Daily Archives: February 2, 2007

Cramer’s Playbook on the Switch & Data IPO

On CNBC’s MAD MONEY tonight, Cramer wanted to preview an IPO you’ll hear about for all next week.  This is Switch & Data that will trade under SDXC on NASDAQ.  SDXC is a network neutral co-location services provider and is the infrastructure builder for your broadband provider.  Its Underwriters are Deutsche Bank Securities, Jefferies & Co., CIBC World Markets, Lazard Capital Markets, Raymond James, RBC Capital Markets and Merriman Curhan Ford & Co.  GOOG YHOO LVLT AKAM are some of its customers.  Equinix (EQIX) is a competitor and it doubled last year, so this is one everyone wants.

It is expected $14.00 to $16.00 and Cramer thinks it will get a premium pricing, he says you can buy it up to $20.00 and you sell it over $24.00.  But he says it would have to go to $28.00 before it has the same valuation ratios that EQIX has.

Some active traders aren’t going to be too happy that he just touted this name and gave a game plan on it.

Jon C. Ogg
February 2, 2007

Cramer Changes His Bullish Intensity on Google

On tonight’s MAD MONEY show on CNBC Cramer said that Google (GOOG-NYSE) got hammered after earnings that Cramer said was a blow-out report.  Yahoo! (YHOO) rose on bad numbers and eBay (EBAY) rose on so-so numbers.

In Cramer’s world he said you don’t have to stare at the past and you look ahead in the mad world.  Cramer has 2 kinds of growth: 1) accelerating growth and 2) decelerating growth.  Cramer thinks some fund managers will only pay up for accelerating revenue growth.  Both YHOO & EBAY are broken stocks to Cramer, but they are rising in "What’s bad is good" world and now it is back to an accelerating growth story because the prior year was so bad.  EBAY is one that did poorly before and it was so oversold that the first good news created a huge move. 

GOOG’s growth was 99% and that can’t be topped, so now it is 40% growth.  Cramer said it is #1 in Cramer’s universe.  The big funds that buy accelerating growth sold it off, but he thinks now uyuou have to like GOOG for reasons other than just the growth.  It’s a monopoly on paid search and has 70% share in some areas.  He thinks this won’t get a 70-multiple anymore because of decelerating growth.  He is still sticking by $600 target but it will take a while now.  In the near-term he thinks this is going lower.  For it to have a 30% updside discounting this would have to drop to $450.00 and that is where he thinks it will go. 

As I noted yesterday, Cramer was changing his tone on the wildly bullish stance on GOOG like he has been maintaining.  He says he’s still sticking by it longer term but it’s probably going down.

Jon C. Ogg
February 2, 2007

Cramer on Paying Up For Strong Earnings

Cramer said it’s ok on CNBC’s MAD MONEY tonight to pay up after some companies beat earnings and you have to pay up to sell higher.

Boeing (BA-NYSE) and Caterpillar (CAT-NYSE) are continuing to run up and are ok to pay a premium for.  Cramer said you can also go with Whirlpool (WHR-NYSE) as the next in the home improvement and building exposure company that is a monopoly and should run after earnings Wednesday.  Cramer said you should get in ahead of earnings because he thinks it’s going up.  Cramer also said that Cisco Systems (CSCO-NASDAQ) and Cramer thinks it could bounce back up to $29.00 after reporting and then it could go even higher.  Doug here art 24/7 Wall St. gave a scenario that would allow Cisco shares to rise to $34.00 by mid-year, but it is a guide of what needs to happen.

VF Corp (VFC-NYSE) is another one Cramer says you can buy.  On Disney (DIS-NYSE) next Wednesday you can think expect it to go higher.  Thursday Bunge (BG-NYSE) is one you can buy ahead of earnings for a snap-back to go higher. Curtis Wright (CW-NYSE) is already on highs but he thinks it is going higher.

This ties into his video segment on TheStreet.com discussing how he likes to buy stocks on 52-week highs more often than not because that is the market casting an affirmative smart vote for the company.

