Qualcomm Can Grow Even as U.S. EV Sales Fall

U.S. electric vehicle sales are sliding, yet Qualcomm's automotive revenue keeps climbing at a pace that defies the headline numbers. The reason has less to do with EVs than with something most investors overlook entirely.

Published October 5, 2026, 4:45pm ET · 6 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

© Justin Sullivan / Getty Images News via Getty Images
  • U.S. battery-electric sales fell 29.2% through September, while conventional hybrid sales rose 22.4%.
  • Qualcomm’s automotive revenue grew 61.4% year over year and 19.8% sequentially in its latest reported quarter.
  • Snapdragon’s opportunity spans vehicle computing and connectivity, but Qualcomm’s worldwide results cannot be directly compared with U.S.-only vehicle sales.

Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM | QCOM Price Prediction) offers investors a way to examine automotive growth beyond the number of electric vehicles sold. Its automotive revenue reached $1.588 billion in its latest reported quarter, even as the U.S. battery-electric market remained under pressure. The apparent contradiction reflects two distinctions that matter to shareholders: Qualcomm sells automotive chips worldwide, and its opportunity extends beyond the electric powertrain into the computing and connectivity used throughout a vehicle.

The investment question is whether Qualcomm can increase the value of the functions it supplies per vehicle as automakers adopt more sophisticated digital cockpits and driver-assistance systems. Those functions can be sold into gasoline vehicles, conventional hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and battery-electric vehicles. A weaker U.S. EV market creates a headwind, but it does not define the entire market for Snapdragon automotive products.

U.S. Buyers Are Choosing Different Forms of Electrification

The U.S. sales mix strengthens the case for distinguishing automotive computing from a pure EV investment. The National Automobile Dealers Association’s October 5 update reported that battery-electric sales fell 29.2% year over year through September 2026, while conventional hybrid sales rose 22.4%. BEVs represented 6.2% of new light-duty vehicle sales, compared with 15.6% for conventional hybrids. These are January–September results, rather than September-only figures.

According to Table 1, the August data show the same division between conventional hybrids and vehicles requiring external charging. Conventional hybrids sold at more than twice the combined volume of BEVs and plug-in hybrids. The hybrid growth story therefore requires a distinction: conventional hybrids are gaining, while plug-in hybrids are also experiencing substantial pressure.

Table 1. U.S. Electrified Vehicle Sales (Million Units, Except Ratios)
Vehicle category or metric September 2025 January 2026 August 2026
Battery-electric vehicles 0.146 0.063 0.080
Plug-in hybrids 0.030 0.012 0.020
Conventional hybrids 0.156 0.151 0.216
Combined BEV + PHEV sales 0.175 0.075 0.100
Conventional hybrids / combined plug-ins 0.89× 2.00× 2.16×
Calculations and analysis: The Information Network

Note: Volumes are rounded to three decimals in millions. Combined volumes and ratios use unrounded inputs. September 2025 included purchases ahead of the federal tax-credit expiration; the three observations are not a seasonally adjusted series.

For Qualcomm, the opportunity is to supply functions buyers want regardless of the powertrain selected. A conventional hybrid does not need an external charger, but it can still use a digital cockpit, connected services, and advanced driver assistance. That makes automotive computing a different investment proposition from charging infrastructure or components tied specifically to large battery packs.

Snapdragon Competes for More Value Within Each Vehicle

Snapdragon Digital Chassis encompasses several platforms. Cockpit supports infotainment, displays, and user interaction. Connectivity links the vehicle to networks and cloud services. Ride addresses driver assistance and automated-driving workloads. Qualcomm can potentially expand its role when a customer adopts its products across several of these functions.

Ride Flex addresses the consolidation of cockpit and driving workloads on shared computing hardware while maintaining isolation and dedicated safety mechanisms. The commercial significance is the potential to capture a larger computing assignment in a vehicle. Consolidation can reduce the number of separate chips, so investors should evaluate the value of the functions Qualcomm supplies rather than assume every new vehicle contains more Qualcomm chips.

BMW provides evidence at two different stages of commercialization. Snapdragon Ride Pilot launched commercially in November 2025 in the BMW iX3, establishing a production deployment of Qualcomm’s driving-system technology. Separately, BMW’s July 2026 selection of Qualcomm as its lead compute silicon provider covers next-generation cockpit and automated-driving model programs starting in the 2030s. That later award supports long-term positioning but cannot explain revenue already reported. Neither disclosed deal value nor guaranteed vehicle volume establishes its eventual financial contribution.

