Special Report
How Health Insurance Coverage in North Dakota Compares to Other States
Published:
The share of Americans under the age of 65 without health insurance fell every year between 2010, when the Affordable Care Act was signed into law, and 2016, when President Barack Obama left office. Though the U.S. uninsured rate among Americans younger than 65 has inched up over the years since, it remains well below the reported 17%+ figures in the years leading up to the ACA.
Without a universal health care program, most Americans under age 65 — the age of eligibility for Medicare — receive employer-based health insurance coverage. Under this system, 10.8% of Americans younger than 65, approximately 29 million people, lacked health insurance in 2019 — and that was before the COVID-19 pandemic put over 22 million Americans out of work.
While most of those jobs have since been restored, the official uninsured rate for Americans younger than 65 for 2020 will likely be higher than the 2019 rate.
In North Dakota, an estimated 50,761 residents lack health insurance coverage — or 8.1% of the under 65 noninstitutionalized population, the 18th lowest uninsured rate among states.
Across the state, 68.3% of the population under age 65 have employer-based insurance, compared to 60.0% of the same age group nationwide. Another 12.4% of the under 65 population in the state are insured through Medicaid, and 13.6% purchased their own insurance directly — compared to the national rates of 21.0% and 9.7%, respectively.
The rankings in this story are based on one-year estimates of the percentage of Americans under 65 without health insurance from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2019 American Community Survey.
Rank | State | Pop. under 65 w/o insurance | Pop. under 65 with employer-based insurance | Pop. under 65 with directly purchased insurance | Pop. under 65 with Medicaid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | Massachusetts | 3.5% | 68.1% | 10.2% | 23.0% |
49 | Rhode Island | 4.8% | 66.8% | 11.7% | 21.6% |
48 | Hawaii | 5.0% | 66.9% | 9.9% | 19.5% |
47 | Vermont | 5.6% | 60.6% | 10.3% | 25.8% |
46 | Minnesota | 5.8% | 69.8% | 8.4% | 18.9% |
45 | Iowa | 6.0% | 67.6% | 8.5% | 21.3% |
44 | New York | 6.1% | 60.2% | 10.8% | 26.9% |
43 | Wisconsin | 6.8% | 69.5% | 8.8% | 17.6% |
41 — tied | Maryland | 6.9% | 65.6% | 9.3% | 19.6% |
41 — tied | Michigan | 6.9% | 63.7% | 8.9% | 23.8% |
39 — tied | Pennsylvania | 7.0% | 65.1% | 9.2% | 22.0% |
39 — tied | Connecticut | 7.0% | 64.2% | 8.5% | 23.2% |
38 | New Hampshire | 7.6% | 68.8% | 9.1% | 14.6% |
36 — tied | Kentucky | 7.7% | 57.1% | 7.3% | 28.3% |
36 — tied | Washington | 7.7% | 63.7% | 8.3% | 21.4% |
35 | Ohio | 7.8% | 64.4% | 7.3% | 22.2% |
33 — tied | North Dakota | 8.1% | 68.3% | 13.6% | 12.4% |
33 — tied | Delaware | 8.1% | 63.6% | 8.3% | 23.0% |
32 | West Virginia | 8.3% | 57.4% | 5.7% | 30.0% |
30 — tied | Oregon | 8.6% | 61.4% | 9.4% | 23.0% |
30 — tied | Illinois | 8.6% | 64.9% | 8.3% | 19.7% |
29 | California | 8.9% | 56.9% | 10.4% | 26.4% |
28 | New Jersey | 9.2% | 66.4% | 8.7% | 17.4% |
26 — tied | Virginia | 9.3% | 64.4% | 9.3% | 14.5% |
26 — tied | Colorado | 9.3% | 62.4% | 10.5% | 18.1% |
25 | Nebraska | 9.8% | 67.2% | 12.1% | 13.4% |
24 | Maine | 10.1% | 61.4% | 10.5% | 20.2% |
23 | Montana | 10.2% | 55.0% | 13.6% | 23.6% |
22 | Indiana | 10.3% | 64.4% | 7.8% | 19.1% |
21 | Louisiana | 10.5% | 50.9% | 8.4% | 31.6% |
20 | Utah | 10.8% | 68.8% | 12.5% | 9.8% |
18 — tied | Kansas | 10.9% | 66.4% | 10.1% | 14.3% |
18 — tied | Arkansas | 10.9% | 51.4% | 9.1% | 29.1% |
17 | Alabama | 11.7% | 58.2% | 9.7% | 20.8% |
15 — tied | New Mexico | 12.0% | 46.1% | 7.6% | 37.0% |
15 — tied | Missouri | 12.0% | 63.3% | 9.3% | 15.6% |
14 | Tennessee | 12.1% | 58.4% | 9.6% | 21.0% |
13 | South Dakota | 12.2% | 61.8% | 12.8% | 14.2% |
12 | Idaho | 12.8% | 58.7% | 12.9% | 17.3% |
11 | South Carolina | 13.2% | 57.0% | 10.1% | 20.2% |
9 — tied | North Carolina | 13.4% | 56.7% | 10.7% | 19.2% |
9 — tied | Nevada | 13.4% | 59.4% | 8.7% | 18.9% |
8 | Arizona | 13.6% | 56.2% | 8.5% | 22.8% |
7 | Alaska | 13.9% | 55.0% | 6.4% | 22.8% |
6 | Wyoming | 14.8% | 62.6% | 10.8% | 12.3% |
5 | Mississippi | 15.4% | 50.9% | 8.6% | 25.1% |
4 | Georgia | 15.5% | 58.1% | 9.2% | 17.5% |
3 | Florida | 16.3% | 51.4% | 14.2% | 18.1% |
2 | Oklahoma | 16.8% | 54.8% | 9.3% | 18.7% |
1 | Texas | 20.8% | 54.8% | 8.6% | 16.2% |
A financial advisor can help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of investment properties. Finding a qualified financial advisor doesn’t have to be hard. SmartAsset’s free tool matches you with up to three financial advisors who serve your area, and you can interview your advisor matches at no cost to decide which one is right for you. If you’re ready to find an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals, get started now.
Investing in real estate can diversify your portfolio. But expanding your horizons may add additional costs. If you’re an investor looking to minimize expenses, consider checking out online brokerages. They often offer low investment fees, helping you maximize your profit.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.