Jim Cramer Says “Never Fear the Tax Man, Fear the Losses.” Should Retirees Take His Advice?

Jim Cramer tells retirees to fear losses more than taxes, but one quiet IRS rule flips that logic entirely for certain investors. Knowing which side of the line you stand on could be worth more than the stock itself.

Published October 22, 2026, 6:00pm ET · 4 min read

Rear view of a man in a dark suit with his hands raised, standing in a modern, dark trading room surrounded by numerous large display screens. The screens show intricate blue, green, and red financial charts and data. A woman is partially visible to the right, also looking at the screens, in a similar professional setting. The room is dimly lit, with the screen displays providing the main light source.
Amidst the digital glow of market screens, a trader reacts to price movements, reflecting the high-stakes decisions investors face when weighing profits against potential losses, a dilemma often highlighted by financial experts like Jim Cramer. © Shutterstock

Jim Cramer gave a short answer to one of the most common questions about taxable brokerage accounts. On the October 21 episode of Mad Money, a viewer asked how to decide between taking a profit now and holding longer to get long-term capital gains treatment. Cramer said: “Never fear the tax man, fear the losses. If stocks can go down, take them off the table even if you have a big gain. That’s what matters to me.”

He also told viewers to work through those questions with an accounting professional because “what I care about is whether stocks can go up or down.” Retirees have less time to recover from a drawdown and often have heirs to think about, so the advice deserves a closer look.

Why the One-Year Mark Changes Your Tax Bill

The IRS counts a gain as short-term if you hold the asset 1 year or less and long-term if you hold it for more than 1 year, according to IRS Publication 544. The IRS taxes short-term gains as ordinary income. For 2026, the top ordinary rate is 37%, which applies to single taxpayers with income above $640,600. Long-term gains fall under a separate schedule in the tax code with rates of 0%, 15%, and 20%.

Losses also count. Capital losses offset capital gains in full and can reduce up to $3,000 of ordinary income each year. The government shares a little of your pain on a losing position, but you still take most of a drop yourself.

Cramer Has Been Saying This Since His First Book

This is a long-held view for Cramer. On the August 21 show, he told a 66-year-old dividend investor that “in my first book I wrote do not fear the tax man. What matters is the quality of the stocks.” On the October 20 episode, he warned against selling winners to fund losers, saying the result is “a self-fulfilling spiral as the bad stocks stay bad and keep going down.”

The timing fits the current debate. A Kiplinger piece published today carried the headline “Tax Paralysis: When Fear of Capital Gains Creates a Bigger Risk.”

When Retirees Should Lock In Gains

Cramer’s rule is most useful in three situations:

  • Concentrated positions. If one stock makes up a large share of your nest egg, a 30% drop can change your retirement plans. Paying a 15% tax to cut that risk can be worth it.
  • Low-income years. Retirees with low enough taxable income can have long-term gains taxed at 0% under the statute. At a zero rate, the tax adds no cost to selling.
  • A weakening business. If the reason you bought the stock no longer holds, waiting a few months for a better rate means risking real dollars to save a fraction of them.

When Holding Still Wins

Heirs get the best argument for holding. Under 26 U.S.C. § 1014(a)(1), inherited property takes a basis equal to its fair market value at the date of the decedent’s death. That wipes out the unrealized gain. Inherited property is also treated as held for more than 1 year, no matter how long the heir has owned it. For an 80-year-old with a decades-old, low-basis position in a durable company, selling turns untaxed gain into taxable gain.

Timing matters too. If a position is a few weeks from the one-year mark and the business looks solid, waiting to move from ordinary rates to long-term rates is a reasonable risk decision. Cramer admitted the tension himself on the same show: “There’s often two rights that compete against each other.”

Verdict: Where Cramer’s Rule Holds and Its One Big Exception

For most retirees, Cramer’s rule is sound. A shorter time horizon makes a big drawdown more expensive than a tax bill, and the 0% and 15% brackets keep the cost of selling low for many households. The exception is a stock you plan to leave to heirs: if you have the cash flow to cover your spending without selling, the step-up in basis can eliminate the tax. It is one of several quiet IRS rules that change a retirement account, and we mapped out the rest in a free guide to the traps that catch retirees. Two numbers shape the math: your projected taxable income for the year and the date your holding period passes one year.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Chris Lange

Chris Lange is a financial and geopolitical writer with more than a decade of experience covering a myriad of topics. He has published thousands of articles for 24/7 Wall St., with past coverage focused heavily on stocks, IPOs, healthcare, defense, global affairs, and technology.

His work has been quoted, or referenced by a number of outlets including Business Insider, USA Today, Yahoo Finance, MSN, The Motley Fool, and many other publications. A graduate of Southwestern University, he studied business with a focus on investments and has previous experience in banking and startups.

When not reading or writing the news, he is following his passion for Lacrosse, playing chess, or building solar projects with his dad.

All articles →