US Crude Traded Below $0, Way Below

WTI crude oil traded in negative territory late Monday as the May delivery contract expires.

Published April 20, 2020, 3:24pm ET · 2 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

An aerial, head-on view of a massive red oil tanker sailing through calm blue ocean waters under a light blue sky. The ship's bow is prominent, with its wide deck featuring white structures, numerous pipelines, and various pieces of maritime equipment. The deep red hull transitions to a lighter reddish-orange near the waterline, contrasting with the dark blue water.
A massive oil tanker navigates the open sea, symbolizing the crucial flow of global energy resources that power markets and economies. This transport is key amid rising oil prices and geopolitical events impacting supply chains. © HeliRy / Getty Images

Just ahead of the close, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) traded at around a negative $28 a barrel. That means a seller would pay a buyer $28 a barrel to take the oil.

What’s happening is that the May futures contract expires Tuesday and oil that is not already in storage tanks has no place to go. But if a buyer should happen to have an empty very large crude carrier (VLCC) tied up at a Gulf Coast port that can accept a cargo of 2 million barrels, a seller with a storage problem would pay the buyer $56 million to take the barrels. That’s $20 million more than the value of the oil at last Friday’s closing price of $18.27 a barrel.

The going spot rate for a VLCC is around $150,000 a day. A buyer who thinks the price of WTI will rise to around $25 a barrel by June 1 would have to pay about $4.65 million to store the oil on a VLCC and sail it around in a circle until June 1. If the price for the June contract holds at around $22.60 a barrel, the 2 million barrels will sell for $45.2 million plus the $56 million the original seller paid the buyer to buy it minus the $4.65 million in floating storage costs. That’s a handsome profit indeed.

[nativounit]

Of course, at this late date, the odds of finding an empty VLCC are approximately zero so sellers are willing to pay the storage costs and if that means giving up the barrels, well, that’s ok too.

The seller is likely to be the manager of a leveraged (double or triple) fund that got caught standing at the end of the May contract when the music finally stopped.

We should see prices revert to something more recognizable on Wednesday when June becomes the front month for delivery. The Brent contract, which is already the contract for June delivery, traded down about 8.5% Monday at $25.70. That contract has been trading about $4 or $5 above the WTI contract for several weeks before widening the spread on April 3, following the front month Brent contract change to June delivery. Brent has been trading at $7 to $8 more than crude for the past few weeks.

The shock value of seeing WTI trade at negative $28 won’t disappear for a while. Seeing crude oil trade in negative numbers is not in anyone’s playbook.

[wallst_email_signup]

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Paul Ausick

Paul Ausick has been writing for 247Wallst.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

All articles →