Steve Jobs, the co-founder, long-time CEO of Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL | AAPL Price Prediction), and the heart and soul of the company, died in 2011. If he were alive, he would watch his handpicked CEO, Tim Cook, retire. Cook did almost everything right for Apple’s shareholders. But he did little to change the company’s products. The iPhone was first released in 2007. It remains Apple’s top revenue-producing product. In a way, Apple has been frozen in time for two decades.
Potential Apple products have come and gone. The most ambitious of these was an EV. Called “Project Titan”, Apple worked on it from 2014 to 2024. The plan was also to create the most advanced self-driving vehicle in history, which would have pitted it against several industry leaders, including Tesla and Google’s Waymo. Most legacy car companies have self-driving projects of their own. Titan would have launched into a crowded field. The iPhone was not.
Although it is not certain, Apple dropped the Titan project to aggressively move into AI development. After a series of false starts, Apple AI leaders began to leave for destinations that included rivals OpenAI and Meta (NASDAQ: META). Cook may have moved away from Apple’s development plans because he came up short on AI experts. While the reason is unclear, he abandoned an iPhone-based AI product that was set to launch earlier this year.
Cook turned to Alphabet to adopt its Gemini AI product to power the next generation of Siri and Apple Intelligence. It gave up its opportunity to be a leader in the industry. Apple will pay $1 billion a year for this, according to CNET. In the process, Cook may have made an ingenious decision by avoiding the hundreds of billions of dollars Apple would have spent on development and AI data centers. He has left it to Alphabet, OpenAI, Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), and others to fight that fight. If these data centers are underutilized, Apple will have made the right decision.
But would Jobs have decided to forgo the risk in exchange for a chance to be a leader in the development of what may be the most important scientific advance in history? It is only a guess, but based on his career and vision, maybe not.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.