Special Report
States Getting the Most and Least From Uncle Sam
Published:
Last Updated:
Every year, workers in all 50 states fill out their 1040 form to pay taxes to the federal government. That money does not necessarily stay in Washington, however. The federal government generates revenue from sources like income and employment taxes and redistributes it based on need. And not all states benefit equally.
The total amount the federal government collected from each state in the 2017 fiscal year ranged from $5.6 billion from Vermont to $435.6 billion from California. The majority of states — including Vermont and California — ultimately get more money back than they contribute. Money from the federal government is redistributed back to states in the form of grants, aid programs for the needy, and payments to major government contracting firms such as defense companies.
A recent report from public policy think tank the Rockefeller Institute of Government titled “Giving or Getting? New York’s Balance of Payments with the Federal Government,” highlights the differences in what states give to the federal government compared to what they receive. 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the report in addition to Census data to identify the states getting the most and least from Uncle Sam. States were ranked based on the amount of money they received per capita from the federal government in fiscal 2017 minus the amount residents and organizations paid the federal government per capita.
The states receiving the most from Washington on a per capita basis tend have relatively large poor populations that depend on federal assistance programs like SNAP (formerly known as food stamps) and Medicaid. On the flip side, the states that give more to the federal government than they receive tend to have higher income residents. Exceptions include states like Maryland and Virginia, which, though they are wealthier states, also benefit from disproportionately high federal funding partly due to their large defense contracting sectors.
Click here to see the states getting the most and least from the federal government.
Click here to read our methodology.
1. Virginia
> Net federal funding: $10,301 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $176.8 billion (5th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.1% (8th lowest)
> Median household income: $71,535 (9th highest)
See all stories featuring: Virginia
[in-text-ad]
2. Kentucky
> Net federal funding: $9,145 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $70.8 billion (19th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 14.1% (8th highest)
> Median household income: $48,375 (7th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Kentucky
24/7 Wall St.
3. New Mexico
> Net federal funding: $8,692 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $31.7 billion (19th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 17.4% (the highest)
> Median household income: $46,744 (5th lowest)
See all stories featuring: New Mexico
4. West Virginia
> Net federal funding: $7,283 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $24.6 billion (15th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 16.8% (2nd highest)
> Median household income: $43,469 (the lowest)
See all stories featuring: West Virginia
[in-text-ad-2]
5. Alaska
> Net federal funding: $7,048 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $13.0 billion (8th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.8% (tied – 22nd lowest)
> Median household income: $73,181 (7th highest)
See all stories featuring: Alaska
6. Mississippi
> Net federal funding: $6,880 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $37.8 billion (21st least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 15.3% (6th highest)
> Median household income: $43,529 (2nd lowest)
See all stories featuring: Mississippi
[in-text-ad]
7. Alabama
> Net federal funding: $6,694 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $65.8 billion (21st most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 14.0% (9th highest)
> Median household income: $48,123 (6th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Alabama
24/7 Wall St.
8. Maryland
> Net federal funding: $6,035 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $105.1 billion (11th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.3% (17th lowest)
> Median household income: $80,776 (the highest)
See all stories featuring: Maryland
9. Maine
> Net federal funding: $5,572 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $17.4 billion (10th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.8% (17th highest)
> Median household income: $56,277 (20th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Maine
[in-text-ad-2]
10. Hawaii
> Net federal funding: $5,270 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $19.9 billion (13th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.7% (20th lowest)
> Median household income: $77,765 (3rd highest)
See all stories featuring: Hawaii
11. Arkansas
> Net federal funding: $5,080 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $35.1 billion (20th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 11.8% (25th highest)
> Median household income: $45,869 (3rd lowest)
See all stories featuring: Arkansas
[in-text-ad]
12. South Carolina
> Net federal funding: $5,008 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $59.7 billion (23rd most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.3% (tied – 19th highest)
> Median household income: $50,570 (9th lowest)
See all stories featuring: South Carolina
24/7 Wall St.
