FAST vs DNOW: Which Industrial Distributor Stock Deserves Your Capital?

Photo of William Temple
By William Temple Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
FAST vs DNOW: Which Industrial Distributor Stock Deserves Your Capital?

© Tempura / E+ via Getty Images

Fastenal (NASDAQ:FAST | FAST Price Prediction) and DNOW (NYSE:DNOW) both just reported Q4 2025 earnings, and the contrast could not be sharper. One is a technology-driven compounder grinding out organic growth in a sluggish industrial economy. The other just swallowed a company twice its size and is wrestling with an ERP system its own CEO called “a much heavier lift than previously known.”

FMI Devices Carry Fastenal. A Broken ERP Weighs on DNOW.

Fastenal posted $2.027 billion in Q4 revenue, up 11% year-over-year, while industrial production sat near flat. The gap between Fastenal’s growth and the broader market tells the story: the company is taking share through vending and managed inventory technology. FMI penetration reached FMI technology now accounts for 46.1% of sales, up from 43.9% a year ago, with an installed base of 136,600 active units. Contract customers represent 73.8% of total sales, and their daily sales rate grew 12.9% versus 5.7% the prior year.

DNOW’s Q4 looked very different. Revenue hit $959 million, but $388 million came from the MRC Global stub period after the merger closed November 6. Adjusted EBITDA margin compressed to 6.4%, well below the 8.2% legacy DNOW achieved for the full year. CEO David Cherechinsky was direct: “We have identified the ERP challenges to be a much heavier lift than previously known. Design architecture is resulting in inefficiencies for certain core processes, continuing negative operating and financial impacts.”

Metric Fastenal (FAST) DNOW
Q4 Revenue $2.03B (+11%) $959M (+60% via merger)
Gross Margin 44.3% 22.6% (adjusted)
EBITDA Margin ~22% 6.4%
YTD Stock Performance +14.46% -15.47%

Organic Compounding vs. Acquisition-Driven Scale

Fastenal’s path to a $15 billion organization runs through deeper FMI penetration, hub infrastructure, and expansion into data centers and construction. The company plans to spend $310 to $330 million in capex in 2026, up from $245.3M in 2025, locking customers into its supply chain ecosystem before competitors can.

DNOW is betting on scale through the MRC merger and eventual synergies, projecting $23 million in first-year cost synergies, already 35% above the original target, with a $70 million three-year commitment. But the ERP disruption affecting roughly 40% of the combined U.S. business is real, and DNOW declined to issue formal 2026 guidance. Cherechinsky guided directionally toward “flattish revenue” and free cash flow of $100 to $200 million.

Execution Is the Next Test

For Fastenal, the key watch item is whether gross margin stabilizes after the fastener expansion project anniversaries in Q1 2026. The 50 basis point compression in 2025 was manageable, but continued mix shift toward large, lower-margin customers could pressure the premium multiple the stock carries at roughly 42x trailing earnings.

For DNOW, the question is more urgent: can the team stabilize the Oracle ERP fast enough to stop bleeding revenue while oil sits around $64 per barrel? The stock trades at $11.20, well below the analyst consensus target of $16, suggesting the market is pricing in more pain before integration delivers.

Two Very Different Risk Profiles

Fastenal has demonstrated consistent organic growth through its FMI technology platform, with a business model that has shown resilience in sluggish industrial environments. The business does not need a strong economy to grow; it just needs to keep signing contracts and installing vending machines.

DNOW presents a different profile: a post-merger integration story with stated synergy targets of $70 million over three years, an unresolved ERP disruption affecting roughly 40% of its combined U.S. business, and no formal 2026 guidance issued. The synergy math is compelling, end market diversification into LNG, data centers, and gas utilities is smart, and the balance sheet at 1.2x leverage is not alarming. But the ERP crisis is the entire near-term thesis, and resolution likely depends on whether the integration team can close the gap within the next two quarters while energy capex holds.

Photo of William Temple
About the Author William Temple →

I write to invest, and I invest to spend more time with nature. Usually all at the same time. I'm a retired equities guy who saw a recession or four, and lives for what comes out of the other side of them.

I cover stocks across the board cause even though I feel like I've seen it all, there's always another way out there to make, and lose money. I want to help you do more of the former, and none of the latter. Making money with friends is my oxygen.

Let's go!

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

COO Vol: 9,090,870
CLX Vol: 3,290,263
KVUE Vol: 24,618,710
KMB Vol: 6,361,016
ALL Vol: 1,638,476

Top Losing Stocks

ENPH Vol: 10,448,766
MU Vol: 77,252,156
TER Vol: 5,480,426
FSLR Vol: 3,903,927
INTC Vol: 145,138,050