Kinder Morgan vs Williams Companies: Both Crush Earnings, But Take Opposite Paths

Photo of Vandita Jadeja
By Vandita Jadeja Published

Quick Read

  • KMI and WMB both posted record 2025 results, but KMI bets on a $10B pipeline backlog while Williams commits $7B to power generation.

  • Williams' 34 P/E versus Kinder Morgan's 23 reflects the premium investors pay for its bold power generation pivot over a proven pipeline model.

  • Kinder Morgan offers income investors a 3.49% yield and BBB+ rating; Williams' upside hinges on its Socrates power project hitting a late-2026 deadline.

  • This lithium producer surpassed a $1B private valuation, joining some of America's most powerful startups. Now you can invest in EnergyX alongside global giants like General Motors, but only through July 16. (sponsor)

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Kinder Morgan vs Williams Companies: Both Crush Earnings, But Take Opposite Paths

© sdf_qwe / Shutterstock.com

Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI | KMI Price Prediction) and Williams Companies (NYSE:WMB) just closed the books on record 2025 results, and both pipeline operators are pointing the same firehose of capital at LNG exports and data center power demand. The way they are doing it, however, looks quite different. One is leaning on a $10 billion pipeline backlog. The other is buying into power generation itself.

Records on Both Sides, but the Mix Tells the Story

Kinder Morgan delivered adjusted EPS of $0.39 against a $0.37 estimate on $4.51 billion in revenue, up 13.64% year over year. CEO Kim Dang credited “record-setting performance in our Natural Gas Pipelines business segment”, with transport volumes up 9% and gathering volumes up 19%. The CO2 segment was the weak spot, dragged by softer commodity and D3 RIN prices.

Williams, under new CEO Chad Zamarin since July 2025, posted full-year adjusted EBITDA of $7.75 billion, up 9%, and Q4 EPS of $0.55. Transco continues to do the heavy lifting, with Transmission, Power & Gulf adjusted EBITDA of $3.71 billion, a $403 million jump. A $212 million impairment on Mid-Continent gas gathering was a reminder that not every basin is humming.

An infographic titled
24/7 Wall St.
Business Driver Kinder Morgan Williams
FY revenue $16.94B $11.95B
FY net income growth +17% +18%
Leverage target 3.8x ~4.0x
2026 dividend $1.19 (+2%) $2.10 (+5%)

Pipeline Purist vs. Power Operator

Kinder Morgan is doubling down on what it already does best. Its $10 billion project backlog is roughly 90% natural gas, with about 60% tied to power generation. Trident Intrastate, SSE4, and Mississippi Crossing are all traditional pipeline projects. Dang says “total demand for natural gas is expected to grow by 17% through 2030, led by LNG exports”, and KMI already moves 8 Bcf/d to LNG facilities, growing to 12 Bcf/d by end of 2028.

KMI analyst ratings

Williams is taking a bolder step. Zamarin is putting over $7 billion of capital into power innovation projects, including the newly announced “Socrates the Younger.” The Cogentrix platform, Rimrock and Saber acquisitions, and the Woodside Energy LNG partnership all push Williams further down the value chain than a traditional pipeline operator goes. Investors are paying for that ambition: WMB trades at a 34 P/E versus 23 for KMI.

WMB analyst ratings

The Next Test Is Whether the Premium Pays Off

WMB shares are up 33.04% year to date and just touched a 52-week high, while KMI has climbed 27.2%.

I will be watching whether Williams’ first power innovation project hits its second-half 2026 commissioning on budget. For Kinder Morgan, the catalyst is FERC certificates on SSE4 and Mississippi Crossing, both expected in July 2026. Analyst targets sit at $81.99 for WMB and $35.33 for KMI, leaving modest implied upside in both names.

Why I Lean Toward Kinder Morgan for Value, Williams for Vision

The two stocks frame distinct investor profiles. KMI offers a cleaner valuation, a 3.49% yield, an S&P upgrade to BBB+, and a backlog that is already commercialized, an income-style profile tied to LNG and power gas.

Williams trades at a richer multiple and asks investors to underwrite execution on power plants and acquisitions, a growth-tilted profile with more upside if Socrates works. Steel tariff moves and 2026 power demand forecasts are the key variables that could reshape either thesis.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Vandita Jadeja
About the Author Vandita Jadeja →

Vandita Jadeja is a financial copywriter who loves to read and write about stocks. She believes in buying and holding for long term gains. Her knowledge of words and numbers helps her write clear stock analysis. She has contributed to several publications, including the Joy Wallet, Benzinga, The Motley Fool and InvestorPlace.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CRWD Vol: 12,003,126
GS Vol: 3,792,568
DELL Vol: 7,232,068
PANW Vol: 5,893,720
MPWR Vol: 777,603

Top Losing Stocks

IBM
IBM Vol: 67,431,363
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
BIIB Vol: 3,821,954
HCA Vol: 4,227,658
ISRG Vol: 5,655,447