Picture a couple in their early sixties. He spent 35 years in a higher-paying career. She stepped in and out of work to raise kids and care for aging parents, so her earnings record is thinner. They are both healthy, the mortgage is nearly gone, and they have enough in savings to cover a few years of expenses. The question: when should each of them start Social Security?
This is exactly the situation Suze Orman keeps returning to on her podcast, and her answer is unusually direct. The higher earner should wait as long as possible, ideally to 70. The reason is simple: whichever spouse outlives the other keeps the larger of the two benefits for life. Orman frames maximizing that number as one of the most important financial gifts you can leave your partner. One recent forum thread put it well: a woman in her sixties wrote that her husband kept talking about claiming at 63 to “lock it in,” and she wanted to know whether she was right to push back. According to Orman’s message, she was.
Why the survivor benefit is the whole ballgame
When one spouse dies, Social Security stops sending two checks. The survivor keeps the larger benefit and the smaller one disappears. That means the higher earner’s claiming decision effectively sets the income floor for a widow or widower who may live another 10, 15, or 20 years alone. Survivor benefits also include any delayed retirement credits the deceased spouse earned, so waiting past full retirement age (FRA) directly lifts what the survivor eventually receives.
The mechanics are simple. Claiming at 62 permanently lowers a benefit by roughly 30% compared with FRA, which is 67 for anyone born in 1960 or later. Waiting past age 67 adds delayed retirement credits worth about 8% per year up to age 70. On a $3,000 full retirement age benefit, claiming at 62 shrinks the check to roughly $2,100, while waiting to 70 grows it to about $3,720. That gap is more than $1,600 a month, every month, for as long as the survivor lives. Every future cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) compounds off that higher base. The 2026 COLA came in at 2.8%
The “what if benefits get cut” worry
Plenty of readers ask: what if Social Security runs out of money before I turn 70? It deserves a direct answer. The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund is projected to deplete its reserves in Q4 2032, after which incoming payroll taxes would still cover about 78% of scheduled benefits unless Congress acts. Congress has intervened before, notably in the early 1980s.
Most people miss this. An across-the-board reduction would trim early claimers and delayed claimers by the same percentage. A larger base benefit still wins on either side of that math. Orman has said it plainly on air: “don’t start claiming at 62 because you don’t think it’s going to be there when you’re 67.”
How the pieces connect
Delaying to age 70 usually means pulling more from savings in the meantime. That is the point. Every dollar spent from an IRA in your late sixties is a dollar that will not inflate a required minimum distribution (RMD) at 73, and it buys a permanently higher, inflation-adjusted, government-guaranteed income stream. Think of it as converting a slice of your portfolio into the best longevity insurance money can buy.
The lower-earning spouse has more flexibility. Claiming earlier, sometimes even at age 62, can bring in cash flow while the higher earner’s benefit keeps growing. If that lower earner is eventually widowed, their smaller check gets replaced by the survivor benefit anyway.
What to actually do with this
Two factors are worth sitting with before anyone files:
- Protect the higher earner’s number first. The claiming age on the bigger benefit is the single lever with the longest-lasting consequence in your household, and filing early is one of the hardest decisions to reverse.
- Coordinate as a couple, not as two individuals. Timing the smaller benefit is mostly about cash flow. Timing the larger benefit is about the surviving spouse. Those are different jobs, and treating them the same is where households leave the most money on the table.
Health, work status, and savings all shift the picture, and there are real cases where claiming early is the right call. For a healthy couple who can afford to wait, the higher earner delaying to age 70 is one of the most subtle yet strategic ways to look after the person you love most.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Top Gaining Stocks
Top Losing Stocks