Jon C. Ogg
February 2, 2007

Earnings Preview for Cisco Systems

Cisco Systems (CSCO-NASDAQ) is set to report earnings next Tuesday.  While there are many others, this is the biggie for tech heads.  This stock was just maintained a BUY at Goldman Sachs this morning in anticipation that it will beat earnings expectations and a belief that management is likely to re-affirm positive longer-term trends after the close next Tuesday (FEB 6).  CSCO used to either just meet or beat by a tad, but lately they have been beating by a couple cents on EPS.

The street is looking for expectations of $0.31 EPS and roughly $8.28 Billion in revenues.  If the company offers guidance the expectation is $0.33 and $8.55 Billion next quarter.

This BUY from Goldman is one of the few recent positive calls along with an AmTech Research calling it a Buy.  In roughly the last two weeks CSCO has been downgraded at many large firms: cut to Hold at Citigroup, cut to Market Perform at JMP Securities, Cut to Neutral at Banc of America, and cut to Neutral at Prudential.

It started the November quarter at roughly $24.00 and it had recently hit as high as $28.99, and it is up from a $17.10 low in the last year.  So the valuation comments were the reasons for the downgrades and many of the analysts had been left holding the bag back in early 2004 when the stock was sniffing at $30.00.  It’s an entirely different company now after some key acquisitions so we’ll see if it can get back the mojo it recently lost.

As far as other fallout in direct supplier or tied stocks: NetLogic (NETL) has 60% of its business tied to CSCO and Clestica (CLS) also has historically been viewed as the EMS company most tied to CSCO manufacturing.  Cypress Semi (CY) is also the chip stock with much Cisco exposure on a historical basis. 

One important thing to note in other fallout stocks in sectors is that Cisco has turned into a bifurcated tech stock.  If Cisco’s business is suddenly deemed bad on an unexpected basis then the fallout in the tech sector could continue because they are deemed one of the brighter spots in tech now.  If they do well it may not lift the entire sector because they are already thought of as an exception to the rule right now.

Even though the stock has come back in, this is deemed as valuation calls from analysts who wanted to lock in some gains.  It isn’t as though the expectations are really looking for a slowdown.  The average price target is still $29.00 to $30.00, so keep in mind that at current prices there could easily be the belief that the great part of the turnaround has happened and it will have to really show massive upside to keep everyone from using strength to lock in gains until later in the year.  My partner here has a scenario that could give it a $34.00 target by the middle of the year if things go right, so we’ll have to see how time goes.  This was also noted as Cramer’s #3 Growth Pick for 2007. Cramer also had Cisco as one of his 5 Tech Exceptions for now.

Stay tuned Tuesday, but be sure to watch the "consensus" estimates.  It is very frequent that the First Call, Zacks, Reuters and others change their consensus matrix ahead of numbers; so if there is a change by Tuesday that is what the deal is.  We will send an "options trader" expectation on this after the close on Monday because that will eliminate the weekend-premium you’d have to account for between now and then.

Jon C. Ogg
February 2, 2007

Prince One Step Closer To Leaving Citigroup

There is an update to why Citigroup’s (C-NYSE) Chuck Prince is one of the 10 CEO’s that need to go.

CNBC’s Charlie Gasparino just noted that Prince Alwaleed bin Talal (Citigroup’s largest holder) has reportedly put Chuck Prince effectively on notice that if he doesn’t bring in expenses and start a real turnaround that he will call for his resignation.  Charlie Gasparino said that Chuck Prince has to do something in a couple months or he is going to start calling for a new leadership team and the re was even the note of it being broken up.  Citigroup (C) shares have started recovering on this news, and there is no telling what the perceived valuations could be if Citigroup was really put on the block for a break-up.  It is unclear if that is real, but that would be a major development and one that doesn’t come around very frequently.

Jim Cramer already said he thinks that Prince will go by the end of the year.  Charlie Gasparino has also been covering this one quite well and just covered this last week.  Here is our 24/7 Wall St. article on why he needs to go from December 15, 2006.

Shares of Citigroup are down 0.3% at $54.56, but have been as low as $54.32 today.  The 52-week trading range is $44.81 to $57.00, and the reason the stock is closer to the highs of the year is because of the hope for change rather than on its fundamentals now.  Maybe a record label could get involved this will become the saga of "The Banker Formerly Known as Prince."

