Clark Howard Sounds off On Retiree With $4.6M Who Wants to Gift $125K But It’s All Tax-Trapped

A retiree sitting on $4.6 million in assets and collecting a $9,500 monthly pension should have no trouble gifting $125,000 to his kids. He does not, and the reason applies to millions of Americans who spent decades doing exactly what…

Published March 20, 2026, 9:00am ET · 6 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

A senior man in a blue button-down shirt and glasses sits at a wooden table, looking stressed with his hand on his forehead while holding a pen. He is using a calculator, with various financial papers, a laptop displaying spreadsheets and charts, and files labeled 'IRS,' 'Pension,' and '401(k)' spread across the table. A window is visible to the left.
A retiree grapples with complex financial decisions, reflecting the challenges of tax-trapped savings when planning to gift assets. His expressions mirror the stress of navigating retirement account distributions. © 24/7 Wall St.

A retiree sitting on $4.6 million in assets and collecting a $9,500 monthly pension should have no trouble gifting $125,000 to his kids. The reality is far more complicated, and the reason applies to millions of Americans who spent decades doing exactly what they were told: save everything in a 401(k).

On a recent Clark Howard Podcast episode, a caller named John laid out his situation. He wanted to give his children $125,000 for home down payments but had almost no accessible cash. Only $50,000 sat in a high-yield savings account and $25,000 in a Roth IRA. Everything else was locked inside traditional retirement accounts. His question was simple: is there any way to avoid the full tax hit on a large withdrawal?

Howard’s answer was correct, but unpacking the full mechanics helps anyone in a similar position apply the same thinking to their own finances.

Howard Gets the Diagnosis Right

Howard first corrected a terminology slip: “He said FICA there. It’s not. He probably just means federal taxes. Not FICA, which would be your wage taxes, your Social Security taxes on your wages.” That distinction matters. FICA taxes apply to earned income, not retirement withdrawals. What John actually faces is ordinary income tax on every dollar pulled from a traditional IRA or 401(k).

Howard’s core advice: “Watch your tax bracket buckets. If you find yourself with $100,000 worth of room before you get to the next bucket, then it’s probably an okay time to be gifting.” He also recommended spreading the gifting over five years rather than three, and warned against jumping “from 24% all the way to 32%.”

Bracket management is the right framework. The problem is that John’s pension income likely makes the math considerably tighter than it first appears.

The Pension Complicates Everything

John’s $9,500 monthly pension represents roughly $114,000 in annual gross income before any retirement account withdrawals. For a married couple filing jointly, the 2026 tax brackets place the 24% rate on income above $211,400, with the 32% rate kicking in above $403,550. Depending on deductions and filing status, the pension alone could push the couple well into the 24% bracket, leaving limited room before a large lump-sum withdrawal triggers the higher rate.

One helpful offset: for tax year 2026, the standard deduction increases to $32,200 for married couples filing jointly. That deduction reduces taxable income directly and effectively widens the cushion between John’s pension income and the 32% threshold.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) further super-sized deductions for seniors: taxpayers 65 and older can claim up to an additional $6,000 without itemizing their deductions. The bonus write-off is slated to expire after tax year 2028, and it is per individual, so a married couple where both spouses are 65 or older can claim up to $12,000. The deduction begins to phase out at incomes of $75,000 for single filers and $150,000 for joint filers. Whether John qualifies depends on his full income picture, but it is worth modeling with a tax professional before finalizing any withdrawal plan.

Spreading a large withdrawal over multiple years keeps each annual distribution inside the existing bracket rather than pushing a portion into a higher rate. The tax cost of impatience here is real and measurable.

The Gift Tax Angle John May Be Missing

There is a separate layer worth understanding that could sharply reduce John’s tax burden. The 2026 gift tax exclusion allows the first $19,000 of monetary gifts to any person to be excluded from tax. That means John and his spouse could each give $19,000 to each child, transferring $76,000 to two children per year with no gift tax consequence. Married couples can combine this exclusion to give $38,000 per recipient.

