North American freight rail is undergoing a quiet transformation. After decades of incremental consolidation, the industry now faces a strategic question: who benefits most from cross-border trade integration? The 2023 merger of Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern created the continent’s only single-line Mexico-Canada-U.S. rail network.
We looked at three major freight carriers to see who actually stands to benefit most from North American trade flows, despite all short-term political involvement in it.
The Contenders
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (NYSE:CP) operates a 20,000-mile transcontinental network spanning all three NAFTA nations. The company hauls bulk commodities (potash, coal, grain), intermodal containers, and automotive products. With a market cap of $67.89 billion and profit margins of 28.4%, CP generates $15.03 billion in annual revenue. The Kansas City Southern acquisition gave CP the only direct rail route connecting Canadian ports to Mexican manufacturing hubs without requiring handoffs to competing carriers.
Union Pacific (NYSE:UNP) dominates the western United States with routes serving major West Coast ports, the Gulf Coast, and key industrial corridors. The railroad connects to Mexico through border gateways but lacks the integrated single-line service CP now offers. UNP focuses heavily on intermodal traffic moving goods from Pacific ports inland, plus agricultural products, chemicals, and energy shipments.
Norfolk Southern (NYSE:NSC) operates primarily in the eastern United States, serving the industrial Midwest, Atlantic ports, and the Southeast. NSC has limited direct Mexico exposure compared to western carriers but benefits from intermodal traffic moving through eastern ports and connects to Canadian rail networks through interchange agreements. The company focuses on automotive, chemicals, agriculture, and merchandise freight.
How Their Networks Compare
The fundamental difference is geographic reach. CP’s post-merger network creates a direct pipeline from Canadian resources and ports through the U.S. heartland to Mexican manufacturing centers. Cross-border freight typically requires multiple carriers, adding costs and complexity. A shipper moving automotive parts from Ontario to Monterrey previously needed at least two railroads. CP now handles the entire route.
Union Pacific has strong Mexico connectivity through border crossings at Laredo and El Paso, but its network ends at the Canadian border. Shipments continuing north require handoffs to Canadian carriers. Norfolk Southern faces even greater limitations. Its eastern focus means most Mexico-bound freight must route through western gateways or rely on Gulf Coast ports, adding distance and cost.
Recent performance reflects these positioning differences. Over the past year, Norfolk Southern gained 22.74% while Union Pacific rose just 3.04%. Year-to-date 2025, NSC is up 26.99% versus UNP’s 5.24%. CP has returned 3.19% year-to-date, supported by a 39.8% operating margin that demonstrates pricing power.
What Management Is Saying
CP management has emphasized the merger’s strategic value. The company’s investor materials describe its network as offering “unparalleled access to key markets across North America” and highlight growth opportunities in intermodal and automotive segments. Standard & Poor’s recently upgraded CP’s outlook from stable to positive, citing “enhanced credit profile post-KCS acquisition” and “strong operating performance.”
Union Pacific has focused on operational efficiency improvements and service reliability but has not articulated a comparable cross-border integration story. Norfolk Southern has emphasized its eastern industrial base and intermodal growth, positioning itself as a complement to western carriers rather than a direct competitor for Mexico traffic.
Who Actually Benefits Most
Based on network structure and market positioning, CP holds the clearest advantage for North American trade integration. The single-line Mexico-Canada route eliminates a competitive disadvantage that previously required shippers to use multiple carriers. This translates to pricing power and market share gains in cross-border lanes.
That advantage shows up in credit markets. S&P’s positive outlook and potential upgrade within 12 months benefits CP bondholders and credit investors. The company’s 75.7% institutional ownership and 28.4% profit margins suggest large asset managers see the strategic value.
Union Pacific benefits from Mexico trade through its border gateways but lacks the integrated network. Norfolk Southern’s eastern focus limits direct exposure, though the railroad remains strong in its core markets. Both face structural limitations CP has eliminated.
The Bottom Line
Cross-border trade integration is reshaping North American freight rail. CP’s transcontinental network positions it to capture disproportionate value from Mexico-Canada-U.S. supply chains. Bondholders benefit from the S&P upgrade path, while shareholders gain from operational leverage and pricing power. Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern remain strong franchises, but their networks lack CP’s continental reach. CP’s transcontinental network creates a structural advantage in North American trade flows that competing railroads cannot easily match.
Top Gaining Stocks
Top Losing Stocks