13. Arizona
> Net federal funding: $4,430 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $82.8 billion (14th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.8% (tied – 22nd lowest)
> Median household income: $56,581 (23rd lowest)
See all stories featuring: Arizona
14. Oklahoma
> Net federal funding: $3,986 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $45.1 billion (23rd least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.2% (tied – 12th highest)
> Median household income: $50,051 (8th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Oklahoma
[in-text-ad-2]
15. Missouri
> Net federal funding: $3,949 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $72.3 billion (18th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 11.0% (23rd lowest)
> Median household income: $53,578 (15th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Missouri
16. Montana
> Net federal funding: $3,808 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $12.2 billion (6th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 9.4% (14th lowest)
> Median household income: $53,386 (14th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Montana
[in-text-ad]
17. Louisiana
> Net federal funding: $3,785 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $52.0 billion (25th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 16.4% (3rd highest)
> Median household income: $46,145 (4th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Louisiana
24/7 Wall St.
18. Vermont
> Net federal funding: $3,741 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $8.0 billion (3rd least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 11.5% (24th lowest)
> Median household income: $57,513 (24th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Vermont
19. Tennessee
> Net federal funding: $3,591 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $76.3 billion (17th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.5% (11th highest)
> Median household income: $51,340 (10th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Tennessee
[in-text-ad-2]
20. Idaho
> Net federal funding: $3,428 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $17.5 billion (11th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 9.7% (16th lowest)
> Median household income: $52,225 (11th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Idaho
21. North Carolina
> Net federal funding: $3,358 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $113.1 billion (9th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.3% (tied – 19th highest)
> Median household income: $52,752 (13th lowest)
See all stories featuring: North Carolina
[in-text-ad]
22. Delaware
> Net federal funding: $2,892 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $11.5 billion (5th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.4% (18th lowest)
> Median household income: $62,852 (17th highest)
See all stories featuring: Delaware
24/7 Wall St.
23. Ohio
> Net federal funding: $2,750 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $125.7 billion (8th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.2% (tied – 12th highest)
> Median household income: $54,021 (16th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Ohio
24. Oregon
> Net federal funding: $2,477 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $45.7 billion (24th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 15.4% (tied – 4th highest)
> Median household income: $60,212 (20th highest)
See all stories featuring: Oregon
[in-text-ad-2]
25. Michigan
> Net federal funding: $2,474 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $108.4 billion (10th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.1% (14th highest)
> Median household income: $54,909 (18th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Michigan
26. Indiana
> Net federal funding: $2,359 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $67.8 billion (20th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 9.3% (13th lowest)
> Median household income: $54,181 (17th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Indiana
[in-text-ad]
27. Pennsylvania
> Net federal funding: $2,299 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $155.8 billion (6th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.9% (tied – 15th highest)
> Median household income: $59,195 (24th highest)
See all stories featuring: Pennsylvania
24/7 Wall St.
28. Georgia
> Net federal funding: $2,253 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $104.5 billion (12th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.6% (18th highest)
> Median household income: $56,183 (19th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Georgia
29. Rhode Island
> Net federal funding: $2,228 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $12.6 billion (7th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 15.4% (tied – 4th highest)
> Median household income: $63,870 (15th highest)
See all stories featuring: Rhode Island
[in-text-ad-2]
30. Florida
> Net federal funding: $2,187 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $237.7 billion (3rd most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 13.6% (10th highest)
> Median household income: $52,594 (12th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Florida
31. Kansas
> Net federal funding: $1,983 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $31.3 billion (18th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 7.7% (6th lowest)
> Median household income: $56,422 (21st lowest)
See all stories featuring: Kansas
[in-text-ad]
32. South Dakota
> Net federal funding: $1,409 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $9.3 billion (4th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.9% (tied – 12th lowest)
> Median household income: $56,521 (22nd lowest)
See all stories featuring: South Dakota
33. Nevada
> Net federal funding: $1,140 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $28.7 billion (16th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.2% (22nd highest)
> Median household income: $58,003 (25th lowest)
See all stories featuring: Nevada
34. Iowa
