Goldman Sachs Says 40% of Americans Earning Over $300,000 Are Still Living Paycheck to Paycheck

Photo of David Beren
By David Beren Published

Quick Read

  • Earning more doesn't actually protect you from the same retirement trap that's catching lower-income households, and the reason why defies conventional financial logic. See why income isn't enough →

  • Most workers in this survey feel confident about their retirement progress and simultaneously fear outliving their savings. Both reactions are rational, and the data explains exactly why. Explore the confidence paradox →

  • The categories eating the biggest share of high earners' income follow a specific pattern that's been accelerating since 2000 and shows no sign of reversing, and none of this is random. See the cost categories →

  • Actual retirees report something very different from what current savers expect retirement to feel like, and that gap between those two pictures changes how the math should be done. See what retirees actually report →

  • One generation is nearly three times more likely than another to say competing priorities are killing their ability to save, and it is probably not the generation you would guess. See the generational gap →

  • Are you ahead, or behind on retirement? SmartAsset's free tool can match you with a financial advisor in minutes to help you answer that today. Each advisor has been carefully vetted, and must act in your best interests. Don't waste another minute; learn more here.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Goldman Sachs Says 40% of Americans Earning Over $300,000 Are Still Living Paycheck to Paycheck

© Canva | DAPA Images and interstid

A new national survey from Goldman Sachs Asset Management lays out a structural reality that is reshaping retirement planning in America. The 2025 Retirement Survey & Insights Report shows that the traditional advice to “just save more” no longer fits the financial lives of most households. Rising costs, competing priorities, and shifting life milestones have created what the report calls a Financial Vortex, a set of pressures that consume a larger share of income and leave less room for long‑term saving. The data show that these pressures are not episodic. They are structural, persistent, and accelerating.

What The Data Actually Shows

The report attributes the squeeze to a long arc of cost shifts that have unfolded since 2000. The cost of basic needs, housing, childcare, college, healthcare, and student loan repayment has risen dramatically as a percentage of income. The chart in the report shows, for example, that the cost of home ownership increased from 21% of income in 2000 to 36% in 2025, while renting rose from 18% to 29%, childcare from 10% to 25%, public college from 8% to 16%, private college from 9% to 33%, and family healthcare coverage from 12% to 33%. These increases have “narrowed the gap between income and expenses, leaving little to save for retirement.”

Workers confirm the pressure directly. Among working respondents, 67% say too many monthly financial expenses affect their ability to save, 64% cite financial hardship, 62% cite caring for and financially supporting family members, 58% cite credit card debt, and 57% cite paying down existing loans.

The report’s framing is blunt: saving more “may not be an option for many.”

Inflation Is Hitting Where High Earners Spend

The report also shows that inflation is not hitting all categories equally. Key household priorities, college tuition, childcare, and healthcare, have risen faster than headline CPI for decades and are projected to continue outpacing wages through 2035. The chart in the report shows tuition, medical care, hospital services, and childcare rising at multiples of overall inflation. Goldman Sachs emphasizes that this is a persistent, structural trend, not a temporary flare‑up.

These cost pressures are also reshaping life milestones. The median age of first marriage has climbed, the average age of first‑time mothers has risen, and the average age of first‑time homebuyers has moved sharply higher. The report attributes these shifts directly to affordability challenges and the need to establish financial stability before taking on major commitments.

The Confidence Gap

The survey also captures a striking psychological split. 68% of working respondents say they are very ahead, somewhat ahead, or on track with their retirement savings, and 68% say they are very or somewhat confident they will meet their retirement goals. Yet 58% believe they will outlive their savings.

Optimism and worry coexist because the day‑to‑day cash flow feels manageable while the long‑horizon math does not. The report calls this the “optimism gap,” a disconnect between how people feel about their progress and what the numbers imply about long‑term sustainability.

Retirees, however, report stronger outcomes than many savers expect. On average, retirees receive 60% of their pre‑retirement income, 71% are satisfied with that income, and 82% say their retirement lifestyle is the same as or better than before retiring. These findings suggest that lived experience may diverge from conventional replacement‑rate benchmarks and that personalized planning may matter more than rigid rules of thumb.

What The Data Suggests About Income-Independent Wealth Building

The report points to several patterns that matter more than income level alone:

  • Competing priorities scale with income. Higher earners face the same structural cost pressures—housing, healthcare, childcare, education—and these categories expand as income rises.
  • Savings discipline is uneven. While 55% of workers increased retirement savings in the past year, a large share still targets replacement rates below 50% of pre‑retirement income, far below what most financial professionals consider sustainable.
  • Generational differences are stark. Only about 30% of Baby Boomers say competing priorities materially constrain saving, compared with more than 50% of Gen X, more than 75% of Millennials, and more than 70% of Gen Z.
  • Retirement costs are rising faster than inflation. Average expenditures for retirees have grown by 3.6% annually since 2000, and the average retirement length has increased from 17.5 years in 2000 to 19.2 years in 2023, with projections indicating further increases.

The report’s conclusion is clear: higher income alone does not resolve the structural pressures that erode retirement readiness. The new economics of retirement require earlier and steadier saving, personalized advice, protected lifetime income options, and strategies that account for rising costs and longer retirements.

 

Photo of David Beren
About the Author David Beren →

David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

KMX Vol: 7,330,419
GLW Vol: 22,800,969
INTC Vol: 233,719,006
SMCI Vol: 68,465,534
ENPH Vol: 13,978,376

Top Losing Stocks

ACN Vol: 41,744,333
EPAM Vol: 5,636,587
CTSH Vol: 61,311,400
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
KR Vol: 26,704,230