Polaris Pays a 5.15% Yield. Should Income Investors Trust It More Than Hasbro?

One stock offers a 31-year streak of raises while the other just froze its payout, yet the frozen dividend may actually be the safer bet for retirees right now. The math behind each company's cash flow tells a story that…

Published September 27, 2026, 11:44am ET · 3 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

An old-fashioned balance scale is depicted against a cool blue and white background. The left pan holds a small collection of U.S. coins, including copper-colored pennies and silver-colored dimes and quarters. The right pan is weighed down by several thick stacks of U.S. hundred-dollar bills, some bundled with paper straps. The scale's arm is noticeably tilted towards the heavier side with the cash, suggesting a significant imbalance in value or weight.
A financial scale balances small coins against large bundles of cash, illustrating the careful consideration investors make when comparing dividend safety and value, such as with Hasbro and Polaris. © DNY59 / Getty Images

Hasbro (NASDAQ:HAS | HAS Price Prediction) or Polaris (NYSE:PII): which dividend is the better fit for a retirement portfolio right now? Polaris offers the higher yield, at 5.15% against Hasbro’s 3.23%, and it has raised its payout for 31 consecutive years. Hasbro has frozen its dividend at $0.70 per quarter since April 2022. Judged on durability, the evidence still favors one company.

HAS price target

PII price target

Business Health: Hasbro Already Repaired What Broke

Both companies posted ugly 2025 results. Hasbro’s $322.4 million net loss traced to a $1.02 billion goodwill impairment, a non-cash charge. Operations have since accelerated. Second-quarter revenue rose 16.2% to $1.14 billion, and EPS of $1.28 beat the $1.13 estimate, the seventh consecutive beat. Magic: The Gathering revenue jumped 32% to $545.3 million, and management raised full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance to $1.45 billion to $1.50 billion. The problem is concentration: one card game carries the growth story.

Polaris lost $465.5 million in 2025, including a $288.1 million Indian Motorcycle impairment, and is selling a majority stake in that brand to Carolwood LP. Its second-quarter adjusted EPS of $1.97 looks strong until you notice roughly $0.96 came from $74 million in one-time tariff refunds. Operational adjusted EPS was $1.01, a solid number, but Polaris still expects to pay about $215 million in tariffs this year and forecasts a flat second-half retail environment. Winner: Hasbro.

Dividend Coverage: A Funded Freeze Beats a Thin Cushion

Hasbro’s freeze costs retirees purchasing power every year it continues. The check itself, however, is well funded. In 2025, operating cash flow hit $893.2 million against capital spending of $63.3 million and dividends of $392.5 million. First-half 2026 operating cash flow reached $604 million, funding $147 million of debt reduction, and management lifted its buyback target to a minimum of $200 million while stating, “we remain committed to our dividend.” The weak spot: in 2022, operating cash flow of $372.9 million fell short of the $385.3 million payout.

Polaris keeps raising, though the most recent increase was just a penny, from $0.67 to $0.68. Its cash flow swings hard. Implied free cash flow in 2024 was just $6.5 million against $147.7 million in dividends, and first-quarter 2026 free cash flow was negative $342.5 million. 2025 recovered to $558.1 million, and net leverage improved to 2.6 times from 3.6 times. Still, trailing EPS shows a $4.60 loss per share. A 5% yield matched with negative trailing earnings is exactly the pattern our free dividend trap guide flags as worth a second look. Winner: Hasbro.

Valuation: Polaris Trades Further Below Its Own History

Both carry a forward P/E of roughly 13, with Hasbro’s trailing multiple near 16. Hasbro, at $88.09, is up 21.95% over the past year despite a 8.52% slide in the last month. Polaris, at $53.05, is down 13.39% year to date and 47.78% over five years, trading well below its 200-day average of $64.36 and closer to its 52-week low of $46.19. The catch: its forward multiple leans on guidance of $3.00 to $3.10 that includes refunds, versus operational guidance of $2.05 to $2.15. Winner: Polaris.

Verdict: Hasbro Is the Safer Paycheck

For a retiree who needs the dividend to arrive every quarter without drama, Hasbro wins. Its cash flow covers the payout easily, and its beta of 0.466 compares with Polaris’ 1.278. Polaris fits a younger income investor willing to absorb volatility for the higher yield and raise streak. Analysts lean the same way: Polaris draws 14 Hold ratings, while Hasbro has 10 Buy and 3 Strong Buy ratings.

HAS analyst ratings

PII analyst ratings

The case could flip if Polaris delivers the “strong cash flow conversion in the second half” management promised and hits operational guidance without refunds, or a Magic slowdown pulls Hasbro’s cash flow back toward 2022 levels. Keep an eye on both fourth-quarter earnings reports.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Chris Lange

Chris Lange is a financial and geopolitical writer with more than a decade of experience covering a myriad of topics. He has published thousands of articles for 24/7 Wall St., with past coverage focused heavily on stocks, IPOs, healthcare, defense, global affairs, and technology.

His work has been quoted, or referenced by a number of outlets including Business Insider, USA Today, Yahoo Finance, MSN, The Motley Fool, and many other publications. A graduate of Southwestern University, he studied business with a focus on investments and has previous experience in banking and startups.

When not reading or writing the news, he is following his passion for Lacrosse, playing chess, or building solar projects with his dad.

All articles →