
The COVID-19 pandemic was a public health crisis that sent shockwaves through the U.S. economy — and the country’s social fabric. In addition to claiming over half a million American lives, the pandemic sent unemployment soaring and exacerbated existing problems, as drug overdoses and crime rates spiked in some parts of the country.
Even before the pandemic, however, there were cities and towns already grappling with severe social and economic distress. These communities have long struggled with challenges such as high unemployment, poverty, crime, drug misuse, and limited access to essential services.
Based on a weighted index of two-dozen social and economic measures, 24/7 Wall St. identified the worst place to live in every state. We considered cities, towns, villages, and census designated places home to at least 8,000 people.
Beloit is a city of about 37,000 in southern Wisconsin along the Illinois border and ranks as the worst place to live in the state. Beloit residents are more than twice as likely as the typical Wisconsin resident to be unemployed and live below the poverty line.
Beloit residents also have relatively limited access to key amenities. For example, nearly 30% of area residents have limited access to fresh, healthy food — meaning those living in urban areas are over a mile away from a grocery store, and those in rural areas are over 10 miles away.
Our index is composed of data across four categories: affordability, economy, quality of life, and community. Data is all for the most recent year available and came from the U.S. Census Bureau, the FBI, The Department of Agriculture, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other sources. This is the worst city to live in every state.
Place | Median home value ($) | Unemployment rate (%) | Poverty rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Alabama: Atmore | 94,300 | 15.7 | 34.6 |
Alaska: Fairbanks | 211,500 | 7.7 | 11.0 |
Arizona: Douglas | 100,300 | 11.4 | 30.1 |
Arkansas: Helena-West Helena | 73,400 | 11.8 | 45.2 |
California: California City | 124,500 | 19.1 | 24.1 |
Colorado: Pueblo | 141,000 | 8.4 | 23.5 |
Connecticut: Hartford | 165,300 | 12.0 | 28.1 |
Delaware: Wilmington | 168,000 | 8.4 | 26.0 |
Florida: Florida City | 153,100 | 14.0 | 40.0 |
Georgia: Albany | 99,800 | 13.7 | 30.8 |
Hawaii: Makaha | 404,900 | 12.7 | 31.0 |
Idaho: Mountain Home | 144,200 | 6.6 | 16.4 |
Illinois: Sauk Village | 70,400 | 16.3 | 31.8 |
Indiana: Gary | 66,100 | 12.4 | 30.6 |
Iowa: Fort Madison | 81,600 | 8.9 | 15.9 |
Kansas: Coffeyville | 55,800 | 6.0 | 29.3 |
Kentucky: Mayfield | 100,200 | 11.6 | 34.7 |
Louisiana: Opelousas | 98,100 | 8.8 | 43.3 |
Maine: Sanford | 183,800 | 6.4 | 13.9 |
Maryland: Baltimore | 160,100 | 8.3 | 21.2 |
Massachusetts: Holyoke | 195,800 | 6.0 | 29.3 |
Michigan: Highland Park | 45,700 | 22.6 | 46.5 |
Minnesota: Virginia | 92,200 | 6.4 | 25.5 |
Mississippi: Yazoo City | 70,900 | 20.5 | 44.8 |
Missouri: St. Louis | 138,700 | 7.0 | 21.8 |
Montana: Havre | 149,300 | 6.6 | 17.8 |
Nebraska: Scottsbluff | 116,600 | 6.4 | 18.0 |
Nevada: Fernley | 221,200 | 5.8 | 9.9 |
New Hampshire: Berlin | 92,100 | 8.0 | 18.5 |
New Jersey: Bridgeton | 109,200 | 6.9 | 31.2 |
New Mexico: Gallup | 132,000 | 7.4 | 28.4 |
New York: Binghamton | 91,000 | 10.4 | 32.6 |
North Carolina: Reidsville | 103,500 | 9.5 | 24.3 |
North Dakota: Jamestown | 144,800 | 3.2 | 14.7 |
Ohio: East Cleveland | 58,100 | 18.8 | 37.5 |
Oklahoma: McAlester | 101,600 | 6.9 | 19.5 |
Oregon: Klamath Falls | 159,500 | 9.3 | 22.7 |
Pennsylvania: McKeesport | 48,000 | 12.1 | 31.4 |
Rhode Island: Central Falls | 159,100 | 6.8 | 30.2 |
South Carolina: Lancaster | 141,600 | 18.0 | 35.3 |
South Dakota: Huron | 91,900 | 1.6 | 19.7 |
Tennessee: Memphis | 101,800 | 8.7 | 25.1 |
Texas: Robstown | 64,000 | 15.4 | 38.4 |
Utah: Price | 144,700 | 7.7 | 21.9 |
Vermont: Barre | 158,300 | 7.4 | 22.8 |
Virginia: Petersburg | 108,100 | 11.7 | 24.1 |
Washington: Tukwila | 315,000 | 7.6 | 17.2 |
West Virginia: Huntington | 98,200 | 6.8 | 32.3 |
Wisconsin: Beloit | 89,900 | 8.8 | 23.1 |
Wyoming: Rawlins | 171,700 | 5.3 | 11.0 |
Take Charge of Your Retirement: Find the Right Financial Advisor For You in Minutes (Sponsor)
Retirement planning doesn’t have to feel overwhelming. The key is finding professional guidance—and we’ve made it easier than ever for you to connect with the right financial advisor for your unique needs.
Here’s how it works:
1️ Answer a Few Simple Questions
Tell us a bit about your goals and preferences—it only takes a few minutes!
2️ Get Your Top Advisor Matches
This tool matches you with qualified advisors who specialize in helping people like you achieve financial success.
3️ Choose Your Best Fit
Review their profiles, schedule an introductory meeting, and select the advisor who feels right for you.
Why wait? Start building the retirement you’ve always dreamed of. Click here to get started today!
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.