ETF

VYM’s 2.2% Yield Hides $141,000 in Decade-Long Underperformance Versus the S&P 500

A retiree who chose VYM for its reliable quarterly deposits may have traded away a surprising fortune without realizing it, and the expense ratio has almost nothing to do with it.

Published August 10, 2026, 6:05pm ET · 3 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

A yellow sign on a small wooden easel displays the words 'DIVIDEND YIELD' in bold black capital letters. To the left is a white vintage alarm clock with brown bells, and to the right is a white calculator with visible buttons. The objects rest on a light-colored wooden surface, against a blurred light blue wooden background.
An alarm clock and calculator frame a sign displaying 'DIVIDEND YIELD', symbolizing the critical role of timing and precise calculation in understanding ETF returns. This visual underscores the importance of carefully examining financial metrics discussed in the article. © mayu85 / Shutterstock.com

A retiree who put $300,000 into the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA:VYM) ten years ago and reinvested every dividend now sits on roughly $922,110. The same $300,000 in the S&P 500 is now worth about $1,063,230. That is roughly $141,000 quietly forfeited in exchange for a yield that never cracked 3%.

What You Are Actually Paying

VYM charges an expense ratio of just 0.04%, equal to about $4 annually for every $10,000 invested. That makes it cheaper than the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEARCA:SCHD) at 0.06% and only slightly more expensive than the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:VOO) at 0.03%. If fees were the only cost that mattered, the analysis could end here.

The real bill is the gap in total returns. Over the past ten years, VYM returned 207.37%. SCHD returned 233.97%. SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY) returned 254.41%. On $300,000, that spread compounds into roughly $79,800 given up versus SCHD and $141,120 given up versus the plain S&P 500. The trailing yield explains the tradeoff clearly: VYM currently pays $3.6303 on a $165.63 share, about a 2.2% trailing yield, while SCHD runs closer to 3.1%. VYM investors accepted the lower yield, and as a result, a lower total return.

The Part the Factsheet Does Not Highlight

Let’s start with the portfolio itself. VYM holds 400+ positions. Its largest single holding is Broadcom at 8.028%, a semiconductor name whose narrative today is driven by artificial intelligence rather than income. Add JPMorgan Chase at 3.344%, Exxon Mobil at 2.715%, and Johnson & Johnson at 2.303%, and you have a giant, benchmark-hugging basket of large-cap value that overlaps heavily with any total-market fund a reader likely already owns. Essentially, the fund provides closet indexing, while presenting as a dividend fund.

Then there is the tax drag. VYM’s quarterly distributions can vary considerably, ranging from $0.6555 per share in the first quarter of 2024 to $1.0237 in the second quarter. Investors holding the fund in a taxable account also owe taxes on those distributions each year, even when they reinvest the income. For long-term investors, that creates another layer of drag beyond the fund’s 0.04% expense ratio.

The Cheaper Mirror

SCHD applies a tighter screen: roughly 139 equity positions, concentrated in names like QUALCOMM at 6.74%, Texas Instruments at 5.90%, and UnitedHealth at 5.09%. Higher trailing yield, higher ten-year return, at 2 basis points more in fees.

If the goal is broad U.S. equity, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) delivers the market at 0.03% and has beaten VYM by roughly 47 percentage points over the last decade. The tradeoff with SCHD is a narrower, more concentrated screen. The tradeoff with VOO is a lower headline yield but higher total return.

What This Means for You

The real question is whether you are paying a hidden opportunity cost to feel the comfort of a quarterly deposit. If the answer to “what do I actually own” is 400 large-cap value stocks led by a semiconductor giant, the yield label may be doing more marketing than investing. Ask what the last decade would have looked like in a portfolio measured by ending dollars rather than dividends collected.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Ryne Mauck

Ryne Mauck is an investment writer covering exchange-traded funds, retirement planning, and portfolio strategy. Through his work at 24/7 Wall St. and other investment platforms, including Seeking Alpha, he aims to provide clear, research-driven insights that help investors make more informed decisions while maintaining a long-term approach to investing.

Ryne holds a B.Sc. in Finance and an M.A. in Political Science. He is a formerly registered Municipal Advisor Representative and has passed the Series 50, Series 63, and Series 65 exams. His articles are not intended to be, nor should they be interpreted as, financial advice.

All articles →