Former Fed President: “Core Inflation Is Too High.” Here’s Why the Fed May Not Be Done Tightening

Photo of Thomas Richmond
By Thomas Richmond Published

Quick Read

  • Bullard flagged core inflation exceeding 3% as a credibility threat to the Fed's 2% target, making late 2026 rate hikes inevitable.

  • Bullard rejected the one-and-done hike consensus, arguing the Fed historically doesn't deliver single rate increases when tightening is warranted.

  • Bullard dismissed AI productivity gains as a near-term inflation fix, arguing diffusion through business culture takes years, not quarters.

  • Don't wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list FREE now.

Former Fed President: “Core Inflation Is Too High.” Here’s Why the Fed May Not Be Done Tightening

© 24/7 Wall St.

Former St. Louis Fed President Jim Bullard, now Dean of the Mitch Daniels School of Business at Purdue University, believes the Federal Reserve is likely to resume tightening later this year despite a likely pause in July. During a July 6, 2026 appearance on CNBC’s Squawk Box, Bullard argued that inflation remains too high to ignore and said the September meeting could emerge as the next realistic opportunity for a rate hike, while expressing skepticism that artificial intelligence-driven productivity gains will arrive quickly enough to change the Fed’s near-term trajectory.

Bullard Says Inflation Is Still Too High for the Fed to Ignore

Bullard’s framing centers on one uncomfortable number. “Core inflation is too high. It’s up 6/10 from where it was over 3%. Well over 3% now. The Committee doesn’t like that. The 3% is a red line,” he told CNBC. That characterization matters because the Fed’s official target remains 2%, and a core reading drifting further above 3% puts credibility on the line.

Bullard did offer two disinflationary offsets. He noted that the bond market is signaling peak inflation has passed, and he pointed to recent oil price declines that are expected to feed through into inflation data in the coming weeks and months. Those forces could buy the Committee time. However, he believes they are unlikely to substitute for policy action.

Why September Looks Like the Fed’s Next Big Decision

On timing, Bullard was direct. “I think it’s a little soon in July here, but you could tee up September,” he said. He also characterized the June meeting as “pretty hawkish,” suggesting the Committee has already begun laying the groundwork for a move.

Bullard’s comments suggest investors should view July as a meeting where the Fed prepares markets rather than changes policy. Whether September ultimately brings another rate hike will likely depend on whether upcoming inflation reports show enough improvement to convince policymakers that price pressures are moving back toward their 2% target.

Additionally, Bullard doesn’t think the Fed will stop at just one rate hike. “A lot of people are talking about one rate increase. The Committee does not generally do that,” he said, noting that the Committee historically does not deliver single rate increases when tightening is warranted.

Bullard Isn’t Buying AI As an Inflation Cure, Yet.

Chairman Warsh has publicly leaned on the idea that artificial intelligence could boost productivity and ease inflationary pressure without aggressive rate hikes. Bullard is still skeptical about the timeline, though. “Productivity is hard to measure. It’s great technology. It will diffuse through the whole economy. But that’ll take time. You got to get it through all these business cultures that have grown up over a long period of time,” he said.

If AI-driven productivity gains take years rather than quarters to show up in the data, the Fed cannot rely on them to close the gap between 3%-plus core inflation and its 2% target. Policy has to do the work in the near term.

What to Watch Next

Bullard’s outlook is based on his belief that inflation remains too high for the Fed to simply hold rates flat indefinitely. While falling oil prices and improving inflation expectations could justify patience in July, he believes those factors are unlikely to eliminate the need for additional tightening if core inflation remains above 3%. For investors, that means expectations of a quick return to easier monetary policy could prove premature if inflation data fails to improve meaningfully over the next several months.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Thomas Richmond
About the Author Thomas Richmond →

Thomas Richmond is a financial writer and content strategist with 5+ years of experience covering stocks and financial markets. He has published over 250 articles focused on individual stock analysis, helping investors better understand business fundamentals, stock valuations, and long-term opportunities.

Thomas previously served as a Content Lead at TIKR, a stock research platform, where he helped scale the company’s blog to hundreds of articles per month and contributed to a weekly newsletter reaching more than 100,000 investors.

He specializes in breaking down complex companies into clear, actionable insights for everyday investors, with a focus on fundamentals-driven research.

His work has also been featured on platforms including Seeking Alpha and Sure Dividend.

Outside of work, Thomas enjoys weight lifting and soccer.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

ANET Vol: 8,509,276
WDC Vol: 7,601,012
TSLA Vol: 54,727,895
AMD
AMD Vol: 30,684,077
NTAP Vol: 3,630,874

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
ORLY Vol: 15,340,926
AZO Vol: 339,602
STZ Vol: 3,584,691