Jon C. Ogg
February 2, 2007

Cramer’s Energy Trade

On today’s STOP TRADING segment on CNBC, Cramer has an energy trade.  On Arch Coal (ACI-NYSE) Cramer said these have gone so low and oil has gone back up enough that it’s a matter of time before coal stocks come back.  Cramer says that Exxon or Sheel should be buying an Arch (ACI-NYSE) or a Peabody (BTU-NYSE).  The guys that sold today are catching the lows.  He has noted this before, but he gave more details about why we need coal.  Chevron (CVX-NYSE) is another one that Cramer likes.  They increased reserves and he thinks CVX shares could creep up to $82.00 to $85.00. 

What Can Buckley Do For 3M?

3M (MMM) is a name that has been kept in the disappointment file for some time under the "dead money" category and it is on the verge of going into the "companies that need new leadership" file.  Usually we like to let the dust settle after there is a big change like this to determine if Wall Street has been to kind or too harsh, but this is one that needs to go on watch.

George Buckley could very well find himself either gone or demoted.  Gone means fired and demoted would be where he remains Chairman instead of Chairman AND President/CEO.  Part of the problem may be the pay.  According to a couple of filings his pay is not even $400,000.00, although it may be safe to assume that the number has changed.  Of course he has Much more in restricted stock options valued around $20 million if they were able to be fully exercised and if they got into profitable levels.  Those numbers may be off, but it doesn’t matter because it is too low by major standards.  But the paychecks are fairly small for being the boss at such a large and powerful MNC such as 3M.  This would make for a short tenure, but if this continues it won’t go without a call for a change at the top.

Dear Mr. Buckley:  If you thought that deciding to stop issuing guidance was a good thing, you couldn’t be more wrong.  3M is a massive conglomerate second perhaps only to GE, and not giving any guidance for the individual components is going to potentially create much more volatility around your earnings in the future.  You should learn from the recent mistakes of Home Depot, Gap, Bristol-Myers, and others.  Dropping guidance projections may make your life easier inside departments but it really turns "setting expectations" into a bit of a dart game instead of a sniper contest.  Also when you announce that guidance will be non-existent you have sent the message that is being interpreted as "If it was good, they’d sure offer it."

There is a reason that Cramer added this stock to the ‘permanent’ SELL BLOCK last night (even though permanent on wall St. means ‘until I say differently’) while on CNBC’s MAD MONEY.  Since he has had a short tenure and since certain issues truly are out of his control it may be too soon to ask for Buckley to leave.  So he’s Not Yet being added to "CEO’s that need to go," but he’s surely on watch.  He may be the nicest man in the world, he may not.  The problem with being a CEO is that some of the shortcomings in the entire operation may not be their fault in reality, but it’s their problem and they are the ones that investors blame.

Over the last 5-days the shares fell and have drifted a tad lower. The stock closed out last week at$78.69 and closed at $78.96 on Monday right before earnings.  The stock closed at $74.70 after the dismal report with guidance (and promise of no more guidance)  and shares are now down under $74.00.  The 52-week range is $67.05 to $88.35.  This stock looked on track earlier last year to get out of a rough $70 to $90 band but that didn’t happen.  If this stock falls down too much and starts putting in lower lows then he is going to be called on to make drastic changes. He can also go out and get aggressive on more corporate change to build for the long-haul.  But doing nothing and slowing the flow of information isn’t the right path. 

He is still young (59-ish) for a CEO of such a large company and he had to fill in for the interim-CEO after McNerney left for Boeing (BA) at the end of 2005.  He was given much credit for the growth and performance at Brunswick (BC), but it has not turned out to be a great year and some change.  Once again, there probably isn’t a call for him to go yet.  But some investors sure might be scratching their heads.

Jon C. Ogg
February 2, 2007

Will Cramer Stay So Bullish on NYSE After Earnings?

NYSE Group (NYX-NYSE) has shown what might be interpreted as a dud of an earnings report.  The operating results were $0.45 EPS versus $0.46 consensus estimates; the highest estimate is $0.49.  Revenues were $658.5 million.  The comparable numbers on a year-over-year basis are a bit difficult because of the Archipelago Exchange closing in March 2006.  After backing out items for ongoing ARCA costs and for Euronext charges totalling $34.1 million, net EPS came in at $0.29.

