The consumer price index jumped by 0.8% in April — a far larger increase than many had anticipated. The recent spike in the cost of goods and services has led to widespread concerns over inflation. If the cost of living continues to climb at such a rapid pace, it could outpace wage growth, weakening the buying power of the American consumer. Such an outcome would be a reversal of a long-term trend in much of the United States.
Over the last 10 years, real personal income per capita, a measure of annual earnings that is adjusted for inflation, climbed in the United States from $42,287 in 2010 to $53,071 in 2020. There are many potential factors that drove up real personal income, not the least of which is wage growth outpacing inflation.
Real personal income per capita in Oregon stands at $49,328, up 29.0% from a decade ago. Wages rising faster than the cost of living likely contributed to the surge in real per capita income in the state. The average weekly wage in Oregon is $975, up 34.7% from $724 in 2010. Nationwide, average weekly wages rose by 31.8% over the same period.
Oregon also has a larger share of the population in the workforce compared to a decade ago, and this has also likely driven up real personal income per capita in the state. Overall employment climbed by 13.7% between 2010 and 2020, outpacing the state’s 10.7% population growth over the same period. An estimated 43.0% of Oregon’s population were working as of 2020, up from 41.9% in 2010.
Percent growth in real personal income per capita from 2010 to 2020 was calculated using data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Personal income figures were adjusted from current dollars to constant 2012 dollars using the U.S. personal consumption expenditure price index and were also adjusted for regional price differences using regional price parity in accordance with the methodology provided by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. These are the 16 states where incomes are rising the fastest.
| Rank | State | 10-yr. chg. in real personal income per capita (%) | Real personal income per capita, 2020 ($) | 10-yr. workforce participation chg. (ppt.) | 10-yr. chg. in avg. weekly hours worked (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Utah | +39.0 | 48,052 | +4.4 | -3.4 |
| 2 | California | +35.0 | 53,097 | +2.7 | +2.4 |
| 3 | Illinois | +32.0 | 57,412 | +1.5 | +0.3 |
| 4 | Colorado | +31.7 | 55,369 | +1.4 | -2.3 |
| 5 | Idaho | +31.2 | 46,567 | +2.9 | +1.2 |
| 6 | Michigan | +30.5 | 50,706 | +1.3 | +1.5 |
| 7 | New York | +29.7 | 56,186 | +1.3 | -2.1 |
| 8 | Arkansas | +29.1 | 48,263 | +1.1 | -0.6 |
| 9 | Oregon | +29.0 | 49,328 | +1.1 | +0.6 |
| 10 | Washington | +28.8 | 55,607 | +0.5 | +2.3 |
| 11 | Pennsylvania | +27.9 | 56,923 | -0.4 | +3.0 |
| 12 | Montana | +27.1 | 50,465 | +0.2 | +0.6 |
| 13 | Arizona | +26.8 | 45,103 | +1.1 | -0.6 |
| 14 | Indiana | +26.4 | 50,772 | +1.0 | +0.3 |
| 15 | Nevada | +25.8 | 48,896 | -0.8 | 0 |
| 16 | Ohio | +25.7 | 52,849 | +1.3 | +2.4 |
| 17 | Georgia | +25.2 | 48,554 | +1.3 | -0.3 |
| 18 | Massachusetts | +24.7 | 63,468 | -0.4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | Iowa | +23.7 | 54,460 | -0.6 | +0.9 |
| 20 | South Carolina | +23.4 | 45,795 | +0.7 | -2.0 |
| 21 | Delaware | +22.6 | 50,743 | -1.6 | +0.3 |
| 22 | Wisconsin | +22.2 | 53,296 | +0.4 | +1.2 |
| 23 | Minnesota | +22.0 | 55,774 | -0.7 | +3.3 |
| 24 | New Jersey | +21.9 | 56,161 | -0.4 | +0.9 |
| 25 | Texas | +21.8 | 50,434 | +0.5 | 0 |
| 26 | Kansas | +21.5 | 55,204 | -0.0 | +0.6 |
| 27 | Nebraska | +21.5 | 56,890 | -0.7 | -1.5 |
| 28 | Wyoming | +21.4 | 60,259 | -3.6 | -4.2 |
| 29 | Tennessee | +21.3 | 49,539 | +2.3 | -0.6 |
| 30 | New Hampshire | +21.0 | 55,179 | -0.5 | +2.4 |
| 31 | Kentucky | +20.8 | 46,530 | +0.4 | 0 |
| 32 | Alabama | +20.6 | 47,598 | +0.8 | +0.6 |
| 33 | Maryland | +20.6 | 55,980 | -1.0 | +0.9 |
| 34 | West Virginia | +20.3 | 45,252 | -0.9 | +1.1 |
| 35 | Hawaii | +20.3 | 43,546 | -3.6 | -0.3 |
| 36 | Florida | +20.2 | 48,677 | +0.9 | -3.7 |
| 37 | New Mexico | +20.2 | 44,320 | -1.1 | -2.9 |
| 38 | North Carolina | +19.1 | 48,197 | +0.8 | +1.5 |
| 39 | Virginia | +19.0 | 54,691 | -0.7 | -3.7 |
| 40 | Maine | +18.9 | 48,518 | -0.5 | +0.9 |
| 41 | Rhode Island | +18.1 | 53,353 | -0.4 | -0.9 |
| 42 | Missouri | +18.0 | 50,611 | +0.5 | -0.9 |
| 43 | South Dakota | +17.6 | 57,098 | -1.8 | +1.2 |
| 44 | Mississippi | +17.4 | 42,878 | +0.6 | -3.6 |
| 45 | Oklahoma | +17.3 | 49,361 | -0.7 | -1.4 |
| 46 | Louisiana | +16.7 | 49,840 | -2.1 | -1.6 |
| 47 | Vermont | +16.2 | 50,497 | -1.6 | -1.5 |
| 48 | North Dakota | +16.2 | 58,415 | -2.2 | +5.5 |
| 49 | Connecticut | +14.8 | 67,336 | -1.3 | +2.4 |
| 50 | Alaska | +12.1 | 54,624 | -4.6 | -0.8 |
Essential Tips for Investing: Sponsored
A financial advisor can help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of investment properties. Finding a qualified financial advisor doesn’t have to be hard. SmartAsset’s free tool matches you with up to three financial advisors who serve your area, and you can interview your advisor matches at no cost to decide which one is right for you. If you’re ready to find an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals, get started now.
Investing in real estate can diversify your portfolio. But expanding your horizons may add additional costs. If you’re an investor looking to minimize expenses, consider checking out online brokerages. They often offer low investment fees, helping you maximize your profit.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Editors' Picks
