Bubble: Seeking A Useless Word’s Ban
John Tamny for Forbes The dictionary definition of the word “bubble” is “a nearly spherical body of gas contained in a liquid.” But economists, market commentators and politicians have hijacked the word, using it now to describe any market rising…
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
John Tamny for Forbes
The dictionary definition of the word “bubble” is “a nearly spherical body of gas contained in a liquid.” But economists, market commentators and politicians have hijacked the word, using it now to describe any market rising higher than what self-presumed experts deem a correct level.
Rolling Stone writer Matt Taibbi’s infamous rant against Goldman Sachs used the word “bubble” 29 times to illustrate Taibbi’s theory that the bank was a “bubble machine.” Recently in The Wall Street Journal, reporter Jon Hilsenrath inserted “bubble” no less than 28 times in an article titled “Fed Debates New Role: Bubble Fighter.”
So overused is the word that its greatest adherents have devalued it altogether. No longer a descriptive noun, “bubble” has become the default term for lazy writers seeking to explain what they cannot.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.




