The COVID-19 pandemic sent economic shockwaves through the U.S. economy, tripling the monthly unemployment to nearly 15% and leading to a more than 30% quarterly decline in GDP — by far the largest economic contraction in U.S. history.
No corner of the country was untouched by the pandemic’s economic consequences — but some states have emerged better off than others. A range of factors, including industrial diversity, labor force education levels, household income, and long-term GDP growth, have an effect on a state’s overall economic strength — and its ability to withstand the impact of the pandemic.
To determine the states with the best and worst economies, both in the years leading up to the pandemic and during it, 24/7 Wall St. created an index of five measures — five-year economic growth, five-year employment growth, the poverty rate, unemployment rate, and share of adults with a bachelor’s degree or higher.
New York state is up against one of the worst unemployment crises in the country. An estimated 8.5% of the state’s labor force are out of work, the second largest share of any state and well above the 6.0% U.S. unemployment rate. Much of the state’s current unemployment problems are the result of the pandemic as just a year ago, New York’s jobless rate was just 3.9%. Since then, the number of people working in the state has fallen by nearly 400,000.
Even before the pandemic, New York’s economy lagged behind that of most other states in its ability to lift people out of poverty. New York’s 13.0% poverty rate is higher than the 12.3% national rate.
All index components used to create this ranking were included at equal weight. All data used to create the index came from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the U.S. Census Bureau. Additional state level data on economic output by industry from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. This is how all 50 state economies rank.
| Rank | State | Poverty rate | March 2021 unemployment rate | Avg. annual employment chg., March 2016 to March 2021 | Avg. annual GDP chg., Q4 2015 to Q4 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Utah | 8.9% | 2.9% | +2.0% | +3.9% |
| 2 | Idaho | 11.2% | 3.2% | +2.3% | +3.9% |
| 3 | Washington | 9.8% | 5.4% | +1.2% | +4.3% |
| 4 | Colorado | 9.3% | 6.4% | +1.4% | +2.8% |
| 5 | New Hampshire | 7.3% | 3.0% | +0.2% | +0.6% |
| 6 | Nebraska | 9.9% | 2.9% | +0.0% | +1.2% |
| 7 | Minnesota | 9.0% | 4.2% | -0.1% | +1.1% |
| 8 | Massachusetts | 9.4% | 6.8% | +0.2% | +1.4% |
| 9 | Georgia | 13.3% | 4.5% | +1.7% | +2.2% |
| 10 | Oregon | 11.4% | 6.0% | +0.9% | +2.8% |
| 11 | Virginia | 9.9% | 5.1% | -0.2% | +1.2% |
| 12 | Kansas | 11.4% | 3.7% | +0.2% | +1.1% |
| 13 | Montana | 12.6% | 3.8% | +0.5% | +1.2% |
| 14 | South Dakota | 11.9% | 2.9% | +0.6% | +0.8% |
| 15 | Florida | 12.7% | 4.7% | +0.9% | +2.2% |
| 16 | Maryland | 9.0% | 6.2% | -0.6% | +1.0% |
| 17 | Arizona | 13.5% | 6.7% | +1.9% | +2.9% |
| 18 | Wisconsin | 10.4% | 3.8% | -0.2% | +0.8% |
| 19 | Vermont | 10.2% | 2.9% | -1.9% | -0.1% |
| 20 | North Carolina | 13.6% | 5.2% | +0.8% | +1.7% |
| 21 | Indiana | 11.9% | 3.9% | +0.1% | +1.5% |
| 22 | South Carolina | 13.8% | 5.1% | +0.9% | +1.8% |
| 23 | Maine | 10.9% | 4.8% | -0.7% | +1.0% |
| 24 | Alabama | 15.5% | 3.8% | +1.3% | +1.1% |
| 25 | Tennessee | 13.9% | 5.0% | +1.2% | +1.0% |
| 26 | Missouri | 12.9% | 4.2% | -0.0% | +0.7% |
| 27 | New Jersey | 9.2% | 7.7% | -0.9% | +0.3% |
| 28 | Iowa | 11.2% | 3.7% | -0.9% | +0.3% |
| 29 | Ohio | 13.1% | 4.7% | +0.0% | +0.7% |
| 30 | North Dakota | 10.6% | 4.4% | -0.6% | -0.4% |
| 31 | Texas | 13.6% | 6.9% | +0.6% | +1.7% |
| 32 | California | 11.8% | 8.3% | -0.6% | +2.4% |
| 33 | Delaware | 11.3% | 6.5% | +0.4% | -0.6% |
| 34 | Nevada | 12.5% | 8.1% | +1.5% | +1.9% |
| 35 | Michigan | 13.0% | 5.1% | -0.6% | +0.4% |
| 36 | Wyoming | 10.1% | 5.3% | -0.4% | -1.6% |
| 37 | Rhode Island | 10.8% | 7.1% | -0.8% | -0.5% |
| 38 | Oklahoma | 15.2% | 4.2% | +0.4% | -0.6% |
| 39 | Pennsylvania | 12.0% | 7.3% | -0.8% | +0.6% |
| 40 | Illinois | 11.5% | 7.1% | -1.6% | +0.2% |
| 41 | New York | 13.0% | 8.5% | -0.8% | +0.8% |
| 42 | Arkansas | 16.2% | 4.4% | +0.1% | +0.6% |
| 43 | Alaska | 10.1% | 6.6% | -0.8% | -0.8% |
| 44 | Connecticut | 10.0% | 8.3% | -2.4% | +0.1% |
| 45 | Kentucky | 16.3% | 5.0% | -0.1% | +0.5% |
| 46 | Hawaii | 9.3% | 9.0% | -2.1% | -0.5% |
| 47 | West Virginia | 16.0% | 5.9% | +0.3% | -0.2% |
| 48 | New Mexico | 18.2% | 8.3% | -0.1% | +1.1% |
| 49 | Mississippi | 19.6% | 6.3% | +0.1% | +0.5% |
| 50 | Louisiana | 19.0% | 7.3% | -0.8% | +0.3% |
Essential Tips for Investing: Sponsored
A financial advisor can help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of investment properties. Finding a qualified financial advisor doesn’t have to be hard. SmartAsset’s free tool matches you with up to three financial advisors who serve your area, and you can interview your advisor matches at no cost to decide which one is right for you. If you’re ready to find an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals, get started now.
Investing in real estate can diversify your portfolio. But expanding your horizons may add additional costs. If you’re an investor looking to minimize expenses, consider checking out online brokerages. They often offer low investment fees, helping you maximize your profit.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Editors' Picks
