SEC Settles Charges With Fund Manager for Misleading Investors

The SEC has announced that a Denver-based fund manager has agreed to settle charges that the firm overcharged management fees and misled investors.

Published January 20, 2016, 10:50am ET · 2 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

© Thinkstock

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that a Denver-based fund manager has agreed to settle charges that the firm overcharged management fees and misled investors about how it valued certain assets.

An investigation by SEC found that Equinox Fund Management calculated management fees contrary to the method described in registration statements for a managed futures fund called The Frontier Fund (TFF). At the same time, the firm also deviated from its disclosed valuation methodology for some TFF holdings.

As a result, Equinox has agreed to refund investors roughly $5.4 million in excessive management fees collected during a seven-year period, plus an additional $600,000 in prejudgment interest. Equinox also agreed to pay a $400,000 penalty.

According to the SEC:

  • TFF’s registration statements disclosed that Equinox charged management fees based upon the net asset value (NAV) of each series. But Equinox actually used the notional trading value of the assets, which is the total amount invested including leverage. Equinox consequently overcharged the fund $5.4 million in fees from 2004 to 2011.
  • TFF’s Form 10-K for 2010 and Forms 10-Q for the first and second quarters of 2011 disclosed that its methodology of valuing certain derivatives was “corroborated by weekly counterparty settlement values.” In fact, Equinox received information during that timeframe showing that its valuation of certain options was substantially higher than the counterparty’s valuations.
  • TFF’s Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2011 disclosed that an option had been transferred between two series consistent with TFF’s valuation policies. But it was actually transferred using a different valuation methodology than substantially identical options held by other TFF series.
  • TFF’s Form 10-Q for the second quarter of 2011 failed to disclose as a material subsequent event the series’ early termination of an option that constituted its largest investment at a materially lower valuation than had been recorded for that option.

[nativounit]
Marshall S. Sprung, co-chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Asset Management Unit, commented:

Fund managers can’t tell investors one thing and do another when assessing fees and valuing assets. Equinox’s misleading disclosures gave investors a distorted picture of how the firm determined compensation and valued significant fund holdings.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Chris Lange

Chris Lange is a financial and geopolitical writer with more than a decade of experience covering a myriad of topics. He has published thousands of articles for 24/7 Wall St., with past coverage focused heavily on stocks, IPOs, healthcare, defense, global affairs, and technology.

His work has been quoted, or referenced by a number of outlets including Business Insider, USA Today, Yahoo Finance, MSN, The Motley Fool, and many other publications. A graduate of Southwestern University, he studied business with a focus on investments and has previous experience in banking and startups.

When not reading or writing the news, he is following his passion for Lacrosse, playing chess, or building solar projects with his dad.

All articles →