My old job had a pension and they offered me to cash out for $24k or get $100 per month for life — which should I choose?

When I hear about people who are eligible for a pension from an employer, I tend to feel a little jealous. Aside from Social Security, any money I have available in retirement is money I will probably have to save…

Published February 5, 2025, 1:18pm ET · 6 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Personal Finance
Personal Finance © corolanty from Getty Images

When I hear about people who are eligible for a pension from a former employer, I feel a little jealous. Aside from Social Security, any money I have in retirement is money I will have to save myself.

Private sector companies have largely abandoned pensions in favor of shifting the savings burden onto employees. A 401(k) match, if you get one at all, is often the best a worker can hope for. I am self-employed, so I get none of that. Then again, setting my own hours and occasionally working from the beach has its own rewards.

I recently came across a Reddit post where the author faces an interesting situation. They are entitled to a pension from a former employer and have two options: take about $100 per month for the rest of their life, or cash out the pension at around $24,000. It is not a simple call, but there is a fairly clear framework for thinking it through.

It all comes down to your break-even age

The decision to take a lump sum versus a monthly payout hinges largely on how long you expect to live. The math is simple: the poster can receive $100 a month indefinitely or accept $24,000 up front. At that ratio, the break-even point falls 20 years out. If the lump sum becomes available at 65, the cumulative total under either option works out to roughly the same figure by age 85.

The current interest rate environment shapes this calculation in an important way. Federal law requires pensions to use Minimum Present Value Segment Rates to calculate lump sum payouts, and those rates carry an inverse relationship with lump sum value: higher rates produce smaller lump sums. As a general rule, a 1% increase in segment rates reduces a lump sum by roughly 10%. That means lump sum offers today remain significantly smaller than they were during the near-zero-rate environment of 2020 and 2021. Worth noting too: Social Security carries a 2.8% cost-of-living adjustment for 2026, while most private pensions are fixed. That $100 a month buys real purchasing power today, but inflation quietly chips away at it every year.

Other factors matter as well. A monthly payout delivers a guaranteed income stream for as long as you live, even if you outlive your best projections. That predictability can provide genuine peace of mind. A lump sum, by contrast, gives you the opportunity to invest and grow the money, and it can also address a near-term need, such as funding a trip while your health is still good.

The math gets more complicated

The break-even calculation is a useful starting point, but the full picture is more nuanced. One key factor is the time value of money: a dollar held today is worth more than a dollar received later because of its potential to grow.

The Federal Reserve voted 9-3 to hold the federal funds rate steady at 3.50% to 3.75% at its July 29, 2026, meeting. Three regional bank presidents, Beth Hammack of Cleveland, Neel Kashkari of Minneapolis, and Lorie Logan of Dallas, dissented in favor of a rate hike. The Fed’s March 2026 Summary of Economic Projections had signaled just one rate move expected in all of 2026, and markets have been pricing in the possibility of one to two quarter-point increases by year-end. Against that backdrop, top high-yield savings accounts at online banks have been offering up to 4.25% APY as of early October 2026. At 4.0%, a $24,000 lump sum generates roughly $960 a year in interest, or $80 a month, without touching the principal. At the current top rate of 4.25%, that figure rises to about $1,020 a year, putting the monthly income stream within striking distance of the $100 pension payment. Depending on where you park the money, you can approximate the pension’s income while preserving the full principal for your heirs.

Compound growth further tilts the analysis toward the lump sum over long time horizons. Receiving $100 a month for 20 years nominally totals $24,000, but reinvesting and compounding the lump sum allows it to pull well ahead of that figure over the same period. Under realistic return assumptions, accumulated monthly payments would take a very long time to catch up with a well-invested lump sum.

Tax-advantaged accounts can amplify that advantage. For 2026, the IRA contribution limit is $7,500 for most savers, with a $1,100 catch-up for those 50 and older, bringing the total to $8,600. Savers enrolled in an employer-sponsored plan such as a 401(k), 403(b), or 457 who fall between ages 60 and 63 can also take advantage of a SECURE 2.0 Act “super catch-up” that raises the workplace-plan catch-up ceiling to $11,250 for that age window. Rolling over a lump sum and pairing it with fresh annual IRA contributions can build a meaningful tax-advantaged balance over time.

The tax trap of “cashing out”

Be careful with the phrase “cash out.” Taking a check made payable to yourself triggers an immediate, mandatory 20% IRS withholding, plus ordinary income taxes, and potentially a 10% early withdrawal penalty if you are under 59.5 years old. To harness the full growth potential of the $24,000, the smarter move is a Direct Rollover into a Traditional IRA. That transfer shields the entire amount from immediate taxes and preserves the full balance for compound growth.

Legacy and portability

Liquidity is a significant advantage of the lump sum that is easy to overlook. One of the biggest drawbacks of a monthly pension is that it typically ends when you do. Pass away early, and that $100 per month disappears, leaving nothing for your heirs. A $24,000 lump sum, by contrast, is a transferable asset. Whether you roll it into an IRA for your spouse or hold it in a brokerage account as a reserve for future needs, you retain full control of the wealth you worked for.

Company solvency and pension insurance

A $100 monthly obligation is modest, but retirees with larger pensions face a real risk if their former employer goes bankrupt. Pensions are insured through the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), though that insurance is capped. For a 65-year-old retiring in 2026, the PBGC maximum guarantee for a straight-life annuity tops out at $7,789.77 per month, or $93,477 per year. Taking a lump sum and executing a rollover eliminates company risk entirely, placing control of the assets directly in your hands rather than those of your former employer.

Talk to a financial advisor

The Reddit poster’s pension is relatively modest, which makes the analysis more tractable. But if your pension is considerably more generous, a conversation with a qualified financial advisor is well worth the time. A good advisor can run the numbers for your specific situation, account for variables like your health history and other income sources in retirement, and surface considerations that are easy to miss when crunching the math on your own.

Editor’s note: This pass updates the top high-yield savings APY to 4.25% as of early October 2026 (from the prior 4.21%) and revises the associated annual interest estimate on a $24,000 lump sum to approximately $1,020 per year. The reference to a “June dot plot” has been corrected to the March 2026 Summary of Economic Projections, which was the most recent Fed projection available at the time of the July meeting.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Maurie Backman

Maurie Backman has more than a decade of experience writing about financial topics, including retirement, investing, Social Security, and real estate. Her work has appeared on sites that include The Motley Fool, USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, The Washington Post, and Kiplinger.

Prior to becoming a full-time financial writer, Maurie worked in the financial industry trading distressed debt. She then changed course and spent a few years designing electronic toys. After a stint in content marketing and UX, she shifted back into writing and has since covered everything from the housing market to estate planning to Medicare.

When she's not busy writing, Maurie can be found hiking, walking her dogs, driving her kids to their various sports practices and games, and curling up with a good book. She cooks on occasion and bakes way too often.

All articles →