The operating results are the ones to use, but all in all this just seems lackluster if you consider the performance and the multiples.  The stock will at least no longer trade with a 100+ P/E ratio, but the forward multiple for 2007 is still roughly 45 times earnings.  We’ll have to see how the street research reports come in, although it is worth noting that they have been in the shadows of the stock on its 100%+ performance.  The analyst calls probably won’t be out in force until Monday morning.

As a reminder, this was Cramer’s #1 Growth Stock pick for 2007 and he has been touting the stock on most occasions over the last 60+ days. So far NYX shares are down 3% at just under $99.00 pre-market; and the 52-week trading range is $48.62 to $112.00.  Its short interest was listed at 4.496 million shares as of January, up almost 3% from December.  The Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME-NYSE) also reported some fairly lackluster results this week, but the BOT earnings were a bit better and they are in a merger together so the shares are back up essentially right where CME shares were ahead of the earnings report.

Jon C. Ogg
February 2, 2007

Goldman Sachs Morning Research Summary (FEB 2, 2007)

Murphy Oil (MUR) started as Buy with a $4.40 forward EPS target.

Companhia Vale do Rio Doce-‘CVRD’ (RIO-NYSE/ADR) started as Neutral by Goldman.

Goldman Sachs raised estimates on Peabody (BTU), Starwood (HOT), Tembec (TBO), CVRD (RIO), Clorox (CLX), Anheuser Busch (BUD), Elizabeth Arden (RDEN), Exxon (XOM), Valero (VLO), Marathon Oil (MRO), Sunoco (SUN), Raytheon (RTN), Alliant Techsystems (ATK), American Standard (ASD), WESCO (WCC), L-3 Communications (LLL), Silgan (SLGN), Secure Computing (SCUR), AMIS (AMIS).

Goldman Sachs Cut estimates on Comcast (CMCSA), Consolidated Energy (CNX), Massey Energy (MEE), Boston Scientific (BSX), Monster Worldwide (MNST), Brunswick (BC), EOG Resources (EOG), Celgene (CELG), Perrigo (PRGO), Vertex Pharma (VRTX), Micrel (MCRL), Time Warner (TWX), ECI Telecom (ECIL).

Today’s Employment Report

From Ticker Sense

As usual, we highlight prior non-farm payroll reports and the coinciding daily change in the stock and bond market.

Jobsreports

Add to del.icio.usDigg This!

http://www.tickersense.typepad.com/

Pre-Market Stock Notes (FEB 2, 2007)

(AAPL) Apple may be renegotiating with Cisco over the iPhone trademark; reports showing more requests for information over stock options.
(AMZN) Amazon traded up 2% initially but now down almost 3% after earnings.
(APC) Anadarko is selling natural gas assets in TX and OK for some $860 million.
(BORL) Borland Software announces the pricing of its offering of $175M Convertible Senior Notes.
(BZ) Bairnco $12.00 offer from Steel Partners II was raised to $13.35.
(CAM) Cameron $0.92 EPS vs $0.87e.
(CGPI) CollaGenex Pharm announces positive results of Phase 4 clinical study evaluating effects of Oracea.
(CMG) Chipotle was noted positively again by Jim Cramer on MAD MONEY.
(CROX) Crocs signed licensing pact with Nickelodeon for Spongebob Squarepants.
(DRAX) Draxis Health’s radiopharmaceuticals division applies to FDA to market cardiac imaging product.
(EOP) Equity Office is reaffirming the commitment to the Blackstone bid rather than the Vornado bid.
(ERTS) Electronic Arts traded up 6% after beating earnings expectations.
(HRBN) Harbin Electric traded up 10% ahead of NASDAQ listing.
(ISRG) Intuitive Surgical traded up 15% after beating earnings.
(NYX) NYSE reported $0.29 EPS , but $0.45 before items; estimates were $0.46.
(R) Ryder $1.09 EPS vs $1.09e; company guides slightly lower.
(RACK) Rackable Systems down 11% after 2007 guidance was light.
(RADN) Radyne received a $4M order.
(RESP) Respironics lost a manufacturing contract from Vital Signs to a Chinese manufacturer.
(SBUX) Starbucks was noted a bit cautiously for near-term traders by Cramer on MAD MONEY.
(SPG) Simon Properties $1.57 EPS vs $1.55e; although guidance looks 1% to 2% light for 2007.
(TBIO) Transgenomic filed patent applications directed to somatic mutations which may be useful as predictive biomarkers for various cancers.
(WR) Westar raised guidance.
(YRCW) YRC Worldwide traded up 6% after earnings and guidance.

