I’m 63 and my children and grandchildren have greatly disappointed me and I don’t want to leave them any inheritance

Photo of Christy Bieber
By Christy Bieber Updated Published

Quick Read

  • No law requires leaving an inheritance to children, but explicit disinheritance language is essential because omitting a name from a will is not enough.

  • A Revocable Living Trust bypasses probate entirely, keeping asset transfers private and reducing a disinherited heir's opportunity to mount a legal challenge.

  • Charities pay no income tax on inherited retirement assets, making them more efficient beneficiaries than heirs who must withdraw funds within 10 years.

  • Are you ahead, or behind on retirement? SmartAsset's free tool can match you with a financial advisor in minutes to help you answer that today. Each advisor has been carefully vetted, and must act in your best interests. Don't waste another minute; learn more here.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
I’m 63 and my children and grandchildren have greatly disappointed me and I don’t want to leave them any inheritance

© Ollyy / Shutterstock.com

Many people want to leave money to their children or grandchildren when they pass away. That impulse is far from universal, however. Family relationships can sour, and children or grandchildren can fall short of expectations in ways that feel genuinely painful rather than merely disappointing.

When that happens, knowing your options makes all the difference. You have real choices about where your estate goes after a lifetime of work, and those choices deserve to be protected.

You don’t have to leave an inheritance to family, but you need to make a plan

No law requires you to leave money to your children or grandchildren. Spouses occupy a different legal category: most states give a surviving spouse the right to claim an “elective share” of the estate regardless of what a will says. Children and grandchildren carry no such automatic entitlement. Parents, siblings, and extended relatives generally do not have the same legal protections that spouses do, which means the person creating an estate plan has broad authority to decide whether these family members inherit anything.

There is one notable state-level exception worth knowing. Louisiana derived much of its civil law from France and Spain rather than England, and it continues to follow a concept known as “forced heirship,” which imposes certain restrictions on a parent’s ability to disinherit children. Forced heirs in Louisiana are children under the age of 24 at the time of the parent’s death, or children of any age who, because of a mental or physical condition, are permanently incapable of managing their own affairs. Outside Louisiana, those restrictions do not apply.

The bigger danger for most people is simply doing nothing. According to the 2025 Trust and Will Estate Planning Report, which surveyed 10,000 U.S. adults, only 31% of Americans have a will and just 11% have a trust, while 55% have no estate plan of any kind. The picture worsened in the following year: Trust and Will’s 2026 report found will ownership had fallen to just 26%, while the share of Americans with no estate documents at all edged up to 56%. Both surveys point in the same direction, and so does Caring.com’s separate 2025 Wills and Estate Planning Study, which put will ownership at just 24%, down sharply from 33% in 2022. Most Americans have simply left their final wishes unprotected.

When someone dies without instructions in place, state intestacy laws take over, distributing assets strictly along bloodlines. If you have no spouse and three children when you pass away intestate, all three will receive an equal share, including any child you might have preferred to receive nothing. The solution is a clear, legally sound estate plan built with an estate planning attorney. One critical detail: disinheriting someone requires an explicit, unambiguous statement in your documents. Leaving a name out is not enough. A court could treat the omission as accidental and award that person a share of your assets, especially if they are a close family member.

Strategic Tools for Restructuring an Estate

Two tools deserve special attention beyond a standard will. A Revocable Living Trust transfers your assets at death without going through probate, the public court process that settles estates. Assets held in a trust bypass probate entirely, meaning a disinherited child is not automatically entitled to notice and their consent is not required for any transfer. That privacy can substantially reduce the opportunity for a disruptive legal challenge.

Beneficiary designations on bank accounts, brokerage accounts, retirement plans, and life insurance policies work completely outside your will. Out-of-date designations override your will every time, regardless of what the document says. Updating Transfer on Death (TOD) and Payable on Death (POD) designations directly on each account is a straightforward step that ensures those assets reach your intended recipients.

A no-contest clause can also help. By stripping an inheritance from anyone who unsuccessfully challenges your will, it raises the stakes of frivolous litigation. Note, however, that this clause has limited effect on a fully disinherited heir, who already stands to receive nothing and therefore has little to lose by challenging.

Consider whether you’ll change your mind, or want to support future generations

Canva: golubovy from Getty Images and Leefoster from Getty Images Signature

Disinheriting a family member is a consequential decision, and one best made with a clear head rather than in the heat of frustration or anger. Before closing the door entirely, consider whether a conditional structure might serve you better than an outright exclusion.

