My wife and I just realized we’ll likely get $75k per year from Social Security – can we actually retire sooner than we planned?

Just because Social Security benefits don’t begin until your 60s doesn’t mean you have to wait until the traditional retirement window of 62 to 65 before making the leap. A paid-off mortgage and a portfolio large enough to carry you through the gap years can open the door to the FIRE movement (financial independence, retire early) well ahead of schedule.

In this piece, we look at a married couple from Reddit in their mid-50s with a fairly generous combined Social Security benefit of $75,000 per year on the horizon. The 2026 cost-of-living adjustment came in at 2.8%, and the 2027 figure is shaping up to be meaningfully higher. Early spring forecasts climbed as high as 4.7%, fueled by an energy-price spike and hot CPI-W readings, but inflation has since moderated. Following the August 2026 CPI-W release, all three major forecasters revised their estimates upward from earlier positions: the Senior Citizens League (TSCL) now projects 3.5%, AARP forecasts 3.6%, and independent analyst Mary Johnson also puts her estimate at 3.5%, placing the current consensus range at 3.5% to 3.6%. The SSA is scheduled to announce the official 2027 figure on October 14, 2026, once third-quarter CPI-W data is complete.

With major expenses like the mortgage and a child’s education already behind them, this couple clearly has options even before they’re eligible to collect. Only a financial adviser will have the full picture, but several concrete questions are worth raising as they think through the timing of retirement.

Below, we’ll review four questions the couple may wish to run by their adviser as they weigh early retirement against working a few more years. Staying on the job longer would likely produce a more comfortable outcome, something closer to “chubby FIRE” rather than lean FIRE, as both savings and Social Security benefits continue to build. That said, if burnout is a genuine factor, stepping away a bit early may be worth more to them than several additional years of higher income.

Here are four questions worth bringing to that adviser conversation:

Does it make sense to shift gears to passive income with the investment portfolio?

A large enough portfolio can bridge the gap between an early retirement date and the start of Social Security benefits. If the portfolio generates enough passive income to cover the couple’s spending, there is a real case for stepping away from work years before those benefits begin.

For those planning a 2026 or 2027 retirement, a useful concept is what planners call a “COLA bridge” strategy: sizing a cash buffer to account for the confirmed 2.8% COLA in 2026 and the projected 3.5% to 3.6% increase for 2027. The goal is to avoid drawing down growth assets during the early years, when the couple faces the greatest sequence-of-returns risk. A cash cushion locked in now insulates the portfolio from being forced into sales at an inopportune moment, which is especially important in the first decade of retirement when a bad stretch of returns can permanently damage a portfolio’s longevity.

Most people in this position hold broad index or mutual funds rather than higher-yielding securities such as dividend stocks paying 4% to 5%. Repositioning a portion of the portfolio toward income-generating holdings could make earlier retirement feasible, though the trade-off between yield and long-term growth deserves a careful look with an adviser before any portfolio shift is made.

How much could healthcare costs eat into retirement income?

Healthcare costs can derail a retirement plan with startling speed. Before Medicare eligibility at 65, the couple would need private coverage, and Silver-level ACA premiums represent a meaningful line item in any pre-62 retirement budget. That pressure doesn’t ease at 65 either. Medicare Part B premiums jumped 9.7% in 2026, rising to $202.90 per month from $185 in 2025, a clear reminder that even a generous COLA can be partially absorbed by rising healthcare costs. The 2026 Medicare Trustees Report projects a further increase to roughly $209.50 per month in 2027, a more moderate 3.25% rise, though CMS will not confirm the official figure until its fall announcement, typically in November.

On the savings side, the IRS confirmed 2027 HSA contribution limits at $4,500 for self-only coverage and $9,000 for family coverage, modest increases from $4,400 and $8,750 in 2026. Because both spouses are in their mid-50s, each can add a $1,000 catch-up contribution on top of the standard limit, sheltering as much as $11,000 in tax-advantaged healthcare savings in 2027 alone. Maximizing those contributions while still employed gives the couple a growing, tax-free pool to draw on for healthcare expenses once they retire.

Long-term care insurance is another product worth a conversation with an adviser. It isn’t the right fit for everyone, but for couples wanting to protect their nest egg against a prolonged care need, a policy can serve as a meaningful safeguard and reduce the financial and emotional burden on family members down the road.

What is the opportunity cost of retiring at 62 versus waiting until 70?

A $75,000 combined benefit is a strong foundation, but the timing of when to claim matters enormously. Claiming early at 62 locks in a permanent reduction: for anyone whose full retirement age is 67 (those born in 1960 or later), an early claim cuts the benefit by 30% for life. Waiting past full retirement age earns delayed retirement credits worth 8% per year up to age 70. Claiming at 70 rather than 67 produces a benefit that is 24% higher for the rest of the claimant’s life, according to SSA data.

For this couple, the adviser should model how projected COLA increases compound over a longer delay period. The combination of delayed retirement credits and annual inflation adjustments could push their combined benefit well into six-figure territory over time, turning a comfortable retirement into a genuinely secure one. One additional wrinkle worth discussing: the 2026 Social Security Trustees Report, released June 9, 2026, projects that the combined trust fund reserves could be depleted by the third quarter of 2034, after which incoming payroll taxes would cover roughly 83% of scheduled benefits if Congress takes no action. The OASI retirement fund on its own faces an earlier deadline, with depletion projected for the fourth quarter of 2032 at just 78% of benefits payable. The combined 2034 timeline is unchanged from the prior year’s report, though the long-term funding gap widened, and both numbers deserve a place in any long-range claiming strategy.

In short, the couple appears to be in solid shape as they approach this decision. Their combined benefit is substantial, their largest expenses are behind them, and they have time to position their portfolio thoughtfully. The main risks fall on the healthcare and inflation side: pre-Medicare coverage costs can catch early retirees off guard, and even modest inflation erodes purchasing power faster than most projections suggest. A candid conversation with an adviser covering the COLA bridge, healthcare funding, and the claiming-age trade-off is the logical next step.

Editor’s note: This article was updated to reflect September 2026 COLA forecasts, in which TSCL and Mary Johnson each revised their 2027 estimates up to 3.5% and AARP raised its forecast to 3.6%, shifting the consensus range from 3.4%–3.6% to 3.5%–3.6%. The update also adds the OASI retirement-fund standalone depletion projection of the fourth quarter of 2032 at 78% of benefits payable, as reported in the 2026 Social Security Trustees Report released June 9, 2026.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.