XDTE vs QDTE: Which Roundhill 0DTE ETF Actually Pays the Higher Friday Yield

Photo of Tony Dong
By Tony Dong Published

Quick Read

  • QDTE currently offers the higher yield: Its 40.27% annualized distribution rate exceeds XDTE's 25.69%, largely because it sells options on a more volatile benchmark.

  • Both funds use the same 0DTE framework: They maintain overnight exposure and sell out-of-the-money call options each trading day to generate income.

  • Both funds use the same 0DTE framework: They maintain overnight exposure and sell out-of-the-money call options each trading day to generate income.

  • Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

XDTE vs QDTE: Which Roundhill 0DTE ETF Actually Pays the Higher Friday Yield

© Jack_the_sparow / Shutterstock.com

Weekly distribution ETFs have attracted a lot of attention from income investors. But before chasing those payouts, it is important to understand how distributions work. When an ETF goes ex-distribution, its net asset value falls by the amount of the upcoming payment, all else being equal. Money is leaving the fund and being transferred to shareholders.

That is why yield alone can be misleading. A large payout does not necessarily mean a better investment. Total return, which includes both distributions and changes in share price, remains the most important metric. Still, the appeal for income investors can be palpable, especially when yields are in the double-digit range.

Income ETF issuers have continually adapted to investor demands for higher and more frequent payouts. This has resulted in the creation of numerous zero-day-to-expiry, or 0DTE options selling ETFs. Of the ones available, the most popular come from Roundhill Investments.

How XDTE and QDTE generate income

The Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and the Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) use similar strategies.

Both funds maintain overnight exposure to their underlying benchmarks. XDTE is tied to the S&P 500, while QDTE tracks the Innovation-100 Index, which behaves similarly to the Nasdaq-100. Maintaining overnight exposure matters because a meaningful portion of long-term equity returns occurs outside normal market hours.

Neither fund simply owns the underlying stocks. Instead, they use Treasury collateral and options positions to create synthetic exposure. Each morning, the funds then sell an out-of-the-money 0DTE call option that expires the same day at market close.

The goal is to collect option premium from rapid time decay, also known as theta. The tradeoff is that some upside is sacrificed if the market rallies sharply during the trading day. By selling options more frequently, these ETFs can pocket more premiums than traditional covered calls that sell one month out.

Why QDTE pays more than XDTE

As of June 8, 2026, QDTE carried a 40.27% annualized distribution rate. XDTE came in lower at 25.69%. This is calculated by taking each ETF’s most recent weekly payout, annualizing it, and dividing against the NAV.

The difference largely comes down to volatility. QDTE’s underlying benchmark is more volatile than the S&P 500. Higher volatility generally results in higher option premiums to compensate for the uncertainty, which allows the fund to generate more income from selling daily calls.

Both funds follow the same distribution schedule. Distributions are typically declared on Wednesday, the funds go ex-distribution on Thursday, and investors receive payment on Friday. Remember, if you want the payout, you have to buy the fund before the ex-distribution date and hold it on the day of.

Investors should remember that neither fund is cheap. Both XDTE and QDTE charge a 0.97% expense ratio, which is significantly higher than a traditional index ETF. They also cap upside price appreciation potential while retaining most downside exposure.

For investors focused strictly on weekly income, QDTE technically currently offers the larger payout. For everyone else, it is worth weighing those distributions against the higher fees, capped upside, and long-term total return tradeoffs.

Photo of Tony Dong
About the Author Tony Dong →

Tony Dong is the founder of ETF Portfolio Blueprint. He also serves as Lead ETF Analyst for ETF Central, a partnership between Trackinsight and the NYSE.

Tony’s work focuses on ETF strategy, portfolio construction, and risk management, with an emphasis on making complex investment concepts accessible to everyday investors. His insights and analysis have also appeared in U.S. News & World Report, Kiplinger, MoneySense, and The Motley Fool.

Tony holds a Master of Science degree in enterprise risk management from Columbia University and the Certified ETF Advisor (CETF) designation from The ETF Institute.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

DVN Vol: 7,738,082
APA
APA Vol: 1,637,332
MPC Vol: 718,263
COP Vol: 2,430,342
LYV Vol: 1,063,446

Top Losing Stocks

SMCI Vol: 62,219,512
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
GNRC Vol: 872,937
ETN Vol: 1,339,404
PWR Vol: 598,623