I Took Social Security at 67 and Kept Working: Does That Boost My Benefits?

Some people stop working completely the moment they retire. But it is not unheard of for retirees to hold down a part-time job or start a business, and there can be real perks to doing so. For starters, the extra…

Published August 18, 2025, 9:03am ET · 6 min read

social security card with fifty dollars bills showing incoming cash flow
© MGS / Shutterstock.com

Some people stop working completely the moment they retire. Others hold down a part-time job, freelance on the side, or even launch a small business, and there can be real advantages to all of those choices.

The extra income is the obvious draw. If you rely heavily on Social Security and your savings are modest, a part-time paycheck can bridge the gap between your monthly benefit and your actual living expenses. Beyond the dollars, there is genuine social and emotional value in staying active. Keeping a regular schedule, engaging with coworkers or customers, and having a reason to leave the house a few days a week can do a great deal for your wellbeing in retirement.

In this Reddit post, a 74-year-old who is still working raises a pointed question about Social Security. They began collecting benefits at age 67 and want to know whether their current earnings could push their monthly checks higher.

It is a smart question. Wages earned later in life can move the needle on Social Security benefits, but whether they actually do depends entirely on the shape of your lifetime earnings record.

How Social Security benefits are calculated

Your Social Security benefit rests on the income you earned during your 35 highest-paid years of work. The Social Security Administration (SSA) adjusts those earlier wages upward for historical wage growth before arriving at the monthly figure you can collect at full retirement age (FRA), which is 67 for anyone born in 1960 or later.

Claiming at 62 is permitted, but doing so permanently reduces your monthly benefit, with a deduction applied for each month you claim before FRA. Waiting past FRA works in the opposite direction: each additional month of delay adds roughly 2/3 of 1%, or about 8% per year, up through age 70. After that birthday, no additional delayed-retirement credits accumulate, so there is no financial reason to keep waiting.

How working later in life can affect your benefits

Whether post-retirement wages actually change a benefit comes down to where those earnings fall within a lifetime record. Because the SSA builds its calculation on the top 35 earning years, current wages only matter if they are high enough to displace one of the years already in that group.

A concrete example makes this easier to follow. Suppose the lowest-earning year in the poster’s current top-35 set reflects $30,000 in wages. If current part-time work brings in $15,000 a year, that figure falls short of the existing floor and changes nothing. Earning $35,000, on the other hand, would knock out the weaker year, nudge the lifetime average upward, and potentially raise the monthly benefit once the SSA processes the updated data.

The SSA reviews the earnings records of all working beneficiaries each year. Employers submit W-2s, and self-employed individuals report income through their tax returns. When those figures arrive, the SSA factors them into the 35-year average, and any year that makes the top 35 raises the monthly average and, in turn, the benefit payment. Per the official SSA publication “How Work Affects Your Benefits,” this is an automatic process. Any resulting increase is paid in December of the following year, retroactive to January of that year, with a mailed notice confirming the adjustment. For instance, 2025 earnings that qualify would generate a higher payment starting in December 2026, backdated to January 2026.

The tax side of working in retirement

Because the Reddit poster has already passed FRA, earned income does not trigger the earnings test, the withholding rule that applies only to people who claim benefits before reaching FRA. For 2026, that pre-FRA earnings limit is $24,480. Past FRA, a beneficiary can earn any amount without an automatic benefit reduction.

Taxation is a separate concern. Federal taxes can apply to up to 85% of Social Security benefits depending on a filer’s combined income, which the SSA defines as adjusted gross income plus tax-exempt interest plus one-half of annual Social Security benefits. For individual filers, up to 50% of benefits become taxable when combined income falls between $25,000 and $34,000, with that share climbing to 85% above $34,000. For married couples filing jointly, those tiers begin at $32,000 and $44,000. These thresholds have not been adjusted for inflation since the 1983 Social Security amendments first introduced the benefit tax, so more retirees get pulled into the taxable range every year simply because their benefits grow with the annual cost-of-living adjustment.

On that front, Social Security beneficiaries received a 2.8% cost-of-living adjustment for 2026, based on changes in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers from the third quarter of 2024 through the third quarter of 2025. That was modestly higher than the 2.5% COLA that took effect at the start of 2025. On average, retirement benefits rose by about $56 per month beginning in January 2026, lifting the typical retired worker’s check from $2,015 to roughly $2,071. Any benefit bump from the annual earnings recalculation stacks on top of that COLA, compounding the improvement over time. The SSA also raised the maximum amount of earnings subject to Social Security tax in 2026 to $184,500, up from $176,100 in 2025, meaning higher earners contribute more to the program throughout the year.

What recent legislation actually changed

During the 2024 campaign, President Trump pledged to eliminate all federal income tax on Social Security benefits. That promise produced a partial result. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law on July 4, 2025, created a new senior deduction rather than removing Social Security income from the tax code outright. Trump described the provision as “the largest tax break in American history for our nation’s seniors,” though that characterization drew scrutiny from tax analysts who noted the underlying benefit tax rules remain unchanged.

The deduction is $6,000 per qualifying individual age 65 and older, available for tax years 2025 through 2028. Married couples where both spouses qualify can claim $12,000 in total. The full deduction is available for individual filers with modified adjusted gross income up to $75,000 and for joint filers up to $150,000. It phases out above those thresholds at a 6% rate and disappears entirely for individuals with income of $175,000 and married couples with income of $250,000. The deduction is available whether filers take the standard deduction or itemize, and it stacks on top of the existing additional standard deduction already available to taxpayers age 65 and older. Crucially, the law leaves the underlying rule intact: up to 85% of Social Security benefits can still be subject to federal tax depending on a beneficiary’s combined income. The senior deduction is designed to help offset that liability, not eliminate it.

The long-term cost of the law to Social Security deserves attention. The SSA’s Chief Actuary, whose analysis was cited by the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, estimated that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will cost the Social Security trust funds roughly $169 billion over 10 years by reducing the income tax revenues that flow into them. The 2026 Social Security Trustees Report, released in June 2026, confirmed that those combined pressures have pushed projected insolvency of the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund to late 2032, a full year earlier than the 2033 date estimated before the law was enacted. At that point, incoming payroll tax revenue would cover only about 78% of scheduled benefits, amounting to an automatic 22% cut for all beneficiaries absent congressional action. That long-term tradeoff is worth keeping in mind as retirees weigh the near-term tax savings from the new deduction.

Why continuing to work can still pay off

For retirees who did not accumulate a full 35-year earnings record, part-time work can be a direct path to a higher benefit for life. Replacing a year of zero earnings with even a modest wage moves the 35-year average upward, and because Social Security pays out for the rest of your life, even a small monthly increase compounds into a meaningful sum over a long retirement. The tax implications deserve careful attention, but so does the real upside built into the benefit calculation itself.

Editor’s note: This article was updated to reflect the 2026 Social Security Trustees Report’s confirmed OASI trust fund insolvency date of late 2032, the SSA Chief Actuary’s estimate that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will cost the trust funds roughly $169 billion over 10 years, and the projected 22% automatic benefit cut that would result if Congress does not act before reserves are depleted.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Maurie Backman

Maurie Backman has more than a decade of experience writing about financial topics, including retirement, investing, Social Security, and real estate. Her work has appeared on sites that include The Motley Fool, USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, and CNN Underscored.

All articles →