My old job had a pension and they offered me to cash out for $24k or get $100 per month for life — which should I choose?

Photo of Maurie Backman
By Maurie Backman Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
My old job had a pension and they offered me to cash out for $24k or get $100 per month for life — which should I choose?

© corolanty from Getty Images

When I hear about people who are eligible for a pension from an employer, I tend to feel a little jealous. Aside from Social Security, any money I have available in retirement is money I will probably have to save myself.

But the reality is that private sector companies have largely abandoned pensions in favor of shifting the savings burden onto employees. If you are lucky, you might have a 401(k) match thrown into the mix. I am self-employed, so I get none of that. Then again, I do get to set my own hours and work from the beach if I so choose, so there is that.

Meanwhile, I recently came across a Reddit post where the author faces an interesting situation. They are entitled to a pension from a former employer and have two options: take about $100 per month for the rest of their life, or cash out the pension at around $24,000. It is not an easy decision. But there is a fairly straightforward way to arrive at a smart choice.

It all comes down to your break-even age

The decision to cash out a pension versus take a monthly payout should hinge largely on how long you think you will live. To figure that out, you need to calculate your break-even age. The math is simple. The poster could get $100 a month indefinitely or settle for $24,000 up front. Their break-even age is the age at which they receive the lump sum, plus 20 years. If they are eligible for the lump sum at 65, then at age 85 they should end up with the same cumulative amount whether they took the $24,000 in full or accepted $100 a month.

The 2026 rate environment matters here. Federal law requires pensions to use Minimum Present Value Segment Rates to calculate payouts, and these rates carry an inverse relationship with the lump sum value: higher rates produce smaller lump sums. As a general rule, a 1% increase in segment rates reduces a lump sum value by roughly 10%, which means lump sum offers today remain significantly smaller than they were during the near-zero-rate environment of 2020 and 2021. It is also worth noting that Social Security carries a 2.8% cost-of-living adjustment for 2026, while most private pensions are fixed. That $100 a month buys something real today, but its purchasing power will quietly erode over time.

Of course, other considerations matter as well. With a monthly payout, some amount of money arrives every month for as long as you live, and you might outlive your own projections. That predictability can provide real peace of mind. On the other hand, taking the lump sum gives you the opportunity to invest it and grow it over time. The lump sum could also address a near-term financial goal, such as a dream vacation while your health is still good.

The math gets more complicated

While the break-even calculation above is a useful starting point, the full picture is more nuanced. One key factor is the time value of money: a dollar held today is worth more than a dollar received later because of its potential to grow.

The Fed funds rate currently sits in the 3.50% to 3.75% range after several cuts in late 2025, and the Federal Reserve held rates unchanged across all four of its 2026 meetings through June. As of early July 2026, top high-yield savings accounts at mainstream banks offer roughly 4.0% to 4.5% APY, with some specialized credit unions still reaching 5% on qualifying balances. At a 4% yield, a $24,000 lump sum generates roughly $960 a year in interest, or $80 a month, without touching the principal. At 4.5%, that figure rises to $1,080 a year, getting close to matching the $100 monthly pension payment. The core insight holds: depending on where you park the money, you can generate an income stream that approximates the pension while preserving the principal entirely.

Compound growth further tilts the analysis toward the lump sum over long time horizons. Receiving $100 a month for 20 years nominally equals $24,000, but factoring in reinvestment and compound interest allows the lump sum to pull well ahead of that figure over the same period. Under realistic return assumptions, it would take a very long time for accumulated monthly payments to catch up with a well-invested lump sum.

In practical terms, the 2026 IRA contribution limits of $7,500 for those under 50, and $8,600 for those 50 and older, mean a rolled-over lump sum can be combined with fresh annual contributions to build a meaningful tax-advantaged account balance over time.

The tax trap of “cashing out”

Be careful with the phrase “cash out.” If you literally take a check made payable to yourself, it triggers an immediate, mandatory 20% IRS withholding, plus ordinary income taxes, and potentially a 10% early withdrawal penalty if you are under 59.5 years old. To actually harness the growth potential of the $24,000, you should execute a Direct Rollover into a Traditional IRA. That move shields the entire amount from immediate taxes and preserves the full balance for compound growth.

Legacy and portability

Liquidity is a significant advantage of the lump sum that is easy to overlook. One of the biggest drawbacks of a monthly pension is that it typically ends when you do. If you pass away early, that $100 per month disappears, leaving nothing for your heirs. A $24,000 lump sum, by contrast, is a transferable asset. Whether you roll it into an IRA for your spouse or keep it in a brokerage account as a reserve for future needs, you remain in control of the wealth you have earned.

Company solvency and pension insurance

While a $100 monthly liability is small, retirees with much larger pensions must consider the risk of their former employer going bankrupt. Pensions are insured by the federal government through the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), but that insurance is capped. For a 65-year-old retiring in 2026, the PBGC maximum guarantee tops out at $7,789.77 per month for a straight-life annuity. Taking a lump sum and executing a rollover eliminates company risk entirely, shifting control of the assets away from the employer and directly into your hands.

Talk to a financial advisor

The Reddit poster’s pension is relatively modest, which makes the analysis more tractable. But if yours is considerably more generous, consulting a financial advisor is well worth your time. A good advisor can run the numbers for your specific situation, account for variables like your health history and other retirement income sources, and flag considerations that are easy to miss when crunching the math alone.

Editor’s note: This pass updates the high-yield savings rate context to reflect July 2026 data, noting that mainstream top rates now sit in the 4.0% to 4.5% APY range (down from their 2023 peaks) with 5% still available at select credit unions on qualifying balances. It also adds context on the Fed holding rates unchanged across all four 2026 FOMC meetings through June, and confirms the 2026 Social Security COLA of 2.8% and the PBGC maximum guarantee of $7,789.77 per month for a 65-year-old.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Maurie Backman
About the Author Maurie Backman →

Maurie Backman has more than a decade of experience writing about financial topics, including retirement, investing, Social Security, and real estate. Her work has appeared on sites that include The Motley Fool, USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, and CNN Underscored.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

HPE Vol: 26,431,700
NCLH Vol: 17,600,839
LRCX Vol: 12,118,424
IVZ Vol: 4,557,369
AMD
AMD Vol: 26,902,257

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
APA
APA Vol: 4,400,255
PSKY Vol: 18,873,941
COST Vol: 4,545,300
CINF Vol: 2,196,176