-afk-eza-pho-pio-pxn-tiny-lit-bp-pbw-pzd-pbd-remx-nlr-moo-gld-bbh-ibb-fpx-iposx-2/</link>
		<comments>http://247wallst.com/2010/11/19/top-investment-trends-for-futurists-ffd-afk-eza-pho-pio-pxn-tiny-lit-bp-pbw-pzd-pbd-remx-nlr-moo-gld-bbh-ibb-fpx-iposx-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 20:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas A. McIntyre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Active Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activist Investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analyst Calls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities & Metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETFs & Mutual Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Biz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPOs & Secondaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mutual Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EZA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FFD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FPX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPOSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PXN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PZD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REMX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TINY]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://247wallst.com/?p=87010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Futurists are an odd lot.  Generally, they are authors, scientists,  consultants and economists.  What many people don&#8217;t know is that investors follow this philosophy as well.  Their goal is to pick winning investment themes over the next decade or so. Predicting markets and economic patterns is difficult over the next 20 years because there are [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/11/19/top-investment-trends-for-futurists-ffd-afk-eza-pho-pio-pxn-tiny-lit-bp-pbw-pzd-pbd-remx-nlr-moo-gld-bbh-ibb-fpx-iposx-2/back-to-the-future-3/"rel="attachment wp-att-87011" ><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-87011" title="Back to the Future" src="http://247wallst.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/back-to-the-future2.jpg?w=200&#038;h=150" alt="" width="200" height="150" /></a>Futurists are an odd lot.  Generally, they are authors, scientists,  consultants and economists.  What many people don&#8217;t know is that investors follow this philosophy as well.  Their goal is to pick winning investment themes over the next decade or so.</p>
<p>Predicting markets and economic patterns is difficult over the next 20 years because there are many unknowns.  After all, who will be President in 2016?  What will tax laws be in 2020?  Which of today&#8217;s deadly diseases will be cured in 2020?  Which regions will experience wars by 2020?  This is why futurism may be one of the more unique approaches in investing. ETFs are often called the mutual funds of the future and our goal is to meld a futurist outlook into an investing strategies.</p>
<p>A rule of long-term investing is that what investments feel good today, such as those in Chinese and Indian markets, may not generate returns tomorrow.  Investors will face short-term pain for long-term gain. Futurists are always thinking beyond the next recession and the next boom behind it.</p>
<p><strong>Beyond Emerging Markets&#8230; Frontier Markets</strong></p>
<p>If you are thinking about China or India over the next 10 to 20 years, there is plenty to consider.  Both countries have grown exponentially as they became some of the world&#8217;s largest economies. Think post-Chindia and post-BRIC.  &#8221;Frontier markets,&#8221; a term which has come up in recent years that goes beyond &#8216;emerging markets&#8217; is &#8216;frontier markets.&#8217;  These &#8220;frontier market&#8221; economies still have room for growth.  Perhaps nothing illustrates this better than <a href="http://maps.nationalgeographic.com/maps/print-collection/earth-at-night.html" target="_blank" target="_blank">The NatGeo World Map at Night</a>.</p>
<p>When it come to Africa and other Frontier Markets, there are three exchange-listed vehicles that we usually choose.  All are generally more volatile than the broader market stock indexes in the developed world.  Many frontier funds base performance  off of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index rather than the S&amp;P 500.</p>
<p>Morgan Stanley Frontier Emerging Market Funds, Inc. (NYSE: FFD) is a small closed-end fund with roughly $105 million in assets.  This fund has diverse investments in banks, breweries, miners and utilities.  At its semi-annual report, the fund listed holdings in 21 nations including Nigeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, U.A.E., Kenya, Kuwait, Pakistan, Serbia, Qatar, Lebanon and Greece.  Average volume is light at just under 20,000 shares in a day and its 52-week range is $10.52 to $15.23.</p>
<p>Market Vectors Africa Index ETF (NYSE: AFK) from Van Eck seeks to track the performance of the Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index, which is full of companies that are headquartered in Africa or that generate the majority of their revenues in Africa.  It holds banks, breweries, miners, utilities, and more.  South Africa is where the largest number of the fund&#8217;s holdings are based. Assets under management were listed as $92 million in mid-November, its 52-week trading range is $26.60 to $34.88, and average daily volume is close to 25,000 shares per day.</p>
