Michael Saylor’s Strategy Just Did the Unthinkable — It Held Its First Bitcoin Liquidation

Photo of Rich Duprey
By Rich Duprey Published

Quick Read

  • Strategy (MSTR) sold 32 Bitcoin at $77,135 per coin to fund preferred stock obligations, breaking its “never sell” doctrine while holding 843,076 Bitcoin at an average cost of $75,699 per coin that is now underwater as Bitcoin trades around $67,338.

  • A potential negative feedback loop emerges where lower Bitcoin prices increase pressure on MicroStrategy’s balance sheet, potentially forcing additional sales that could further depress Bitcoin prices, undermining the company’s core investment thesis.

  • It sounds nuts, but SoFi is giving new active invest users up to $1,000 in stock for a limited time, and all it takes is a $50 deposit to get started. See for yourself (Sponsor)
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Michael Saylor’s Strategy Just Did the Unthinkable — It Held Its First Bitcoin Liquidation

© Michael Saylor (BY-SA 2.0) by Gage Skidmore

For years, one of the most powerful narratives in the cryptocurrency market wasn’t Bitcoin (CRYPTO:BTC) itself. It was the idea that Michael Saylor’s Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR | MSTR Price Prediction) could buy Bitcoin indefinitely and never sell a single coin. The company transformed itself into the world’s largest corporate Bitcoin holder and became a leveraged proxy for investors who wanted exposure to the cryptocurrency.

But what happens when a company built on “never sell” finally sells?

That question became very real after Strategy disclosed in a June 1 SEC filing that it sold 32 Bitcoin at an average price of $77,135 per coin to help meet obligations tied to its preferred stock. The transaction was tiny relative to its overall holdings, but the symbolism was enormous. A line that investors once assumed would never be crossed just got crossed.

From “Never Sell” to Selling as a Last Resort

The evolution of Saylor’s position has been gradual.

First came the unwavering commitment that Strategy would never sell Bitcoin. If Bitcoin’s price fell, Saylor said he would just buy more. Then came disclosures acknowledging that sales were theoretically possible under extreme circumstances. More recently, management argued that selective sales could occur if they “maximized Bitcoin per share” for shareholders.

Now the company has completed its first outright liquidation to fund preferred dividend obligations.

According to the SEC filing, Strategy still owns 843,076 Bitcoin acquired at an average purchase price of $75,699 per coin. That means the company’s aggregate cost carries a razor-thin margin modestly below its carrying value.

The problem is that Bitcoin is no longer trading near the levels where those purchases looked comfortable. Bitcoin currently changes hands around $67,338, meaning Strategy’s holdings are underwater relative to their average acquisition cost.

The sale itself generated only about $2.5 million. The larger concern is what it signals about future liquidity needs.

A green and white financial infographic detailing the liquidation of Bitcoin holdings to meet preferred stock obligations and the changing market dynamics of BTC as a store of value.
The 'diamond hands' era is over. A single $2.5 million sale has shattered the 'never sell' narrative and exposed a high-stakes liquidity trap. © 24/7 Wall St.

The Reserve Fund Didn’t Solve the Problem

Strategy previously established a roughly $900 million U.S. dollar reserve intended to help fund preferred dividends and debt-related obligations without forcing Bitcoin sales. That reserve was supposed to buy time.

Instead, the company’s first Bitcoin liquidation suggests the reserve alone may not be sufficient to eliminate pressure from its growing stack of preferred securities. Every new preferred issuance raises fixed obligations that must be paid regardless of Bitcoin’s price.

That’s where the Bitcoin treasury model starts to look less elegant than it did during the bull market.

The strategy worked exceptionally well when Bitcoin was rising faster than Strategy’s obligations. As long as asset values expanded, new financing could be raised and existing commitments could be serviced.

But when Bitcoin declines while dividend obligations remain fixed, the math changes.

A Feedback Loop Investors Can’t Ignore

Surprisingly, the bigger risk isn’t the 32 Bitcoin already sold. It’s the possibility of what comes next.

Saylor has previously suggested Bitcoin might trade in the $40,000 to $50,000 range without Strategy’s consistent weekly purchases helping absorb supply. If that assessment is correct, the company occupies a far more important role in the Bitcoin ecosystem than many investors realized. That also creates a potential negative feedback loop.

Lower Bitcoin prices increase pressure on Strategy’s balance sheet. Additional balance-sheet pressure could require more Bitcoin sales. More sales could add further downward pressure on Bitcoin prices.

Granted, 843,076 Bitcoin remains an enormous position, and Strategy still controls the largest cryptocurrency treasury in the world. But investors can no longer assume the company is a permanent one-way buyer.

At the same time, capital markets appear to be shifting. Increasingly, investors are viewing productive assets such as AI infrastructure, data centers, and high-performance computing systems that generate cash flows as a true store of value rather than relying primarily on appreciation. 

That trend doesn’t eliminate Bitcoin’s role, but it does create new competition for capital.

Key Takeaway

Bitcoin’s price tumbled 5.5% on Strategy’s Bitcoin sale. The real importance, though, lies in what it represents. A company built around the principle of never selling Bitcoin has now sold Bitcoin to meet financial obligations. The investment thesis has changed.

The Bitcoin treasury model worked remarkably well — until it didn’t. The first liquidation raises a new question shareholders must now answer: if Bitcoin remains below Strategy’s average cost basis and preferred obligations continue to grow, was this a one-time sale or just the first of many to come?

Photo of Rich Duprey
About the Author Rich Duprey →

After two decades of patrolling the dark corners of suburbia as a police officer, Rich Duprey hung up his badge and gun to begin writing full time about stocks and investing. For the past 20 years he’s been cruising the markets looking for companies to lock up as long-term holdings in a portfolio while writing extensively on the broad sectors of consumer goods, technology, and industrials. Because his experience isn’t from the typical financial analyst track, Rich is able to break down complex topics into understandable and useful action points for the average investor. His writings have appeared on The Motley Fool, InvestorPlace, Yahoo! Finance, and Money Morning. He has been featured in both U.S. and international publications, including MarketWatch, Financial Times, Forbes, Fast Company, and USA Today.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

HPE Vol: 122,418,488
GLW Vol: 12,994,438
ENPH Vol: 4,974,412
APTV Vol: 3,453,918
SMCI Vol: 44,353,910

Top Losing Stocks

TTD Vol: 14,127,365
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
INTU Vol: 5,180,003
CBOE Vol: 3,495,977
NOW Vol: 31,881,989