Worldwide Revenue Changes the Interpretation

According to Table 2, the geographic distribution of plug-in vehicle sales illustrates the scale of Qualcomm’s opportunity outside the United States. Greater China and Europe together represented 79.2% of global BEV and PHEV sales in August 2026, while the United States represented 5.5%. For investors, that distribution supports evaluating Snapdragon’s worldwide customer programs rather than using U.S. EV sales alone to assess its automotive growth potential.

Table 2. Regional Share of Global BEV and PHEV Sales
Region or metric September 2025 January 2026 August 2026
Europe 20.5% 27.6% 21.4%
Greater China 62.8% 50.1% 57.8%
United States 8.2% 6.4% 5.5%
Rest of world 8.5% 16.0% 15.2%
Global BEV + PHEV sales, million units 2.149 1.179 1.806
Calculations and analysis: The Information Network

Volumes are rounded to three decimals in millions; shares use unrounded inputs. Percentages measure shares of global plug-in sales, not penetration within each region. Conventional hybrids and fuel-cell vehicles are excluded. Vehicle coverage follows the underlying dataset’s passenger and commercial vehicle designation. Rounding can prevent shares from summing to 100%.

The table shows where demand is concentrated; these three monthly observations do not establish regional growth rates. September 2025 included purchases ahead of the U.S. federal tax-credit expiration, and January reflects a different seasonal period. Qualcomm’s ability to convert the international opportunity into revenue depends on customer adoption, computing content per vehicle, and competition. The regional shares also do not measure Qualcomm’s own revenue exposure, and its automotive products address gasoline vehicles and conventional hybrids in addition to plug-ins.

According to Table 3, automotive has become a larger contributor to Qualcomm’s semiconductor business. Revenue increased 61.4% year over year in fiscal Q3 2026 and 19.8% from the preceding quarter. Automotive accounted for 18.7% of QCT revenue, compared with 10.9% a year earlier. QCT is Qualcomm’s semiconductor business; its patent-licensing business is reported separately.

Table 3. Qualcomm’s Automotive Revenue and Semiconductor Mix ($ Millions, Except Percentages)
Metric Fiscal Q3 2025 Fiscal Q2 2026 Fiscal Q3 2026
Automotive revenue 984 1,326 1,588
Total QCT revenue 8,993 9,076 8,504
Automotive share of QCT 10.9% 14.6% 18.7%
Automotive revenue growth, year over year — 38.3% 61.4%
Automotive revenue growth, quarter over quarter — — 19.8%
Source: The Information Network compilation and calculations using Qualcomm’s reported results

The geographic limitation is important. Table 1 covers nationwide U.S. sales, Table 2 covers worldwide plug-in sales, and Table 3 reports Qualcomm’s worldwide automotive revenue. These measures provide context for the investment case, but they cannot be treated as matching measures of U.S. EV chip demand.

Timing also differs. Semiconductor shipments to manufacturers occur before vehicles reach buyers, and inventory adjustments can separate chip orders from retail sales. Qualcomm’s revenue growth is consistent with expanding automotive adoption and content, but the reported totals do not isolate hybrids, individual products, or the effect of specific customer awards.

Investor Takeaway

Qualcomm’s automotive expansion gives shareholders an additional growth opportunity as its smartphone business faces pressure. Apple’s development of its own modems threatens part of Qualcomm’s chip content in phones, while Snapdragon creates an opportunity to supply more computing functions in cars. Automotive growth does not automatically replace lost handset profits, and Qualcomm’s total fiscal Q3 revenue still fell approximately 4% despite its strong automotive performance.

My investment view is constructive because the automotive opportunity already has reported revenue and production deployments behind it. The next test is whether Qualcomm sustains that momentum as customer programs expand, while converting the changing revenue mix into stronger company-wide earnings. Investors should judge the shares against sustainable profits and the price paid, rather than treating an automotive design award as revenue already secured.

The U.S. EV slowdown makes that distinction more useful. Qualcomm’s opportunity depends on what it supplies inside the vehicle and where its customers produce and sell vehicles. Continued gains in computing content across multiple powertrains can support growth even when American BEV sales remain weak, although they do not eliminate exposure to an automotive downturn.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Dr. Robert Castellano

Dr. Robert Castellano has over 40 years of experience analyzing the high-tech industries. He is president of The Information Network (www.theinformationnet.com). He earned a PhD degree in Chemistry from Oxford University (UK). His PhD thesis advisor, John Goodenough, won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2019 for the invention of the Lithium Ion Battery. He writes with George Gilder, novelist, futurist, and economist, and his team for Eagle Financial Publishing.

All articles →