Suze Orman Says the Biggest Financial Gift You Can Leave Your Spouse Is One Social Security Decision

Picture a couple in their early sixties. He spent 35 years in a higher-paying career. She stepped in and out of work to raise kids and care for aging parents, so her earnings record is thinner. They are both healthy, the mortgage is nearly gone, and they have enough in savings to cover a few years of expenses. The question: when should each of them start Social Security?

This is exactly the situation Suze Orman keeps returning to on her podcast, and her answer is unusually direct. The higher earner should wait as long as possible, ideally to age 70. The reason is straightforward: whichever spouse outlives the other keeps the larger of the two benefits for life. Orman frames maximizing that number as one of the most important financial gifts you can leave your partner. One recent forum thread illustrated the stakes: a woman in her sixties wrote that her husband kept talking about claiming at 63 to “lock it in,” and she wanted to know whether she was right to push back. Orman’s position is clear. She was.

Why the survivor benefit is the whole ballgame

When one spouse dies, Social Security stops sending two checks. The survivor keeps the larger benefit and the smaller one disappears. That reality means the higher earner’s claiming decision effectively sets the income floor for a widow or widower who may live another 10, 15, or 20 years on their own. Survivor benefits also include any delayed retirement credits the deceased spouse earned, so waiting past full retirement age (FRA) directly lifts what the survivor eventually receives.

The mechanics are simple. Claiming at 62 permanently lowers a benefit by roughly 30% compared with FRA, which is 67 for anyone born in 1960 or later. Waiting past 67 adds delayed retirement credits worth about 8% per year up to age 70. On a $3,000 FRA benefit, claiming at 62 shrinks the monthly check to roughly $2,100, while waiting to 70 grows it to about $3,720. That gap exceeds $1,600 a month for as long as the survivor lives. Every future cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) then compounds off that higher base. The 2026 COLA came in at 2.8%, meaning a larger starting benefit captures more inflation protection in real dollars every single year.

One additional change has expanded the survivor benefit calculus for some households. The Social Security Fairness Act, signed into law in January 2025, repealed the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset. Those two rules had reduced or eliminated Social Security spousal and survivor benefits for millions of public-sector workers, including teachers, firefighters, and law enforcement officers. With both provisions now gone, the survivor benefit strategy carries even more weight for couples where one partner worked in a government job.

The “what if benefits get cut” worry

Many readers ask: what if Social Security runs out of money before I turn 70? It deserves a direct answer. The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund is projected to deplete its reserves in the fourth quarter of 2032, one quarter earlier than the prior year’s estimate, according to the 2026 Social Security Trustees Report. At that point, incoming payroll taxes would cover about 78% of scheduled benefits, translating to an automatic cut of roughly 22%, unless Congress acts. Congress intervened before, notably in the early 1980s, and has a range of options on both the revenue and benefit sides.

Here is the point most people miss. An across-the-board reduction would trim early claimers and delayed claimers by the same percentage. A larger base benefit still wins on either side of that math. Orman reaffirmed this logic in a blog post published just two days after the June 2026 Trustees Report, calling early claiming a permanent pay cut and pushing back against advice to file at 62 out of fear. She has put it plainly on air: “don’t start claiming at 62 because you don’t think it’s going to be there when you’re 67.”

How the pieces connect

Delaying to age 70 usually means drawing more from savings in the meantime. That is the point. Every dollar spent from an IRA in your late sixties is a dollar that will not inflate a required minimum distribution (RMD) at 73, and it buys a permanently higher, inflation-adjusted, government-guaranteed income stream. Think of it as converting a slice of your portfolio into the most durable form of longevity insurance available.

The lower-earning spouse has considerably more flexibility. Claiming earlier, sometimes even at 62, can bring in cash flow while the higher earner’s benefit keeps growing. And if that lower earner is eventually widowed, their smaller check gets replaced by the survivor benefit regardless.

What to actually do with this

Two priorities are worth sitting with before anyone files. First, protect the higher earner’s number. The claiming age on the bigger benefit is the single lever with the longest-lasting consequence in your household, and filing early is one of the hardest decisions to reverse. Second, coordinate as a couple rather than as two individuals. Timing the smaller benefit is mostly a cash-flow decision. Timing the larger benefit is about the surviving spouse. Those are different jobs, and treating them the same is where households leave the most money on the table.

Health, work status, and savings all shift the picture, and there are real cases where claiming early is the right call. For a healthy couple who can afford to wait, though, the higher earner delaying to age 70 is one of the most consequential ways to protect the person they love most.

Editor’s note: This article was updated to add the depletion timeline from the 2026 Social Security Trustees Report, which moved the OASI reserve exhaustion date one quarter earlier to Q4 2032 (with 78% of benefits payable afterward), to include the 22% cut figure confirmed by the Bipartisan Policy Center, to note Suze Orman’s June 2026 blog post reaffirming the delay strategy after the report’s release, and to add context on the Social Security Fairness Act’s January 2025 repeal of WEP and GPO and its expanded impact on survivor benefits for public-sector households.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.