Looking back, going long on fixed-income duration in 1995 was unquestionably the right call. Duration measures a bond portfolio’s sensitivity to interest rate changes: the longer the duration, the more a bond’s price moves when rates shift.
Back then, interest rates across developed economies had entered a long secular decline. When rates fall, bond prices rise because fixed coupon payments become more attractive relative to newly issued debt. In that environment, long-duration bonds delivered powerful capital appreciation on top of their income.
That dynamic fueled one of history’s greatest bond bull markets. Investors like Bill Gross earned legendary status not by passively clipping coupons, but by actively trading duration, credit spreads, and interest rate cycles in what became known as the “total return” approach to fixed income. Gross built his reputation at PIMCO managing what would become the world’s largest bond fund, applying strategies that consistently beat benchmarks for decades.
Then 2022 shattered that framework entirely. As inflation surged, central banks worldwide hiked rates aggressively to contain it. Bonds suffered their worst year since the Volcker era of the early 1980s, with the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index losing 13%. More jarring still, the traditional negative correlation between stocks and bonds evaporated. The classic 60/40 portfolio fell nearly 18%, failing to provide the diversification retirees had counted on for a generation.
The story did not end there. The 60/40 portfolio roared back with a 17.2% return in 2023, well above its historical median of 7.8%. Performance stayed strong in 2024 as well, delivering roughly 17% as both stocks and bonds posted positive returns. In 2025, the portfolio returned approximately 15%, roughly double its long-run average, even as spring tariff fears briefly rattled equity markets. When stocks stumbled during that period, long-term Treasury bonds stepped up with gains of more than 4% in just two months, demonstrating that the diversification mechanism still works when it matters. Perhaps most significantly, the stock-bond correlation began normalizing. After peaking at 0.80 in mid-2024 on a 12-month rolling basis, it dropped to just 0.16 by late 2025, suggesting bonds are reclaiming their traditional role as portfolio stabilizers.
Still, bonds clearly have a place. Municipal bonds remain particularly attractive for their federal and sometimes state tax advantages. A simple pairing like the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (NYSEARCA:VTI) alongside the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (NASDAQ:BND) provides broad diversification at an ultra-low blended expense ratio of 0.03%.
But investors need to recognize that a higher-for-longer rate environment means stock-bond correlations can spike again quickly. If you are 65 today and looking to reduce portfolio risk, simply adding bonds the way advisors recommended in the 1990s may not be sufficient. The more productive question is how to think about risk management altogether.
Why Options Create More Defined Protection
Correlation measures how assets move relative to one another. A correlation of negative one means two assets move in perfect opposition; positive one means they move in lockstep. The problem is that correlations are unstable. They can shift dramatically during inflationary or stressed environments, as investors discovered in 2022. When inflation becomes the dominant macro variable, both stocks and bonds can decline at the same time, eliminating the ballast that retirees expect.
Options work differently. They rely not on historical correlations but on explicitly defined payoff structures. Put options give investors the right (but not the obligation) to sell an underlying asset at a predetermined strike price, functioning as portfolio insurance with contractually specified terms.
The cost is real: insurance is never free. Put options lose value over time through what traders call theta decay. If the market does not decline, those puts gradually expire worthless, and the premium paid becomes a drag on returns.
Investors can offset that cost by selling covered calls. Combining a protective put with a covered call creates a collar strategy. The covered call generates premium that helps finance the downside protection, while simultaneously capping upside gains within a predefined range.
The trade-off is clear. You exchange some upside potential for more controlled downside risk. Investors who prefer not to trade options directly can now access these structures through ETFs that automate the strategy continuously.
The Simplify ETF Solution
One ETF that can serve as a viable alternative or complement to a traditional 60/40 portfolio is the Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (NYSEARCA:HEQT). Most of HEQT’s portfolio is invested in an iShares ETF tracking the S&P 500, with a put-spread collar strategy layered on top.
The mechanics work in three steps. First, HEQT buys a 5% out-of-the-money put option, establishing downside protection if the market falls. To partially finance that hedge, the ETF sells a 20% out-of-the-money put option, generating premium income while also meaning investors begin absorbing losses again if declines exceed 20%. In practice, this creates a protection band covering market losses between roughly 5% and 20%.
Selling the lower put alone does not fully cover the cost of the protective put. So HEQT also sells covered calls, with strike prices varying based on market conditions, to make the hedge fully self-financing at the cost of capping upside appreciation.
Importantly, these option positions are laddered across three sequential monthly expirations. Unlike many traditional buffer ETFs that reset on a fixed annual schedule, HEQT does not depend on when an investor happens to buy relative to a specific outcome period. The result is an evergreen hedging solution with continuous downside protection and rolling upside caps.
Looking at annual performance data, HEQT returned 16.6% in 2023 and 18.3% in 2024, capturing much of the equity rally while carrying less risk. In the year ended June 30, 2025, the fund returned 10.1%, lagging its 60/40 benchmark by roughly 2 percentage points as the equity recovery outpaced the fund’s capped upside. More importantly, during the 2022 bear market, HEQT’s worst drawdown was considerably smaller than the traditional 60/40 mix. Annualized volatility also fell significantly compared to the stock-and-bond blend, producing a stronger Sharpe ratio (a measure of risk-adjusted returns).
On pricing, HEQT carries a 0.43% net expense ratio, considerably more than a passive stock-and-bond portfolio. For context, the fund’s actual cost came in at 0.42% for the fiscal year ended June 2025 as fee waivers took effect. Given that investors receive an actively managed hedging overlay with continuously laddered options protection, the cost is reasonable relative to its peer group and especially compared to legacy hedged mutual funds.
The lesson from 2022 through 2026 is clear: traditional diversification can still work, as the 60/40 portfolio’s strong recovery demonstrates. But when inflation and rates remain elevated, and when correlations can turn positive without warning, investors should consider strategies that offer more explicit downside controls rather than relying solely on historical correlation patterns.
Editor’s note: This article was updated to correct the 2024 60/40 portfolio return from “roughly 15%” to “roughly 17%” based on Morningstar and Kiplinger data, to add HEQT’s specific annual returns for 2023 (16.6%), 2024 (18.3%), and the fiscal year ended June 2025 (10.1%) from Simplify’s SEC annual report, and to add context about bonds rallying during spring 2025 tariff-driven equity weakness.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Top Gaining Stocks
Top Losing Stocks