He Went on Strike From the Steel Mill at 63. His Union Check Was Taxable, but Social Security Treated It Differently From His Paycheck.

When the picket line replaces the time clock, the IRS and Social Security start playing by completely different rules, and a 63-year-old steelworker collecting benefits stands to win on one front while quietly losing on another.

Published September 10, 2026, 2:03pm ET · 4 min read

The Full Benefits Desk desk. Editor: Gerelyn Terzo.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Construction worker wearing a yellow hard hat and safety vest, kneeling and working on steel rebar at a construction site.
© Sach336699 / Shutterstock.com

This summer’s steel-industry bargaining has put wages, benefits and job protections back across the table for thousands of union workers. At Cleveland-Cliffs alone, United Steelworkers locals entered negotiations ahead of a September contract expiration. For an older steelworker, a walkout can put something else in play that rarely makes the bargaining updates: Social Security.

Picture a skilled trades worker at 63. He filed for Social Security a year ago, kept his mill job and was managing fine. Then contract talks stalled and the local went out. His paycheck stopped. A check from the union’s strike fund began showing up instead. His first question is obvious. Does that new money count against the Social Security check he already depends on?

The IRS Sees Income. Social Security Sees Something Else.

Strike and lockout benefits paid by a union are usually taxable. The IRS generally includes them in income as compensation. Social Security asks a different question. Union strike benefits generally do not count as wages for Social Security purposes. SSA’s own guidance says that remains true even when the worker is on picket duty or subject to call during the strike.

For someone claiming Social Security before full retirement age (FRA), which is 67 for a worker his age, that distinction can be worth real money. The retirement earnings test counts wages from a job and net earnings from self-employment. In 2026, someone under FRA for the entire year can earn $24,480 before Social Security begins withholding $1 in benefits for every $2 above the limit.

The strike check generally does not add to that total. That does not mean he automatically escapes the earnings test. Wages earned before the walkout still count, and those alone could put him over the limit. The point is narrower: the money replacing part of his paycheck during the strike generally does not make the earnings-test problem worse.

Ordinary strike benefits are one thing. Separate payments for actually performing services or other strike-related duties can be treated differently. The name on the check matters less than what the payment is actually for.

The Retirement Cost Is Somewhere Else

This is where the strike can still reach his Social Security record. Social Security calculates retirement benefits using a worker’s 35 highest years of covered earnings. Because he has already claimed, going on strike does not erase wages earned in prior years. Nor does one thin year automatically push a stronger year out of his calculation. What he can lose is an opportunity.

Social Security reviews the earnings records of people who continue working after they claim. If a new year of earnings ranks among their highest years, the agency can recalculate the benefit and replace a lower year with the stronger one. A 63-year-old skilled trades worker may be earning some of the best wages of his career. Without the strike, another full year of covered earnings might have knocked a weaker year out of his top 35 and nudged his monthly benefit higher.

Spend several months off payroll, and that opportunity gets smaller. For someone who already has 35 stronger earning years, the strike may make no difference to the calculation at all. For someone with lower years sitting near the bottom of the record, or fewer than 35 years of covered earnings, it can matter considerably more. That is the part the strike-fund check can hide. Cash is still arriving, but covered wages are not.

The Earnings Record Shows What the Check Does Not

Once the year’s earnings have posted, pull up the Social Security earnings record and see what actually landed there. A strike payment can appear on the tax return without appearing as covered wages on that record. For a worker already collecting benefits, the comparison is useful. Look at the strike year against the lower-earning years already sitting in the 35-year history.

If returning to work produces a stronger year later, Social Security can automatically recalculate the benefit when that new year belongs among his highest. It is also another reason to understand the claiming decision before the next contract fight arrives (we condensed the 62 versus 67 versus 70 claiming math into a free one-page framework here: The Social Security Decision).

The larger lesson reaches well beyond the union hall. Taxable income and Social Security earnings are not synonyms. A strike makes the distinction unusually visible. The union can replace part of the paycheck. The IRS can tax the replacement. Social Security can ignore it for the earnings test. But the missing paycheck can still leave a mark on the earnings record. Same work stoppage. Two Social Security rules. Only one of them cares about the union check.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Gerelyn Terzo

Gerelyn Terzo is the author of dividend investing handbook "Dividend Investing Strategies: How to Have Your Cake & Eat It Too." A veteran financial journalist, she covers agri-finance for outlets like Global AgInvesting and the broader stock market and personal finance for 24/7 Wall Street. She began at CNBC and later helped launch Fox Business in New York. Gerelyn currently resides in Woodland Park, Colorado and dabbles in nature photography as a hobby.

All articles →