<p>iShares MSCI South Africa Index (NYSE: EZA) is an ETF that seeks to track the MSCI South Africa Index and it is one of the largest  vehicles out there since South Africa has a more established markets and is more politically stable compared with other African nations.  The fund invests in South African companies and has roughly $520 million in assets.  It trades close to 400,000 shares a day, and its 52-week range is in the low-$50s to $72.77 (flash crash low was listed as $23.00).  Its holdings include Anglo Platinum, AngloGold Ashanti, Firstrand, Gold Fields Ltd., Sasol, and Standard Bank.</p>
<p>Is Africa risky?  Are many other nations in the Frontiers markets risky? Absolutely.  But many of these nations have some of the biggest undisturbed deposits of natural resources.  That&#8217;s why we have highlighted these ETF and fund products rather than make individual picks.</p>
<p><strong>Are You Ready For The International Water Wars?</strong></p>
<p>Americans, Canadians, and many Europeans take potable water for granted.  However, Montezuma&#8217;s Revenge and many water-borne illnesses are rather common around the globe.  Building water filtration systems and desalination plants is costly. Nations are already setting limits on water resources.  Don&#8217;t ever discount the future of water.  Wars could be fought over potable water sources.  If you refer to that Nat-Geo World at Night Map, you can guess where much of the water resources are needed.</p>
<p>Many speculators have invested in the water industry for years.  It is no wonder that GE, 3M, and many other conglomerates have invested in the sector.  PowerShares Global Water (NYSE: PIO) and PowerShares Water Resources (NYSE: PHO) are two ETFs that compete in the world of water investing.</p>
<p>The PowerShares Water Resources (NYSE: PHO) seeks to track the Palisades Water index and it tends to have more of a U.S. focus.  Of course, many of these companies were hurt because they built new infrastructure ahead of housing developments that were scraped when the bubble burst.  PowerShares Water U.S. assets are close to $1 billion. It trades well over 200,000 shares per day, and its 52-week range is $14.70 to $18.68. (outside flash crash listed low of $6.99) to $18.68.</p>
<p>The PowerShares Global Water (NYSE: PIO) seeks to track the Palisades Global Water index, and it invests in U.S. companies and large international companies.  This is a smaller fund than the domestic water fund (PHO) from PowerShares.  Still,  it has more than $300 million in assets and trades close to 60,000 shares per day, and it has a 52-week range of $15.60 to $19.46.</p>
<p>J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Water Asset Management acquired Southwest Water, and that Water Asset Management is a private investment vehicle.  These are four small water mutual funds: Kinetics Water Infrastructure Advantaged Fund (KWIAX), PFW Water Fund (PFWAX), Allianz RCM Global Water Fund (AWTAX), and Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX).</p>
<p><strong>NANO-NANO&#8230; Take Me To Your InnerSpace</strong></p>
<p>The word nanotechnology, or nanotech for short, is another futurist technology. Many aspects of nanotechnology are already in use today in chemicals and other products.  This may also be one of the most controversial issues in the world of technology.  Think about atomic and molecular scale systems comprised of compounds between 1 to 100 nanometers, or one billionth of a meter.  There have been fortunes made by investors and there have been many fortunes lost.</p>
<p>Imagine machines so small that they could operate and move freely in your blood.  Imagine coatings that are comprised of molecules and materials small enough that they get a perfectly flat surface.  Unfortunately, you also have to consider toxicity, regulation, and the potential for a destructive use for such small products.  There is one ETF in the PowerShares Lux Nanotech (NYSE: PXN).</p>
<p>The PowerShares Lux Nanotech (NYSE: PXN) from Invesco seeks to track the the Lux Nanotech index.  It is comprised of some well-known companies and many companies have nanotech as a portion of their business.  The ETF has been around since the end of 2005 and has never recaptured its former highs.  It is also small at about $6 million in assets and trades under 25,000 shares a day on average.  Its 52-week range is $7.74 to $10.85.  Some of the companies in the fund include A123 Systems, Elan, 3M, GE, and Headwaters; but this ETF has some very risky and very volatile holdings as well.</p>
<p>Harris &amp; Harris Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: TINY) is a nanotech venture capital fund whose website address tinytechvc.com tells what it is all about.  Its market capitalization is roughly $137 million, it trades close to 100,000 shares per day, and its 52-week range is $3.70 to $5.50.  While this is not a fund, it is close enough as the <a href="http://www.tinytechvc.com/portfolio.cfm" target="_blank" target="_blank">VC-company&#8217;s portfolio</a> has more than 30 investment company holdings.  The company claimed a net asset value of $4.51 per share as of September 30, 2010, but founder Charles Harris also passed away at the end of September 2010.</p>
