This Couple’s 20-Year-Old Roth IRA Just Unlocked a $100,000 Strategy Most Retirees Miss

A couple in their early 70s is sitting on traditional IRAs they wish were smaller. Required minimum distributions (RMDs) have kicked in, and each year those withdrawals push more of their Social Security into taxable territory, nudging them closer to…

Published June 19, 2026, 2:02pm ET · 5 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

An older Black man wearing a blue button-up shirt over a white t-shirt and an older Black woman wearing a vibrant, multicolored patterned short-sleeve shirt are seated at a wooden table. Both are smiling broadly as they look down at white documents held by the woman. On the table are a pair of dark reading glasses and a smartphone. The background shows a bright, modern interior with large windows and indoor plants.
A happy couple reviews important financial documents, reflecting on their future retirement income. Their contentment highlights the peace of mind achieved through diligent financial planning. © Monkey Business Images / Shutterstock.com

A couple in their early 70s is sitting on traditional IRAs they wish were smaller. Required minimum distributions (RMDs) have kicked in, and each year those withdrawals push more of their Social Security into taxable territory, nudging them closer to the next Medicare premium bracket. They have been thinking about converting about $100,000 to their Roth IRAs to shrink the problem, but one fear keeps stalling them: will they have to wait five more years before touching the converted money?

The answer, for this particular couple, is no. They each opened their Roth IRAs roughly 20 years ago, and that single fact rewrites the entire conversation.

The confusion is understandable. Retirement forums surface this question constantly, usually phrased something like “I’m 70, I want to convert, but I heard there’s a new five-year clock every time.” The rule has been written about in so many different ways that even careful readers walk away confused.

Why a Long-Seasoned Roth Changes the Math

For qualified, tax-free distributions, the IRS treats all of a person’s Roth IRAs as a single account. The five-year aging clock runs from the very first Roth IRA ever opened. Once that timer is satisfied and the owner is at least 59½, money converted later is immediately available as a qualified distribution, with no second waiting period attached.

Wes Moss explained the mechanics on the May 5, 2026 Clark Howard Podcast, saying, “the IRS treats all of your Roth IRAs [as] one… if you’ve got one that’s 20 years old, then you have the five year vintage already… even if you opened a new one… it still should be treated as that same age.”

For this couple, the old Roths already carry that vintage. A $100,000 conversion this year lands in a Roth that, for IRS purposes, is already two decades old. They could withdraw the converted funds the very next day if they chose to do so.

One precision point for younger savers: a separate five-year clock does attach to each individual conversion, but its only job is to police the 10% early-withdrawal penalty for anyone under 59½. This couple is well past that threshold, so the second clock simply does not apply to them. Investors in their fifties should keep the two clocks separate in their planning.

The Social Security and Medicare Payoff

The reason this strategy matters for Social Security is the tax torpedo. When provisional income climbs past $32,000 for a married couple filing jointly, a portion of Social Security becomes taxable. Past $44,000, up to 85% of benefits get pulled into the tax return. Traditional IRA withdrawals and RMDs feed straight into that calculation. Roth withdrawals do not. Worth noting: those thresholds were set in the 1980s and 1990s and have never been adjusted for inflation, so more retirees drift into taxable territory every year as cost-of-living increases push their income higher.

The same logic applies to Medicare’s income-related monthly adjustment amount, known as IRMAA. In 2026, a married couple holds the base Part B premium of $202.90 per month as long as joint modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) stays at or below $218,000. Cross that line and Part B per person jumps to $284.10, with Part D surcharges added on top. IRMAA works as a cliff, not a gradual slope: one dollar over a threshold triggers the full surcharge for the entire next tier. Roth withdrawals stay out of that MAGI calculation entirely.

A long-seasoned Roth is the cleanest tool this couple has for managing both the tax torpedo and IRMAA at the same time. Each dollar shifted out of a traditional IRA and into a Roth today is a dollar of future RMD income that will no longer appear in provisional income or MAGI calculations for the rest of their lives.

What the OBBBA Changes (and What It Doesn’t)

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed on July 4, 2025, permanently extended the lower TCJA tax-bracket rates that were previously set to expire after 2025. Before that law passed, many advisors pressed clients to convert as much as possible while lower rates were still available. That particular urgency is gone. For this couple, the conversion still makes sense on its own terms: the goal is not to lock in a rate before a deadline, but to reduce future RMDs and keep provisional income out of the Social Security and IRMAA danger zones for the rest of their lives.

The OBBBA also introduced a temporary senior deduction of $6,000 per qualifying person age 65 or older, available through 2028. For a married couple where both spouses are 65 or older, that adds up to $12,000 in combined deductions. The benefit phases out beginning at $150,000 of joint MAGI and disappears entirely at $250,000. For couples whose income sits comfortably below that lower limit, the full deduction provides a meaningful offset against the ordinary income added by a conversion, slightly widening the window for tax-efficient conversions in the near term.

Because there is no new waiting period on withdrawals, the couple has the freedom to convert in slices rather than one large move. Annual partial conversions, sized to fill the top of their current tax bracket without spilling into the next one or crossing an IRMAA threshold, tend to work better than a single $100,000 transfer. Each slice shrinks future RMDs, lightening the provisional income load on Social Security for years to come.

What to Think Through Before Year-End

Two details deserve careful attention before any conversion lands. First, model the IRMAA brackets two years out. Medicare looks back at the tax return from two years prior when setting premiums, so a conversion done in 2026 sets the 2028 Part B and Part D bill. The 2026 IRMAA figures are based on 2024 returns. Second, keep enough cash outside the IRA to cover the conversion tax. Using the converted dollars themselves to pay the tax bill defeats much of the purpose, since it reduces the amount that enters the Roth and compounds tax-free going forward.

The relief here is real. A Roth opened 20 years ago is doing work today that a brand-new account simply cannot match. Every household’s numbers come out differently, and the right conversion size depends on bracket math, state taxes, the OBBBA senior deduction phase-out range, and whatever other income is landing in the same year. Running the specific figures before pulling the trigger is worth the time.

Editor’s note: This revision clarifies that the OBBBA was signed specifically on July 4, 2025; adds that married couples where both spouses are 65 or older can claim up to $12,000 in combined OBBBA senior deductions (not just $6,000 each in isolation); and notes that Social Security’s provisional income thresholds of $32,000 and $44,000 for married couples have never been adjusted for inflation since the 1980s and 1990s, which explains why more retirees face the tax torpedo each year.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Gerelyn Terzo

Gerelyn Terzo is the author of dividend investing handbook "Dividend Investing Strategies: How to Have Your Cake & Eat It Too." A veteran financial journalist, she covers agri-finance for outlets like Global AgInvesting and the broader stock market and personal finance for 24/7 Wall Street. She began at CNBC and later helped launch Fox Business in New York. Gerelyn currently resides in Woodland Park, Colorado and dabbles in nature photography as a hobby.

All articles →