Dave Ramsey Just Gave You Two Hidden Reasons to Move Everything to a Roth: No RMDs and No Inherited-IRA Forced Withdrawal

Dave Ramsey just gave away the two reasons most people convert to a Roth too late, if they convert at all. The part of his pitch that lands hardest is not about your own tax bill. It is about what…

Published June 29, 2026, 10:01am ET · 5 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

A composite image featuring a smiling Dave Ramsey on the right, wearing a dark suit jacket over a striped shirt and glasses. To his left, a large green speech bubble reads 'Dave Ramsey's Best Retirement Advice.' Below the text, a canvas money bag with a black dollar sign overflows with US currency. In the top right corner, a '24/7 WALL ST' logo is visible against a crumpled paper texture background.
Financial guru Dave Ramsey shares his best retirement advice, resonating with the success story of a nearly millionaire discussed in the accompanying article.

Dave Ramsey just gave away the two reasons most people convert to a Roth too late, if they convert at all. The part of his pitch that lands hardest is not about your own tax bill. It is about what happens to the account after you die. Here is the math behind both of his claims, and the one variable that decides whether converting is brilliant or expensive.

The quote that reframes the Roth debate

On the April 10, 2026 episode of The Ramsey Show titled Start Telling Your Money Where To Go, Dave Ramsey said: “moving everything to Roth people, that ain’t bad or overtime, that’s the move. It gives you two things I had not considered early on. And that’s no RMDs and no inherited IRA forced withdrawal.”

He then walked through the upside for heirs: “think about the what if they held, let’s take a million dollars and they hold that seven years, years after you die because they don’t have to withdraw it under the Biden rule, it’s going to double. It’s going to be another million dollars. The million will be 2 million.”

If your retirement savings sit in a traditional 401(k) or IRA, the IRS will eventually force money out, first while you are alive and then again from your heirs. Every forced dollar is taxed as ordinary income in the year it leaves the account. Roth dollars do not get that treatment, and that difference compounds dramatically over a decade or more.

Ramsey is right on the mechanics

The two rules he is pointing at are real. Under SECURE 2.0, traditional 401(k) and IRA holders born between 1951 and 1959 must begin required minimum distributions at age 73, whether they want the cash or not. Those born in 1960 or later get a longer runway, with RMDs not starting until age 75. The SECURE Act then forces most non-spouse heirs of traditional accounts to drain an inherited balance within 10 years of the original owner’s death. Roth IRAs sidestep both rules entirely. SECURE 2.0 also eliminated pre-death RMDs for designated Roth accounts inside 401(k) and 403(b) plans beginning in 2024, closing a gap that had previously distinguished Roth IRAs from Roth workplace accounts.

One important nuance the Ramsey clip skips: IRS final regulations issued in July 2024 clarified that if the original IRA owner had already started RMDs before dying, heirs cannot simply wait until year 10 to take everything out in a lump sum. Annual distributions are required in years one through nine of the 10-year window, with the full remaining balance due by December 31 of year 10. That compressed timeline creates a predictable tax crunch for heirs unless the inherited account is a Roth.

Run the numbers on a 73-year-old with $1 million in a traditional IRA. Using the IRS Uniform Lifetime Table divisor of 26.5 for age 73, the first RMD comes to $37,736, stacked on top of Social Security and any pension. For a married couple filing jointly in 2026, the 22% federal bracket kicks in on taxable income above $100,800. That forced withdrawal landing on top of other income can push a meaningful slice into the 22% range and generate $8,000 to $9,000 of federal tax on money the retiree did not need or request. Because the IRS divisor shrinks each year, RMDs automatically grow larger as you age, even when the market goes nowhere.

The inheritance side of the ledger is even starker. Leave that same $1 million traditional IRA to an adult child earning $150,000. Single filers enter the 24% bracket on income above $105,700 in 2026. Forced to empty the account over 10 years, each $100,000 annual withdrawal lands on top of the child’s salary and pushes some of it into the 32% bracket. The federal tax drag alone can shave $250,000 to $300,000 off the inheritance, before state income tax takes its share.

Convert that same $1 million to a Roth and the picture flips completely. The original owner faces no lifetime RMD. The heir still faces a 10-year window to empty the account, but if the Roth’s 5-year clock has elapsed, every dollar comes out tax-free and the balance compounds untouched the entire time. Ramsey’s seven-year doubling assumes roughly a 10% annual return, which is aggressive but not historically unreasonable for an all-equity portfolio left alone to grow.

The variable that decides everything

Conversions carry an upfront cost. You pay ordinary income tax on every dollar you move from traditional to Roth in the year you move it. The whole strategy hinges on one comparison: the rate you pay to convert today versus the rate you or your heirs would pay on those withdrawals later.

Scenario A: You are 67, retired, living on cash and Social Security, and your taxable income is $40,000. You can convert roughly $60,000 a year and stay inside the 12% bracket, which tops out at $100,800 for joint filers in 2026. Your kids are doctors sitting in the 32% bracket. Every dollar you convert at 12% saves them 20 cents on that same dollar later. That gap is straightforward arbitrage.

Scenario B: You are 55, still earning $300,000, sitting in the 24% to 32% range, and your kids are schoolteachers who will inherit during their 50s while semi-retired at a 12% effective rate. Converting now means paying a higher rate than anyone in the family will ever pay on that money again. The smarter move is to wait for a low-income gap year, when the math actually tilts in your favor.

What to do this week

  1. Pull your most recent 1040 and find your marginal bracket. Compare it to the 2026 brackets. If you are sitting in 12% or 22%, you have room to convert at relatively low cost.
  2. Project your RMD at 73 (or 75 if you were born in 1960 or later). Divide your expected traditional balance by 26.5. That is roughly your first forced withdrawal. If that number plus Social Security pushes you into a higher bracket than you occupy today, conversions now are arbitrage.
  3. Ask your heirs their bracket. The conversation is awkward, but the information is valuable. If they earn more than you, the inherited-IRA math alone may justify converting.
  4. Use a Roth conversion ladder, not a one-shot. Convert just enough each year to fill the top of your current bracket without spilling into the next one, and repeat the process annually until the traditional account is gone or the math stops working.

Ramsey is right that escaping lifetime RMDs and protecting heirs from a 10-year forced drain changes the calculus. The discipline is paying the conversion tax at the lowest rate any family member will ever see on that money, then letting the Roth compound untouched for the next generation. That is the move he was pointing at, and the math backs him up.

Editor’s note: This update adds the SECURE 2.0 detail that savers born in 1960 or later do not face RMDs until age 75 (not 73), notes that designated Roth accounts inside 401(k) and 403(b) plans were also freed from pre-death RMDs starting in 2024, and corrects the first-year RMD on a $1 million balance to the exact figure of $37,736 using the IRS Uniform Lifetime Table divisor of 26.5 for age 73.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Danielle Liverance

I've spent more than 15 years inside enterprise software, working alongside the finance, sales operations, and HR leaders who run the revenue engines at some of the largest tech companies in the country.

My day job is helping enterprise executives make smarter decisions about retention, compensation, and growth. These are the same operational levers that show up in every earnings report investors actually read. That perspective shapes my writing for 24/7 Wall St.

The headline numbers are easy. The interesting stuff is underneath: how companies make money, what executives are worried about, and what any of it means for the person checking their 401(k) on a Sunday afternoon. I write about personal finance and business as someone who has spent her career inside the rooms where these decisions get made.

All articles →