ETF

VYM’s 2.2% Yield Hides $141,000 in Decade-Long Underperformance Versus the S&P 500

Photo of Ryne Mauck
By Ryne Mauck Published

Quick Read

  • VYM turned $300,000 into $922,110 over ten years, but reinvesting every dividend still left investors $141,000 behind the S&P 500.

  • SCHD outpaced VYM by 27 percentage points over the decade while delivering a higher yield at only 2 basis points more in fees.

  • VYM's 400+ holdings, led by AI-driven Broadcom at 8%, function as closet indexing that adds quarterly tax drag without index-level returns.

  • Many financial professionals are salespeople paid on what they push, not whether you end up wealthier. A fiduciary is the opposite. The SEC legally requires them to put your interests first. Advisor.com's free matching tool pairs you with vetted fiduciaries from major national firms, all in under three minutes. See who you match with today.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
VYM’s 2.2% Yield Hides $141,000 in Decade-Long Underperformance Versus the S&P 500

© mayu85 / Shutterstock.com

A retiree who put $300,000 into the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA:VYM) ten years ago and reinvested every dividend now sits on roughly $922,110. The same $300,000 in the S&P 500 is now worth about $1,063,230. That is roughly $141,000 quietly forfeited in exchange for a yield that never cracked 3%.

What You Are Actually Paying

VYM charges an expense ratio of just 0.04%, equal to about $4 annually for every $10,000 invested. That makes it cheaper than the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEARCA:SCHD) at 0.06% and only slightly more expensive than the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:VOO) at 0.03%. If fees were the only cost that mattered, the analysis could end here.

The real bill is the gap in total returns. Over the past ten years, VYM returned 207.37%. SCHD returned 233.97%. SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY) returned 254.41%. On $300,000, that spread compounds into roughly $79,800 given up versus SCHD and $141,120 given up versus the plain S&P 500. The trailing yield explains the tradeoff clearly: VYM currently pays $3.6303 on a $165.63 share, about a 2.2% trailing yield, while SCHD runs closer to 3.1%. VYM investors accepted the lower yield, and as a result, a lower total return.

The Part the Factsheet Does Not Highlight

Let’s start with the portfolio itself. VYM holds 400+ positions. Its largest single holding is Broadcom at 8.028%, a semiconductor name whose narrative today is driven by artificial intelligence rather than income. Add JPMorgan Chase at 3.344%, Exxon Mobil at 2.715%, and Johnson & Johnson at 2.303%, and you have a giant, benchmark-hugging basket of large-cap value that overlaps heavily with any total-market fund a reader likely already owns. Essentially, the fund provides closet indexing, while presenting as a dividend fund.

Then there is the tax drag. VYM’s quarterly distributions can vary considerably, ranging from $0.6555 per share in the first quarter of 2024 to $1.0237 in the second quarter. Investors holding the fund in a taxable account also owe taxes on those distributions each year, even when they reinvest the income. For long-term investors, that creates another layer of drag beyond the fund’s 0.04% expense ratio.

The Cheaper Mirror

SCHD applies a tighter screen: roughly 139 equity positions, concentrated in names like QUALCOMM at 6.74%, Texas Instruments at 5.90%, and UnitedHealth at 5.09%. Higher trailing yield, higher ten-year return, at 2 basis points more in fees.

If the goal is broad U.S. equity, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) delivers the market at 0.03% and has beaten VYM by roughly 47 percentage points over the last decade. The tradeoff with SCHD is a narrower, more concentrated screen. The tradeoff with VOO is a lower headline yield but higher total return.

What This Means for You

The real question is whether you are paying a hidden opportunity cost to feel the comfort of a quarterly deposit. If the answer to “what do I actually own” is 400 large-cap value stocks led by a semiconductor giant, the yield label may be doing more marketing than investing. Ask what the last decade would have looked like in a portfolio measured by ending dollars rather than dividends collected.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Ryne Mauck
About the Author Ryne Mauck →

Ryne Mauck is an individual investor, analyst, and investment writer. Drawing on his experience in financial analysis, municipal bonds, and regulatory compliance, he manages his own portfolio with a focus on ETFs, macroeconomic trends, and value-oriented investment opportunities.

His investment approach is grounded in rational decision-making, downside protection, and independent thinking. Through his work at 24/7 Wall St. and other investment platforms, including Seeking Alpha, he aims to provide readers with clear, research-driven insights into valuation, fundamentals, portfolio construction, and risk management. His goal is to help investors make more informed decisions while maintaining a disciplined long-term approach to investing.

Ryne holds a B.Sc. in Finance and an M.A. in Political Science.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

DDOG Vol: 8,662,403
APA
APA Vol: 7,196,384
MPC Vol: 4,056,885
AKAM Vol: 6,198,025
CF Vol: 2,778,825

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
VRSK Vol: 2,924,374
GLW Vol: 7,649,436
LUV Vol: 5,579,118
UAL Vol: 2,844,611