<p><strong>Advanced Batteries&#8230; High on Lithium</strong></p>
<p>All of those rechargeable batteries, batteries in consumer electronics and electric cars need lithium, which makes it a trend for futurists to consider.  There are two key risks here for this precious commodity: it could eventually run out or become uneconomical.  Moreover, China and Russia are major suppliers, which gives the sector an element of political instability.</p>
<p>Is it possible a better technology could come along?  Of course.  Still, there are many opportunities in the industry and it is probably no accident that behemoths such as General Electric have already invested in advanced batteries and have vowed to continue to do so. Lithium demand has nearly doubled in the past decade from above 15,000 metric tons in 2002 and is expected to rise to 55,000 metric tons by 2020 , according to the TRU Group.</p>
<p>Global X Lithium ETF (NYSE: LIT) is a very new ETF that launched in the summer and its holdings are solely in companies active in exploring and mining of lithium and producing lithium batteries.  So far it has been a big success.  The fund seeks to track the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Some key holdings are Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile (above 22% of the fund), FMC Corp., Rockwood Holdings, Sanyo Electric, Ener1 and A123 Systems.  Assets under management are $91.5 million, it trades over 100,000 shares on an average day, in a range of $15.63 to $21.30.<br />
<strong>Alternative Energy, In A Broader Sense</strong></p>
<p>Investing in alternative energy may hold the promise of the future.  It has also been very painful even for futurists with a decade or longer outlook.  True futurists may seek an answer out of wind, solar, wave, geothermal, biofuels and even nuclear energy.  Not all alternative energy is technically renewable.  But the world needs alternative energy sources.  That is no longer even debated in public by most oil executives.</p>
<p>A problem that arises even for futurists with a ten-year outlook or longer is that the oil and gas giants of today may be the leaders of alternative energy in the future.  BP plc (NYSE: BP) has one of the worlds largest solar operations, and it is not unchallenged by other oil and gas giants.  Another caveat is that you do not need to be a futurist to see how many alternative energy and renewable energy investments are often considered nothing more than highly leveraged bets against the future price of oil.</p>
<p>PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy (NYSE: PBW) is one of the go-to ETF products in alternative energy.  The fund is meant to track the performance of the WilderHill Clean Energy index.  Its largest holdings do seem to be more geared toward solar, which is most established alternative energy technology.  Some of its key components are First Solar, Broadwind Energy, IDACORP, JA Solar, and Suntech Power.  The fund has more than $550 million in assets, it trades over 300,000 shares per day, and its 52-week range is roughly $8.25 to $11.95.  The biggest issue is performance as it was worth over $25 at the 2008 peak versus close to $10.00 currently.</p>
<p>PowerShares Cleantech (NYSE: PZD) is the international and smaller competing version of the PowerShares Wilderhill Clean Energy ETF.  It is meant to track the price and yield performance of the Cleantech index.  Some of its top holdings are ABB, Corning, First Solar, IBERDROLA, Novozymes, Siemens, and Vestas Wind Systems.  Assets are about $150 million, it trades only about 14,000 shares a day and its 52-week range is $20.00 to $25.95.  This too suffers from poor performance as its shares were above $35.00 in the 2008 peak versus under $25 today.</p>
<p>An even more international focus in clean energy is the PowerShares Global Clean Energy (NYSE: PBD).  Its focus is to track the performance of the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index and many more companies are global.  Most of its larger constituent members are not known to most US investors.  The market cap is fairly small at about $160 million, it trades about 40,000 shares a day, and its 52-week range is $11.51 to $17.64.  It is far from alone in performance anxiety as this was above $30 at the peak and it is closer to $13.00 in November-2010.</p>
<p><strong>Rare Earth&#8230; Not So Rare, But&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Any investors thinking of investing in rare earth should consider what happened in 2010 before putting on a futurist&#8217;s hat and taking a shot.   All caveats aside, nations such as the United States have to depend upon foreign sources of rare earth materials and these are critical for defense equipment  autos, clean energy, electronics and medical devices.  It is vital that these REOs and REEs have a local source and it is vital that we have our own sources.  The risks in investing in this might be like comparing biotech to DJIA components.  Futurists down the road will likely concede that many of the companies in this field were little more than Hail Mary passes with a story rather than real assets that could be monetized economically.</p>
