VYM Delivers 200% in 10 Years, but the Income Tradeoff Costs $3,150 Annually

Photo of David Beren
By David Beren Published

Quick Read

  • VYM's 618-stock diversification costs retirees $3,150 annually versus SCHD, which delivers a 3.4% yield against VYM's 2.35% on a $300,000 allocation.

  • SPHD and HDV offer yields above 4% but require quality and turnover screening before substituting them for a dividend-focused core holding.

  • VYM's market-cap weighting places Broadcom alone at 8%, and a 20% tech allocation creates cyclical risk its dividend-focused label obscures.

  • Don't wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list FREE now.

VYM Delivers 200% in 10 Years, but the Income Tradeoff Costs $3,150 Annually

© Andrew Angelov / Shutterstock.com

For a 70-year-old recent widow trying to simplify her late husband’s portfolio, the appeal of Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA:VYM) starts with a simple count: 618 individual stocks, with the top 10 representing 26% of assets. VYM was built for investors who need dividend income but cannot afford a single-name blowup that would eat into a 15-to-20-year drawdown. That is the niche VYM has filled since its November 2006 launch, and it explains why retirees keep buying it instead of more concentrated rivals.

What VYM is actually buying

The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which screens the top 50% of U.S. dividend payers by yield and weights them by market capitalization. The result is a portfolio of 580+ positions spanning large-cap financials, healthcare, energy, industrials, and utilities. Technology and financials each account for 20%, with no single sector dominating. Total assets under management run $78.33 billion, and the expense ratio is a lean 0.04%.

The return engine is plain. Underlying companies pay cash dividends, the fund collects them, and shareholders receive quarterly distributions. Quarterly payments have been made uninterrupted since 2006, including during the 2008-2009 financial crisis. Recent distributions range from $0.84 to $0.98, with the most recent payment of $0.9795 on June 18, 2026.

Does the math work over time

The 10-year total return for this fund runs 200%, with a 5-year return of 75% and a 1-year gain of 23%. The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEARCA:SCHD), the obvious comparison, has returned 223% over 10 years and 51% over 5. The Schwab fund beat the Vanguard fund over the full decade by roughly 22 percentage points, but trailed it over the most recent 5-year stretch by 23 points. The relative ranking depends entirely on the window.

The income picture cuts the other way. The Vanguard fund’s trailing yield is 2.3%, against the Schwab fund’s 3.4%. A $300,000 allocation at 2.35% in the Vanguard fund produces $7,050 a year, while the Schwab fund at 3.4% generates $10,200. The Schwab fund delivers $3,150 more in annual cash. The widow accepting the Vanguard fund is paying for diversification at the expense of foregone yield.

The tradeoffs retirees absorb

  1. Lower current income. SCHD’s 41% top-10 concentration is the price of its higher yield. VYM’s broader sweep dilutes the income punch by holding hundreds of mid-yield names alongside the highest payers.
  2. Market-cap weighting creates its own concentration. Broadcom sits at 8% of VYM, larger than any SCHD holding. The 580-stock count masks the fact that a handful of mega-caps still drive performance.
  3. Tech weighting is meaningful. With 20% in technology, VYM carries meaningful cyclical exposure, and a tech drawdown will hit the portfolio harder than its dividend label suggests.

Who VYM actually fits

The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF works for a retiree who wants dividend income but is more worried about single-stock risk than maximizing yield. A blended approach, 60% Vanguard and 40% Schwab, drops top-10 concentration to roughly 31% and lifts blended yield to about 2.8%, splitting the difference for investors who cannot decide. Anyone whose primary need is maximum current income, with a tolerance for the Schwab fund’s concentrated bet on quality, will find the higher-yield fund more efficient. Anyone chasing yields above 4% in products like SPHD or HDV is shopping in a different aisle entirely and should screen those for quality and turnover before substituting.

 

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of David Beren
About the Author David Beren →

David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

META Vol: 6,123,710
GIS Vol: 1,638,257
WDAY Vol: 263,702
INTU Vol: 372,457
FDS Vol: 117,487

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
GLW Vol: 1,620,545
TER Vol: 180,913
STX Vol: 272,969
MU Vol: 5,160,090