These ‘High-Yield’ ETFs Pay 5%–9% While Quietly Shrinking Your Principal. Here’s What to Own Instead

A 6%, 7%, or even 9% yield can look like exactly what an income investor wants. Put $100,000 into a fund yielding 9%, collect roughly $9,000 a year, and leave the principal alone. At face value, that sounds great. The problem is that a large distribution does not automatically mean the underlying investment is preserving your capital.

Three popular examples of funds include the Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (NYSEARCA:DIV), Global X SuperDividend ETF (NYSEARCA:SDIV), and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (NASDAQ:PFF). All three currently offer yields well above the broader stock market, but their long-term total returns show what can happen when investors prioritize today’s distribution over dividend growth and capital appreciation.

The better alternative for many long-term investors is accepting a smaller check today from funds such as Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEARCA:SCHD) or Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSEARCA:VIG) in exchange for a portfolio built to compound.

DIV: A 6.6% Yield with a Long-Term Growth Problem

DIV is the least extreme of the three. The fund owns 50 high-yielding U.S. stocks and currently carries a trailing 12-month distribution rate of roughly 6.6%. It also pays monthly, which makes the fund easy to understand for investors trying to turn a portfolio into regular income. Global X charges a 0.45% expense ratio.

The problem appears when you move beyond the distribution. Although recent performance has been strong, up approximately 19% on a YTD basis, cumulative total returns over longer periods significantly underperform the broad market. Over a ten-year period, DIV has returned roughly 55% compared to 260% from the S&P 500.

The long-term growth problem comes partly from what DIV’s strategy selects. As of September 4, 2026,  roughly 17.75% of the portfolio is in real estate, and 12.37% in consumer defensive. There is no meaningful exposure to technology.

Screening heavily for current yield naturally pushes the portfolio toward mature, slower-growing businesses and sectors where high yields can sometimes reflect weak share prices. The monthly check is attractive, but investors should not mistake it for free return.

SDIV: The 9% Yield That Has Barely Compounded

SDIV takes the same basic idea and pushes it further. The fund searches internationally for some of the world’s highest-yielding stocks. Its trailing 12-month distribution was recently 9.32%, with a current distribution rate around 8.72%. Global X also notes that the distribution is estimated to include return of capital.

The long-term numbers are difficult to ignore. Through August 30, SDIV’s NAV total return was up approximately 10%. If we expand out further, the fund’s total return is essentially flat (-0.01%).

That is the yield trap in its clearest form. A $100,000 position can throw off thousands of dollars in annual distributions while the underlying investment fails to create meaningful long-term wealth. Investors spending those distributions rather than reinvesting them can experience an even larger gap between the cash arriving in their accounts and the value of the capital left behind.

PFF: Better Quality, But the Same Income Trade-Off

PFF is different. It is not screening common stocks for extreme dividend yields. Instead, the roughly $13 billion fund owns hundreds of preferred and hybrid securities, with financial institutions representing more than half of the portfolio. Its 30-day SEC yield recently stood at 6.52%, while its trailing yield was 5.51%.

That income is legitimate, but preferred securities have limited participation in corporate growth and considerably more sensitivity to interest rates and credit conditions. The result has been modest long-term compounding. Through August 30, PFF has returned only slightly more than 1%  annually, and over five years, cumulative total returns equate to just 3%.

PFF can still make sense for an investor specifically seeking preferred-stock exposure. The mistake is treating a 5%-plus yield as evidence that the fund should serve as a long-term wealth-building substitute for dividend equities.

What to Own Instead

For investors who do not absolutely need the maximum possible income today, SCHD offers a much different trade. Its trailing distribution yield was recently about 3.3%, well below DIV, SDIV, or PFF, but the fund screens for dividend quality and financial strength rather than simply chasing the largest payouts. It also charges just 0.06% annually.

Investors willing to start with even less income can look toward VIG. The fund recently yielded roughly 1.5% and charges 0.04%, but its strategy specifically targets companies with records of increasing dividends over time.

What This Means for You

A 9% distribution can feel safe because more cash lands in your account today. However, this is not necessarily true if the portfolio underneath struggles to grow. DIV, SDIV, and PFF can all serve specific income objectives, but investors with a decade or more ahead of them should care about the size of the account that remains after those checks are paid. Sometimes the better income investment is the one that pays you less today and leaves you with considerably more tomorrow.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.