That 85% ‘Yield’ Lost 73% in a Year: The Weekly Payday Fund That Ate Its Own NAV
An 85% yield sounds like a dream until the fund paying it quietly returns your own money and calls it income. What happened to MSTY investors reveals a structural flaw hiding inside every eye-popping distribution rate.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
The YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (NYSEARCA:MSTY) was sold to income seekers as a way to harvest the wild volatility of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) as weekly cash. The pitch worked. MSTY briefly posted a trailing distribution rate north of 85%, and retail investors piled in expecting a lottery ticket that paid rent. What they got instead was a fund whose share price fell from a peak near $40 to $12.83, with a one-year price decline of 68.39% and a total return of roughly -72.7%, including all distributions paid. There is a cleaner way to run a weekly-income options strategy, and it lives one aisle over in the same product category.
Why Investors Bought MSTY in the First Place
Where the Strategy Broke
Covered calls cap upside and keep all downside. Strategy’s stock fell 74.91% over the past year, and MSTY’s synthetic position took the full hit while the sold calls expired worthless. The fund kept distributing, so the principal went out the door as “income.” Weekly payouts collapsed from that $4.42 peak in late 2024 to $0.2222 on July 30, 2026. The distribution rate still looks high because the denominator, NAV, fell faster than the numerator. A yield calculated on a shrinking base is a return of capital dressed up as income.
Retail investors took notice of the deterioration. A r/wallstreetbets post titled “Got liquidated but thankfully just under 25 so will never do this ever again” drew 610 upvotes and 397 comments in early July, and sentiment tracking across the sample window was classified as very bearish at every snapshot.
The Alternative: A Weekly-Pay Fund That Kept Its NAV
The Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (NYSEARCA:QDTE) uses the same weekly-distribution wrapper investors liked about MSTY, but writes zero-days-to-expiration calls against the Nasdaq-100 rather than a single high-beta stock. Diversification and same-day theta decay are the difference. Over the past year, QDTE’s price rose 27.19%, from $23.36 to $29.71, while it continued to pay weekly. MSTY holders received distributions and lost principal; QDTE holders received distributions and gained principal.
The mechanism matters. QDTE’s portfolio is 89.86% derivative exposure backed by a 4.01% government money-market position (FGXXX) and a 6.00% allocation to Roundhill’s Weekly T-Bill ETF. Losses on any single equity cannot vaporize the collateral, because the collateral is Treasuries. MSTY’s collateral is a synthetic long on one company whose stock can and did fall 75% in a year.
The Tradeoffs Worth Naming
Making the Swap
In a taxable account, an MSTY position sold today likely carries a capital loss that can offset gains elsewhere; the wash-sale rule does not block a rotation into QDTE because the two funds do not track substantially identical securities. In a Roth or IRA, the swap is mechanical with no tax consequence. Investors who bought MSTY specifically for MSTR exposure should size QDTE smaller, since it is a broader index play.
What Would Change the Call
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.








