After Their Golden Crosses, Is Bank of America or Ford Better for Retirement Portfolios?
Both Bank of America (NYSE: BAC | BAC Price Prediction) and Ford (NYSE: F) flashed bullish technical signals over the past few months, but which one is better in a retirement portfolio right now? A quick reality check on the…
Both Bank of America (NYSE: BAC | BAC Price Prediction) and Ford (NYSE: F) flashed bullish technical signals over the past few months, but which one is better in a retirement portfolio right now? A quick reality check on the technicals matters first. Ford’s 50-day moving average of $13.13 sits above its 200-day at $12.89, so its golden cross remains intact. Bank of America’s chart is more ambiguous: the 50-day at $51.82 is currently a hair below the 200-day at $52.00, meaning that bullish crossover has faded into a near-tie. Treat the technicals as a tailwind, not a green light. Fundamentals decide this one.
Dimension 1: Income Reliability
Ford carries the higher headline yield at roughly 4.2% on a $0.60 annualized dividend, versus Bank of America’s 2.1% on a $1.12 per-share payout. But yield is only useful if the check keeps clearing. Bank of America has raised its quarterly dividend 8% to $0.28 and authorized a $40 billion buyback, returning $9.30 billion to shareholders in Q1 2026 alone. Ford’s Q1 buybacks totaled just $311 million, and the automaker famously cut its dividend during the last downturn and again in 2020. Ford’s higher yield is mostly a reflection of its depressed share price.
| Dimension | Winner |
| Income Reliability | Bank of America |
Dimension 2: Volatility and Risk
Bank of America’s beta of 1.196 compares favorably to Ford’s beta of 1.798, meaning Ford swings roughly half again as hard as the bank in either direction. The underlying businesses tell the same story. Bank of America posted net income of $30.51 billion in FY2025, up 12.45%, with a CET1 ratio of 11.4% and credit card charge-offs improving to 3.64% from 4.05%. Ford reported a FY2025 GAAP net loss of $8.16 billion after $15.50 billion in special charges, including $10.70 billion in Model e impairments. Adding roughly $2.0 billion in 2026 commodity headwinds and ongoing Model e losses guided at $4.0 billion to $4.5 billion, Ford remains a cyclical turnaround story.
| Dimension | Winner |
| Volatility and Risk | Bank of America |
Dimension 3: Valuation and Upside
Ford trades at a forward P/E of roughly 9, well below Bank of America’s forward P/E of roughly 12. But the analyst consensus tells a different story about implied returns. Wall Street’s average price target on Bank of America is $63.16 against a current price of $54.54, with analysts overwhelmingly recommending the stock. Ford’s $14.55 target barely tops its $14.30 price, and the rating mix is dominated by Holds. Ford has been the better one-year trade, up 34.9% versus Bank of America’s 21.0%, but analysts view most of that re-rating as already priced in.
| Dimension | Winner |
| Valuation and Upside | Bank of America |
The Verdict
Bank of America is the clear core holding for a retirement-focused investor. Brian Moynihan’s team delivered four consecutive EPS beats, $15.9 billion in Q1 net interest income, and guidance for 6% to 8% NII growth in 2026. That is the profile a retiree wants: a rising dividend, a substantial buyback program, improving credit quality, and a CEO who is “bullish on the U.S. economy in 2026.”
Ford has a role, but it’s a narrow one. It fits as a higher-risk, higher-yield satellite for investors who want exposure to a possible margin recovery toward Farley’s 8% adjusted EBIT margin target by 2029 and can stomach a negative-free-cash-flow quarter and a payout history that has not survived prior recessions. For a retirement core holding, it’s Bank of America. Ford stays on the bench.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Trey has been an editor and author at 24/7 Wall St. for more than a decade, where he has published thousands of articles analyzing corporate earnings, dividend stocks, short interest, insider buying, private equity, and market trends. His comprehensive coverage spans the full spectrum of financial markets, from blue-chip stalwarts to emerging growth companies.
Beyond 24/7 Wall St., Trey has created and edited financial content for Benzinga and AOL's BloggingStocks, contributing additional hundreds of articles to the investment community. He previously oversaw the 24/7 Climate Insights site, managing editorial operations and content strategy, and currently oversees and creates content for My Investing News.
Trey's editorial expertise extends across multiple publishing environments. He served as production editor at Dearborn Financial Publishing and development editor at Kaplan, where he helped shape financial education materials. Earlier in his career, he worked as a writer-producer at SVE. His freelance editing portfolio includes work for prestigious clients such as Sage Publications, Rand McNally, the Institute for Supply Management, the American Library Association, Eggplant Literary Productions, and Spiegel.
Outside of financial journalism, Trey writes fiction and has been an active member of the writing community for years, overseeing a long-running critique group and moderating workshop sessions at regional conventions. He lives with his family in an old house in the Midwest.
