Dave Ramsey Just Gave You Two Hidden Reasons to Move Everything to a Roth. No RMDs and No Inherited-IRA Forced Withdrawal

Photo of Danielle Liverance
By Danielle Liverance Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Dave Ramsey just gave away the two reasons most people convert to a Roth too late, if they convert at all. The part of his pitch that lands hardest is not about your own tax bill. It is about what happens to the account after you die. Here is the math behind both of his claims, and the one variable that decides whether converting is brilliant or expensive.

The quote that reframes the Roth debate

On the April 10, 2026 episode of The Ramsey Show titled Start Telling Your Money Where To Go, Dave Ramsey said: “moving everything to Roth people, that ain’t bad or overtime, that’s the move. It gives you two things I had not considered early on. And that’s no RMDs and no inherited IRA forced withdrawal.”

He then walked through the kicker: “think about the what if they held, let’s take a million dollars and they hold that seven years, years after you die because they don’t have to withdraw it under the Biden rule, it’s going to double. It’s going to be another million dollars. The million will be 2 million.”

If your retirement savings sit in a traditional 401(k) or IRA, the IRS will eventually force money out of the account, first while you are alive, then again from your heirs. Every forced dollar is taxed as ordinary income in the year it leaves. Roth dollars do not get that treatment.

Ramsey is right on the mechanics

The two rules he is pointing at are real. At 73, traditional 401(k) and IRA holders must begin required minimum distributions whether they want the cash or not. The SECURE Act then forces most non-spouse heirs of traditional accounts to drain the inherited balance within 10 years of the original owner’s death. Roth IRAs sidestep both.

One important nuance the Ramsey clip skips: IRS final regulations issued in July 2024 clarified that if the original IRA owner had already started RMDs before dying, heirs cannot simply wait until year 10 to take everything out in a lump sum. Annual distributions are required in years one through nine of the 10-year window, with the full balance due by December 31 of year 10. The compressed timeline creates a predictable tax crunch for heirs unless the account is a Roth.

Run the numbers on a 72-year-old with $1 million in a traditional IRA. The first RMD lands around 3.8% of the balance, roughly $38,000, stacked on top of Social Security and any pension. For a married couple filing jointly, the 22% federal bracket kicks in on taxable income above $100,800 in 2026. That $38,000 withdrawal, landing on top of other income, can push a meaningful slice into the 22% range and generate $8,000 to $9,000 of federal tax on money the retiree did not need or ask for. Because the IRS divisor shrinks each year, RMDs grow automatically as you age, even if the market goes nowhere.

Now the inheritance side. Leave that same $1 million traditional IRA to an adult child earning $150,000. They sit in the 24% bracket, which in 2026 applies to single filers with income above $105,700. Forced to empty the account over 10 years, each $100,000 withdrawal lands on top of their salary and pushes some of it into the 32% bracket. The federal tax drag alone can shave $250,000 to $300,000 off the inheritance, before state income tax.

Convert that same $1 million to a Roth and the picture flips. No lifetime RMD for the original owner. The heir still faces a 10-year window to empty the account, but if the Roth’s 5-year clock has elapsed, every dollar comes out tax-free and the balance compounds untouched the entire time. Ramsey’s seven-year doubling assumes roughly a 10% annual return, which is aggressive but not historically absurd for an all-equity portfolio left alone.

The variable that decides everything

Conversions carry an upfront cost. You pay ordinary income tax on every dollar you move from traditional to Roth in the year you move it. The whole strategy turns on one comparison: the rate you pay to convert today versus the rate you or your heirs would pay to withdraw later.

Scenario A: You are 67, retired, living on cash and Social Security, and your taxable income is $40,000. You can convert about $60,000 a year and stay inside the 12% bracket, which tops out at $100,800 for joint filers in 2026. Your kids are doctors sitting in the 32% bracket. Every dollar you convert at 12% saves them 20 cents on the dollar later. That is a straightforward win.

Scenario B: You are 55, still earning $300,000, sitting in the 24% to 32% range, and your kids are schoolteachers who will inherit in their 50s during semi-retirement at a 12% rate. Converting now means paying a higher rate than anyone in the family will ever pay on that money again. Skip it, or wait for a low-income gap year when the math actually works in your favor.

What to do this week

  1. Pull your most recent 1040 and find your marginal bracket. Compare it to the 2026 brackets. If you are sitting in 12% or 22%, you have room to convert cheaply.
  2. Project your RMD at 73. Divide your expected traditional balance at 73 by 26.5. That is roughly your first forced withdrawal. If that number plus Social Security pushes you into a higher bracket than today, conversions now are arbitrage.
  3. Ask your heirs their bracket. Awkward, but useful. If they earn more than you, the inherited-IRA math alone justifies converting.
  4. Use a Roth conversion ladder, not a one-shot. Convert just enough each year to fill the top of your current bracket without spilling into the next one.

Ramsey is right that no lifetime RMDs and no 10-year forced drain on heirs change the calculus. The discipline is paying the conversion tax at the lowest rate the family will ever see, then letting the Roth compound untouched for the next generation. That is the move he was pointing at, and the math backs him up.

Editor’s note: This article corrects the 2026 tax bracket figures for the 22% threshold for married joint filers (the bracket begins at $100,800 of taxable income, not $24,800) and adds context from the IRS July 2024 final regulations, which clarified that annual distributions are required in years one through nine of the 10-year inherited-IRA window when the original owner had already begun RMDs before dying.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Danielle Liverance
About the Author Danielle Liverance →

I've spent more than 15 years inside enterprise software, working alongside the finance, sales operations, and HR leaders who run the revenue engines at some of the largest tech companies in the country.

My day job is helping enterprise executives make smarter decisions about retention, compensation, and growth. These are the same operational levers that show up in every earnings report investors actually read. That perspective shapes my writing for 24/7 Wall St.

The headline numbers are easy. The interesting stuff is underneath: how companies make money, what executives are worried about, and what any of it means for the person checking their 401(k) on a Sunday afternoon. I write about personal finance and business as someone who has spent her career inside the rooms where these decisions get made.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

ABNB Vol: 11,658,667
MCHP Vol: 9,818,786
PLTR Vol: 54,451,961
MRNA Vol: 3,527,456
AXON Vol: 780,593

Top Losing Stocks

TTD Vol: 109,914,402
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
RMD Vol: 2,310,889
ZTS Vol: 7,715,201
AKAM Vol: 5,286,544