ETF

VYM’s 2.2% Yield Hides $141,000 in Decade-Long Underperformance Versus the S&P 500

A retiree who chose VYM for its reliable quarterly deposits may have traded away a surprising fortune without realizing it, and the expense ratio has almost nothing to do with it.

Published August 10, 2026, 6:05pm ET · 3 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

A financial still life featuring a white alarm clock on the left, a bright yellow sign on a wooden easel in the center displaying 'DIVIDEND YIELD' in bold black capital letters, and a white calculator on the right. All items are arranged on a light wooden surface against a light blue wooden plank background.
The concept of dividend yield is crucial for investors seeking income-generating assets. This visual emphasizes the analytical approach required when exploring high-yield investment opportunities. © mayu85 / Shutterstock.com

A retiree who put $300,000 into the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA:VYM) ten years ago and reinvested every dividend now sits on roughly $922,110. The same $300,000 in the S&P 500 is now worth about $1,063,230. That is roughly $141,000 quietly forfeited in exchange for a yield that never cracked 3%.

What You Are Actually Paying

VYM charges an expense ratio of just 0.04%, equal to about $4 annually for every $10,000 invested. That makes it cheaper than the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEARCA:SCHD) at 0.06% and only slightly more expensive than the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:VOO) at 0.03%. If fees were the only cost that mattered, the analysis could end here.

The real bill is the gap in total returns. Over the past ten years, VYM returned 207.37%. SCHD returned 233.97%. SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY) returned 254.41%. On $300,000, that spread compounds into roughly $79,800 given up versus SCHD and $141,120 given up versus the plain S&P 500. The trailing yield explains the tradeoff clearly: VYM currently pays $3.6303 on a $165.63 share, about a 2.2% trailing yield, while SCHD runs closer to 3.1%. VYM investors accepted the lower yield, and as a result, a lower total return.

The Part the Factsheet Does Not Highlight

Let’s start with the portfolio itself. VYM holds 400+ positions. Its largest single holding is Broadcom at 8.028%, a semiconductor name whose narrative today is driven by artificial intelligence rather than income. Add JPMorgan Chase at 3.344%, Exxon Mobil at 2.715%, and Johnson & Johnson at 2.303%, and you have a giant, benchmark-hugging basket of large-cap value that overlaps heavily with any total-market fund a reader likely already owns. Essentially, the fund provides closet indexing, while presenting as a dividend fund.

Then there is the tax drag. VYM’s quarterly distributions can vary considerably, ranging from $0.6555 per share in the first quarter of 2024 to $1.0237 in the second quarter. Investors holding the fund in a taxable account also owe taxes on those distributions each year, even when they reinvest the income. For long-term investors, that creates another layer of drag beyond the fund’s 0.04% expense ratio.

The Cheaper Mirror

SCHD applies a tighter screen: roughly 139 equity positions, concentrated in names like QUALCOMM at 6.74%, Texas Instruments at 5.90%, and UnitedHealth at 5.09%. Higher trailing yield, higher ten-year return, at 2 basis points more in fees.

If the goal is broad U.S. equity, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) delivers the market at 0.03% and has beaten VYM by roughly 47 percentage points over the last decade. The tradeoff with SCHD is a narrower, more concentrated screen. The tradeoff with VOO is a lower headline yield but higher total return.

What This Means for You

The real question is whether you are paying a hidden opportunity cost to feel the comfort of a quarterly deposit. If the answer to “what do I actually own” is 400 large-cap value stocks led by a semiconductor giant, the yield label may be doing more marketing than investing. Ask what the last decade would have looked like in a portfolio measured by ending dollars rather than dividends collected.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Ryne Mauck

Ryne Mauck is an investment writer covering exchange-traded funds, portfolio strategy, and opportunities across public markets. His investment approach emphasizes fundamental analysis, valuation, and disciplined risk-taking.

Through his work at 24/7 Wall St. and other investment platforms, including Seeking Alpha, he aims to provide readers with clear, research-driven insights into investment fundamentals, portfolio construction, and risk management. His goal is to help investors make more informed decisions while maintaining a disciplined long-term approach to investing.

Ryne holds a B.Sc. in Finance and an M.A. in Political Science.

All articles →