24/7 Wall St. 2007 Break-Up Values: ADP $44 (Current Price $48.50)

By Ryan Barnes. Edited By Douglas A. McIntyre

Automatic Data Processing (ADP)

ADP – the 500lb gorilla of the HR services world – has seen its valuation get slowly eroded in the past few years as top-line growth has slowed down from the double-digit levels they were putting up like clockwork in the past.  The company is clearly focused on increasing shareholder value, as seen by the pending spin-off of the Brokerage Services group, which will happen sometime in 2007.  This will be a 100% spin-off to existing shareholders, and takes out one of the two segments that show lower operating margins than the flagship Employer Services (i.e., payroll services) group.  The other segment that lags behind Employer Services is the Dealer Services group, which is a mature enough business to stand alone as a publicly-traded company should the company decide to go that route. 

ADP’s biggest asset is the fact that they are used by just about every large company in America for something, whether it be for just payrolls or, for financial firms, more high-touch services like proxy filing and securities clearing.  ADP will often gobble up small companies that have new & interesting service offerings and then offer them to their world-class client list.  It’s a potential hit-or-miss strategy, but a few winners a decade is all ADP needs to generate above-market returns for shareholders.  Then as a fledgling operating segment becomes more mature and larger in size, it can be considered for divesting or spinning off, such as with the brokerage group. 

It makes sense for ADP to eventually spin off the Dealer Services group, as the lower margins are compressing the company valuation to some degree.  ADP still won’t get the multiple of Paychex, but it could certainly get closer (currently ADP trades at 17x earnings to PAYX’s 30x). 

To take a stab at the breakup value we first need to determine how big the brokerage spinoff will be; based on industry multiples for brokerage-related services, current growth rates and operating margins, the new stock should trade at about 20x earnings, which would garner just over $3b.

The Dealer Services group has very similar margins and growth rates to the brokerage group.  Based on the same multiple, this division would be worth $2.7b. 

After all this spinning around, the core of ADP, human resources and outsource planning, would be back to 20% plus operating margins across the board, and should allow for some multiple expansion.  Given the fact that – 1) ADP is held in just about every institutional manager’s portfolios because of the unique area of the economy that they operate in, and 2) the company is a proven operator and innovator with a great distribution system – the company still deserves a premium – we’ll give it a P/E of 25, which translates to a PEG of 1.67 and a total breakup value for ADP of $44.  ADP is a company based on people and information capital, and these companies will usually trade at levels above breakup value, as the key assets have less tangible value.

Ryan Barnes

Ryan Barnes has over 10 years’ experience in portfolio management and investment research, covering equities, fixed income, and derivative products. Ryan spent the past 5 years working as an institutional trader & manager for high-net worth investors, working with Merrill Lynch, Charles Schwab, Morgan Stanley, and many others.  Ryan is currently working as a writer and financial modeling consultant on hedging and capital appreciation strategies, and does not own securities in the companies being covered.

Methodology

24/7 Wall St. 2007 Break-up Values: Caterpillar $85 (Current Price $65)

By Ryan Barnes. Edited By Douglas A. McIntyre

Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) Price $65; Breakup Value $85

Caterpillar currently trades at a large discount to industry averages, and it is hard to determine why.  Company management is very optimistic about future prospects, going so far as to project a 15% CAGR for earnings over the next 5 years.  And yet the stock trades for just 12x current earnings and a PEG of only .65!  The most likely culprits are investor perceptions about the company’s exposure to the U.S. housing market and CAT’s hefty $18b debt load. 

The debt figure is misleading, however, as the majority of company debt is not being used to finance manufacturing of products; instead it’s being used within the financial segment of Caterpillar, known as CAT Finance, which grants loans and insurance products to both customers and dealers. 