For 2026, the federal estate tax exemption is $15 million per individual and $30 million for married couples filing jointly. If a couple gives more than $38,000 to one person in a year, they file Form 709, but for the vast majority of families that is a paperwork event rather than a tax event. Any amount above the annual exclusion simply draws down a portion of the lifetime exemption. The real cost John faces is not the gift tax rules but the ordinary income tax triggered by pulling money out of his retirement accounts in the first place.

Who This Strategy Fits and Who It Doesn’t

Howard’s bracket-management approach works well for retirees with predictable, moderate income who have enough years ahead to spread large distributions strategically. A 65-year-old whose pension covers basic expenses and who has a decade before required minimum distributions (RMDs) begin has real flexibility to time gifting across multiple tax years.

The approach grows more constrained for retirees already near the top of their current bracket from pension and Social Security combined, or those approaching age 73 when RMDs begin. Once RMDs are required, the IRS mandates a minimum withdrawal each year regardless of tax consequences. A retiree who waits too long may find RMDs have already consumed most available bracket room, leaving no clean window for tax-efficient distributions.

John’s $350,000 remaining mortgage adds another wrinkle. He mentioned waiting to pay it off until he is out of the 35% bracket, which is a reasonable instinct. Still, it is worth modeling whether his mortgage interest rate actually exceeds what the retirement account earns after taxes. The 10-year Treasury yield has climbed to around 4.64%, after recently touching a 20-month high of 4.75%, and broader pressure in the bond market has pushed 30-year yields to multi-decade highs. With rates at these levels, the opportunity cost calculation for carrying a mortgage is far less obvious than it appeared during the near-zero-rate years.

Putting This Into Practice

Start by calculating current taxable income from all predictable sources: pension, Social Security, rental income, and any other fixed payments. Then subtract the applicable standard deduction and any senior bonus deduction to arrive at taxable income, and determine how much room remains before the next bracket threshold. That gap defines the annual gifting budget from retirement accounts for anyone who wants to stay within their current rate.

A Roth IRA, like the one John holds, offers a critical escape valve. Qualified distributions from a Roth are completely tax-free and do not count toward taxable income, which is why financial advisors often emphasize sequencing account withdrawals carefully. John’s $25,000 Roth balance is small relative to his $125,000 goal, but it illustrates the core principle: every dollar in a tax-free account is a dollar that does not create a bracket problem when liquidity is needed.

Howard’s recommendation to work with “a CPA or your CPA on this in coordination with a financial advisor” is the right call for a situation this complex. The bracket-spreading strategy is the correct framework, but execution requires knowing exact numbers, including deductions, Social Security taxation thresholds, and RMD timelines, that only a complete tax projection can reveal.

John’s core constraint is the near-total absence of flexibility outside his retirement accounts. Decades of pre-tax saving built an impressive balance but left almost nothing accessible without triggering a tax event. For anyone still in the accumulation phase, the lesson is straightforward: build after-tax savings alongside pre-tax accounts so a large financial need does not force a choice between an avoidable tax bill and a costly delay.

Editor’s note: This article updates the 10-year Treasury yield reference to approximately 4.65% as of mid-August 2026, notes the broader bond market selloff that recently pushed 30-year yields to multi-decade highs, adds the 2026 standard deduction figure of $32,200 for married couples filing jointly, and clarifies that the OBBBA senior deduction of up to $12,000 requires both spouses to be 65 or older and phases out for joint filers with AGI above $150,000.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Austin Smith

Austin Smith is a financial publisher with over two decades of experience as an investor, analyst, and advisor. He covers stocks, ETFs, Artificial intelligence and personal finance for 24/7 Wall St. Previously, he spent over a decade at The Motley Fool as a senior editor for Fool.com, portfolio advisor for Millionacres, and launched The Ascent to help reader take control of their personal finances.

His work has been featured on Fool.com, NPR, CNBC, USA Today, Yahoo Finance, MSN, AOL, Marketwatch, and many other publications. He is as an advisor to private companies, and co-hosts The AI Investor Podcast with Eric Bleeker. 

When not looking for investment opportunities, he can be found skiing, running, or playing soccer with his children. Learn more about Austin's investment approach here.

All articles →