<p>The Market Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (NYSE: REMX) is the only current fund-oriented instrument that revolves around the REE and REO trade.  It is extremely new, its methodology is unproven, and its company constituents are often very risky companies with promises rather than operating histories.  The launch came at the end of October-2008 and it has been very actively traded.  For 2010, we are going to not discuss price ranges, performance, and more because of all the risks here.  Either way and regardless of how this performs, the rare earth theme is unlikely a theme that purchasing managers will not have to consider for the future.</p>
<p><strong>Back to futurists and secular themes in general&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>If you want to learn more about futurist thoughts and ideas, one source I have used for some time is the <a href="http://www.wfs.org/" target="_blank" target="_blank">World Future Society</a>.  This is not an investment web site.  It has offered insight for futurists and those who think beyond the next month for years and years.  It publishes <em>The Futurist</em><em> </em>magazine, has free email newsletters, conferences, books, blogs, and links to many local chapters throughout the U.S. and around the world.</p>
<p>Predicting markets and sectors is a tricky game, and most forecasting models have a hard enough time getting the next week or month accurate.  Modeling for a decade or a generation is that much harder.</p>
<p>JON C.  OGG</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<br />Filed under: <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/active-trader/'>Active Trader</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/activist-investor/'>Activist Investor</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/adr/'>ADR</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/agriculture/'>Agriculture</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/alternative-energy/'>Alternative Energy</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/analyst-calls/'>Analyst Calls</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/biotech/'>Biotech</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/business-services/'>Business Services</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/commodities/'>Commodities</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/commodities-metals/'>Commodities &amp; Metals</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/consumer-electronics/'>Consumer Electronics</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/economy/'>Economy</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/editors-picks/'>Editor's Picks</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/emerging-markets/'>Emerging Markets</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/entertainment/'>Entertainment</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/etf/'>ETF</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/etfs-mutual-funds/'>ETFs &amp; Mutual Funds</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/food/'>Food</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/green-biz/'>Green Biz</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/healthcare/'>Healthcare</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/industrials/'>Industrials</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/infrastructure/'>Infrastructure</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/international-markets/'>International Markets</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/ipos/'>IPOs</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/ipos-secondaries/'>IPOs &amp; Secondaries</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/media/'>Media</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/metals/'>Metals</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/mutual-funds/'>Mutual Funds</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/nanotech/'>Nanotech</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/nuclear/'>Nuclear</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/retail/'>Retail</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/services/'>Services</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/technology/'>Technology</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/technology-companies/'>Technology Companies</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/utilities/'>Utilities</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/category/water/'>Water</a> Tagged: <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/afk/'>AFK</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/bbh/'>BBH</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/bp/'>BP</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/eza/'>EZA</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/ffd/'>FFD</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/fpx/'>FPX</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/gld/'>GLD</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/ibb/'>IBB</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/iposx/'>IPOSX</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/lit/'>LIT</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/moo/'>MOO</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/nlr/'>NLR</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/pbd/'>PBD</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/pbw/'>PBW</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/pho/'>PHO</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/pio/'>PIO</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/pxn/'>PXN</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/pzd/'>PZD</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/remx/'>REMX</a>, <a href='http://247wallst.com/tag/tiny/'>TINY</a> ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://247wallst.com/2010/11/19/top-investment-trends-for-futurists-ffd-afk-eza-pho-pio-pxn-tiny-lit-bp-pbw-pzd-pbd-remx-nlr-moo-gld-bbh-ibb-fpx-iposx-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category domain="tickers">AFK</category><category domain="tickers">BBH</category><category domain="tickers">BP</category><category domain="tickers">EZA</category><category domain="tickers">FFD</category><category domain="tickers">FPX</category><category domain="tickers">GLD</category><category domain="tickers">IBB</category><category domain="tickers">IPOSX</category><category domain="tickers">LIT</category><category domain="tickers">MOO</category><category domain="tickers">NLR</category><category domain="tickers">PBD</category><category domain="tickers">PBW</category><category domain="tickers">PHO</category><category domain="tickers">PIO</category><category domain="tickers">PXN</category><category domain="tickers">PZD</category><category domain="tickers">REMX</category><category domain="tickers">TINY</category>
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4f47d41f885f4a21d5f519f6d303d0bd?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">247wallst</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://247wallst.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/back-to-the-future2.jpg?w=200" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Back to the Future</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear Stocks Reacting to USEC Woes (USU, CCJ, NLR, URZ, DNN, URRE, PESI)</title>
		<link>http://247wallst.com/2009/07/28/nuclear-stocks-reacting-to-usec-woes-usu-ccj-nlr-urz-dnn-urre-pesi/</link>
		<comments>http://247wallst.com/2009/07/28/nuclear-stocks-reacting-to-usec-woes-usu-ccj-nlr-urz-dnn-urre-pesi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas A. McIntyre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Active Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trading Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PESI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://247wallst.com/?p=42298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have already covered the nuclear winter blow-up over at USEC Inc. (NYSE: USU) after the DOE declines to issue a guarantee for it long-pending loan application.  What we wanted to see is what the fallout is in the rest of the nuclear sector.  As we expected, all of the stocks are down.  The good [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/07/28/nuclear-stocks-reacting-to-usec-woes-usu-ccj-nlr-urz-dnn-urre-pesi/carbon-emission-image-5/"rel="attachment wp-att-42301" ><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-42301" title="Carbon Emission Image" src="http://247wallst.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/carbon-emission-image2.jpg?w=125&#038;h=83" alt="Carbon Emission Image" width="125" height="83" /></a>We have already covered the <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/07/28/nuclear-winter-uncle-sam-punts-usec-usu/">nuclear winter blow-up</a> over at USEC Inc. (NYSE: USU) after the DOE declines to issue a guarantee for it long-pending loan application.  What we wanted to see is what the fallout is in the rest of the nuclear sector.  As we expected, all of the stocks are down.  The good news is that these are not down anywhere as much we would have guessed based upon the sharp negative reaction for USEC shares.  This has Cameco Corp. (NYSE: CCJ), Market Vectors Nuclear Energy ETF (NYSE: NLR), and others on the defensive.<br />
<span id="more-42298"></span><br />
Cameco Corp. (NYSE: CCJ) is the largest miner and explorer of uranium in North America and is based in Canada, although it is at least somewhat diversified.  The Uranium segment involves in the exploration for mining, milling, and purchase and sale of uranium.  Its stock is down more than 2% at $26.80, and its 52-week range is $11.78 to $36.97.</p>
<p>Market Vectors Nuclear Energy ETF (NYSE: NLR) is the ETF that tracks the nuclear energy field. However, it is very global and tracks the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index.  It normally invests at least 80% of total assets in equities of U.S. and foreign companies which derive at least 50% of their total revenues from nuclear energy business.  This ETF is down 3.5% at $22.64 and its 52-week trading range is $13.75 to $31.06.</p>
