The Nvidia Vs. AMD Narrative Was Never True, It’s Not a Zero Sum Game
OpenAI and Meta just signed major deals with both NVIDIA and AMD in the same quarter, which forces a hard question about whether the fierce rivalry investors keep betting on actually exists.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA | NVDA Price Prediction) and AMD (NASDAQ: AMD) both posted blowout quarters that push back on the tired “one must lose for the other to win” framing. NVIDIA reported $81.615 billion in Q1 FY2027 revenue. AMD delivered $10.253 billion in Q1 2026. Both cited agentic AI as the demand engine. Both listed OpenAI and Meta as customers. The pie is expanding faster than either can slice it.
Blackwell Prints Cash. Instinct Wins Sockets.
Jensen Huang framed the quarter around infrastructure scale, calling AI factories “the largest infrastructure expansion in human history.” The proof lives in the segment lines. NVIDIA’s Data Center pulled $75.246 billion, up 92%, with networking alone jumping 199% as InfiniBand and NVLink demand tripled. That networking business is the quiet moat most investors underweight.
Lisa Su hit a different note. AMD’s Data Center rose 57% to $5.775 billion on EPYC server CPUs and Instinct GPU shipments, and Client (Ryzen) added another 26%, a business NVIDIA does not touch. Su told investors “customer engagement around MI450 Series and Helios is strengthening, with leading customer forecasts exceeding our initial expectations.”
Two Very Different Businesses, Same Tailwind
| Lens | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Gross margin | 75.0% | 55% |
| Forward revenue guide | $91.0B | ~$11.2B |
| Marquee AI deal | OpenAI 10 GW, Meta millions of Blackwell/Rubin | OpenAI 6 GW, Meta up to 6 GW MI450 |
| Trailing P/E | 31 | 164 |
The customer overlap matters. OpenAI and Meta signed with both vendors because no single supplier can meet the demand curve. NVIDIA has $119.0 billion in supply commitments locked up, yet still guides to excluding China Data Center revenue. AMD is scaling its own supply to keep pace. That is a capacity story, not a share-war story.
What Actually Decides the Next Year
I will watch three things. First, whether NVIDIA’s networking growth holds its 199% pace as Vera Rubin ships. Second, whether AMD’s MI450 and Helios rack platform convert pipeline into recognized revenue in H2 2026. Third, hyperscaler capex. Meta’s spending plans and Google Cloud’s Vera Rubin instances tell me the buildout has not peaked. You should also track China. Both companies stripped it from guidance, so any thaw is upside.
Why I Would Own Both
My read: this is a barbell trade. If I want durable free cash flow (NVIDIA generated $48.554 billion in one quarter) and shareholder returns like the $80.0 billion new buyback and 25x dividend hike, NVIDIA fits. If I want higher-variance upside tied to a credible second source with 252.96% free cash flow growth, AMD earns the slot, even at 68x forward earnings. AMD is up year to date; NVIDIA also green. Both green. Zero-sum theory keeps failing the market it tries to describe.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Alex Sirois is a financial writer with experience spanning both retail and institutional investing. He has written for InvestorPlace and held roles at BNY Mellon and Bernstein, giving him a perspective that bridges Main Street portfolios and Wall Street analysis.
Alex holds an MBA from George Washington University and has built his career across multiple industries, including e-commerce, education, and translation — a breadth of experience that informs how he breaks down complex financial topics for everyday investors. His writing is conversational, actionable, and grounded in long-term, buy-and-hold investing principles.
At 247 Wall St., Alex focuses on delivering analysis that is both accessible and useful, with a clear emphasis on helping readers make more informed decisions with their money.
