ETF

The 20-Year Wait for a Losing Stock to Break Even Ends With These 3 ETFs

You've sworn to sell the day it gets back to even, but nearly two decades have passed and that day keeps slipping away. The market ignores your purchase price, and one question may show why waiting costs you more than…

Published November 5, 2026, 4:03pm ET · 4 min read

The ETF Examiner desk. Editor: Ryne Mauck.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Laptop, finance and senior couple in home for budget, pension and mortgage payment. Retirement, taxes and man and woman with paperwork for life insurance, investment and bills for online banking
Laptop, finance and senior couple in home for budget, pension and mortgage payment. Retirement, taxes and man and woman with paperwork for life insurance, investment and bills for online banking © Laptop, finance and senior couple in home for budget, pension and mortgage payment. Retirement, taxes and man and woman with paperwork for life insurance, investment and bills for online banking (Shutterstock.com) by PeopleImages

You’re 69, retired, and one stock in your account has sat below what you paid for it for close to two decades. You’ve promised yourself you’ll sell the day it gets back to even. That day keeps slipping further out, and the money stays tied to a single company. If that sounds like you, three ETFs show diversified alternatives for that money: VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (CBOE:MOAT), JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (NYSEARCA:JQUA) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (CBOE:EFV).

Why Your Purchase Price Stopped Mattering Long Ago

The market has no idea what you paid, and it doesn’t care. Your purchase price is history. The loss is already sitting in your account today, and selling just puts it on the record.

A better question looks ahead. If this money were cash right now, would you use it to buy this stock? If the answer is no, then every day you hold it, you’re making that same choice again.

Some losing stocks still deserve a place in your account. If you still believe in the company based on where it stands today, holding can make sense. The point is to judge it on what comes next, using today’s facts and leaving the old price out of it.

Recording the Loss Can Lower Your Tax Bill

In a taxable account, a realized capital loss offsets capital gains. If your losses exceed your gains, the extra can offset other income up to $3,000 (26 U.S.C. § 1211(b)). So recording the loss can come with a tax benefit.

Watch the wash-sale rule.  The loss deduction is prohibited if you acquire substantially identical stock or securities within 30 days before or after the sale (26 U.S.C. § 1091(a)). Buying the same stock back inside that window would trigger it.

If the stock is held in an IRA, none of this applies. Selling at a loss inside an IRA has no tax effect either way and gives you no capital loss deduction. The wash-sale and IRA quirks are two of several IRS rules that quietly cost retirees real money, and we charted the rest in a free tax trap map.

MOAT Owns U.S. Companies With Lasting Advantages at Reasonable Prices

MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. That index picks U.S. companies Morningstar rates as having a wide economic moat, meaning a durable competitive advantage, and chooses the ones trading at the lowest market price-to-fair-value ratios. Holdings are equally weighted and rebalanced quarterly. The fund held about $11.6 billion in net assets, and its largest position was under 3% of net assets as of June 30, 2026. On an adjusted basis, shares rose 18.16% over the past year and 61.25% over five years.

JQUA Screens U.S. Stocks on Quality

JQUA aims to track the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, which picks U.S. companies using quality measures. Its holdings cover technology, healthcare, financials, consumer, energy, and industrial companies. As of July 31, 2026, its largest disclosed positions each made up around 2% of net assets, and the fund held about $8.2 billion. Adjusted shares gained 23.57% over one year and 84.44% over five.

EFV Takes Your Money Outside the U.S.

EFV tracks a market-cap-weighted index of developed-market value stocks from Europe, Australia, and the Far East. Its holdings span the U.K., Japan, Switzerland, France, Spain, Australia, and Germany, with large stakes in banks and insurers alongside energy, utilities, and consumer staples. It’s the largest of the three at about $29.1 billion, and its biggest position was about 3.2% of net assets as of July 31, 2026. Adjusted shares climbed 24.73% over the past year and 95.01% over five years.

Trade-Offs to Weigh Before You Move the Money

All three are stock funds, and all three can fall. Their advantage over a single stock is diversification. None of them protects you from a falling market, and the returns above are history, with no promise attached. MOAT relies on one research firm’s ratings.

JQUA’s biggest holdings lean toward large technology names. EFV adds currency swings and heavy exposure to financials. Each fund’s current expense ratio matters, since fees cut into every year’s return.

For a retiree who has spent two decades waiting on one number, these funds show an alternative. Each one picks holdings based on where companies stand today, spreads the money across many businesses and, in EFV’s case, many countries. Your next decision then rests on what lies ahead.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Ryne Mauck

Ryne Mauck is an investment writer covering exchange-traded funds, retirement planning, and portfolio strategy. Through his work at 24/7 Wall St. and other investment platforms, including Seeking Alpha, he aims to provide clear, research-driven insights that help investors make more informed decisions while maintaining a long-term approach to investing.

Ryne holds a B.Sc. in Finance and an M.A. in Political Science. He is a formerly registered Municipal Advisor Representative and has passed the Series 50, Series 63, and Series 65 exams. His articles are not intended to be, nor should they be interpreted as, financial advice.

All articles →