I’m 63 and my children and grandchildren have greatly disappointed me and I don’t want to leave them any inheritance

Many people want to leave money to their children or grandchildren when they pass away. That impulse is far from universal. Family relationships can sour, and children or grandchildren can fall short of expectations in ways that feel genuinely painful rather than merely disappointing.

When that happens, knowing your options makes all the difference. You have real choices about where your estate goes after a lifetime of work, and those choices deserve to be protected.

You don’t have to leave an inheritance to family, but you need a plan

No law requires you to leave money to your children or grandchildren. Spouses occupy a different legal category: most states give a surviving spouse the right to claim an “elective share” of the estate regardless of what a will says. Children and grandchildren carry no such automatic entitlement, and neither do parents, siblings, or extended relatives. The person creating an estate plan has broad authority to decide whether those family members inherit anything at all.

One notable state-level exception is worth understanding. Louisiana derived much of its civil law from France and Spain rather than England, and it continues to follow a concept called “forced heirship,” which limits a parent’s ability to disinherit certain children. Forced heirs in Louisiana are children under 24 at the time of the parent’s death, or children of any age who are permanently incapable of managing their own affairs because of a mental or physical condition. Everywhere else in the country, those restrictions simply do not exist.

The bigger danger for most people is doing nothing. The 2026 Trust and Will Estate Planning Report, based on a fresh survey of 5,000 U.S. adults, found that will ownership had fallen to just 26% (down from 31% in the 2025 report, which surveyed 10,000 adults), while trust ownership rose from 11% to 14%. Those who do act are increasingly choosing more comprehensive planning vehicles, but 56% of Americans still have no estate documents at all. Caring.com’s separate 2025 Wills and Estate Planning Study put will ownership even lower, at just 24%, down sharply from 33% in 2022. By any measure, most Americans have left their final wishes entirely unprotected.

When someone dies without instructions in place, state intestacy laws take over and distribute assets strictly along bloodlines. If you have no spouse and three children when you pass away intestate, all three receive an equal share, including any child you might have preferred to receive nothing. The solution is a clear, legally sound estate plan built with an estate planning attorney. One critical detail: disinheriting someone requires an explicit, unambiguous statement in your documents. Leaving a name out is not enough. A court could treat that omission as accidental and award that person a share of your assets, especially if they are a close family member.

Strategic Tools for Restructuring an Estate

Two tools deserve special attention beyond a standard will. A Revocable Living Trust transfers your assets at death without going through probate, the public court process that settles estates. Assets held in a trust bypass probate entirely, meaning a disinherited child has no automatic right to notice and their consent is not required for any transfer. That privacy can substantially reduce the opportunity for a disruptive legal challenge.

Beneficiary designations on bank accounts, brokerage accounts, retirement plans, and life insurance policies work completely outside your will. Outdated designations override your will every single time, regardless of what the document says. Updating Transfer on Death (TOD) and Payable on Death (POD) designations directly on each account is a straightforward step that ensures those assets reach your intended recipients.

A no-contest clause can also add a layer of protection. By stripping an inheritance from anyone who unsuccessfully challenges your will, it raises the stakes of frivolous litigation. Note, however, that this clause has limited effect on a fully disinherited heir. Someone who already stands to receive nothing has little to lose by challenging, so the clause does not deter the people you may be most worried about.

Consider whether you’ll change your mind, or want to support future generations

Disinheriting a family member is a consequential decision, and one best made with a clear head rather than in the heat of frustration or anger. Before closing the door entirely, consider whether a conditional structure might serve you better than an outright exclusion.

As long as you remain legally competent, you can revise your estate plan at any time to include a child if a relationship improves. That flexibility cuts both ways: you can also write a conditional bequest that triggers only if specific circumstances change. If your concern is that an heir will squander money or has made choices you find deeply troubling, a complete cutoff is not the only option. A trust that releases funds only when certain milestones are reached, such as completing a degree, purchasing a home, or maintaining steady employment, can accomplish the same goal with more nuance.

The Power of an Incentive Trust

An incentive trust ties distributions to behaviors or achievements you define in advance. Unlike a traditional trust that provides regular payouts without conditions, an incentive trust releases funds only when a beneficiary meets goals you have specified. The purpose is to encourage family members toward outcomes that reflect your values, not to punish them for past choices.