The concerns about the U.S. housing market are warranted, especially considering that both the core business segments (Machinery and Engines) and the financial segment are exposed to the effects of the downturn.  The effects of owning CAT financial amplify the problem, because most financing is for U.S. customers, which means if things turn bad default rates will grow, and things could get ugly in a hurry.  While machinery sales would suffer as well, this can be counter-balanced by strong housing markets in the rest of the world, where CAT conducts almost half of its business. 

Spinning off the U.S. business is not really an option.  Caterpillar is first and foremost a U.S. company, and the perceptions about growth rates at home would depress the multiple of the spin-off from the get-go.  The best way to enhance shareholder value is to divest the Cat Financial division; by selling it to a larger financial institution that could handle the debt load and diversify the economic risks, CAT could take almost $14b in debt off the balance sheets and allow shareholders to see that business is very promising not only abroad but in other industrial segments of the U.S. economy. 

Cat Financial produced over $600m in operating profit in 2006 with strong growth yoy and solid 25% margins.  The unit could sell for 15-20x profits ($11.3b) and still perform the valuable function of providing financing for CAT products worldwide.  By eliminating the “double-whammy” exposure to a falling housing market and reducing overall debt by over 75%, CAT should trade in line with peers, which trade for P/Es in the range of 15 to 17.  We’ll be conservative and say that Caterpillar minus the leveraged finance group should trade for a P/E of 15 (and a PEG of 1 based on company projections), bringing the total breakup value in this scenario to an impressive $85/share. 

Ryan Barnes

Ryan Barnes has over 10 years’ experience in portfolio management and investment research, covering equities, fixed income, and derivative products. Ryan spent the past 5 years working as an institutional trader & manager for high-net worth investors, working with Merrill Lynch, Charles Schwab, Morgan Stanley, and many others.  Ryan is currently working as a writer and financial modeling consultant on hedging and capital appreciation strategies, and does not own securities in the companies being covered.

Methodology

Ford’s Mullaly: Is It Better To Rule In Hell

Milton put the word’s into the Devil’s mouth: "It is better to rule in Hell than to serve in Heaven." That must be Alan Mulally’s feeling since joining Ford (F) and leaving Boeing (BA). Since then, Ford’s stock is down about 3% (it was already off a ton for the previous year. Boeing is rocketing. It stock is up 15% over the same period since October. The Dow is up 5%.

But, the news of the last two days must bring Mulally a sense of dismay. Ford’s US sales fell 19% in January putting it behind Toyota (TM) and DaimlerChrysler (DCX) as well as GM (GM). Of course, Ford also announced at $12.7 billion lose for 2006.

Of course, Mr. Mulally did not have the top job at Boeing. But, he was close. Boeing announced a strong Q4 and forecast big gains for the next two years. The stock hit a 52-week high at $92.24.

And so, Mr. Mulally can look back on his decision. He may fly Ford into a mountain, and sooner rather than later. Falling sales will not be able to keep up with cost cuts and job eliminations forever. He can point to his predecessor Bill Ford as the villain, but he will still be on board when things get bad.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Disney Films iTune Failure

Disney (DIS), which has close ties to Apple (AAPL) due to Mr. Job’s presence on the entertainment company’s board, has gotten 1.3 million movie downloads through the iTune service. These movies are played on iPods.The theory is that these figures will pressure other studios to join the party. Some are reluctant because they do not want to hurt relationships with their big DVD distributors like Target (TGT) and Wal-Mart (WMT).

But, the business is crummy, so what’s the fuss. The movies sell for under $10 and Disney must get much less than that from Apple. So, that’s $130 million, at best. At very best. It is no bounty for a $35 billion in revenue company like Disney, and it risks alienating other distribution partners.

No wonder the other studios give it a cold shoulder.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Is Options Back-Dating Good For Shareholders

According to The Wall Street Journal, Gartmore Small Cap Fund has risen about 30% in the last year, due, in part, in buying shares depressed by the options back-dating scandals. Shares in companies like Foundry Networks (FDRY), Apple (AAPL), and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) have jumped up after the initial reaction to announcements that they had options problems.

