The U.S. Global Jets ETF (NYSEARCA:JETS) and the iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (NYSEARCA:ITA) both carry the word aviation in their pitch, yet they bet on entirely different cash flows. JETS owns passenger airlines, airports, and aircraft makers whose fortunes hinge on leisure demand and jet fuel. ITA owns defense primes and aerospace suppliers paid by multi-year government contracts. The 2026 YTD performance gap sits at 8.97% for ITA against 5.2% for JETS through June 12.
What each fund is actually betting on
JETS tracks the U.S. Global Jets Index, composed of U.S. and international passenger airlines, aircraft manufacturers, airports, terminal services companies, and airline-related internet media and services companies. The implicit thesis is consumer cyclical: rising disposable income, falling fuel costs, and stable load factors. Two of those three inputs are running against the fund right now. University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment sat at 49.8 in April 2026, down from 61.7 in July 2025, a reading the index classifies as recessionary. WTI crude, the proxy for jet fuel, traded at $95 per barrel as of June 8, after peaking at $114.58 in early April.
ITA bets on government procurement. The fund is heavily concentrated, with General Electric at 20.66%, RTX at 14.64%, and Boeing at 9.19%, putting roughly 45% in the top three names and 64.13% in the top ten. The tailwind is Washington spending. The FY 2027 Department of War budget allocates $52.9 billion for critical munitions, $87.2 billion for sea power, and $59.7 billion for space capabilities, more than double the FY 2026 enacted level. Backlogs at Lockheed, RTX, and General Dynamics convert that flow into multi-year revenue visibility.
Where the divergence shows up
Over one year, the two funds are roughly tied: JETS returned 31.33%, and ITA returned 30.96%. The longer window tells a different story. Over five years, ITA gained 117.98% while JETS rose 13.82%. The ten-year figures are 311% for ITA versus 35% for JETS. Airlines absorbed the 2020 demand collapse and then the 2022 fuel spike. Defense primes were able to price through both.
The practical comparison
| Metric | JETS | ITA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.38% |
| Net assets | Not disclosed in current snapshot | $13.49 billion |
| Top holding | Global airline basket | GE at 19.03% |
| YTD 2026 | 5.2% | 8.97% |
| 5-year return | 13.82% | 117.98% |
ITA’s defense tilt cuts both ways. With so much weight in three major contractors, a single program cancellation or a budget continuing resolution can hit the fund harder than its 47‑position roster suggests. JETS spreads its exposure across more names, but the risk still funnels into one variable: passenger demand, the swing factor that drives airline cyclicality and shapes how traffic‑sensitive ETFs behave in volatile markets.
How the two funds compare
ITA fits an investor who wants exposure to defense budget growth, long-cycle backlogs, and is comfortable with mega-cap concentration. JETS fits a tactical position: a bet that consumer sentiment recovers, fuel costs ease, and airline pricing power returns. With sentiment at 49.8 and WTI near $95, the JETS thesis requires two macro reversals to play out. A sustained drop in oil toward the winter low of $55.44 alongside a sentiment recovery above 60 would flip the calculus.
Top Gaining Stocks
Top Losing Stocks