<p>Uranerz Energy Corp. (NYSE/AMEX: URZ) is the speculative exploration stage company for uranium resources.  Shares are down 4.4% at $1.93 in light volume trading of 63,000 shares (avg. volume is 350,000 or so).  Uranerz has a 52-week trading range of $0.40 to $2.67.  Denison Mines Corp. (NYSE/AMEX: DNN) made an investment Uranerz Energy Corp and its stock is down 4% at $1.73 on 380,000 shares, and its 52-week range is $0.54 to $6.95.</p>
<p>Uranium Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ: URRE) is another micro-cap company that engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of uranium.  Its shares are down 6% at $1.05 on about 600,000 shares (vs. 1.15 million avg. volume).  Its 52-week range is $0.36 to $3.69.</p>
<p>Perma-Fix Environmental Services Inc. (NASDAQ: PESI) is a remediation company under a DOE contract for nuclear clean-up.  Its shares are down 2.6% at $2.60 on almost 200,000 shares (vs. almost 300,000 avg. volume).  Perma-Fix has a 52-week trading range of $0.63 to $2.74.</p>
<p>Think of the good news.  If you are investing based upon the notion that the U.S. is going to have to keep being dependent upon foreign energy, this denial just helped to keep that scenario as more likely rather than less likely.</p>
<p>JON C. OGG<br />
JULY 28, 2009</p>
<br />Posted in Active Trader, Infrastructure, Nuclear, Trading Alert, Utilities Tagged: CCJ, DNN, NLR, PESI, URRE, URZ, USU ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://247wallst.com/2009/07/28/nuclear-stocks-reacting-to-usec-woes-usu-ccj-nlr-urz-dnn-urre-pesi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category domain="tickers">CCJ</category><category domain="tickers">DNN</category><category domain="tickers">NLR</category><category domain="tickers">PESI</category><category domain="tickers">URRE</category><category domain="tickers">URZ</category><category domain="tickers">USU</category>
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4f47d41f885f4a21d5f519f6d303d0bd?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">247wallst</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://247wallst.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/carbon-emission-image2.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Carbon Emission Image</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pressure on Uranium Prices, Real or Not? (CCJ, URRE, DNN, NLR)</title>
		<link>http://247wallst.com/2009/04/21/pressure-on-uranium-prices-real-or-not-ccj-urre-dnn-nlr/</link>
		<comments>http://247wallst.com/2009/04/21/pressure-on-uranium-prices-real-or-not-ccj-urre-dnn-nlr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas A. McIntyre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Active Trader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities & Metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trading Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URRE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://247wallst.com/?p=31452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because there is no real established exchange for buying and selling uranium, the workings of the uranium mining business is pretty much as mysterious to most of us as the nuclear reaction itself. One uranium miner, Cameco Corporation (NYSE:CCJ), trades substantial volumes at share prices well above $1/share. Most trade around a buck a share, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because there is no real established exchange for buying and selling uranium, the workings of the uranium mining business is pretty much as mysterious to most of us as the nuclear reaction itself. One uranium miner, Cameco Corporation (NYSE:CCJ), trades substantial volumes at share prices well above $1/share. Most trade around a buck a share, at thin volumes, and have market caps well below $1 billion. That doesn&#8217;t mean there isn&#8217;t any action in uranium, just that it&#8217;s hard to spot. For example, Uranium Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ:URRE) recently received a decision in federal circuit court related to oversight of a planned underground injection control program that the company needs for in situ mining on a site within the Navajo Nation. The US Environmental Protection Agency has been judged to be the permitting agency for the project. Both the Navajo Nation and the state of New Mexico sought control of the program, and either would have been more to the company&#8217;s liking.</p>
<ul>
<li><span id="more-31452"></span>While we have stated no real exchange exists, there is that old NYMEX-Ux Consulting <a href="http://www.nymex.com/UX_pre_agree.aspx" target="_blank" target="_blank">partnership</a> to provide financially settled on- and off-exchange traded uranium futures contracts.  Unfortunately, no data is available on that.  There is also <a href="http://www.uxc.com/review/uxc_Prices.aspx" target="_blank" target="_blank">the tracking</a> via Ux Consulting that shows week-old data.</li>
</ul>
<p>Another miner, Denison Mines Corp. (AMEX:DNN) has just agreed to sell a 19.9% stake in the company to Korea Electric Power Company, for about $62 million. The company will raise another $16 million from sales to &#8220;entities nominated by or affiliated with Denison&#8217;s chairman.&#8221; The company will issue some 73 million new shares at about $1.06/share.</p>