But, the move its a bit too cute. A number of the company’s stock have not recovered. A Birinyi Associates survey of the 120 companies tied up in the options mess says that most underperformed the major induces.

Good for Gartmore, but not a bright way to screen stocks for good returns.

Douglas A. Mcintyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Micheal Dell’s One Day Honeymoon

Michael Dell has not even had the time to put the CEO title on his business cards and he is greeted with a shareholder suit that alleged funny accounting between Dell (DELL) and its major chip supplier Intel (INTC). The documents filed in District Court claim that there were $1 billion in kickbacks and payments. It would seem that a figure of that size would be hard to hide, so the investors sued Dell accountants PricewaterhouseCopper a well.

Dell is looking into accounting irregularities with its audit committee and accounting firm and the SEC is looking over its shoulders. Dell has not been able to file final financial statements for two quarters due to the problems.

The suit further alleges that these payments were made to keep Dell from doing business with Intel competitor AMD (AMD).

Now, AMD’s chips were not considered as good as Intel’s for a number of years. As their chips improved, they picked up considerable share in both the server and PC markets and now have about a quarter of the world’s market. The argument that this should have happened overnight is a bit stretched.

The law firm of class-action specialist William Lerach is handling the suit. Not a ringing endorsement of its merits.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Microsoft’s China Problem

Mozilla.org, which makes the Firefox browser that competes with Microsoft’s Internet Explorer, will open a China office in the hopes of fighting Microsoft (MSFT) for share in the world’s second largest internet market.

The open source initiative might as well save its money. Mozilla’s share of the market at 13% is about the same as it was in mid-2005. There is even an argument to be made that as the new Microsoft Vista OS comes into the market, Internet Explorer could get a bump.

Open source? Not likely.

Douglas A. McIntyre can be reached at douglasamcintyre@247wallst.com. He does not own securities in companies that he writes about.

Media Digest 2/2/2007 Reuters, WSJ, NYTimes, FT, Barron’s

According to Reuters, Mozilla, which makes the main alternative to Microsoft’s (MSFT) Internet Explorer browser, is setting up an office in China to set up a fight in the world’s second largest online market.

Ericsson (ERIC), the world’s largest provider of cell phone infrasturcture, indicated that its 2007 figures would be below many forecasts, Reuters wrotes.

Nissan’s profits fell on weak US sales, according to Reuters.

The Wall Street Journal reports that gas producing countries including Russia and Iran are considering building an "OPEC-like" cartel.

The WSJ also writes that an investor lawsuit accues Dell (DELL) of improper accounting with its major chip partner, Intel (INTC).

The WSJ writes that drop-offs in January sales at Ford (F) and GM (GM), helped bring down US car sales by 4.6%.

The WSJ also writes that British Airways (BAB) net profit fell 12%.

The Wall Street Journal writes that the net at Amazon (AMZN) fell by half on tax considerations, but revenue rose 34% in Q4.

The New York Times reports that Comcast’s (CMCSA) profits rose by 3x as consumers flocked to its triple play of TV, phone and broadband.

The NYT reports that results at Boston Scientific (BSX) were hurt by merger costs with Guidant and that the upcoming year may be difficult because of volatility in the sales of heart stents.

FT reports that Exxon (XOM) reported the largest corporate profit for a year in US history. Q4 results were off slightly.

FT also reports that Disney (DIS) has sold 1.3 million movies on Apples (AAPL) iTune service.

Barron’s reports that Amazon’s (AMZN) stock was pressured after hours on concerns that 2007 margins may be squeezed.

Barron’s also reports that CA (CA) reported results ahead of forecasts and raised expectations for 2007.

Douglas A. McIntyre

Europe Markets 2/2/2007

FTSE FTSE 100 Index View Report 04:37 AM 6,312.50 +30.30 +0.48%
.GDAXI DAXX Index View Report 04:37 AM 6,864.00 +12.72 +0.19%
.FCHI CAC 40 Index View Report 04:37 AM 5,677.39 +15.14 +0.27%
.SSMI SMI-Index View Report 04:22 AM 9,236.23 +18.36 +0.20%

Data from Reuters

Douglas A. McIntyre