The conditions are highly customizable. Common examples include education (distributions after completing a degree or maintaining certain grades), employment (funds released once the beneficiary secures steady work), and financial responsibility (payouts contingent on demonstrating a budget or avoiding excessive debt). For families dealing with addiction, an incentive trust can be especially valuable. You can require regular drug testing or completion of a rehabilitation program, with funds released only if the beneficiary maintains a substance-free lifestyle.

One practical note: incentive trusts work best when their conditions are objective and measurable. Proof of graduation, income tax returns, and written confirmation of employment all make clean benchmarks. Vague conditions invite disputes between beneficiaries and trustees, and poorly defined terms can actually discourage the independence you hoped to cultivate. Close collaboration with an estate planning attorney on the specific language is essential before finalizing any such arrangement.

Consider directing your estate to charity instead

For anyone who genuinely does not want to leave assets to family, philanthropy offers a meaningful and tax-efficient alternative. According to Cerulli Associates, American households are on track to transfer approximately $124 trillion to heirs and nonprofits through 2048, with roughly $105 trillion flowing to individual heirs and $18 trillion going directly to charity. Nearly $100 trillion of that total will come from Baby Boomers and older generations. Heirs already inherit about $2.5 trillion annually, a figure Cerulli projects will exceed $3 trillion by 2030. Redirecting even a portion of your wealth toward causes you care about can create a legacy that outlasts any family dispute.

The simplest approach is a charitable bequest: naming a qualified nonprofit as a beneficiary in your will or revocable living trust. A bequest can be a fixed dollar amount, a percentage of your estate, or a specific asset such as real estate or a brokerage account. Because the designation sits inside a revocable document, it can be changed at any time while you remain competent.

For those age 70 and a half or older, retirement accounts offer an especially tax-efficient giving vehicle. A qualified charitable distribution (QCD) allows a donor to transfer funds directly from a traditional IRA to a qualified charity, satisfying required minimum distributions for the year while keeping those funds out of taxable income entirely. The 2026 annual QCD limit is $111,000 per donor, up from $108,000 in 2025, with the cap indexed to inflation going forward. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law on July 4, 2025, added two new restrictions that make the QCD route even more attractive for most retirees: a 0.5% AGI floor before itemized charitable deductions kick in, and a cap limiting the tax benefit of those deductions to 35% for the highest earners, both effective in the 2026 tax year. Leaving retirement assets to charity rather than to individual heirs also makes strong financial sense because most heirs who inherit a traditional IRA must withdraw the entire balance within 10 years under current law, generating a significant income tax bill in the process. A charity pays no income tax on those same assets.

One important note: QCDs work only from IRAs, not from 401(k)s or similar employer-sponsored plans. Funds must move directly from the IRA custodian to the charity; the account holder cannot receive the distribution and then forward it.

The same legislation also permanently raised the federal estate and gift tax exemption to $15 million per individual (or $30 million for a married couple) effective January 1, 2026. For most families, this removes the federal estate tax entirely from the picture, shifting the focus of estate planning away from tax avoidance and toward questions of control, distribution, and legacy. That shift makes intentional disinheritance decisions all the more important to document clearly, since no tax-driven reason now compels a particular structure.

A donor-advised fund (DAF) is another flexible option worth considering. You can fund a DAF during your lifetime, take an immediate charitable deduction, and then recommend grants to specific organizations over time. Many DAF sponsors allow you to name successor advisors, meaning a trusted friend, advisor, or cause-focused committee can continue directing grants after your death, without the administrative complexity of running a private foundation.

Whatever direction you choose, a financial planner and an estate attorney working together can help you build a plan that reflects your actual values, protects the people and causes you care about most, and holds up if it is ever challenged.

Editor’s note: This pass added the new $15 million federal estate tax exemption established by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, clarified that QCDs apply to IRAs rather than 401(k)s directly, incorporated Cerulli’s data showing heirs currently inherit about $2.5 trillion annually (projected to exceed $3 trillion by 2030), and noted the Act’s specific 0.5% AGI floor and 35% deduction cap that took effect in the 2026 tax year.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.