70 Isn’t Always the Optimal Social Security Claiming Age. Here’s When the Math Stops Working

Delaying Social Security until 70 can hand you a permanent monthly raise, but that strategy quietly backfires for a surprising number of retirees. Your life expectancy changes the math in ways most people never calculate before filing.

Published September 18, 2026, 8:18pm ET · 3 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

A pair of black reading glasses is positioned over a stack of financial documents and U.S. hundred-dollar bills, arranged on a dark wooden surface. Visible are two 'United States Treasury' documents, a blue 'Social Security' card, and three partially fanned $100 bills showing Benjamin Franklin's portrait.
This image illustrates the various financial components, including Social Security documents and checks, that individuals often navigate when managing their personal finances. © Rix Pix Photography / Shutterstock.com

There’s a reason so many financial experts recommend delaying Social Security as long as possible.

You’re eligible for your monthly benefits based on your earnings history without a reduction once full retirement age (FRA) arrives. That age is 67 if you were born in 1960 or later. But for each year you delay your claim beyond FRA, your Social Security checks become eligible for a permanent 8% boost.

Now this incentive runs out once you reach age 70. But with an FRA of 67, you could give your monthly checks a 24% increase in total.

For context, if you’re eligible for a $2,000 monthly benefit at 67, filing at age 70 instead could leave you with $2,480 per month — for the rest of your life. Larger monthly checks could help reduce your financial stress and give you more leeway to do the things you love.

But while it can make sense to delay Social Security until age 70, the math only works out in your favor if you live a decent lifespan. If you don’t expect to do that, then filing earlier is a better choice.

Why your life expectancy matters

Delaying Social Security until age 70 means giving up on years of checks. And it’s not just three years of missing benefits you’re looking at.

The earliest age to claim Social Security is 62. Doing so will result in reduced benefits for life. But if you don’t expect to live a long life, filing early could put more money in your pocket in total from Social Security compared to filing later.

To put it another way, if you don’t expect a longer life, then filing for Social Security at 70 may not make sense financially. Despite getting more money each month, you could end up with a smaller lifetime paycheck.

Here’s how the math might work if you live until age 75 and you’re eligible for a $2,000 monthly benefit at 67:

  • If you file at 62, your lifetime Social Security benefit will be $218,400.
  • If you file at 67, your lifetime Social Security benefit will be $192,000.
  • If you file at 70, your lifetime Social Security benefit will be $148,800.

So all told, in this case, claiming Social Security at 70 leaves you with a $43,200 shortfall compared to filing at 67 and a $69,600 shortfall compared to filing at 62.

Make an educated guess

Of course, the tricky thing is that in your early 60s, you can’t exactly see into the future and predict how long you’ll live. But your health at the time and family history can offer clues.

If you’re already managing multiple health conditions and your parents passed away in their mid-70s, you may want to err on the side of claiming Social Security early. But if you’re in great health and have parents still alive in their late 80s or beyond, then delaying your claim could pay off.

All told, there are plenty of people who can benefit from claiming Social Security at 70. But it’s not a given that the math will work out in your favor if you delay. It’s important to recognize that before locking yourself into a decision that may not be the best thing for you.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Maurie Backman

Maurie Backman has more than a decade of experience writing about financial topics, including retirement, investing, Social Security, and real estate. Her work has appeared on sites that include The Motley Fool, USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, and Kiplinger.

Prior to becoming a full-time financial writer, Maurie worked in the financial industry trading distressed debt. She then changed course and spent a few years designing electronic toys. After a stint in content marketing and UX, she shifted back into writing and has since covered everything from the housing market to estate planning to Medicare.

When she's not busy writing, Maurie can be found hiking, walking her dogs, driving her kids to their various sports practices and games, and curling up with a good book. She cooks on occasion and bakes way too often.

All articles →