As long as you remain legally competent, you can always revise your estate plan to include a child if a relationship improves. That flexibility cuts both ways: you can also write a conditional bequest that triggers only if specific circumstances change. If your concern is that an heir will squander money or has made choices you find deeply troubling, a complete cutoff is not the only tool available. You could establish a trust that releases funds only when certain milestones are reached, such as completing a degree, purchasing a home, or maintaining steady employment.

The Power of an Incentive Trust

An incentive trust ties distributions to behaviors or achievements you define in advance. Unlike a traditional trust that provides regular payouts without conditions, an incentive trust releases funds only when a beneficiary meets goals you have specified. The purpose is not to punish family members but to encourage them toward outcomes that reflect your values.

The conditions are highly customizable. Common examples include education (distributions after completing a degree or maintaining certain grades), employment (funds released once the beneficiary secures steady work), and financial responsibility (payouts contingent on demonstrating a budget or staying out of excessive debt). For families dealing with addiction, an incentive trust can be particularly valuable. You can require regular drug testing or completion of a rehabilitation program, with funds released only if the beneficiary maintains a substance-free lifestyle.

One practical note: incentive trusts work best when their conditions are objective and measurable. Proof of graduation, income tax returns, and written confirmation of employment all make clean benchmarks. Vague conditions invite disputes between beneficiaries and trustees, and poorly defined terms can discourage the very independence you hoped to cultivate. Close collaboration with an estate planning attorney on the specific language is essential.

Consider directing your estate to charity instead

For anyone who genuinely does not want to leave assets to family, philanthropy offers a meaningful and tax-efficient alternative. According to Cerulli Associates, American households are expected to transfer approximately $124 trillion to heirs, widows, and nonprofits through 2048, making this the largest intergenerational wealth transfer ever recorded. Redirecting even a portion of that wealth toward causes you care about can create a legacy that outlasts any family dispute.

The simplest approach is a charitable bequest: naming a qualified nonprofit as a beneficiary in your will or revocable living trust. A bequest can be a fixed dollar amount, a percentage of your estate, or a specific asset such as real estate or a brokerage account. Because the designation sits inside a revocable document, it can be changed at any time while you remain competent.

For those age 70 and a half or older, retirement accounts offer an especially tax-efficient giving vehicle. A qualified charitable distribution (QCD) allows a donor to transfer funds directly from an IRA to a qualified charity. The transfer satisfies required minimum distributions for the year while keeping those funds out of taxable income entirely. For 2025, the annual QCD limit is $108,000 per donor. That cap rose to $111,000 per donor for 2026, indexed to inflation. Leaving retirement assets to charity rather than to individual heirs also makes sense because most heirs who inherit a traditional IRA or 401(k) must withdraw the entire balance within 10 years under current law, generating a significant income tax bill along the way. A charity pays no income tax on those assets.

A donor-advised fund (DAF) is another flexible option. You can fund a DAF during your lifetime, take an immediate charitable deduction, and then recommend grants to specific organizations over time. Many DAF sponsors allow you to name successor advisors, meaning a trusted friend, advisor, or cause-focused committee can continue directing grants after your death, without the administrative complexity of running a private foundation.

Whatever direction you choose, a financial planner and an estate attorney working together can help you build a plan that reflects your actual values, protects the people and causes you care about most, and holds up if it is ever challenged.

Editor’s note: This pass updated the wealth-transfer figure to Cerulli Associates’ most recent projection of $124 trillion through 2048 (revised from the older $84 trillion estimate), added the 2026 Trust and Will finding that will ownership fell to 26% while the share of Americans with no estate documents rose to 56%, and noted that the QCD annual limit increased to $111,000 per donor for 2026.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Christy Bieber
About the Author Christy Bieber →

Christy Bieber has been a personal finance and legal writer since 2008. She has a JD from UCLA School of Law and a BA in English, Media and Communications with a certification in business from the University of Rochester.  

Christy has been published by a wide variety of sites, including WSJ Buy Side, Forbes,  Kiplinger, Fox Business, Credit Karma, Insurify, and Annuity.org. In addition to writing for the web, she has also ghostwritten textbooks on business and law and served as a subject matter expert for course design. 

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

ABNB Vol: 13,419,217
MCHP Vol: 12,834,857
PLTR Vol: 64,946,115
MRNA Vol: 5,136,170
AXON Vol: 1,240,958

Top Losing Stocks

TTD Vol: 122,685,732
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
AKAM Vol: 6,739,510
RMD Vol: 3,008,347
ZTS Vol: 10,359,846