<p>Since hitting a price high of about $120/pound in 2007, uranium prices have tumbled to around $40/pound and with them the fortunes of uranium miners. Even Cameco, which trades at around $17/share is well down from a 52-week high of $44/share. It&#8217;s highest closing price in 2007 was above $55/share, more than two-thirds higher than today&#8217;s price. Uranium Resources hit its high of more than $13/share in November 2007 and trades today at about $0.55/share.</p>
<p>Because nuclear power generation still provides the single best hope for generating enough electricity to have a meaningful impact on carbon emissions reductions, it seems reasonable to expect that uranium prices will rise. The problem, of course, is the long lead times and enormous expense of building new nuclear plants, especially in the US. Outside the US, Britain and Korea are actively discussing plans for more nuclear generation, and China and India are both known to have significant interest in nuclear power.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still too early to predict a resurgence in uranium mining stocks. But if energy prices rise or if there is more of an olive branch from the administration, then it&#8217;s just a matter of time.</p>
<p>The Market Vectors Nuclear Energy ETF (NYSE: NLR) ETF is also still rather suppressed.  At $18.50, its 52-week trading range is $13.75 to $36.42.</p>
<p>Paul Ausick<br />
April 21, 2009</p>
<br />Posted in Active Trader, Commodities, Commodities &amp; Metals, Nuclear, Trading Alert, Utilities Tagged: CCJ, DNN, NLR, URRE ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://247wallst.com/2009/04/21/pressure-on-uranium-prices-real-or-not-ccj-urre-dnn-nlr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category domain="tickers">CCJ</category><category domain="tickers">DNN</category><category domain="tickers">NLR</category><category domain="tickers">URRE</category>
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4f47d41f885f4a21d5f519f6d303d0bd?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">247wallst</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>As Media Touts Nuclear Power, Time To Review Nuclear &amp; Uranium Stocks (CCJ, USU, SGE, FLR, GE, URRE, USEG, URZ, CAU, MOS, CF, NLR)</title>
		<link>http://247wallst.com/2007/09/14/as-media-touts/</link>
		<comments>http://247wallst.com/2007/09/14/as-media-touts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas A. McIntyre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chernobyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three mile island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USEG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://247wallst.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/as-media-touts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like the media is touting and flaunting more and more for a return of nuclear energy.&#160; This may or may not happen as the applications are again for &#34;Next Year&#34; and it is with no surprise that it&#8217;s becoming the topic of much labor in Mexico pronounced &#34;Man-ya-na&#34; (sorry no N~ without changing [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like the media is touting and flaunting more and more for a return of nuclear energy.&nbsp; This may or may not happen as the applications are again for &quot;Next Year&quot; and it is with no surprise that it&#8217;s becoming the topic of much labor in Mexico pronounced <em>&quot;Man-ya-na&quot; (sorry no N~ without changing languages)</em>.&nbsp; &nbsp; You can also see where spot Uranium prices have come down significantly from the pre-summer ramp and summer highs.&nbsp; TradeTech&#8217;s Uranium site shows <a href="http://www.uranium.info/" target="_blank">its price chart for Uranium</a> and The Ux Consulting Company <a href="http://www.uxc.com/review/uxc_Prices.aspx" target="_blank">shows much of the same</a>.&nbsp; But with $80.00 per barrel of oil and T. Boone Pickens <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/09/t-boone-pickens.html">calling for even higher oil prices</a> you never know just how long the <em>&quot;call for nuclear power&quot;</em> will take to resurface from the investment community.&nbsp; Nuclear power is getting more media coverage again.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume for a moment that we forget about the discussions leading to delays that have been perpetual.&nbsp; Let&#8217;s for get about the political side of nuclear power.&nbsp; Lets forget about killing land under mountains where we&#8217;ll bury the stuff in Nevada.&nbsp; And let&#8217;s forget about the potential environmental catastrophe that can result if something goes horribly wrong. </p>
<p>There are many stock plays in the U.S. alone that will be huge beneficiaries of this if even one nuclear power plant approval goes through.&nbsp; If there is one, why not the full dozen of them.&nbsp; Here is the lot of companies:</p>
<p>Shaw Group (NYSE:<strong>SGR</strong>) is perhaps the most vertical of the engineering and construction firms.&nbsp; Fluor (NYSE:<strong>FLR</strong>) is also in there.&nbsp; And we can&#8217;t leave out the monster General Electric (NYSE:<strong>GE</strong>) for new reactors, nuclear fuel, reactor services and performance services.</p>
