Oxford Square’s 21% Yield Masks a Crumbling Portfolio

Photo of John Seetoo
By John Seetoo Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Oxford Square’s 21% Yield Masks a Crumbling Portfolio

© DC Studio / Shutterstock.com

Oxford Square Capital (NASDAQ:OXSQ) advertises a headline yield north of 21%, and the math checks out at the surface. With shares trading around $2 and a monthly distribution of $0.035 per share, the payout looks like a gift. The company behind it is in worse shape than the yield suggests.

How Oxford Square Generates Its Income

Oxford Square is a business development company. It raises capital from shareholders and lends to private middle-market businesses, then passes the interest income through as monthly distributions. Its income comes from two buckets: senior secured debt investments yielding a weighted 14.5% at cost and CLO equity tranches, the riskiest, first-loss slice of collateralized loan obligations.

In the fourth quarter of 2025, debt investments produced $5.3 million and CLO equity contributed $4.3 million. CLO equity is the engine of the high yield, and also the source of the trouble.

The Numbers That Don’t Add Up

The single most important figure for a BDC investor is whether net investment income (NII) covers the distribution. It does not. Q4 NII per share came in at $0.07, which annualizes to roughly $0.28. The annualized distribution is $0.42. Shareholders are receiving about 50% more in cash than the portfolio is actually earning, with the gap effectively a return of capital.

That capital is visibly eroding. NAV per share has fallen every quarter of 2025:

Period NAV per share
Year-end 2024 $2.30
Q1 2025 $2.09
Q2 2025 $2.06
Q3 2025 $1.95
Q4 2025 $1.69

That is a 27% decline in book value over four quarters. Q4 alone shaved off 13%, driven by unrealized depreciation and realized losses. Full-year 2025 realized losses totaled around $17 million.

Portfolio and Balance Sheet Stress

The CLO equity book is feeling the squeeze. The effective yield on those positions compressed from roughly 10% in Q3 to 9% in Q4, a single-quarter drop. With the 10-year/2-year spread barely positive and the fed funds rate near 4%, leveraged loan defaults are the swing factor for that yield, and Oxford Square already carries one portfolio company on non-accrual at a $5.0 million fair value.

Funding is getting more expensive. The company issued 7.75% Unsecured Notes for net proceeds of about $72.1 million, pushing total liabilities up while shareholders’ equity fell 10%. Management has also leaned heavily on at-the-market share sales, issuing roughly 15.9 million new shares across 2025, much of it below NAV. That dilutes per-share NII at exactly the moment per-share NII needs to recover.

The Yield Is Real. The Total Return Isn’t.

Oxford Square already cut its monthly distribution from $0.04 to $0.035 in early 2025, a reduction during 2025. The full-year total return on NAV was -8%, and the market-value total return was -12%. Even after a 11% bounce over the past month, the stock has lagged. Collecting a 21% yield while watching principal compound lower is a losing trade.

Verdict

The distribution is at meaningful risk. With NII covering only two-thirds of the payout, NAV down sharply, realized losses mounting, CLO yields compressing, and a non-accrual already on the books, another cut is more likely than not if portfolio stress continues into 2026. Oxford Square may suit speculators willing to bet on a credit cycle turn and wider CLO spreads. Income investors focused on a sustainable monthly check have reason to be skeptical of this payout.

Photo of John Seetoo
About the Author John Seetoo →

After 15 years on Wall Street with 7 of them as Director of Corporate and Municipal Bond Trading for a NYSE member firm, I started my own project and corporate finance consultancy. Much of the work involves writing business plans, presentations, white papers and marketing materials for companies seeking budgetary allocations for spinoffs and new initiatives or for raising capital for expansion or startup companies and entrepreneurs. On financial topics, I have been published under my own byline at The Motley Fool, 247wallst.com, DealFlow Events’ Healthcare Services Investment Newsletter and The Microcap Newsletter, among others.  Additionally, I have done freelance ghostwriting writing and editing for several financial websites, such as Seeking Alpha and Shmoop Financial. I have also written and been published on a variety of other topics from music, audiophile sound and film to musical instrument history, martial arts, and current events.  Publications include Copper Magazine, Fidelity (Germany), Blasting News, Inside Kung-Fu, and other periodicals.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

WDC Vol: 9,515,081
DASH Vol: 6,827,663
MU Vol: 44,892,852
STX Vol: 5,771,574
ON Vol: 11,013,934

Top Losing Stocks

Fox
FOXA Vol: 33,658,109
Fox
FOX Vol: 6,970,859
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
LDOS Vol: 2,581,154
TFC Vol: 22,997,951