> Net federal funding: $1,105 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $29.9 billion (17th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 9.6% (15th lowest)
> Median household income: $58,570 (25th highest)
See all stories featuring: Iowa
[in-text-ad-2]
35. Minnesota
> Net federal funding: $959 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $64.4 billion (22nd most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 7.8% (7th lowest)
> Median household income: $68,388 (12th highest)
See all stories featuring: Minnesota
36. Wyoming
> Net federal funding: $670 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $7.1 billion (the least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 6.3% (tied – the lowest)
> Median household income: $60,434 (19th highest)
See all stories featuring: Wyoming
[in-text-ad]
37. Wisconsin
> Net federal funding: $536 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $55.4 billion (25th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 10.6% (19th lowest)
> Median household income: $59,305 (22nd highest)
See all stories featuring: Wisconsin
38. Texas
> Net federal funding: $304 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $269.0 billion (2nd most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.0% (tied – 23rd highest)
> Median household income: $59,206 (23rd highest)
See all stories featuring: Texas
39. Utah
> Net federal funding: $296 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $23.9 billion (14th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 6.8% (3rd lowest)
> Median household income: $68,358 (13th highest)
See all stories featuring: Utah
[in-text-ad-2]
40. California
> Net federal funding: $12 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $436.1 billion (the most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.9% (tied – 12th lowest)
> Median household income: $71,805 (8th highest)
See all stories featuring: California
41. Colorado
> Net federal funding: -$95 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $57.5 billion (24th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 7.6% (5th lowest)
> Median household income: $69,117 (11th highest)
See all stories featuring: Colorado
[in-text-ad]
42. Nebraska
> Net federal funding: -$164 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $17.7 billion (12th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.3% (9th lowest)
> Median household income: $59,970 (21st highest)
See all stories featuring: Nebraska
24/7 Wall St.
43. Washington
> Net federal funding: -$184 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $80.5 billion (15th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.3% (tied – 19th highest)
> Median household income: $70,979 (10th highest)
See all stories featuring: Washington
44. New Hampshire
> Net federal funding: -$234 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $15.0 billion (9th least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 7.0% (4th lowest)
> Median household income: $73,381 (6th highest)
See all stories featuring: New Hampshire
[in-text-ad-2]
45. Illinois
> Net federal funding: -$364 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $131.8 billion (7th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.9% (tied – 15th highest)
> Median household income: $62,992 (16th highest)
See all stories featuring: Illinois
46. North Dakota
> Net federal funding: -$720 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $7.9 billion (2nd least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 6.3% (tied – the lowest)
> Median household income: $61,843 (18th highest)
See all stories featuring: North Dakota
[in-text-ad]
47. New York
> Net federal funding: -$1,792 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $220.6 billion (4th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 14.8% (7th highest)
> Median household income: $64,894 (14th highest)
See all stories featuring: New York
24/7 Wall St.
48. Massachusetts
> Net federal funding: -$2,343 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $78.7 billion (16th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 11.7% (25th lowest)
> Median household income: $77,385 (4th highest)
See all stories featuring: Massachusetts
49. New Jersey
> Net federal funding: -$2,368 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $97.7 billion (13th most)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 8.9% (tied – 12th lowest)
> Median household income: $80,088 (2nd highest)
See all stories featuring: New Jersey
[in-text-ad-2]
50. Connecticut
> Net federal funding: -$4,000 per resident
> Total revenue from fed. gov.: $41.1 billion (22nd least)
> SNAP benefit recipiency: 12.0% (tied – 23rd highest)
> Median household income: $74,168 (5th highest)
See all stories featuring: Connecticut
Methodology
To identify the states getting the most and least from the federal government, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the “Giving or Getting? New York’s Balance of Payments with the Federal Government” report from the Rockefeller Institute of Government. States were ranked based on the amount of money they received per capita from the federal government in fiscal 2017 minus the amount residents and organizations paid the federal government per capita. SNAP benefit recipiency and median household income are 2017 estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Take Charge of Your Retirement: Find the Right Financial Advisor For You in Minutes (Sponsor)
Retirement planning doesn’t have to feel overwhelming. The key is finding professional guidance—and we’ve made it easier than ever for you to connect with the right financial advisor for your unique needs.
Here’s how it works:
1️ Answer a Few Simple Questions
Tell us a bit about your goals and preferences—it only takes a few minutes!
2️ Get Your Top Advisor Matches
This tool matches you with qualified advisors who specialize in helping people like you achieve financial success.
3️ Choose Your Best Fit
Review their profiles, schedule an introductory meeting, and select the advisor who feels right for you.
Why wait? Start building the retirement you’ve always dreamed of. Click here to get started today!
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