<p>Cameco (NYSE:<strong>CCJ</strong>) out of Canada is THE go-to behemoth in the stock market for Uranium miners and producers.&nbsp; The much smaller company in the US is USEC (NYSE:<strong>USU</strong>), although its shares were hit exceptionally hard Friday after testing started.&nbsp; Some more smaller and much more speculative stocks in the sector are Uranium Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ:<strong>URRE</strong>), U.S. Energy Corp. (NASDAQ:<strong>USEG</strong>), Uranerz Energy Corp (AMEX:<strong>URZ</strong>), and even Canyon Resources Corporation (AMEX:<strong>CAU</strong>).&nbsp; Mosaic (NYSE:<strong>MOS</strong>) and CF Industries (NYSE:<strong>CF</strong>) are stealth plays in the sector that can enrich uranium from phosphate, but you should know that prices have to be very high and have to be expected to remain very high for quite some time for those to be cost effective.</p>
<p><em>&nbsp;</em></p>
<p><span id="more-9020"></span></p>
<p>The Economist recent magazine cover also <a href="http://economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9762843&amp;CFID=23433171&amp;CFTOKEN=59997403" target="_blank">flaunted a comeback for nuclear power</a>.It said America&#8217;s nuclear industry is about to embark on its biggestexpansion in more than a generation. This will influence energy policyin the rest of the world.&nbsp; CNET today discussed the wave of coming <a href="http://www.news.com/Nuclear+power+looks+for+comeback+in+U.S./2100-11392-6207899.html?part=dht&amp;tag=nl.e703" target="_blank">applications for more nuclear power plants</a>that are coming. Personally, I&#8217;m a believer in this.&nbsp; No greenhousegases, no pollution, no icky air around the place.&nbsp; But the dark sideis not Three Mile Island.&nbsp; That was nothing.&nbsp; The dark side isChernobyl and a vast area of land that won&#8217;t be habitable forgenerations and generations.&nbsp; The other thing that might act as apossible lid on investors reviewing nuclear power stocks this timearound is that <a href="http://www.gasbuddy.com/" target="_blank">local gas prices for your car</a> are far lower than earlier this year when energy prices were rising but not as high as the $80.00 seen this week.</p>
<p>No wonder <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2006/12/uranium_investo.html">Merrill Lynch got credit</a>for what seemed to be overly bullish analysis that ended up lookinglike they had a crystal ball for a few months.&nbsp; They gave a huge safetynet for uranium prices. The Canadian National Post also gave <a href="http://communities.canada.com/nationalpost/blogs/tradingdesk/archive/2007/05/04/sxr-uranium-s-recent-purchase-signals-u-s-push-raymond-james-lists-potential-acquisition-targets.aspx" target="_blank">some buyout picks</a> in the sector based on Raymond James analysis.</p>
<p>Nuclear power plants are coming online more and more in China andIndia, and Japan and France are largely dependent upon the glowinggreen juice to power those nations.&nbsp; Russia is showing it is expandingnuclear power use again and South Korea is expanding its program.&nbsp; Noneof us in the Western hemisphere are going to be too excited about this,but the chances that we are going to have to deal with a nuclear-usingIran is getting larger instead of smaller.</p>
<p>Back in August an ETF was launched as the Market Vectors Nuclear EnergyETF that launched on the American Stock Exchange under the &quot;<strong>NLR</strong>&quot; ticker, but only a portion of these stocks in here are US-based and many names wont be familiar.&nbsp; Here is the f<a href="http://www.vaneck.com/index.cfm?cat=3193&amp;tkr=NLR" target="_blank">ull list of the company stocks in the ETF</a>.</p>
<p>Jon C. Ogg<br />September 14, 2007</p>
<p><em>Jon C. Ogg can be reached at jonogg@247wallst.com; he produces the 24/7 Wall St. <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/special_situation_newsletter.html">Special Situation Investing Newsletter</a> and does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em></p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/247wallst.wordpress.com/9020/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/247wallst.wordpress.com/9020/" /> ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://247wallst.com/2007/09/14/as-media-touts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category domain="tickers">Cameco</category><category domain="tickers">CAU</category><category domain="tickers">CCJ</category><category domain="tickers">CF</category><category domain="tickers">chernobyl</category><category domain="tickers">FLR</category><category domain="tickers">GE</category><category domain="tickers">General Electric</category><category domain="tickers">MOS</category><category domain="tickers">NLR</category><category domain="tickers">Nuclear</category><category domain="tickers">SGE</category><category domain="tickers">three mile island</category><category domain="tickers">uranium</category><category domain="tickers">URRE</category><category domain="tickers">URZ</category><category domain="tickers">USEC</category><category domain="tickers">USEG</category><category domain="tickers">USU</category>
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4f47d41f885f4a21d5f519f6d303d0bd?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">247wallst</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
